libertas: unify request_firmware failure
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
RFC PATCH v2 1/1 libertas: unify request_firmware failure
Use almost the same string for all interfaces (USB, compact flash and SDIO) when request_firmware fails.
---
Hi all!
This patch is an attemp to clarify the message "firmware not found, please fix your userspace (== this is not a libertas bug)".
changes from v1:
* replaced %#x with %d because "ret" is supposed to be a negative integer (suggested by Dan Williams).
Best regards
Marc
patch agaisnt 2.6.27-rc7:
drivers/net/wireless/libertas/if_cs.c +4 -2
@@ -553,7 +553,8 @@ static int if_cs_prog_helper(struct if_cs_card *card) ret =request_firmware (&fw,"libertas_cs_helper.fw" , &handle_to_dev (card->p_dev));if (ret) { -lbs_pr_err ("can't load helper firmware\n" ); +lbs_pr_err ("request_firmware() failed with %d\n" , ret); +lbs_pr_err ("helper firmware libertas_cs_helper.fw not found\n" ); ret = -ENODEV ; goto done; }
@@ -626,7 +627,8 @@ static int if_cs_prog_real(struct if_cs_card *card) ret =request_firmware (&fw,"libertas_cs.fw" , &handle_to_dev (card->p_dev));if (ret) { -lbs_pr_err ("can't load firmware\n" ); +lbs_pr_err ("request_firmware() failed with %d\n" , ret); +lbs_pr_err ("firmware libertas_cs.fw not found\n" ); ret = -ENODEV ; goto done; }
drivers/net/wireless/libertas/if_sdio.c +4 -2
@@ -396,7 +396,8 @@ static int if_sdio_prog_helper(struct if_sdio_card *card) ret =request_firmware (&fw, card->helper, &card->func->dev);if (ret) { -lbs_pr_err ("can't load helper firmware\n" ); +lbs_pr_err ("request_firmware() failed with %d\n" , ret); +lbs_pr_err ("helper firmware %s not found\n" , card->helper); goto out; }
@@ -512,7 +513,8 @@ static int if_sdio_prog_real(struct if_sdio_card *card) ret =request_firmware (&fw, card->firmware, &card->func->dev);if (ret) { -lbs_pr_err ("can't load firmware\n" ); +lbs_pr_err ("request_firmware() failed with %d\n" , ret); +lbs_pr_err ("firmware %s not found\n" , card->firmware); goto out; }
drivers/net/wireless/libertas/if_usb.c +1 -1
@@ -819,7 +819,7 @@ static int if_usb_prog_firmware(struct if_usb_card *cardp)if ((ret =request_firmware (&cardp->fw, lbs_fw_name, &cardp->udev->dev)) <0 ) { -lbs_pr_err ("request_firmware() failed with %#x\n" , ret); +lbs_pr_err ("request_firmware() failed with %d\n" , ret);lbs_pr_err ("firmware %s not found\n" , lbs_fw_name); goto done; }
drivers/net/wireless/libertas/if_cs.c static int if_cs_prog_helper(struct if_cs_card *card)
Quoted 3 lines
drivers/net/wireless/libertas/if_cs.c +2
-1-lbs_pr_err ("can't load helper firmware\n" ); +lbs_pr_err ("request_firmware() failed with %d\n" , ret); +lbs_pr_err ("helper firmware libertas_cs_helper.fw not found\n" ); ret = -ENODEV ;
While I don't have a problem with the idea per se, I don't like it outputting two error lines now.
So for if_cs.c, I like the original code better.
I don't care to emit the error number, won't be usable to most people anyway. And I don't care about outputting the filename, because udev will already show you the filename if it doesn't find what was requested.