e2fsprogs-config-before-cmdline.patch
PATCH 2/15 e2fsprogs-config-before-cmdline.patch
The patch changes the order that the config file and command line are parsed so that command line has precedence. It also adds a check to make sure only one -E option is passed on the command line as -E option parsing is not cumulative.
The patch changes the order that the config file and command line are parsed so that command line has precedence. It also adds a check to make sure only one -E option is passed on the command line as -E option parsing is not cumulative.
e2fsck/unix.c +7 -4
@@ -589,7 +589,6 @@ static errcode_t PRS(int argc, char *arg#ifdef HAVE_SIGNAL_H struct sigaction sa;#endif -char *extended_opts =0 ;char *cp;int res;/* result of sscanf */ #ifdef CONFIG_JBD_DEBUG
@@ -620,6 +619,12 @@ static errcode_t PRS(int argc, char *arg ctx->program_name = *argv; else ctx->program_name = "e2fsck"; + +if ((cp =getenv ("E2FSCK_CONFIG" )) !=NULL ) + config_fn[0 ] = cp; +profile_set_syntax_err_cb (syntax_err_report); +profile_init (config_fn, &ctx->profile); +while ((c =getopt (argc, argv,"panyrcC:B:dE:fvtFVM:b:I:j:P:l:L:N:SsDk" )) !=EOF )switch (c) {case 'C' :
@@ -650,7 +655,7 @@ static errcode_t PRS(int argc, char *arg ctx->options |=E2F_OPT_COMPRESS_DIRS ;break ;case 'E' : - extended_opts = optarg; +parse_extended_opts (ctx, optarg);break ;case 'p' :case 'a' :
@@ -777,13 +782,6 @@ static errcode_t PRS(int argc, char *argfatal_error (ctx,0 ); } ctx->filesystem_name =string_copy (ctx, ctx->filesystem_name,0 ); -if (extended_opts) -parse_extended_opts (ctx, extended_opts);
Quoted 4 lines · Kalpak Shah
The patch changes the order that the config file and command line are parsed so that command line has precedence. It also adds a check to make sure only one -E option is passed on the command line as -E option parsing is not cumulative.
Hmm. I wonder if we would be better off making -E option parsing cumulative, especially if we are going to add a way of specifying some extended options via the config file. Comments?
- Ted
Quoted 9 lines · Theodore Ts'o
Quoted 4 lines · Kalpak Shah
The patch changes the order that the config file and command line are parsed so that command line has precedence. It also adds a check to make sure only one -E option is passed on the command line as -E option parsing is not cumulative.
Hmm. I wonder if we would be better off making -E option parsing cumulative, especially if we are going to add a way of specifying some extended options via the config file. Comments?
I've always thought that both -E and -O should be cumulative.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group
Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.