compat/Makefile.am manpages fix / pand/dund question
Hi,
pand.1 and dund.1 are always installed. Fix below.
Then some kind of packaging question:
I got users that request pand and dund. I am under the impression that this should be handled by the networking service, however was unable to find anything understandable on the WIKI where I can point them to.
Am I still "allowed" to package pand and dund, e.g. in a "bluez-compat" package? I guess that I should not package hidd, no matter how much users would like it, though ;-)
Thanks,
Stefan
compat/Makefile.am +2 -2
@@ -20,11 +20,11 @@ bin_PROGRAMS += pand pand_SOURCES = pand.c pand.h bnep.c sdp.h sdp.c pand_LDADD = $(top_builddir)/common/libhelper.a @BLUEZ_LIBS@ -endif if MANPAGES man_MANS += pand.1 endif +endif if DUND bin_PROGRAMS += dund
@@ -32,11 +32,11 @@ bin_PROGRAMS += dund dund_SOURCES = dund.c dund.h lib.h sdp.h sdp.c dun.c msdun.c dund_LDADD = $(top_builddir)/common/libhelper.a @BLUEZ_LIBS@ -endif if MANPAGES man_MANS += dund.1 endif +endif AM_CFLAGS = @BLUEZ_CFLAGS@
Signature · 6 lines
Stefan Seyfried R&D Team Mobile Devices | "Any ideas, John?" SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Nürnberg | "Well, surrounding them's out." This footer brought to you by insane German lawmakers: SUSE Linux Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
Marcel Holtmann
maintainerHi Stefan,
Quoted 1 line
pand.1 and dund.1 are always installed. Fix below.
I fixed that already. Thanks for reporting.
Quoted 9 lines
Then some kind of packaging question:
I got users that request pand and dund. I am under the impression that this should be handled by the networking service, however was unable to find anything understandable on the WIKI where I can point them to.Am I still "allowed" to package pand and dund, e.g. in a "bluez-compat" package? I guess that I should not package hidd, no matter how much users would like it, though ;-)
You can put hidd in bluez-compat if you like. It is useful for debugging since it can show the actual kernel state of the hidp.ko module.
Regards
Marcel
Hi Marcel,
Quoted 5 lines · Marcel Holtmann
Quoted 2 lines
package? I guess that I should not package hidd, no matter how much users would like it, though ;-)
You can put hidd in bluez-compat if you like. It is useful for debugging since it can show the actual kernel state of the hidp.ko module.
Fortunately nobody has requested it for quite some time.
Would it be helpful to remove the "--server" code from hidd, since I guess that this will not be useful anymore (and I fear that once I package up hidd, people _will_ use "hidd --server", because they read that in some outdated README). I can come op with a patch for that, if wanted.
Thanks,
seife
Signature · 6 lines
Stefan Seyfried R&D Team Mobile Devices | "Any ideas, John?" SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Nürnberg | "Well, surrounding them's out." This footer brought to you by insane German lawmakers: SUSE Linux Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)