ftrace: clean ups and sanity checks
Steven Rostedt
maintainercover ftrace: clean ups and sanity checks
Ingo,
Can you please pull in these two patches and run them through your tests.
I've tested them, but I know you have a more elaborate setup. Then can you send them over to Linus for 2.6.28.
These are clean ups and robustness patches. No new features here.
Thanks,
-- Steve
Steven Rostedt
maintainerPATCH 1/2 ftrace: make dynamic ftrace more robust
This patch cleans up some of the ftrace code as well as adds some more sanity checks. If any of the sanity checks fail, a warning will be printed and ftrace will be disabled.
--- arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c | 15 ++++++++++----- include/linux/ftrace.h | 7 ++++++- include/linux/init.h | 10 +++++----- kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 4 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c +10 -5
@@ -66,19 +66,24 @@ ftrace_modify_code(unsigned long ip, uns/* * Note: Due to modules and __init, code can * disappear and change, we need to protect against faulting -* as well as code changing. +* as well as code changing. We do this by using the +* __copy_*_user functions. * * No real locking needed, this code is run through * kstop_machine, or before SMP starts. */ + +/* read the text we want to modify */ if (__copy_from_user_inatomic (replaced, (char __user *)ip,MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE )) -return 1 ; +return FTRACE_CODE_FAILED_READ ; +/* Make sure it is what we expect it to be */ if (memcmp (replaced, old_code,MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE ) !=0 ) -return 2 ; +return FTRACE_CODE_FAILED_CMP ; -WARN_ON_ONCE (__copy_to_user_inatomic ((char __user *)ip, new_code, -MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE )); +/* replace the text with the new text */ +if (__copy_to_user_inatomic ((char __user *)ip, new_code,MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE )) +return FTRACE_CODE_FAILED_WRITE ;sync_core ();
include/linux/ftrace.h +6 -1
@@ -232,6 +232,11 @@ static inline void start_boot_trace(voidstatic inline void stop_boot_trace (void ) { }#endif - +enum { +FTRACE_CODE_MODIFIED , +FTRACE_CODE_FAILED_READ , +FTRACE_CODE_FAILED_CMP , +FTRACE_CODE_FAILED_WRITE , +};#endif /* _LINUX_FTRACE_H */
include/linux/init.h +5 -5
@@ -75,15 +75,15 @@#ifdef MODULE -#define __exitused +#define __exitused notrace#else -#define __exitused __used +#define __exitused __used notrace#endif #define __exit __section(.exit.text) __exitused __cold/* Used for HOTPLUG */ -#define __devinit __section(.devinit.text) __cold +#define __devinit __section(.devinit.text) __cold notrace#define __devinitdata __section(.devinit.data)#define __devinitconst __section(.devinit.rodata)#define __devexit __section(.devexit.text) __exitused __cold
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@#define __devexitconst __section(.devexit.rodata)/* Used for HOTPLUG_CPU */ -#define __cpuinit __section(.cpuinit.text) __cold +#define __cpuinit __section(.cpuinit.text) __cold notrace#define __cpuinitdata __section(.cpuinit.data)#define __cpuinitconst __section(.cpuinit.rodata)#define __cpuexit __section(.cpuexit.text) __exitused __cold
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@#define __cpuexitconst __section(.cpuexit.rodata)/* Used for MEMORY_HOTPLUG */ -#define __meminit __section(.meminit.text) __cold +#define __meminit __section(.meminit.text) __cold notrace#define __meminitdata __section(.meminit.data)#define __meminitconst __section(.meminit.rodata)#define __memexit __section(.memexit.text) __exitused __cold
kernel/trace/ftrace.c +31 -4
@@ -318,6 +318,14 @@ static inline void ftrace_del_hash(strucstatic void ftrace_free_rec (struct dyn_ftrace *rec) { +/* +* No locking, only called from kstop_machine, or +* from module unloading with module locks and interrupts +* disabled to prevent kstop machine from running. +*/ + +WARN_ON (rec->flags &FTRACE_FL_FREE ); + rec->ip = (unsigned long )ftrace_free_records; ftrace_free_records = rec; rec->flags |=FTRACE_FL_FREE ;
@@ -346,7 +354,6 @@ void ftrace_release(void *start, unsigne } }spin_unlock (&ftrace_lock); - }static struct dyn_ftrace *ftrace_alloc_dyn_node (unsigned long ip)
@@ -556,9 +563,12 @@ static void ftrace_replace_code(int enab failed =__ftrace_replace_code (rec, old, new, enable);if (failed && (rec->flags &FTRACE_FL_CONVERTED )) { +/* kprobes can cause this failure */ rec->flags |=FTRACE_FL_FAILED ;if ((system_state ==SYSTEM_BOOTING ) || !core_kernel_text (rec->ip)) { +/* kprobes was not the fault */ +ftrace_kill_atomic ();ftrace_del_hash (rec);ftrace_free_rec (rec); }
@@ -601,12 +611,12 @@ ftrace_code_disable(struct dyn_ftrace *r failed =ftrace_modify_code (ip, call, nop);if (failed) {switch (failed) { -case 1 : +case FTRACE_CODE_FAILED_READ :WARN_ON_ONCE (1 );pr_info ("ftrace faulted on modifying " );print_ip_sym (ip);break ; -case 2 : +case FTRACE_CODE_FAILED_CMP :WARN_ON_ONCE (1 );pr_info ("ftrace failed to modify " );print_ip_sym (ip);
@@ -615,7 +625,18 @@ ftrace_code_disable(struct dyn_ftrace *rprint_ip_ins (" replace: " , nop);printk (KERN_CONT "\n" );break ; +case FTRACE_CODE_FAILED_WRITE : +WARN_ON_ONCE (1 ); +pr_info ("ftrace failed to write " ); +print_ip_sym (ip); +break ; +default : +WARN_ON_ONCE (1 ); +pr_info ("ftrace unkown error " ); +print_ip_sym (ip); +break ; } +ftrace_kill_atomic (); rec->flags |=FTRACE_FL_FAILED ;return 0 ;
@@ -789,6 +810,11 @@ static int __ftrace_update_code(void *ig/* No locks needed, the machine is stopped! */ for (i =0 ; i <FTRACE_HASHSIZE ; i++) { + +/* If something went wrong, bail without enabling anything */ +if (unlikely (ftrace_disabled)) +return ; +INIT_HLIST_HEAD (&temp_list); head = &ftrace_hash[i];
@@ -796,7 +822,8 @@ static int __ftrace_update_code(void *ighlist_for_each_entry_safe (p, t, n, head, node) {/* Skip over failed records which have not been * freed. */ -if (p->flags &FTRACE_FL_FAILED ) +if (p->flags &FTRACE_FL_FAILED || + p->flags &FTRACE_FL_FREE )continue ;/* Unconverted records are always at the head of the
Re: [PATCH 1/2] ftrace: make dynamic ftrace more robust
include/linux/ftrace.h static inline void start_boot_trace(void · line 236
Quoted 2 lines · Steven Rostedt
include/linux/ftrace.h +2
-0+enum { +FTRACE_CODE_MODIFIED ,
i'd suggest to name it FTRACE_CODE_MODIFIED_OK here, to make it stand out from the failure codes.
include/linux/ftrace.h static inline void start_boot_trace(void · line 239
Quoted 3 lines
include/linux/ftrace.h +3
-0+FTRACE_CODE_FAILED_READ , +FTRACE_CODE_FAILED_CMP , + FTRACE_CODE_FAILED_WRITE,
but maybe we should just use the standard kernel return codes. 0 for success, -EINVAL for the rest. Is there any real value to know exactly why it failed? We just know the modification was fishy (this is an exception situation), and want to stop ftrace ASAP and then print a warning so a kernel developer can debug it.
Complicating error handling by introducing similar-looking return code names just makes it easier to mess up accidentally, hence it _reduces_ robustness.
Quoted 31 lines
include/linux/init.h +4
-4@@ -75,15 +75,15 @@#ifdef MODULE -#define __exitused +#define __exitused notrace#else -#define __exitused __used +#define __exitused __used notrace#endif #define __exit __section(.exit.text) __exitused __cold/* Used for HOTPLUG */ -#define __devinit __section(.devinit.text) __cold +#define __devinit __section(.devinit.text) __cold notrace#define __devinitdata __section(.devinit.data)#define __devinitconst __section(.devinit.rodata)#define __devexit __section(.devexit.text) __exitused __cold@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@#define __devexitconst __section(.devexit.rodata)/* Used for HOTPLUG_CPU */ -#define __cpuinit __section(.cpuinit.text) __cold +#define __cpuinit __section(.cpuinit.text) __cold notrace#define __cpuinitdata __section(.cpuinit.data)#define __cpuinitconst __section(.cpuinit.rodata)#define __cpuexit __section(.cpuexit.text) __exitused __cold
include/linux/init.h line 105
Quoted 8 lines
include/linux/init.h +1
-1@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@#define __cpuexitconst __section(.cpuexit.rodata)/* Used for MEMORY_HOTPLUG */ -#define __meminit __section(.meminit.text) __cold +#define __meminit __section(.meminit.text) __cold notrace#define __meminitdata __section(.meminit.data)#define __meminitconst __section(.meminit.rodata)#define __memexit __section(.memexit.text) __exitused __cold
there's no justification given for this in the changelog and the change looks fishy.
include/linux/init.h
Quoted 9 lines
static void
ftrace_free_rec(struct dyn_ftrace *rec){include/linux/init.h +7
-0+/* +* No locking, only called from kstop_machine, or +* from module unloading with module locks and interrupts +* disabled to prevent kstop machine from running. +*/ + +WARN_ON (rec->flags &FTRACE_FL_FREE );
this should _NOT_ be just a WARN_ON(). It should immediately stop ftrace entirely, then print _one_ warning. Then it should never ever run up to the next reboot.
this is a basic principle for instrumentation. If we detect a bug we disable ourselves immediately and print a _single_ warning.
Do _not_ print possibly thousands of warnings and continue as if nothing happened ...
include/linux/init.h
Quoted 2 lines
include/linux/init.h +2
-0+/* kprobes was not the fault */ +ftrace_kill_atomic ();
while at it, ftrace_kill_atomic() is a misnomer.
Please use something more understandable and less ambigious, like "ftrace_turn_off()". Both 'kill' and 'atomic' are heavily laden phrases used for many other things in the kernel.
And any such facility must work from any context, because we might call it from crash paths, etc. So dont name it _atomic() - it must obviously be atomic.
Ingo
Steven Rostedt
maintainerRe: [PATCH 1/2] ftrace: make dynamic ftrace more robust
Quoted 9 lines · Ingo Molnar
include/linux/ftrace.h static inline void start_boot_trace(void · line 236
Quoted 2 lines · Steven Rostedt
include/linux/ftrace.h +2
-0+enum { +FTRACE_CODE_MODIFIED ,i'd suggest to name it
FTRACE_CODE_MODIFIED_OKhere, to make it stand out from the failure codes.
Quoted 9 lines
include/linux/ftrace.h static inline void start_boot_trace(void · line 239
Quoted 3 lines
include/linux/ftrace.h +3
-0+FTRACE_CODE_FAILED_READ , +FTRACE_CODE_FAILED_CMP , + FTRACE_CODE_FAILED_WRITE,but maybe we should just use the standard kernel return codes. 0 for success,
-EINVALfor the rest. Is there any real value to know exactly why it failed? We just know the modification was fishy (this is an exception situation), and want to stop ftrace ASAP and then print a warning so a kernel developer can debug it.
Yes it is important to know the reason of failure, since it helps with diagnosing the issue.
Quoted 4 lines
Complicating error handling by introducing similar-looking return code names just makes it easier to mess up accidentally, hence it _reduces_ robustness.
I had in mind for 2.6.29 that I would let an arch add another non-error code that says, "FAIL NICELY". This is a way, for example, to let an arch not be able to modify the code because it does not have the ability yet. Like with the trampoline example. I wanted to let the arch say, I do not make this kind of change, but it is not a bug (I didn't modify anything) simply ignore. And have ftrace simply remove the record and go on.
Quoted 34 lines
Quoted 34 lines
include/linux/init.h +4
-4@@ -75,15 +75,15 @@#ifdef MODULE -#define __exitused +#define __exitused notrace#else -#define __exitused __used +#define __exitused __used notrace#endif #define __exit __section(.exit.text) __exitused __cold/* Used for HOTPLUG */ -#define __devinit __section(.devinit.text) __cold +#define __devinit __section(.devinit.text) __cold notrace#define __devinitdata __section(.devinit.data)#define __devinitconst __section(.devinit.rodata)#define __devexit __section(.devexit.text) __exitused __cold@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@#define __devexitconst __section(.devexit.rodata)/* Used for HOTPLUG_CPU */ -#define __cpuinit __section(.cpuinit.text) __cold +#define __cpuinit __section(.cpuinit.text) __cold notrace#define __cpuinitdata __section(.cpuinit.data)#define __cpuinitconst __section(.cpuinit.rodata)#define __cpuexit __section(.cpuexit.text) __exitused __cold@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@#define __cpuexitconst __section(.cpuexit.rodata)
Quoted 9 lines
include/linux/init.h line 105
Quoted 6 lines
include/linux/init.h +1
-1/* Used for MEMORY_HOTPLUG */ -#define __meminit __section(.meminit.text) __cold +#define __meminit __section(.meminit.text) __cold notrace#define __meminitdata __section(.meminit.data)#define __meminitconst __section(.meminit.rodata)#define __memexit __section(.memexit.text) __exitused __coldthere's no justification given for this in the changelog and the change looks fishy.
Sorry, I missed writing this. I had it in other patches, but forgot to add the change log here. These are areas, just like the __init section that I have no way ok finding out in an arch independent way, what to remove from the ftrace records. So by not adding these notraces, we are guaranteed to hit the warnings above!
Quoted 15 lines
include/linux/init.h
Quoted 10 lines
static void
ftrace_free_rec(struct dyn_ftrace *rec){include/linux/init.h +7
-0+/* +* No locking, only called from kstop_machine, or +* from module unloading with module locks and interrupts +* disabled to prevent kstop machine from running. +*/ + +WARN_ON (rec->flags &FTRACE_FL_FREE );this should _NOT_ be just a
WARN_ON(). It should immediately stop ftrace entirely, then print _one_ warning. Then it should never ever run up to the next reboot.
Quoted 5 lines
this is a basic principle for instrumentation. If we detect a bug we disable ourselves immediately and print a _single_ warning.
Do _not_ print possibly thousands of warnings and continue as if nothing happened ...
Fine. I'll replace all WARN_ONs with FTRACE_WARN_ONS.
Quoted 6 lines
include/linux/init.h
Quoted 3 lines
include/linux/init.h +2
-0+/* kprobes was not the fault */ +ftrace_kill_atomic ();while at it,
ftrace_kill_atomic()is a misnomer.
Quoted 7 lines
Please use something more understandable and less ambigious, like "
ftrace_turn_off()". Both 'kill' and 'atomic' are heavily laden phrases used for many other things in the kernel.And any such facility must work from any context, because we might call it from crash paths, etc. So dont name it
_atomic()- it must obviously be atomic.
The reason for the naming was that ftrace_kill was used when I knew something was wrong but not seriously wrong. But enough to disable ftrace with the kstop_machine. But fine, I'll fix it.
-- Steve
Steven Rostedt
maintainerRe: [PATCH 1/2] ftrace: make dynamic ftrace more robust
Quoted 9 lines · Steven Rostedt
Quoted 9 lines
kernel/trace/ftrace.c static void ftrace_replace_code(int enab · line 571
Quoted 3 lines
kernel/trace/ftrace.c +2
-0+/* kprobes was not the fault */ +ftrace_kill_atomic ();while at it,
ftrace_kill_atomic()is a misnomer.Please use something more understandable and less ambigious, like "
ftrace_turn_off()". Both 'kill' and 'atomic' are heavily laden phrases used for many other things in the kernel.
I agree with your "atomic" part but the 'kill' I do not. Yes, it is unfortunate that Unix used 'kill' to send signals. But the Unix name is the misnomer. The problem with a "ftrace_turn_off" or anything similar, is that people will likely use it to temporarily disable ftrace when they need to do some sensitive code that they can not allow tracing on. Then they will be confused when they can not find a "ftrace_turn_on()".
We already use "disable" to shut down ftrace and put it back into the "NOP" state. We have "stop" and "start" to stop function tracing quickly (just a bit is set, no conversion of code).
I figured "kill" is self explanatory. You use it when you want to kill ftrace and do not want it to come back. We have no "ftrace_resurrect" (well, not yet ;-)
I think most developers know the "kill" meaning. If you do not like the name, you can change it.
-- Steve
Re: [PATCH 1/2] ftrace: make dynamic ftrace more robust
In reply to Steven RostedtQuoted 13 lines · Steven Rostedt
Quoted 12 lines
i'd suggest to name it
FTRACE_CODE_MODIFIED_OKhere, to make it stand out from the failure codes.include/linux/ftrace.h static inline void start_boot_trace(void · line 239
Quoted 3 lines
include/linux/ftrace.h +3
-0+FTRACE_CODE_FAILED_READ , +FTRACE_CODE_FAILED_CMP , + FTRACE_CODE_FAILED_WRITE,but maybe we should just use the standard kernel return codes. 0 for success,
-EINVALfor the rest. Is there any real value to know exactly why it failed? We just know the modification was fishy (this is an exception situation), and want to stop ftrace ASAP and then print a warning so a kernel developer can debug it.
Quoted 2 lines
Yes it is important to know the reason of failure, since it helps with diagnosing the issue.
we have everything we need: a warning message. We only add "reason debugging" _if and only if_ problems are so frequent in an area of code that it's absolutely needed. Otherwise we just fix the bugs, whenever they happen.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Complicating error handling by introducing similar-looking return code names just makes it easier to mess up accidentally, hence it _reduces_ robustness.
I had in mind for 2.6.29 that I would let an arch add another non-error code that says, "FAIL NICELY". [...]
no ... you are really thinking about robustness in the wrong way.
This code runs in the deepest guts of the kernel and hence is playing with fire and it must be absolutely robust. Not 'nicely diagnosable', not 'fail nicely'. But utterly robust in stopping whatever it does early enough to make that problem reportable, should it trigger. (which it really should not)
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 9 lines
include/linux/init.h line 105
Quoted 6 lines
/* Used for
MEMORY_HOTPLUG*/include/linux/init.h +1
-1-#define __meminit __section(.meminit.text) __cold +#define __meminit __section(.meminit.text) __cold notrace#define __meminitdata __section(.meminit.data)#define __meminitconst __section(.meminit.rodata)#define __memexit __section(.memexit.text) __exitused __coldthere's no justification given for this in the changelog and the change looks fishy.
Quoted 5 lines
Sorry, I missed writing this. I had it in other patches, but forgot to add the change log here. These are areas, just like the
__initsection that I have no way ok finding out in an arch independent way, what to remove from the ftrace records. So by not adding these notraces, we are guaranteed to hit the warnings above!
this is utterly fragile and might miss places that insert symbols into some of these sections manually.
the robust approach is to make sure these things are never in an ftrace record to begin with. scripts/recordmcount.pl should be taught to only record places that it is _100% sure of is traceable_. Not "everything and we'll sort out the stuff that we think is not okay".
if that needs arch dependent smarts then so be it - ftrace has to be enabled per arch anyway.
Ingo
Steven Rostedt
maintainerRe: [PATCH 1/2] ftrace: make dynamic ftrace more robust
Quoted 20 lines · Ingo Molnar
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 10 lines
Review
Quoted 7 lines
/* Used for
MEMORY_HOTPLUG*/(quoted diff) +1
-1-#define __meminit __section(.meminit.text) __cold +#define __meminit __section(.meminit.text) __cold notrace #define __meminitdata __section(.meminit.data) #define __meminitconst __section(.meminit.rodata) #define __memexit __section(.memexit.text) __exitused __coldthere's no justification given for this in the changelog and the change looks fishy.
Quoted 5 lines
Sorry, I missed writing this. I had it in other patches, but forgot to add the change log here. These are areas, just like the
__initsection that I have no way ok finding out in an arch independent way, what to remove from the ftrace records. So by not adding these notraces, we are guaranteed to hit the warnings above!this is utterly fragile and might miss places that insert symbols into some of these sections manually.
Quoted 7 lines
the robust approach is to make sure these things are never in an ftrace record to begin with.
scripts/recordmcount.plshould be taught to only record places that it is _100% sure of istraceable_. Not "everything and we'll sort out the stuff that we think is not okay".if that needs arch dependent smarts then so be it - ftrace has to be enabled per arch anyway.
In that case, the only reasonable patch, until we do the above is this.
--- kernel/trace/Kconfig | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
kernel/trace/Kconfig +2 -1
@@ -159,10 +159,11 @@ config STACK_TRACER Say N if unsure. config DYNAMIC_FTRACE - bool "enable/disable ftrace tracepoints dynamically" + bool "enable/disable ftrace tracepoints dynamically (BROKEN)" depends on FTRACE depends on HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE depends on DEBUG_KERNEL + depends on BROKEN default y help This option will modify all the calls to ftrace dynamically
Steven Rostedt
maintainerPATCH 2/2 ftrace: release functions from hash
In reply to Steven RostedtThe x86 architecture uses a static recording of mcount caller locations and is not affected by this patch.
For architectures still using the dynamic ftrace daemon, this patch is critical. It removes the race between the recording of a function that calls mcount, the unloading of a module, and the ftrace daemon updating the call sites.
This patch adds the releasing of the hash functions that the daemon uses to update the mcount call sites. When a module is unloaded, not only are the replaced call site table update, but now so is the hash recorded functions that the ftrace daemon will use.
Again, architectures that implement MCOUNT_RECORD are not affected by this (which currently only x86 has).
--- kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
kernel/trace/ftrace.c +44 -0
@@ -164,10 +164,14 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(ftrace_hash_lock)#define ftrace_hash_lock (flags) spin_lock_irqsave(&ftrace_hash_lock, flags)#define ftrace_hash_unlock (flags) \ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ftrace_hash_lock, flags) +static void ftrace_release_hash (unsigned long start,unsigned long end);#else /* This is protected via the ftrace_lock with MCOUNT_RECORD. */ #define ftrace_hash_lock (flags) do { (void)(flags); } while (0)#define ftrace_hash_unlock (flags) do { } while(0) +static inline void ftrace_release_hash (unsigned long start,unsigned long end) +{ +}#endif /*
@@ -354,6 +358,8 @@ void ftrace_release(void *start, unsigne } }spin_unlock (&ftrace_lock); + +ftrace_release_hash (s, e); }static struct dyn_ftrace *ftrace_alloc_dyn_node (unsigned long ip)
@@ -1686,6 +1692,44 @@ void __init ftrace_init(void) ftrace_disabled =1 ; }#else /* CONFIG_FTRACE_MCOUNT_RECORD */ + +static void ftrace_release_hash (unsigned long start,unsigned long end) +{ +struct dyn_ftrace *rec; +struct hlist_node *t, *n; +struct hlist_head *head, temp_list; +unsigned long flags; +int i, cpu; + +preempt_disable_notrace (); + +/* disable incase we call something that calls mcount */ + cpu =raw_smp_processor_id (); +per_cpu (ftrace_shutdown_disable_cpu, cpu)++; + +ftrace_hash_lock (flags); + +for (i =0 ; i <FTRACE_HASHSIZE ; i++) { +INIT_HLIST_HEAD (&temp_list); + head = &ftrace_hash[i]; + +/* all CPUS are stopped, we are safe to modify code */ +hlist_for_each_entry_safe (rec, t, n, head, node) { +if (rec->flags &FTRACE_FL_FREE ) +continue ; + +if ((rec->ip >= start) && (rec->ip < end)) +ftrace_free_rec (rec); + } + } + +ftrace_hash_unlock (flags); + +per_cpu (ftrace_shutdown_disable_cpu, cpu)--; +preempt_enable_notrace (); + +} +static int ftraced (void *ignore) {unsigned long usecs;
Steven Rostedt
maintainerRe: [PATCH 2/2] ftrace: release functions from hash
Ingo,
I found a bug with this patch. Do not incorporate it. I'll come up with a new patch to replace this one.
Thanks,
-- Steve
Quoted 98 lines · Steven Rostedt
The x86 architecture uses a static recording of mcount caller locations and is not affected by this patch.
For architectures still using the dynamic ftrace daemon, this patch is critical. It removes the race between the recording of a function that calls mcount, the unloading of a module, and the ftrace daemon updating the call sites.
This patch adds the releasing of the hash functions that the daemon uses to update the mcount call sites. When a module is unloaded, not only are the replaced call site table update, but now so is the hash recorded functions that the ftrace daemon will use.
Again, architectures that implement
MCOUNT_RECORDare not affected by this (which currently only x86 has).Signed-off-by Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>--- kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)Index:
linux-compile.git/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
===================================================================kernel/trace/ftrace.c +44
-0@@ -164,10 +164,14 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(ftrace_hash_lock)#define ftrace_hash_lock (flags) spin_lock_irqsave(&ftrace_hash_lock, flags)#define ftrace_hash_unlock (flags) \ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ftrace_hash_lock, flags) +static void ftrace_release_hash (unsigned long start,unsigned long end);#else /* This is protected via the ftrace_lock with MCOUNT_RECORD. */ #define ftrace_hash_lock (flags) do { (void)(flags); } while (0)#define ftrace_hash_unlock (flags) do { } while(0) +static inline void ftrace_release_hash (unsigned long start,unsigned long end) +{ +}#endif /* @@ -354,6 +358,8 @@ void ftrace_release(void *start, unsigne } }spin_unlock (&ftrace_lock); + +ftrace_release_hash (s, e); }static struct dyn_ftrace *ftrace_alloc_dyn_node (unsigned long ip)@@ -1686,6 +1692,44 @@ void __init ftrace_init(void) ftrace_disabled =1 ; }#else /* CONFIG_FTRACE_MCOUNT_RECORD */ + +static void ftrace_release_hash (unsigned long start,unsigned long end) +{ +struct dyn_ftrace *rec; +struct hlist_node *t, *n; +struct hlist_head *head, temp_list; +unsigned long flags; +int i, cpu; + +preempt_disable_notrace (); + +/* disable incase we call something that calls mcount */ + cpu =raw_smp_processor_id (); +per_cpu (ftrace_shutdown_disable_cpu, cpu)++; + +ftrace_hash_lock (flags); + +for (i =0 ; i <FTRACE_HASHSIZE ; i++) { +INIT_HLIST_HEAD (&temp_list); + head = &ftrace_hash[i]; + +/* all CPUS are stopped, we are safe to modify code */ +hlist_for_each_entry_safe (rec, t, n, head, node) { +if (rec->flags &FTRACE_FL_FREE ) +continue ; + +if ((rec->ip >= start) && (rec->ip < end)) +ftrace_free_rec (rec); + } + } + +ftrace_hash_unlock (flags); + +per_cpu (ftrace_shutdown_disable_cpu, cpu)--; +preempt_enable_notrace (); + +} +static int ftraced (void *ignore) {unsigned long usecs;Signature · 1 line
--