Skip to contentSkip to conversation

arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c: avoid using work_on_cpu()

PATCH In review [email protected] 1 participant 1 message Apr 11, 2009

Subsystems (2)
x86 ACPI
lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/2 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c: avoid using work_on_cpu()

From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

Atttempting to rid us of the problematic work_on_cpu(). Just use smp_call_fuction_single() here.

This repairs a 10% sysbench(oltp)+mysql regression which Mike reported, due to

commit 6b44003e5ca66a3fffeb5bc90f40ada2c4340896

Author: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Date:   Thu Apr 9 09:50:37 2009 -0600

work_on_cpu(): rewrite it to create a kernel thread on demand

It seems that the kernel calls these acpi-cpufreq functions at a quite high frequency.

Cc Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
Cc Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc Venkatesh Pallipadi <[email protected]>
Cc Len Brown <[email protected]>
Cc Zhao Yakui <[email protected]>
Cc Dave Jones <[email protected]>
Cc Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Tested-by Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
Cc "Zhang, Yanmin" <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

---

 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c |   25 ++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c renamed from arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c~arch-x86-kernel-cpu-cpufreq-acpi-cpufreqc-avoid-using-work_on_cpu +11 -14
diff -puN arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c~arch-x86-kernel-cpu-cpufreq-acpi-cpufreqc-avoid-using-work_on_cpu arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
@@ -153,7 +153,8 @@ struct drv_cmd {
 	u32 val;
 };
 
-static long do_drv_read(void *_cmd)
+/* Called via smp_call_function_single(), on the target CPU */
+static void do_drv_read(void *_cmd)
 {
 	struct drv_cmd *cmd = _cmd;
 	u32 h;

@@ -170,10 +171,10 @@ static long do_drv_read(void *_cmd)
 	default:
 		break;
 	}
-	return 0;
 }
 
-static long do_drv_write(void *_cmd)
+/* Called via smp_call_function_single(), on the target CPU */
+static void do_drv_write(void *_cmd)
 {
 	struct drv_cmd *cmd = _cmd;
 	u32 lo, hi;

@@ -192,23 +193,21 @@ static long do_drv_write(void *_cmd)
 	default:
 		break;
 	}
-	return 0;
 }
 
 static void drv_read(struct drv_cmd *cmd)
 {
 	cmd->val = 0;
 
-	work_on_cpu(cpumask_any(cmd->mask), do_drv_read, cmd);
+	smp_call_function_single(cpumask_any(cmd->mask), do_drv_read, cmd, 1);
 }
 
 static void drv_write(struct drv_cmd *cmd)
 {
-	unsigned int i;
+	unsigned int cpu;
 
-	for_each_cpu(i, cmd->mask) {
-		work_on_cpu(i, do_drv_write, cmd);
-	}
+	for_each_cpu(cpu, cmd->mask)
+		smp_call_function_single(cpu, do_drv_write, cmd, 1);
 }
 
 static u32 get_cur_val(const struct cpumask *mask)

@@ -252,15 +251,13 @@ struct perf_pair {
 	} aperf, mperf;
 };
 
-
-static long read_measured_perf_ctrs(void *_cur)
+/* Called via smp_call_function_single(), on the target CPU */
+static void read_measured_perf_ctrs(void *_cur)
 {
 	struct perf_pair *cur = _cur;
 
 	rdmsr(MSR_IA32_APERF, cur->aperf.split.lo, cur->aperf.split.hi);
 	rdmsr(MSR_IA32_MPERF, cur->mperf.split.lo, cur->mperf.split.hi);
-
-	return 0;
 }
 
 /*

@@ -283,7 +280,7 @@ static unsigned int get_measured_perf(st
 	unsigned int perf_percent;
 	unsigned int retval;
 
-	if (!work_on_cpu(cpu, read_measured_perf_ctrs, &readin))
+	if (smp_call_function_single(cpu, read_measured_perf_ctrs, &cur, 1))
 		return 0;
 
 	cur.aperf.whole = readin.aperf.whole -

_