x86: microcode_amd: fixes and cleanup
cover x86: microcode_amd: fixes and cleanup
Hi,
Following a small series of patches to cleanup microcode_amd. Patch 1 might be of interest for .28. But I don't know whether you are willing to apply the whole series for .28.
In any case the stuff should go into .29.
Thanks,
Andreas
PATCH 1/10 x86: microcode_amd: fix wrong handling of equivalent CPU id
mc_header->processor_rev_id is a 2 byte value. Similar is true for equiv_cpu in an equiv_cpu_entry -- only 2 bytes are of interest.
--- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 23 ++++++----------------- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c +6 -17
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ struct microcode_header_amd {unsigned int mc_patch_data_checksum;unsigned int nb_dev_id;unsigned int sb_dev_id; -unsigned char processor_rev_id[2 ]; +u16 processor_rev_id;unsigned char nb_rev_id;unsigned char sb_rev_id;unsigned char bios_api_rev;
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static int get_matching_microcode(int cpu, void *mc, int rev)while (equiv_cpu_table[i].installed_cpu !=0 ) {if (current_cpu_id == equiv_cpu_table[i].installed_cpu) { - equiv_cpu_id = equiv_cpu_table[i].equiv_cpu; + equiv_cpu_id = equiv_cpu_table[i].equiv_cpu &0xffff ;break ; } i++;
@@ -137,21 +137,10 @@ static int get_matching_microcode(int cpu, void *mc, int rev)return 0 ; } -if ((mc_header->processor_rev_id[0 ]) != (equiv_cpu_id &0xff )) { -printk (KERN_ERR -"microcode: CPU%d patch does not match " -"(patch is %x, cpu extended is %x) \n" , - cpu, mc_header->processor_rev_id[0 ], - (equiv_cpu_id &0xff )); -return 0 ; - } - -if ((mc_header->processor_rev_id[1 ]) != ((equiv_cpu_id >>16 ) &0xff )) { -printk (KERN_ERR "microcode: CPU%d patch does not match " -"(patch is %x, cpu base id is %x) \n" , - cpu, mc_header->processor_rev_id[1 ], - ((equiv_cpu_id >>16 ) &0xff )); - +if (mc_header->processor_rev_id != equiv_cpu_id) { +printk (KERN_ERR "microcode: CPU%d patch does not match " +"(processor_rev_id: %x, eqiv_cpu_id: %x)\n" , + cpu, mc_header->processor_rev_id, equiv_cpu_id);return 0 ; }
Signature · 1 line
1.6.0.4
PATCH 2/10 x86: microcode_amd: fix typos and trailing whitespaces in log messages
In reply to Andreas Herrmann--- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c +6 -6
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@* This driver allows to upgrade microcode on AMD * family 0x10 and 0x11 processors. * -* Licensed unter the terms of the GNU General Public +* Licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public * License version 2. See file COPYING for details. */
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ static int get_matching_microcode(int cpu, void *mc, int rev)if (!equiv_cpu_id) {printk (KERN_ERR "microcode: CPU%d cpu_id " -"not found in equivalent cpu table \n" , cpu); +"not found in equivalent cpu table\n" , cpu);return 0 ; }
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ static int get_matching_microcode(int cpu, void *mc, int rev) NULL);if ((!nb_pci_dev) || (mc_header->nb_rev_id != nb_pci_dev->revision)) { -printk (KERN_ERR "microcode: CPU%d NB mismatch \n" , cpu); +printk (KERN_ERR "microcode: CPU%d NB mismatch\n" , cpu);pci_dev_put (nb_pci_dev);return 0 ; }
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static int get_matching_microcode(int cpu, void *mc, int rev) NULL);if ((!sb_pci_dev) || (mc_header->sb_rev_id != sb_pci_dev->revision)) { -printk (KERN_ERR "microcode: CPU%d SB mismatch \n" , cpu); +printk (KERN_ERR "microcode: CPU%d SB mismatch\n" , cpu);pci_dev_put (sb_pci_dev);return 0 ; }
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ static void apply_microcode_amd(int cpu) }printk (KERN_INFO "microcode: CPU%d updated from revision " -"0x%x to 0x%x \n" , +"0x%x to 0x%x\n" , cpu_num, uci->cpu_sig.rev, mc_amd->hdr.patch_id); uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev;
@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ static int install_equiv_cpu_table(u8 *buf,if (buf_pos[1 ] !=UCODE_EQUIV_CPU_TABLE_TYPE || !size) {printk (KERN_ERR "microcode: error! " -"Wrong microcode equivalnet cpu table\n" ); +"Wrong microcode equivalent cpu table\n" );return 0 ; }
Signature · 1 line
1.6.0.4
PATCH 3/10 x86: microcode_amd: fix checkpatch warnings/errors
In reply to Andreas Herrmann--- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 25 ++++++++++++++----------- 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c +14 -11
@@ -32,9 +32,9 @@#include <linux/platform_device.h> #include <linux/pci.h> #include <linux/pci_ids.h> +#include <linux/uaccess.h> #include <asm/msr.h> -#include <asm/uaccess.h> #include <asm/processor.h> #include <asm/microcode.h>
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ static void apply_microcode_amd(int cpu) uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev; } -static void *get_next_ucode (u8 *buf,unsigned int size, +static void *get_next_ucode (u8 *buf,unsigned int size,int (*get_ucode_data)(void *,const void *,size_t ),unsigned int *mc_size) {
@@ -256,7 +256,8 @@ static void * get_next_ucode(u8 *buf, unsigned int size, mc =vmalloc (UCODE_MAX_SIZE );if (mc) {memset (mc,0 ,UCODE_MAX_SIZE ); -if (get_ucode_data (mc, buf +UCODE_CONTAINER_SECTION_HDR , total_size)) { +if (get_ucode_data (mc, buf +UCODE_CONTAINER_SECTION_HDR , + total_size)) {vfree (mc); mc =NULL ; }else
@@ -332,7 +333,8 @@ static int generic_load_microcode(int cpu, void *data, size_t size,unsigned int uninitialized_var (mc_size );struct microcode_header_amd *mc_header; - mc =get_next_ucode (ucode_ptr, leftover, get_ucode_data, &mc_size); + mc =get_next_ucode (ucode_ptr, leftover, get_ucode_data, + &mc_size);if (!mc)break ;
@@ -342,7 +344,7 @@ static int generic_load_microcode(int cpu, void *data, size_t size,vfree (new_mc); new_rev = mc_header->patch_id; new_mc = mc; - }else + }else vfree (mc); ucode_ptr += mc_size;
@@ -354,9 +356,9 @@ static int generic_load_microcode(int cpu, void *data, size_t size,if (uci->mc)vfree (uci->mc); uci->mc = new_mc; -pr_debug ("microcode: CPU%d found a matching microcode update with" -" version 0x%x (current=0x%x)\n" , - cpu, new_rev, uci->cpu_sig.rev); +pr_debug ("microcode: CPU%d found a matching microcode " +"update with version 0x%x (current=0x%x)\n" , + cpu, new_rev, uci->cpu_sig.rev); }else vfree (new_mc); }
@@ -383,7 +385,8 @@ static int request_microcode_fw(int cpu, struct device *device) ret =request_firmware (&firmware, fw_name, device);if (ret) { -printk (KERN_ERR "microcode: ucode data file %s load failed\n" , fw_name); +printk (KERN_ERR "microcode: ucode data file %s load failed\n" , + fw_name);return ret; }
@@ -397,8 +400,8 @@ static int request_microcode_fw(int cpu, struct device *device)static int request_microcode_user (int cpu,const void __user *buf,size_t size) { -printk (KERN_WARNING "microcode: AMD microcode update via /dev/cpu/microcode" -"is not supported\n" ); +printk (KERN_WARNING "microcode: AMD microcode update via " +"/dev/cpu/microcode is not supported\n" );return -1 ; }
Signature · 1 line
1.6.0.4
PATCH 4/10 x86: microcode_amd: fix compile warning
In reply to Andreas Herrmann CC arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.oarch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c: In function ‘request_microcode_fw’:arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c:393: warning: passing argument 2 of ‘generic_load_microcode’ discards qualifiers from pointer target type
(Respect "const" qualifier of firmware->data.)
--- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 20 +++++++++++--------- 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c +11 -9
@@ -225,8 +225,8 @@ static void apply_microcode_amd(int cpu) uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev; } -static void *get_next_ucode (u8 *buf,unsigned int size, -int (*get_ucode_data)(void *,const void *,size_t ), +static void *get_next_ucode (const u8 *buf,unsigned int size, +int (*get_ucode_data)(void *,const u8 *,size_t ),unsigned int *mc_size) {unsigned int total_size;
@@ -268,8 +268,8 @@ static void *get_next_ucode(u8 *buf, unsigned int size, } -static int install_equiv_cpu_table (u8 *buf, -int (*get_ucode_data)(void *,const void *,size_t )) +static int install_equiv_cpu_table (const u8 *buf, +int (*get_ucode_data)(void *,const u8 *,size_t )) {#define UCODE_CONTAINER_HEADER_SIZE 12u8 *container_hdr[UCODE_CONTAINER_HEADER_SIZE ];
@@ -311,11 +311,13 @@ static void free_equiv_cpu_table(void) } } -static int generic_load_microcode (int cpu,void *data,size_t size, -int (*get_ucode_data)(void *,const void *,size_t )) +static int generic_load_microcode (int cpu,const u8 *data,size_t size, +int (*get_ucode_data)(void *,const u8 *,size_t )) {struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu; -u8 *ucode_ptr = data, *new_mc =NULL , *mc; +const u8 *ucode_ptr = data; +void *new_mc =NULL ; +void *mc;int new_rev = uci->cpu_sig.rev;unsigned int leftover;unsigned long offset;
@@ -368,7 +370,7 @@ static int generic_load_microcode(int cpu, void *data, size_t size,return (int )leftover; } -static int get_ucode_fw (void *to,const void *from,size_t n) +static int get_ucode_fw (void *to,const u8 *from,size_t n) {memcpy (to, from, n);return 0 ;
@@ -390,7 +392,7 @@ static int request_microcode_fw(int cpu, struct device *device)return ret; } - ret =generic_load_microcode (cpu, (void *)firmware->data, firmware->size, + ret =generic_load_microcode (cpu, firmware->data, firmware->size, &get_ucode_fw);release_firmware (firmware);
Signature · 1 line
1.6.0.4
PATCH 5/10 x86: microcode_amd: don't pass superfluous function pointer for get_ucode_data
In reply to Andreas Herrmann--- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 29 ++++++++++++----------------- 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c +12 -17
@@ -225,9 +225,14 @@ static void apply_microcode_amd(int cpu) uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev; } +static int get_ucode_data (void *to,const u8 *from,size_t n) +{ +memcpy (to, from, n); +return 0 ; +} +static void *get_next_ucode (const u8 *buf,unsigned int size, -int (*get_ucode_data)(void *,const u8 *,size_t ), -unsigned int *mc_size) +unsigned int *mc_size) {unsigned int total_size;#define UCODE_CONTAINER_SECTION_HDR 8
@@ -268,8 +273,7 @@ static void *get_next_ucode(const u8 *buf, unsigned int size, } -static int install_equiv_cpu_table (const u8 *buf, -int (*get_ucode_data)(void *,const u8 *,size_t )) +static int install_equiv_cpu_table (const u8 *buf) {#define UCODE_CONTAINER_HEADER_SIZE 12u8 *container_hdr[UCODE_CONTAINER_HEADER_SIZE ];
@@ -311,8 +315,7 @@ static void free_equiv_cpu_table(void) } } -static int generic_load_microcode (int cpu,const u8 *data,size_t size, -int (*get_ucode_data)(void *,const u8 *,size_t )) +static int generic_load_microcode (int cpu,const u8 *data,size_t size) {struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;const u8 *ucode_ptr = data;
@@ -322,7 +325,7 @@ static int generic_load_microcode(int cpu, const u8 *data, size_t size,unsigned int leftover;unsigned long offset; - offset =install_equiv_cpu_table (ucode_ptr, get_ucode_data); + offset =install_equiv_cpu_table (ucode_ptr);if (!offset) {printk (KERN_ERR "microcode: installing equivalent cpu table failed\n" );return -EINVAL ;
@@ -335,8 +338,7 @@ static int generic_load_microcode(int cpu, const u8 *data, size_t size,unsigned int uninitialized_var (mc_size );struct microcode_header_amd *mc_header; - mc =get_next_ucode (ucode_ptr, leftover, get_ucode_data, - &mc_size); + mc =get_next_ucode (ucode_ptr, leftover, &mc_size);if (!mc)break ;
@@ -370,12 +372,6 @@ static int generic_load_microcode(int cpu, const u8 *data, size_t size,return (int )leftover; } -static int get_ucode_fw (void *to,const u8 *from,size_t n) -{ -memcpy (to, from, n); -return 0 ; -} -static int request_microcode_fw (int cpu,struct device *device) {const char *fw_name ="amd-ucode/microcode_amd.bin" ;
@@ -392,8 +388,7 @@ static int request_microcode_fw(int cpu, struct device *device)return ret; } - ret =generic_load_microcode (cpu, firmware->data, firmware->size, - &get_ucode_fw); + ret =generic_load_microcode (cpu, firmware->data, firmware->size);release_firmware (firmware);
Signature · 1 line
1.6.0.4
PATCH 6/10 x86: microcode_amd: replace inline asm by common rdmsr/wrmsr functions
In reply to Andreas Herrmann--- arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 2 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 23 +++++------------------ 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h +2 -0
@@ -85,7 +85,9 @@/* AMD64 MSRs. Not complete. See the architecture manual for a more complete list. */ +#define MSR_AMD64_PATCH_LEVEL 0x0000008b#define MSR_AMD64_NB_CFG 0xc001001f +#define MSR_AMD64_PATCH_LOADER 0xc0010020#define MSR_AMD64_IBSFETCHCTL 0xc0011030#define MSR_AMD64_IBSFETCHLINAD 0xc0011031#define MSR_AMD64_IBSFETCHPHYSAD 0xc0011032
arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c +5 -18
@@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ static struct equiv_cpu_entry *equiv_cpu_table;static int collect_cpu_info_amd (int cpu,struct cpu_signature *csig) {struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data (cpu); +u32 dummy;memset (csig,0 ,sizeof (*csig));
@@ -102,9 +103,7 @@ static int collect_cpu_info_amd(int cpu, struct cpu_signature *csig)return -1 ; } - asmvolatile ("movl %1, %%ecx; rdmsr" - :"=a" (csig->rev) - :"i" (0x0000008B ) :"ecx" ); +rdmsr (MSR_AMD64_PATCH_LEVEL , csig->rev, dummy);printk (KERN_INFO "microcode: collect_cpu_info_amd : patch_id=0x%x\n" , csig->rev);
@@ -181,12 +180,10 @@ static int get_matching_microcode(int cpu, void *mc, int rev)static void apply_microcode_amd (int cpu) {unsigned long flags; -unsigned int eax, edx; -unsigned int rev; +u32 rev, dummy;int cpu_num =raw_smp_processor_id ();struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu_num;struct microcode_amd *mc_amd = uci->mc; -unsigned long addr;/* We should bind the task to the CPU */ BUG_ON (cpu_num != cpu);
@@ -195,19 +192,9 @@ static void apply_microcode_amd(int cpu)return ;spin_lock_irqsave (µcode_update_lock, flags); - - addr = (unsigned long )&mc_amd->hdr.data_code; - edx = (unsigned int )(((unsigned long )upper_32_bits (addr))); - eax = (unsigned int )(((unsigned long )lower_32_bits (addr))); - - asmvolatile ("movl %0, %%ecx; wrmsr" : - :"i" (0xc0010020 ),"a" (eax),"d" (edx) :"ecx" ); - +wrmsrl (MSR_AMD64_PATCH_LOADER , &mc_amd->hdr.data_code);/* get patch id after patching */ - asmvolatile ("movl %1, %%ecx; rdmsr" - :"=a" (rev) - :"i" (0x0000008B ) :"ecx" ); - +rdmsr (MSR_AMD64_PATCH_LEVEL , rev, dummy);spin_unlock_irqrestore (µcode_update_lock, flags);/* check current patch id and patch's id for match */
Signature · 1 line
1.6.0.4
PATCH 7/10 x86: microcode_amd: consolidate macro definitions
In reply to Andreas Herrmann--- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 16 +++------------- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c +3 -13
@@ -75,15 +75,9 @@ struct microcode_amd {unsigned int mpb[0 ]; }; -#define UCODE_MAX_SIZE (2048) -#define DEFAULT_UCODE_DATASIZE (896) -#define MC_HEADER_SIZE (sizeof(struct microcode_header_amd)) -#define DEFAULT_UCODE_TOTALSIZE (DEFAULT_UCODE_DATASIZE + MC_HEADER_SIZE) -#define DWSIZE (sizeof(u32)) -/* For now we support a fixed ucode total size only */ -#define get_totalsize (mc) \ - ((((struct microcode_amd *)mc)->hdr.mc_patch_data_len * 28) \ - + MC_HEADER_SIZE) +#define UCODE_MAX_SIZE 2048 +#define UCODE_CONTAINER_SECTION_HDR 8 +#define UCODE_CONTAINER_HEADER_SIZE 12/* serialize access to the physical write */ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK (microcode_update_lock);
@@ -222,7 +216,6 @@ static void *get_next_ucode(const u8 *buf, unsigned int size, unsigned int *mc_size) {unsigned int total_size; -#define UCODE_CONTAINER_SECTION_HDR 8u8 section_hdr[UCODE_CONTAINER_SECTION_HDR ];void *mc;
@@ -255,14 +248,12 @@ static void *get_next_ucode(const u8 *buf, unsigned int size, }else *mc_size = total_size +UCODE_CONTAINER_SECTION_HDR ; } -#undef UCODE_CONTAINER_SECTION_HDRreturn mc; }static int install_equiv_cpu_table (const u8 *buf) { -#define UCODE_CONTAINER_HEADER_SIZE 12u8 *container_hdr[UCODE_CONTAINER_HEADER_SIZE ];unsigned int *buf_pos = (unsigned int *)container_hdr;unsigned long size;
@@ -291,7 +282,6 @@ static int install_equiv_cpu_table(const u8 *buf) }return size +UCODE_CONTAINER_HEADER_SIZE ;/* add header length */ -#undef UCODE_CONTAINER_HEADER_SIZE }static void free_equiv_cpu_table (void )
Signature · 1 line
1.6.0.4
PATCH 8/10 x86: microcode_amd: remove (wrong) chipset deivce ID checks
In reply to Andreas HerrmannCurrently there is no chipset specific ucode. The checks are incorrect anyway (e.g. pci device IDs are 16 bit and not 8 bit).
Thus I remove the stuff for the time being and will reintroduce it if it's foreseeable that it is really needed.
--- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 32 +++++--------------------------- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c +5 -27
@@ -108,7 +108,6 @@ static int collect_cpu_info_amd(int cpu, struct cpu_signature *csig)static int get_matching_microcode (int cpu,void *mc,int rev) {struct microcode_header_amd *mc_header = mc; -struct pci_dev *nb_pci_dev, *sb_pci_dev;unsigned int current_cpu_id;unsigned int equiv_cpu_id =0x00 ;unsigned int i =0 ;
@@ -137,32 +136,11 @@ static int get_matching_microcode(int cpu, void *mc, int rev)return 0 ; } -/* ucode may be northbridge specific */ -if (mc_header->nb_dev_id) { - nb_pci_dev =pci_get_device (PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD , - (mc_header->nb_dev_id &0xff ), -NULL ); -if ((!nb_pci_dev) || - (mc_header->nb_rev_id != nb_pci_dev->revision)) { -printk (KERN_ERR "microcode: CPU%d NB mismatch\n" , cpu); -pci_dev_put (nb_pci_dev); -return 0 ; - } -pci_dev_put (nb_pci_dev); - } - -/* ucode may be southbridge specific */ -if (mc_header->sb_dev_id) { - sb_pci_dev =pci_get_device (PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD , - (mc_header->sb_dev_id &0xff ), -NULL ); -if ((!sb_pci_dev) || - (mc_header->sb_rev_id != sb_pci_dev->revision)) { -printk (KERN_ERR "microcode: CPU%d SB mismatch\n" , cpu); -pci_dev_put (sb_pci_dev); -return 0 ; - } -pci_dev_put (sb_pci_dev); +/* ucode might be chipset specific -- currently we don't support this */ +if (mc_header->nb_dev_id || mc_header->sb_dev_id) { +printk (KERN_WARNING "microcode: CPU%d loading of chipset " +"specific code not yet supported\n" , cpu); +return 0 ; }if (mc_header->patch_id <= rev)
Signature · 1 line
1.6.0.4
PATCH 9/10 x86: microcode_amd: use 'packed' attribute for structs
In reply to Andreas Herrmann--- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------- 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c +23 -22
@@ -47,28 +47,29 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");#define UCODE_UCODE_TYPE 0x00000001struct equiv_cpu_entry { -unsigned int installed_cpu; -unsigned int fixed_errata_mask; -unsigned int fixed_errata_compare; -unsigned int equiv_cpu; -}; +u32 installed_cpu; +u32 fixed_errata_mask; +u32 fixed_errata_compare; +u16 equiv_cpu; +u16 res; +} __attribute__((packed));struct microcode_header_amd { -unsigned int data_code; -unsigned int patch_id; -unsigned char mc_patch_data_id[2 ]; -unsigned char mc_patch_data_len; -unsigned char init_flag; -unsigned int mc_patch_data_checksum; -unsigned int nb_dev_id; -unsigned int sb_dev_id; -u16 processor_rev_id; -unsigned char nb_rev_id; -unsigned char sb_rev_id; -unsigned char bios_api_rev; -unsigned char reserved1[3 ]; -unsigned int match_reg[8 ]; -}; +u32 data_code; +u32 patch_id; +u16 mc_patch_data_id; +u8 mc_patch_data_len; +u8 init_flag; +u32 mc_patch_data_checksum; +u32 nb_dev_id; +u32 sb_dev_id; +u16 processor_rev_id; +u8 nb_rev_id; +u8 sb_rev_id; +u8 bios_api_rev; +u8 reserved1[3 ]; +u32 match_reg[8 ]; +} __attribute__((packed));struct microcode_amd {struct microcode_header_amd hdr;
@@ -109,7 +110,7 @@ static int get_matching_microcode(int cpu, void *mc, int rev) {struct microcode_header_amd *mc_header = mc;unsigned int current_cpu_id; -unsigned int equiv_cpu_id =0x00 ; +u16 equiv_cpu_id =0 ;unsigned int i =0 ;BUG_ON (equiv_cpu_table ==NULL );
@@ -117,7 +118,7 @@ static int get_matching_microcode(int cpu, void *mc, int rev)while (equiv_cpu_table[i].installed_cpu !=0 ) {if (current_cpu_id == equiv_cpu_table[i].installed_cpu) { - equiv_cpu_id = equiv_cpu_table[i].equiv_cpu &0xffff ; + equiv_cpu_id = equiv_cpu_table[i].equiv_cpu;break ; } i++;
Signature · 1 line
1.6.0.4
PATCH 10/10 x86: microcode_amd: modify log messages
In reply to Andreas HerrmannChange log level and provide (at least I tried to;-) consistent, short, meaningful content.
--- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c +26 -32
@@ -91,18 +91,13 @@ static int collect_cpu_info_amd(int cpu, struct cpu_signature *csig)u32 dummy;memset (csig,0 ,sizeof (*csig)); -if (c->x86_vendor !=X86_VENDOR_AMD || c->x86 <0x10 ) { -printk (KERN_ERR "microcode: CPU%d not a capable AMD processor\n" , - cpu); +printk (KERN_WARNING "microcode: CPU%d: AMD CPU family 0x%x not " +"supported\n" , cpu, c->x86);return -1 ; } -rdmsr (MSR_AMD64_PATCH_LEVEL , csig->rev, dummy); - -printk (KERN_INFO "microcode: collect_cpu_info_amd : patch_id=0x%x\n" , - csig->rev); - +printk (KERN_INFO "microcode: CPU%d: patch_level=0x%x\n" , cpu, csig->rev);return 0 ; }
@@ -125,21 +120,21 @@ static int get_matching_microcode(int cpu, void *mc, int rev) }if (!equiv_cpu_id) { -printk (KERN_ERR "microcode: CPU%d cpu_id " -"not found in equivalent cpu table\n" , cpu); +printk (KERN_WARNING "microcode: CPU%d: cpu revision " +"not listed in equivalent cpu table\n" , cpu);return 0 ; }if (mc_header->processor_rev_id != equiv_cpu_id) { -printk (KERN_ERR "microcode: CPU%d patch does not match " -"(processor_rev_id: %x, eqiv_cpu_id: %x)\n" , +printk (KERN_ERR "microcode: CPU%d: patch mismatch " +"(processor_rev_id: %x, equiv_cpu_id: %x)\n" , cpu, mc_header->processor_rev_id, equiv_cpu_id);return 0 ; }/* ucode might be chipset specific -- currently we don't support this */ if (mc_header->nb_dev_id || mc_header->sb_dev_id) { -printk (KERN_WARNING "microcode: CPU%d loading of chipset " +printk (KERN_ERR "microcode: CPU%d: loading of chipset " "specific code not yet supported\n" , cpu);return 0 ; }
@@ -172,15 +167,13 @@ static void apply_microcode_amd(int cpu)/* check current patch id and patch's id for match */ if (rev != mc_amd->hdr.patch_id) { -printk (KERN_ERR "microcode: CPU%d update from revision " -"0x%x to 0x%x failed\n" , cpu_num, - mc_amd->hdr.patch_id, rev); +printk (KERN_ERR "microcode: CPU%d: update failed " +"(for patch_level=0x%x)\n" , cpu, mc_amd->hdr.patch_id);return ; } -printk (KERN_INFO "microcode: CPU%d updated from revision " -"0x%x to 0x%x\n" , - cpu_num, uci->cpu_sig.rev, mc_amd->hdr.patch_id); +printk (KERN_INFO "microcode: CPU%d: updated (new patch_level=0x%x)\n" , + cpu, rev); uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev; }
@@ -202,18 +195,18 @@ static void *get_next_ucode(const u8 *buf, unsigned int size,return NULL ;if (section_hdr[0 ] !=UCODE_UCODE_TYPE ) { -printk (KERN_ERR "microcode: error! " -"Wrong microcode payload type field\n" ); +printk (KERN_ERR "microcode: error: invalid type field in " +"container file section header\n" );return NULL ; } total_size = (unsigned long ) (section_hdr[4 ] + (section_hdr[5 ] <<8 )); -printk (KERN_INFO "microcode: size %u, total_size %u\n" , - size, total_size); +printk (KERN_DEBUG "microcode: size %u, total_size %u\n" , + size, total_size);if (total_size > size || total_size >UCODE_MAX_SIZE ) { -printk (KERN_ERR "microcode: error! Bad data in microcode data file\n" ); +printk (KERN_ERR "microcode: error: size mismatch\n" );return NULL ; }
@@ -243,14 +236,15 @@ static int install_equiv_cpu_table(const u8 *buf) size = buf_pos[2 ];if (buf_pos[1 ] !=UCODE_EQUIV_CPU_TABLE_TYPE || !size) { -printk (KERN_ERR "microcode: error! " -"Wrong microcode equivalent cpu table\n" ); +printk (KERN_ERR "microcode: error: invalid type field in " +"container file section header\n" );return 0 ; } equiv_cpu_table = (struct equiv_cpu_entry *)vmalloc (size);if (!equiv_cpu_table) { -printk (KERN_ERR "microcode: error, can't allocate memory for equiv CPU table\n" ); +printk (KERN_ERR "microcode: failed to allocate " +"equivalent CPU table\n" );return 0 ; }
@@ -283,7 +277,8 @@ static int generic_load_microcode(int cpu, const u8 *data, size_t size) offset =install_equiv_cpu_table (ucode_ptr);if (!offset) { -printk (KERN_ERR "microcode: installing equivalent cpu table failed\n" ); +printk (KERN_ERR "microcode: failed to create " +"equivalent cpu table\n" );return -EINVAL ; }
@@ -339,8 +334,7 @@ static int request_microcode_fw(int cpu, struct device *device) ret =request_firmware (&firmware, fw_name, device);if (ret) { -printk (KERN_ERR "microcode: ucode data file %s load failed\n" , - fw_name); +printk (KERN_ERR "microcode: failed to load file %s\n" , fw_name);return ret; }
@@ -353,8 +347,8 @@ static int request_microcode_fw(int cpu, struct device *device)static int request_microcode_user (int cpu,const void __user *buf,size_t size) { -printk (KERN_WARNING "microcode: AMD microcode update via " -"/dev/cpu/microcode is not supported\n" ); +printk (KERN_INFO "microcode: AMD microcode update via " +"/dev/cpu/microcode not supported\n" );return -1 ; }
Signature · 1 line
1.6.0.4
Hello Andreas,
Quoted 5 lines
Following a small series of patches to cleanup
microcode_amd. Patch 1 might be of interest for .28. But I don't know whether you are willing to apply the whole series for .28.
I wonder if you see a problem with the scenario described here
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/process_bug.cgi
on any of your systems?
Thanks in advance,
Quoted 5 lines
Thanks,
Andreas
Signature · 2 lines
Best regards, Dmitry Adamushko
2008/12/17 Dmitry Adamushko <[email protected]>:
Quoted 11 lines
Hello Andreas,
Quoted 5 lines
Following a small series of patches to cleanup
microcode_amd. Patch 1 might be of interest for .28. But I don't know whether you are willing to apply the whole series for .28.I wonder if you see a problem with the scenario described here
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/process_bug.cgi
on any of your systems?
here is the correct link:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12100
Signature · 2 lines
Best regards, Dmitry Adamushko