ext[234]: cleanup ext[234]_bg_num_gdb()
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 ext[234]: cleanup ext[234]_bg_num_gdb()
Use ext[234]_bg_has_super() to remove duplicate code.
Cc Stephen Tweedie <[email protected]>
Cc Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by Akinobu Mita <[email protected]>
--- fs/ext2/balloc.c | 5 +---- fs/ext3/balloc.c | 6 +----- fs/ext4/balloc.c | 6 +----- 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
fs/ext2/balloc.c +1 -4
@@ -1466,9 +1466,6 @@ int ext2_bg_has_super(struct super_block*/ unsigned long ext2_bg_num_gdb (struct super_block *sb,int group) { -if (EXT2_HAS_RO_COMPAT_FEATURE (sb,EXT2_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_SPARSE_SUPER )&& - !ext2_group_sparse (group)) -return 0 ; -return EXT2_SB (sb)->s_gdb_count; +return ext2_bg_has_super (sb, group) ?EXT2_SB (sb)->s_gdb_count :0 ; }
fs/ext3/balloc.c +1 -5
@@ -1782,11 +1782,7 @@ static unsigned long ext3_bg_num_gdb_metstatic unsigned long ext3_bg_num_gdb_nometa (struct super_block *sb,int group) { -if (EXT3_HAS_RO_COMPAT_FEATURE (sb, -EXT3_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_SPARSE_SUPER ) && - !ext3_group_sparse (group)) -return 0 ; -return EXT3_SB (sb)->s_gdb_count; +return ext3_bg_has_super (sb, group) ?EXT3_SB (sb)->s_gdb_count :0 ; }/**
fs/ext4/balloc.c +1 -5
@@ -1902,11 +1902,7 @@ static unsigned long ext4_bg_num_gdb_metstatic unsigned long ext4_bg_num_gdb_nometa (struct super_block *sb,int group) { -if (EXT4_HAS_RO_COMPAT_FEATURE (sb, -EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_SPARSE_SUPER ) && - !ext4_group_sparse (group)) -return 0 ; -return EXT4_SB (sb)->s_gdb_count; +return ext4_bg_has_super (sb, group) ?EXT4_SB (sb)->s_gdb_count :0 ; }/**
Quoted 1 line · On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 00:31:56 +0900 Akinobu Mita <[email protected]> wrote:
Use ext[234]_bg_has_super() to remove duplicate code.
Would prefer one patch per filesystem, please.
After fixing the rejects, I now have patches which affect ext2 and ext3 but which have a merging dependency upon ext4.