Increase kernel text size for x86_64
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 Increase kernel text size for x86_64
Hi all,
I cannot load a x86_64 kernel with kexec on 2.6.31; the error message is:
Can't find kernel text map area from kcore
Cannot load /boot/vmlinuz
Digging through the source I found a mismatch between the assumed kernel text size; kexec has:
#define KERNEL_TEXT_SIZE (40UL*1024*1024)
but on the kernel side we have:
include/asm/page_64_types.h:
#define KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE (512 * 1024 * 1024)
And, indeed, changing the definition in kexec-tools to the kernel one fixed the problem.
Not sure if this has been reported before, if so please ignore the noise.
Cheers,
Hannes
Signature · 4 lines
Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage [email protected] +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
kexec/arch/x86_64/crashdump-x86_64.h +1 -1
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ int load_crashdump_segments(struct kexec_info *info, char *mod_cmdline,#define MAXMEM 0x3fffffffffffUL/* Kernel text size */ -#define KERNEL_TEXT_SIZE (40UL*1024*1024) +#define KERNEL_TEXT_SIZE (512UL*1024*1024)#define CRASH_MAX_MEMMAP_NR (KEXEC_MAX_SEGMENTS + 1)#define CRASH_MAX_MEMORY_RANGES (MAX_MEMORY_RANGES + 2)
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
Quoted 14 lines · Hannes Reinecke
Hi all,
I cannot load a
x86_64kernel with kexec on 2.6.31; the error message is:Can't find kernel text map area from kcore
Cannot load/boot/vmlinuzDigging through the source I found a mismatch between the assumed kernel text size; kexec has:
#define
KERNEL_TEXT_SIZE(40UL*1024*1024)but on the kernel side we have:
Quoted 8 lines
include/asm/page_64_types.h:
#defineKERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE(512 * 1024 * 1024)And, indeed, changing the definition in kexec-tools to the kernel one fixed the problem.
Not sure if this has been reported before, if so please ignore the noise.
Hi,
I'm wondering what effect this would have when using kexec-tools with older kernels, which presumably have a smaller value for KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE.
kexec/arch/x86_64/crashdump-x86_64.h int load_crashdump_segments(struct kexec_info *info, char *mod_cmdline, · line 17
Quoted 13 lines
kexec/arch/x86_64/crashdump-x86_64.h +1
-1@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ int load_crashdump_segments(struct kexec_info *info, char *mod_cmdline,#define MAXMEM 0x3fffffffffffUL/* Kernel text size */ -#define KERNEL_TEXT_SIZE (40UL*1024*1024) +#define KERNEL_TEXT_SIZE (512UL*1024*1024)#define CRASH_MAX_MEMMAP_NR (KEXEC_MAX_SEGMENTS + 1)#define CRASH_MAX_MEMORY_RANGES (MAX_MEMORY_RANGES + 2)
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
Quoted 37 lines · Simon Horman
Quoted 14 lines · Hannes Reinecke
Hi all,
I cannot load a
x86_64kernel with kexec on 2.6.31; the error message is:Can't find kernel text map area from kcore
Cannot load/boot/vmlinuzDigging through the source I found a mismatch between the assumed kernel text size; kexec has:
#define
KERNEL_TEXT_SIZE(40UL*1024*1024)but on the kernel side we have:
Quoted 8 lines
include/asm/page_64_types.h:
#defineKERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE(512 * 1024 * 1024)And, indeed, changing the definition in kexec-tools to the kernel one fixed the problem.
Not sure if this has been reported before, if so please ignore the noise.
Hi,
I'm wondering what effect this would have when using kexec-tools with older kernels, which presumably have a smaller value for
KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE.Quoted 7 lines
kexec/arch/x86_64/crashdump-x86_64.h +0
-0@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ int load_crashdump_segments(struct kexec_info *info, char *mod_cmdline,#define MAXMEM 0x3fffffffffffUL
Quoted 7 lines
kexec/arch/x86_64/crashdump-x86_64.h int load_crashdump_segments(struct kexec_info *info, char *mod_cmdline, · line 17
Quoted 6 lines
kexec/arch/x86_64/crashdump-x86_64.h +1
-1/* Kernel text size */ -#define KERNEL_TEXT_SIZE (40UL*1024*1024) +#define KERNEL_TEXT_SIZE (512UL*1024*1024)#define CRASH_MAX_MEMMAP_NR (KEXEC_MAX_SEGMENTS + 1)#define CRASH_MAX_MEMORY_RANGES (MAX_MEMORY_RANGES + 2)
Well, the actual point of failure is in kexec/arch/x86_64/crashdump-x86_64.c:125
/* Look for kernel text mapping header. */
if ((saddr >= __START_KERNEL_map) &&
(eaddr <= __START_KERNEL_map + KERNEL_TEXT_SIZE)) {
saddr = (saddr) & (~(KERN_VADDR_ALIGN - 1));
info->kern_vaddr_start = saddr;
size = eaddr - saddr;which basically should look for a ELF header into which the kernel fits. As we're effectively just moving the upper limit I fail to see any harm to older kernels.
Hmm. Haven't checked for other occurrences of KERNEL_TEXT_SIZE, though.
Would be nice we could be getting these values off somewhere; rely on some kernel defines is going to break now and then.
Cheers,
Hannes
Signature · 9 lines
Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage [email protected] +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
Quoted 54 lines · Hannes Reinecke
Quoted 37 lines · Simon Horman
Quoted 14 lines · Hannes Reinecke
Hi all,
I cannot load a
x86_64kernel with kexec on 2.6.31; the error message is:Can't find kernel text map area from kcore
Cannot load/boot/vmlinuzDigging through the source I found a mismatch between the assumed kernel text size; kexec has:
#define
KERNEL_TEXT_SIZE(40UL*1024*1024)but on the kernel side we have:
Quoted 8 lines
include/asm/page_64_types.h:
#defineKERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE(512 * 1024 * 1024)And, indeed, changing the definition in kexec-tools to the kernel one fixed the problem.
Not sure if this has been reported before, if so please ignore the noise.
Hi,
I'm wondering what effect this would have when using kexec-tools with older kernels, which presumably have a smaller value for
KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE.Quoted 7 lines
kexec/arch/x86_64/crashdump-x86_64.h +0
-0@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ int load_crashdump_segments(struct kexec_info *info, char *mod_cmdline,#define MAXMEM 0x3fffffffffffULQuoted 7 lines
kexec/arch/x86_64/crashdump-x86_64.h int load_crashdump_segments(struct kexec_info *info, char *mod_cmdline, · line 17
Quoted 6 lines
kexec/arch/x86_64/crashdump-x86_64.h +1
-1/* Kernel text size */ -#define KERNEL_TEXT_SIZE (40UL*1024*1024) +#define KERNEL_TEXT_SIZE (512UL*1024*1024)#define CRASH_MAX_MEMMAP_NR (KEXEC_MAX_SEGMENTS + 1)#define CRASH_MAX_MEMORY_RANGES (MAX_MEMORY_RANGES + 2)Well, the actual point of failure is in
kexec/arch/x86_64/crashdump-x86_64.c:125/* Look for kernel text mapping header. */ if ((saddr >= __START_KERNEL_map) && (eaddr <= __START_KERNEL_map + KERNEL_TEXT_SIZE)) { saddr = (saddr) & (~(KERN_VADDR_ALIGN - 1)); info->kern_vaddr_start = saddr; size = eaddr - saddr;
Quoted 7 lines
which basically should look for a ELF header into which the kernel fits. As we're effectively just moving the upper limit I fail to see any harm to older kernels.
Hmm. Haven't checked for other occurrences of
KERNEL_TEXT_SIZE, though.Would be nice we could be getting these values off somewhere; rely on some kernel defines is going to break now and then.
Agreed, but I think that your patch is worth having in the mean time. I will apply it.
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec