Improved submodule merge support
PATCH 1/1 Improved submodule merge support
Currently merging submodules from a super module does not work at all, here is an example:
$ git merge change1 Updating 41dee71..6dbd2d9 Fast forward sub-module | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
$ git merge change2 fatal: cannot read object 4a0b570e9b7c6fd36f964eb6ef55263834462235 'sub-module' Merge with strategy recursive failed.
$ git status # On branch mergetest nothing to commit (working directory clean)
$ git submodule status 4a0b570e9b7c6fd36f964eb6ef55263834462235 sub-module (undefined)
So - the merge simply failed, and git status has no clue what happened.
With the following patch, this happens instead:
$ git merge change1 Updating 41dee71..6dbd2d9 Fast forward sub-module | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
$ git merge change2 Auto-merged sub-module CONFLICT (submodule): Merge conflict in sub-module - needs b65e6131a2705620a0b08a4ecc44427b9059e4e3 Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.
$ git status sub-module: needs merge # On branch mergetest # Changed but not updated: # (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed) # # unmerged: sub-module # no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a")
$ git submodule status 11253a619a520fa4b2e2c2f83cb5c897170faafd sub-module (undefined) 4a0b570e9b7c6fd36f964eb6ef55263834462235 sub-module (undefined) b65e6131a2705620a0b08a4ecc44427b9059e4e3 sub-module (undefined)
To resolve this:
$ cd sub-module $ git merge b65e6131a27 $ cd .. $ git add sub-module $ git commit -m 'merged sub-module blablabla' $ git submodule status eb66300641185297648b2a71e41a66b2053fdae0 sub-module (undefined)
So it actually works in some sense, and you see what you need to merge aftwards in the submodule.
- Finn Arne
-- >8 --
Improved submodule merge support
When merging conflicting submodule changes from a supermodule, generate a conflict message saying what went wrong. Also leave the tree in a state where git status shows the conflict, and git submodule status gives the user enough information to do the merge manally. Previously this would just fail.
--- merge-recursive.c | 9 ++++++++- 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
merge-recursive.c +8 -1
@@ -549,6 +549,10 @@ static void update_file_flags(const unsigned char *sha,void *buf;unsigned long size; +if (S_ISGITLINK (mode)) +die ("cannot read object %s '%s': It is a submodule!" , +sha1_to_hex (sha), path); + buf =read_sha1_file (sha, &type, &size);if (!buf)die ("cannot read object %s '%s'" ,sha1_to_hex (sha), path);
@@ -1463,10 +1467,13 @@ static int process_entry(const char *path, struct stage_data *entry, mfi =merge_file (&o, &a, &b, branch1, branch2); + clean_merge = mfi.clean;if (mfi.clean)update_file (1 , mfi.sha, mfi.mode, path); +else if (S_ISGITLINK (mfi.mode)) +output (1 ,"CONFLICT (submodule): Merge conflict in %s " +"- needs %s" , path,sha1_to_hex (b.sha1));else { - clean_merge =0 ;output (1 ,"CONFLICT (%s): Merge conflict in %s" , reason, path);
Signature · 1 line
1.5.4.rc0.67.gf9c5
Hi,
Quoted 9 lines · Finn Arne Gangstad
merge-recursive.c +1
-0@@ -1463,10 +1467,13 @@ static int process_entry(const char *path, struct stage_data *entry, mfi =merge_file (&o, &a, &b, branch1, branch2); + clean_merge = mfi.clean;
merge-recursive.c static int process_entry(const char *path, struct stage_data *entry, · line 1479
Quoted 10 lines
merge-recursive.c +3
-1if (mfi.clean)update_file (1 , mfi.sha, mfi.mode, path); +else if (S_ISGITLINK (mfi.mode)) +output (1 ,"CONFLICT (submodule): Merge conflict in %s " +"- needs %s" , path,sha1_to_hex (b.sha1));else { - clean_merge =0 ;output (1 ,"CONFLICT (%s): Merge conflict in %s" , reason, path);
It took me a little while to find that the unilateral assignment to clean_merge does not break things. But as it was only set to 1 at the beginning of the function, and no loops are involved, this change is correct.
Ciao,
Dscho