relay: Fix race condition which occurs when reading across CPUs.
PATCH 2/3 relay: Fix race condition which occurs when reading across CPUs.
Suppose CPU0, as instructed by userspace, reads CPU1's data. If the latter is logging data, it's not enough to disable IRQs or preemption to protect the data. Added a per-buffer (thus per-CPU) spinlock to prevent concurrent access. The choice of using a spinlock is motivated by the need to log data (and thus lock the buffer) from interrupt context. The problem was revealed when working on kmemtrace, where some events were seemingly out-of-order or just all-zeros, even though the necessary precautions had already been taken.
--- include/linux/relay.h | 10 +++++++--- kernel/relay.c | 8 ++++++++ 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
include/linux/relay.h +7 -3
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ struct rchan_bufsize_t subbufs_produced;/* count of sub-buffers produced */ size_t subbufs_consumed;/* count of sub-buffers consumed */ struct rchan *chan;/* associated channel */ +spinlock_t rw_lock;/* protects buffer during R/W */ wait_queue_head_t read_wait;/* reader wait queue */ struct timer_list timer;/* reader wake-up timer */ struct dentry *dentry;/* channel file dentry */
@@ -200,13 +201,14 @@ static inline void relay_write(struct rchan *chan,unsigned long flags;struct rchan_buf *buf; -local_irq_save (flags); - buf = chan->buf[smp_processor_id ()]; + buf = chan->buf[get_cpu ()]; +spin_lock_irqsave (&buf->rw_lock, flags);if (unlikely (buf->offset + length >= chan->subbuf_size)) length =relay_switch_subbuf (buf, length);memcpy (buf->data + buf->offset, data, length); buf->offset += length; -local_irq_restore (flags); +spin_unlock_irqrestore (&buf->rw_lock, flags); +put_cpu (); }/**
@@ -228,10 +230,12 @@ static inline void __relay_write(struct rchan *chan,struct rchan_buf *buf; buf = chan->buf[get_cpu ()]; +spin_lock (&buf->rw_lock);if (unlikely (buf->offset + length >= buf->chan->subbuf_size)) length =relay_switch_subbuf (buf, length);memcpy (buf->data + buf->offset, data, length); buf->offset += length; +spin_unlock (&buf->rw_lock);put_cpu (); }
kernel/relay.c +8 -0
@@ -430,6 +430,8 @@ static struct rchan_buf *relay_open_buf(struct rchan *chan, unsigned int cpu)if (!buf) goto free_name; +spin_lock_init (&buf->rw_lock); + buf->cpu = cpu;__relay_reset (buf,1 );
@@ -1013,11 +1015,13 @@ static ssize_t relay_file_read_subbufs(struct file *filp, loff_t *ppos,struct rchan_buf *buf = filp->private_data;size_t read_start, avail;int ret; +unsigned long flags;if (!desc->count)return 0 ;mutex_lock (&filp->f_path.dentry->d_inode->i_mutex); +spin_lock_irqsave (&buf->rw_lock, flags); do { if (!relay_file_read_avail(buf, *ppos)) break;
@@ -1028,15 +1032,19 @@ static ssize_t relay_file_read_subbufs(struct file *filp, loff_t *ppos,break ; avail =min (desc->count, avail); +/* subbuf_actor may sleep, so release the spinlock for now */ +spin_unlock_irqrestore (&buf->rw_lock, flags); ret =subbuf_actor (read_start, buf, avail, desc, actor);if (desc->error <0 )break ; +spin_lock_irqsave (&buf->rw_lock, flags);if (ret) {relay_file_read_consume (buf, read_start, ret); *ppos =relay_file_read_end_pos (buf, read_start, ret); } }while (desc->count && ret); +spin_unlock_irqrestore (&buf->rw_lock, flags);mutex_unlock (&filp->f_path.dentry->d_inode->i_mutex);return desc->written;
Signature · 1 line
1.5.5.4
kernel/relay.c static ssize_t relay_file_read_subbufs(struct file *filp, loff_t *ppos, · line 1039
Quoted 9 lines · Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu
kernel/relay.c +2
-0@@ -1028,15 +1032,19 @@ static ssize_t relay_file_read_subbufs(struct file *filp, loff_t *ppos,break ; avail =min (desc->count, avail); +/* subbuf_actor may sleep, so release the spinlock for now */ +spin_unlock_irqrestore (&buf->rw_lock, flags); ret =subbuf_actor (read_start, buf, avail, desc, actor);if (desc->error <0 )break ;
If you just break here buf->rw_lock will be unlocked twice. Maybe a better way is:
if (desc->error < 0) goto out; ... } while (desc->count && ret); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&buf->rw_lock, flags);
out:
mutex_unlock(&filp->f_path.dentry->d_inode->i_mutex);
return desc->written;
kernel/relay.c static ssize_t relay_file_read_subbufs(struct file *filp, loff_t *ppos, · line 1050
Quoted 11 lines
kernel/relay.c +2
-0+spin_lock_irqsave (&buf->rw_lock, flags);if (ret) {relay_file_read_consume (buf, read_start, ret); *ppos =relay_file_read_end_pos (buf, read_start, ret); } }while (desc->count && ret); +spin_unlock_irqrestore (&buf->rw_lock, flags);mutex_unlock (&filp->f_path.dentry->d_inode->i_mutex);return desc->written;
-Andrea
Quoted 11 lines · On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 00:58:01 +0200 (MEST) Andrea Righi…
If you just break here
buf->rw_lockwill be unlocked twice. Maybe a better way is:if (desc->error < 0) goto out; ... } while (desc->count && ret); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&buf->rw_lock, flags);out:
mutex_unlock(&filp->f_path.dentry->d_inode->i_mutex);return
desc->written;
Thanks, I did not notice. Will fix and resubmit.
Eduard