x86_64: enable irq in default_idle
PATCH 1/1 x86_64: enable irq in default_idle
Hi Ingo,
I think local_irq_enable() is missing in default_idle() on x86_64. It's for recent x86 tree.
From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH] x86_64: enable irq in default_idle
local_irq_enable() is missing after sched_clock_idle_wakeup_event().
--- arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c +2 -2
@@ -119,8 +119,8 @@ void default_idle(void) t1 =ktime_get (); t1n =ktime_to_ns (t1);sched_clock_idle_wakeup_event (t1n - t0n); - }else -local_irq_enable (); + } +local_irq_enable ();current_thread_info ()->status |=TS_POLLING ; }
Signature · 1 line
1.5.3.6
Quoted 9 lines · Hiroshi Shimamoto
Hi Ingo,
I think
local_irq_enable()is missing indefault_idle()onx86_64. It's for recent x86 tree.From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH]x86_64: enable irq indefault_idle
local_irq_enable()is missing aftersched_clock_idle_wakeup_event().
thanks Hiroshi, applied.
The effects of this bug should be increased latencies on 64-bit. Did you notice these latencies, or did you find the bug in some other way (code review)?
Ingo
Quoted 10 lines · Ingo Molnar
Quoted 8 lines · Hiroshi Shimamoto
Hi Ingo,
I think
local_irq_enable()is missing indefault_idle()onx86_64. It's for recent x86 tree.From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH]x86_64: enable irq indefault_idle
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 1 line
local_irq_enable()is missing aftersched_clock_idle_wakeup_event().thanks Hiroshi, applied.
The effects of this bug should be increased latencies on 64-bit. Did you notice these latencies, or did you find the bug in some other way (code review)?
I found this when I was comparing 32-bit and 64-bit source code for x86 unification.
Thanks,
Hiroshi Shimamoto
Quoted 11 lines · Hiroshi Shimamoto
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines
local_irq_enable()is missing aftersched_clock_idle_wakeup_event().thanks Hiroshi, applied.
The effects of this bug should be increased latencies on 64-bit. Did you notice these latencies, or did you find the bug in some other way (code review)?
I found this when I was comparing 32-bit and 64-bit source code for x86 unification.
cool :) Indeed even for other code, a number of times we got bugfixes when unifying 32-bit and 64-bit files.
Ingo