Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Wanted: i2c subsystem co-maintainer

DISCUSSION Jean Delvare 2 participants 3 messages Mar 4, 2008 – May 15, 2008 I2C subsystem host drivers

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Hi all,

I have a hard time maintaining the i2c subsystem alone. New drivers and, more importantly, subsystem evolutions are submitted much faster than I can review and merge them. I am hearing complaints about this. It has been lasting for a while now and it doesn't seem like the situation is going to improve. Thus, I think it would be better if someone was co-maintaining the i2c subsystem with me.

So, if anyone is interested in co-maintaining the i2c subsystem with me, please let me know. The ideal candidate would come from the embedded world, as I have absolutely no experience with this myself and most of the new drivers are for embedded devices, and should have contributed to the kernel in a significant way already.

Thanks,

Signature · 1 line
Jean Delvare
#1 lore raw
Quoted 7 lines · Jean Delvare

I have a hard time maintaining the i2c subsystem alone. New drivers and, more importantly, subsystem evolutions are submitted much faster than I can review and merge them. I am hearing complaints about this. It has been lasting for a while now and it doesn't seem like the situation is going to improve. Thus, I think it would be better if someone was co-maintaining the i2c subsystem with me.

Quoted 5 lines

So, if anyone is interested in co-maintaining the i2c subsystem with me, please let me know. The ideal candidate would come from the embedded world, as I have absolutely no experience with this myself and most of the new drivers are for embedded devices, and should have contributed to the kernel in a significant way already.

Ben Dooks agreed to become my co-maintainer for the i2c subsystem. In particular, Ben will help with drivers for embedded systems, of which my experience is inexistent. Thanks Ben and welcome on board!

---
Ben, please give by your ack on this patch, then I will push it upstream.

 MAINTAINERS |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
MAINTAINERS +2 -0
@@ -1883,6 +1883,8 @@ S:	Maintained
 I2C SUBSYSTEM
 P:	Jean Delvare
 M:	[email protected]
+P:	Ben Dooks
+M:	[email protected]
 L:	[email protected]
 T:	quilt http://khali.linux-fr.org/devel/linux-2.6/jdelvare-i2c/
 S:	Maintained
Signature · 1 line
Jean Delvare
Acked-by
#2 lore raw
Quoted 14 lines · Jean Delvare
Quoted 7 lines · Jean Delvare

I have a hard time maintaining the i2c subsystem alone. New drivers and, more importantly, subsystem evolutions are submitted much faster than I can review and merge them. I am hearing complaints about this. It has been lasting for a while now and it doesn't seem like the situation is going to improve. Thus, I think it would be better if someone was co-maintaining the i2c subsystem with me.

Quoted 5 lines

So, if anyone is interested in co-maintaining the i2c subsystem with me, please let me know. The ideal candidate would come from the embedded world, as I have absolutely no experience with this myself and most of the new drivers are for embedded devices, and should have contributed to the kernel in a significant way already.

Quoted 5 lines

Ben Dooks agreed to become my co-maintainer for the i2c subsystem. In particular, Ben will help with drivers for embedded systems, of which my experience is inexistent. Thanks Ben and welcome on board!

Quoted 3 lines

---
Ben, please give by your ack on this patch, then I will push it upstream.

Sorry, my main mailbox got hit by a major spam flood, have mostly sorted this out now.

Quoted 18 lines
 MAINTAINERS |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
MAINTAINERS +2 -0
@@ -1883,6 +1883,8 @@ S:	Maintained
 I2C SUBSYSTEM
 P:	Jean Delvare
 M:	[email protected]
+P:	Ben Dooks
+M:	[email protected]
 L:	[email protected]
 T:	quilt http://khali.linux-fr.org/devel/linux-2.6/jdelvare-i2c/
 S:	Maintained
Signature · 2 lines
-- 
Jean Delvare
Signature · 5 lines
-- 
Ben

Q:      What's a light-year?
A:      One-third less calories than a regular year.