fix spurious gcc warnings
PATCH 1/1 fix spurious gcc warnings
Some recent gcc warnings don't like passing string variables to printf-like functions without using at least a "%s" format string. Chaneg the two occurances of that in xfs to please gcc.
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_stats.c: In function "xfs_read_xfssta":fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_stats.c:64: warning: format not a string literal and no format arguments fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c: In function "init_xfs_fs":fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c:1833: warning: format not a string literal and no format arguments
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_stats.c +1 -1
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ xfs_read_xfsstats(/* Loop over all stats groups */ for (i=j=len =0 ; i <ARRAY_SIZE (xstats); i++) { - len +=sprintf (buffer + len, xstats[i].desc); + len +=sprintf (buffer + len,"%s" , xstats[i].desc);/* inner loop does each group */ while (j < xstats[i].endpoint) { val =0 ;
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c +2 -3
@@ -1827,10 +1827,9 @@ STATIC int __initinit_xfs_fs (void) {int error; - static char message[] __initdata = KERN_INFO \ -XFS_VERSION_STRING " with " XFS_BUILD_OPTIONS " enabled\n" ; -printk (message); + printk(KERN_INFO XFS_VERSION_STRING " with " + XFS_BUILD_OPTIONS " enabled\n");ktrace_init (64 );vn_init ();
Quoted 3 lines · Christoph Hellwig
Some recent gcc warnings don't like passing string variables to printf-like functions without using at least a "%s" format string. Chaneg the two occurances of that in xfs to please gcc.
Looks fine to me (might re-spell "Chaneg" though ;) )
-Eric
Quoted 30 lines
Signed-off-by Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_stats.c: In function "xfs_read_xfssta":fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_stats.c:64: warning: format not a string literal and no format argumentsfs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c: In function "init_xfs_fs":fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c:1833: warning: format not a string literal and no format argumentsIndex:
linux-2.6-xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_stats.c
===================================================================fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_stats.c +1
-1@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ xfs_read_xfsstats(/* Loop over all stats groups */ for (i=j=len =0 ; i <ARRAY_SIZE (xstats); i++) { - len +=sprintf (buffer + len, xstats[i].desc); + len +=sprintf (buffer + len,"%s" , xstats[i].desc);/* inner loop does each group */ while (j < xstats[i].endpoint) { val =0 ;Index:
linux-2.6-xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c
===================================================================fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c +0
-0@@ -1827,10 +1827,9 @@ STATIC int __initinit_xfs_fs (void) {
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c STATIC int __init · line 1835
Quoted 10 lines
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c +2
-3int error; - static char message[] __initdata = KERN_INFO \ -XFS_VERSION_STRING " with " XFS_BUILD_OPTIONS " enabled\n" ; -printk (message); + printk(KERN_INFO XFS_VERSION_STRING " with " + XFS_BUILD_OPTIONS " enabled\n");ktrace_init (64 );vn_init ();
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
Quoted 17 lines · Christoph Hellwig
Some recent gcc warnings don't like passing string variables to printf-like functions without using at least a "%s" format string. Chaneg the two occurances of that in xfs to please gcc.
Signed-off-by Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_stats.c: In function "xfs_read_xfssta":fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_stats.c:64: warning: format not a string literal and no format argumentsfs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c: In function "init_xfs_fs":fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c:1833: warning: format not a string literal and no format argumentsIndex:
linux-2.6-xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_stats.c
===================================================================
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_stats.c xfs_read_xfsstats( · line 64
Quoted 5 lines
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_stats.c +1
-1@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ xfs_read_xfsstats(/* Loop over all stats groups */ for (i=j=len =0 ; i <ARRAY_SIZE (xstats); i++) { - len +=sprintf (buffer + len, xstats[i].desc); + len +=sprintf (buffer + len,"%s" , xstats[i].desc);
Why not use strcpy here?
Josef 'Jeff' Sipek.
--
Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated, cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
Quoted 5 lines · Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_stats.c xfs_read_xfsstats( · line 64
Quoted 3 lines
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_stats.c +1
-1for (i=j=len =0 ; i <ARRAY_SIZE (xstats); i++) { - len +=sprintf (buffer + len, xstats[i].desc); + len +=sprintf (buffer + len,"%s" , xstats[i].desc);Why not use strcpy here?
I applies the principle of minimal change. strcpy would work, too and be a tidbit more efficient.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs