acpi x86: Make aperf mperf MSR usage in acpi_cpufreq read only

PATCH Applied [email protected] 2 participants 5 messages Apr 6, 2009 – Apr 7, 2009

Subsystems (2)

x86 ACPI

lore

Share & tools

lore

[email protected]

author

2009-04-06 18:28 UTC #0 lore raw

cover acpi x86: Make aperf mperf MSR usage in acpi_cpufreq read only

Patchset makes aperf mperf MSR access in acpi_cpufreq read only. This enables other kernel and usaer level components to share read access to these MSRs.

[email protected]

author

2009-04-06 18:28 UTC #1 lore raw

PATCH 1/2 acpi x86: Cleanup acpi_cpufreq structures related to aperf/mperf

Change structure name to make the code cleaner and simpler. No functionality change in this patch.

Signed-off-by Venkatesh Pallipadi <[email protected]>

---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c |   42 +++++++++++++--------------
 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c +20 ~~-22~~

index 19f6b9d..340bdbe 100644
@@ -241,23 +241,23 @@ static u32 get_cur_val(const struct cpumask *mask)
 	return cmd.val;
 }
 
-struct perf_cur {
+struct perf_pair {
 	union {
 		struct {
 			u32 lo;
 			u32 hi;
 		} split;
 		u64 whole;
-	} aperf_cur, mperf_cur;
+	} aperf, mperf;
 };
 
 
 static long read_measured_perf_ctrs(void *_cur)
 {
-	struct perf_cur *cur = _cur;
+	struct perf_pair *cur = _cur;
 
-	rdmsr(MSR_IA32_APERF, cur->aperf_cur.split.lo, cur->aperf_cur.split.hi);
-	rdmsr(MSR_IA32_MPERF, cur->mperf_cur.split.lo, cur->mperf_cur.split.hi);
+	rdmsr(MSR_IA32_APERF, cur->aperf.split.lo, cur->aperf.split.hi);
+	rdmsr(MSR_IA32_MPERF, cur->mperf.split.lo, cur->mperf.split.hi);
 
 	wrmsr(MSR_IA32_APERF, 0, 0);
 	wrmsr(MSR_IA32_MPERF, 0, 0);

@@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ static long read_measured_perf_ctrs(void *_cur)
 static unsigned int get_measured_perf(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 				      unsigned int cpu)
 {
-	struct perf_cur cur;
+	struct perf_pair cur;
 	unsigned int perf_percent;
 	unsigned int retval;

@@ -294,39 +294,37 @@ static unsigned int get_measured_perf(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 	 * Get an approximate value. Return failure in case we cannot get
 	 * an approximate value.
 	 */
-	if (unlikely(cur.aperf_cur.split.hi || cur.mperf_cur.split.hi)) {
+	if (unlikely(cur.aperf.split.hi || cur.mperf.split.hi)) {
 		int shift_count;
 		u32 h;
 
-		h = max_t(u32, cur.aperf_cur.split.hi, cur.mperf_cur.split.hi);
+		h = max_t(u32, cur.aperf.split.hi, cur.mperf.split.hi);
 		shift_count = fls(h);
 
-		cur.aperf_cur.whole >>= shift_count;
-		cur.mperf_cur.whole >>= shift_count;
+		cur.aperf.whole >>= shift_count;
+		cur.mperf.whole >>= shift_count;
 	}
 
-	if (((unsigned long)(-1) / 100) < cur.aperf_cur.split.lo) {
+	if (((unsigned long)(-1) / 100) < cur.aperf.split.lo) {
 		int shift_count = 7;
-		cur.aperf_cur.split.lo >>= shift_count;
-		cur.mperf_cur.split.lo >>= shift_count;
+		cur.aperf.split.lo >>= shift_count;
+		cur.mperf.split.lo >>= shift_count;
 	}
 
-	if (cur.aperf_cur.split.lo && cur.mperf_cur.split.lo)
-		perf_percent = (cur.aperf_cur.split.lo * 100) /
-				cur.mperf_cur.split.lo;
+	if (cur.aperf.split.lo && cur.mperf.split.lo)
+		perf_percent = (cur.aperf.split.lo * 100) / cur.mperf.split.lo;
 	else
 		perf_percent = 0;
 
 #else
-	if (unlikely(((unsigned long)(-1) / 100) < cur.aperf_cur.whole)) {
+	if (unlikely(((unsigned long)(-1) / 100) < cur.aperf.whole)) {
 		int shift_count = 7;
-		cur.aperf_cur.whole >>= shift_count;
-		cur.mperf_cur.whole >>= shift_count;
+		cur.aperf.whole >>= shift_count;
+		cur.mperf.whole >>= shift_count;
 	}
 
-	if (cur.aperf_cur.whole && cur.mperf_cur.whole)
-		perf_percent = (cur.aperf_cur.whole * 100) /
-				cur.mperf_cur.whole;
+	if (cur.aperf.whole && cur.mperf.whole)
+		perf_percent = (cur.aperf.whole * 100) / cur.mperf.whole;
 	else
 		perf_percent = 0;

Signature · 3 lines

1.6.0.6

--

Len Brown

reviewer Applied

2009-04-07 05:34 UTC #2 lore raw

Re: [patch 1/2] acpi x86: Cleanup acpi_cpufreq structures related to aperf/mperf

applied

(and [email protected] added to cc)

thanks,
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center

Quoted 114 lines · On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, [email protected] wrote:

Change structure name to make the code cleaner and simpler. No functionality change in this patch.

Signed-off-by Venkatesh Pallipadi <[email protected]>

---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c |   42 +++++++++++++--------------
 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c +20 ~~-22~~

index 19f6b9d..340bdbe 100644
@@ -241,23 +241,23 @@ static u32 get_cur_val(const struct cpumask *mask)
 	return cmd.val;
 }
 
-struct perf_cur {
+struct perf_pair {
 	union {
 		struct {
 			u32 lo;
 			u32 hi;
 		} split;
 		u64 whole;
-	} aperf_cur, mperf_cur;
+	} aperf, mperf;
 };
 
 
 static long read_measured_perf_ctrs(void *_cur)
 {
-	struct perf_cur *cur = _cur;
+	struct perf_pair *cur = _cur;
 
-	rdmsr(MSR_IA32_APERF, cur->aperf_cur.split.lo, cur->aperf_cur.split.hi);
-	rdmsr(MSR_IA32_MPERF, cur->mperf_cur.split.lo, cur->mperf_cur.split.hi);
+	rdmsr(MSR_IA32_APERF, cur->aperf.split.lo, cur->aperf.split.hi);
+	rdmsr(MSR_IA32_MPERF, cur->mperf.split.lo, cur->mperf.split.hi);
 
 	wrmsr(MSR_IA32_APERF, 0, 0);
 	wrmsr(MSR_IA32_MPERF, 0, 0);

@@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ static long read_measured_perf_ctrs(void *_cur)
 static unsigned int get_measured_perf(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 				      unsigned int cpu)
 {
-	struct perf_cur cur;
+	struct perf_pair cur;
 	unsigned int perf_percent;
 	unsigned int retval;

@@ -294,39 +294,37 @@ static unsigned int get_measured_perf(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 	 * Get an approximate value. Return failure in case we cannot get
 	 * an approximate value.
 	 */
-	if (unlikely(cur.aperf_cur.split.hi || cur.mperf_cur.split.hi)) {
+	if (unlikely(cur.aperf.split.hi || cur.mperf.split.hi)) {
 		int shift_count;
 		u32 h;
 
-		h = max_t(u32, cur.aperf_cur.split.hi, cur.mperf_cur.split.hi);
+		h = max_t(u32, cur.aperf.split.hi, cur.mperf.split.hi);
 		shift_count = fls(h);
 
-		cur.aperf_cur.whole >>= shift_count;
-		cur.mperf_cur.whole >>= shift_count;
+		cur.aperf.whole >>= shift_count;
+		cur.mperf.whole >>= shift_count;
 	}
 
-	if (((unsigned long)(-1) / 100) < cur.aperf_cur.split.lo) {
+	if (((unsigned long)(-1) / 100) < cur.aperf.split.lo) {
 		int shift_count = 7;
-		cur.aperf_cur.split.lo >>= shift_count;
-		cur.mperf_cur.split.lo >>= shift_count;
+		cur.aperf.split.lo >>= shift_count;
+		cur.mperf.split.lo >>= shift_count;
 	}
 
-	if (cur.aperf_cur.split.lo && cur.mperf_cur.split.lo)
-		perf_percent = (cur.aperf_cur.split.lo * 100) /
-				cur.mperf_cur.split.lo;
+	if (cur.aperf.split.lo && cur.mperf.split.lo)
+		perf_percent = (cur.aperf.split.lo * 100) / cur.mperf.split.lo;
 	else
 		perf_percent = 0;
 
 #else
-	if (unlikely(((unsigned long)(-1) / 100) < cur.aperf_cur.whole)) {
+	if (unlikely(((unsigned long)(-1) / 100) < cur.aperf.whole)) {
 		int shift_count = 7;
-		cur.aperf_cur.whole >>= shift_count;
-		cur.mperf_cur.whole >>= shift_count;
+		cur.aperf.whole >>= shift_count;
+		cur.mperf.whole >>= shift_count;
 	}
 
-	if (cur.aperf_cur.whole && cur.mperf_cur.whole)
-		perf_percent = (cur.aperf_cur.whole * 100) /
-				cur.mperf_cur.whole;
+	if (cur.aperf.whole && cur.mperf.whole)
+		perf_percent = (cur.aperf.whole * 100) / cur.mperf.whole;
 	else
 		perf_percent = 0;

Signature · 8 lines

1.6.0.6

-- 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[email protected]

author

2009-04-06 18:28 UTC #3 lore raw

PATCH 2/2 acpi x86: Make aperf/mperf MSR access in acpi_cpufreq read_only

In reply to [email protected]

Not write zeroes to APERF and MPERF by ondemand governor. With this change, other users can share these MSRs for reads.

Signed-off-by Venkatesh Pallipadi <[email protected]>

---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c |   15 ++++++++++-----
 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c +10 -5

index 340bdbe..9d3af38 100644
@@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ struct acpi_cpufreq_data {
 	unsigned int max_freq;
 	unsigned int resume;
 	unsigned int cpu_feature;
+	u64 saved_aperf, saved_mperf;
 };
 
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct acpi_cpufreq_data *, drv_data);

@@ -259,9 +260,6 @@ static long read_measured_perf_ctrs(void *_cur)
 	rdmsr(MSR_IA32_APERF, cur->aperf.split.lo, cur->aperf.split.hi);
 	rdmsr(MSR_IA32_MPERF, cur->mperf.split.lo, cur->mperf.split.hi);
 
-	wrmsr(MSR_IA32_APERF, 0, 0);
-	wrmsr(MSR_IA32_MPERF, 0, 0);
-
 	return 0;
 }

@@ -281,13 +279,20 @@ static long read_measured_perf_ctrs(void *_cur)
 static unsigned int get_measured_perf(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 				      unsigned int cpu)
 {
-	struct perf_pair cur;
+	struct perf_pair readin, cur;
 	unsigned int perf_percent;
 	unsigned int retval;
 
-	if (!work_on_cpu(cpu, read_measured_perf_ctrs, &cur))
+	if (!work_on_cpu(cpu, read_measured_perf_ctrs, &readin))
 		return 0;
 
+	cur.aperf.whole = readin.aperf.whole -
+				per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)->saved_aperf;
+	cur.mperf.whole = readin.mperf.whole -
+				per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)->saved_mperf;
+	per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)->saved_aperf = readin.aperf.whole;
+	per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)->saved_mperf = readin.mperf.whole;
+
 #ifdef __i386__
 	/*
 	 * We dont want to do 64 bit divide with 32 bit kernel

Signature · 3 lines

1.6.0.6

--

Len Brown

reviewer Applied

2009-04-07 05:35 UTC #4 lore raw

Re: [patch 2/2] acpi x86: Make aperf/mperf MSR access in acpi_cpufreq read_only

applied

(and [email protected] cc'd)

thanks,
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center

Quoted 63 lines · On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, [email protected] wrote:

Not write zeroes to APERF and MPERF by ondemand governor. With this change, other users can share these MSRs for reads.

Signed-off-by Venkatesh Pallipadi <[email protected]>

---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c |   15 ++++++++++-----
 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c +10 -5

index 340bdbe..9d3af38 100644
@@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ struct acpi_cpufreq_data {
 	unsigned int max_freq;
 	unsigned int resume;
 	unsigned int cpu_feature;
+	u64 saved_aperf, saved_mperf;
 };
 
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct acpi_cpufreq_data *, drv_data);

@@ -259,9 +260,6 @@ static long read_measured_perf_ctrs(void *_cur)
 	rdmsr(MSR_IA32_APERF, cur->aperf.split.lo, cur->aperf.split.hi);
 	rdmsr(MSR_IA32_MPERF, cur->mperf.split.lo, cur->mperf.split.hi);
 
-	wrmsr(MSR_IA32_APERF, 0, 0);
-	wrmsr(MSR_IA32_MPERF, 0, 0);
-
 	return 0;
 }

@@ -281,13 +279,20 @@ static long read_measured_perf_ctrs(void *_cur)
 static unsigned int get_measured_perf(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 				      unsigned int cpu)
 {
-	struct perf_pair cur;
+	struct perf_pair readin, cur;
 	unsigned int perf_percent;
 	unsigned int retval;
 
-	if (!work_on_cpu(cpu, read_measured_perf_ctrs, &cur))
+	if (!work_on_cpu(cpu, read_measured_perf_ctrs, &readin))
 		return 0;
 
+	cur.aperf.whole = readin.aperf.whole -
+				per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)->saved_aperf;
+	cur.mperf.whole = readin.mperf.whole -
+				per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)->saved_mperf;
+	per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)->saved_aperf = readin.aperf.whole;
+	per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)->saved_mperf = readin.mperf.whole;
+
 #ifdef __i386__
 	/*
 	 * We dont want to do 64 bit divide with 32 bit kernel

Signature · 8 lines

1.6.0.6

-- 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html