workqueues: fix some linux coding style typos
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 workqueues: fix some linux coding style typos
workqueues: fix some linux coding style typos:
* spaces were replaced with tabs
* "foo* bar" was replaced with "foo *bar"
Signed-off-by Dotan Barak <[email protected]>
---
kernel/workqueue.c +3 -3
@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ static void run_workqueue(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq)printk (KERN_ERR "BUG: workqueue leaked lock or atomic: " "%s/0x%08x/%d\n" , current->comm,preempt_count (), -task_pid_nr (current)); +task_pid_nr (current));printk (KERN_ERR " last function: " );print_symbol ("%s\n" , (unsigned long )f);debug_show_held_locks (current);
@@ -551,7 +551,7 @@ static void wait_on_work(struct work_struct *work) }static int __cancel_work_timer (struct work_struct *work, -struct timer_list * timer) +struct timer_list *timer) {int ret;
@@ -908,7 +908,7 @@ void destroy_workqueue(struct workqueue_struct *wq)for_each_cpu_mask_nr (cpu, *cpu_map)cleanup_workqueue_thread (per_cpu_ptr (wq->cpu_wq, cpu)); -cpu_maps_update_done (); +cpu_maps_update_done ();free_percpu (wq->cpu_wq);kfree (wq);
PATCH 1/1 kernel/workqueue.c mm/sparse.c: fix some linux coding style typos
kernel/workqueue.c static void run_workqueue(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq)
Quoted 14 lines · Dotan Barak
workqueues: fix some linux coding style typos:
* spaces were replaced with tabs
* "foo* bar" was replaced with "foo *bar"Signed-off-by Dotan Barak <[email protected]>---
kernel/workqueue.c +0
-0@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ static void run_workqueue(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq)
The same problem is in mm/sparse.c .
* spaces were replaced with tabs
* "foo* bar" was replaced with "foo *bar"
Signed-off-by Dotan Barak <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by Jianjun Kong <[email protected]>
--- kernel/workqueue.c | 6 +++--- mm/sparse.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
kernel/workqueue.c +3 -3
@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ static void run_workqueue(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq)printk (KERN_ERR "BUG: workqueue leaked lock or atomic: " "%s/0x%08x/%d\n" , current->comm,preempt_count (), -task_pid_nr (current)); +task_pid_nr (current));printk (KERN_ERR " last function: " );print_symbol ("%s\n" , (unsigned long )f);debug_show_held_locks (current);
@@ -551,7 +551,7 @@ static void wait_on_work(struct work_struct *work) }static int __cancel_work_timer (struct work_struct *work, -struct timer_list * timer) +struct timer_list *timer) {int ret;
@@ -908,7 +908,7 @@ void destroy_workqueue(struct workqueue_struct *wq)for_each_cpu_mask_nr (cpu, *cpu_map)cleanup_workqueue_thread (per_cpu_ptr (wq->cpu_wq, cpu)); -cpu_maps_update_done (); +cpu_maps_update_done ();free_percpu (wq->cpu_wq);kfree (wq);
mm/sparse.c +1 -1
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static inline int sparse_index_init(unsigned long section_nr, int nid)* to also work for the flat array case because * NR_SECTION_ROOTS==NR_MEM_SECTIONS. */ -int __section_nr (struct mem_section * ms) +int __section_nr (struct mem_section *ms) {unsigned long root_nr;struct mem_section * root;
Signature · 6 lines
1.5.2.5 -- Jianjun Kong | Happy Hacking HomePage: http://kongove.cn Gtalk: [email protected]