ARM: DaVinci: DaVinci DM365 SOC specific code
PATCH 1/1 ARM: DaVinci: DaVinci DM365 SOC specific code
From: Sandeep Paulraj <[email protected]>
This patch adds support for DaVinci DM365 SOC.
--- cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/Makefile | 1 + cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/dm365.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/dm365.c
cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/Makefile +1 -0
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ LIB = $(obj)lib$(SOC).a COBJS-y += cpu.o timer.o psc.o COBJS-$(CONFIG_SOC_DM355) += dm355.o +COBJS-$(CONFIG_SOC_DM365) += dm365.o COBJS-$(CONFIG_SOC_DM644X) += dm644x.o COBJS-$(CONFIG_DRIVER_TI_EMAC) += lxt972.o dp83848.o
cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/dm365.c new file +35 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ +/* +* SoC-specific code for tms320dm365 and similar chips +* +* See file CREDITS for list of people who contributed to this +* project. +* +* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify +* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by +* the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or +* (at your option) any later version. +* +* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, +* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of +* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the +* GNU General Public License for more details. +* +* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License +* along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software +* Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. +*/ + +#include <common.h> +#include <asm/arch/hardware.h> + +void davinci_enable_uart0 (void ) +{ +lpsc_on (DAVINCI_LPSC_UART0 ); +} + +#ifdef CONFIG_DRIVER_DAVINCI_I2C +void davinci_enable_i2c (void ) +{ +lpsc_on (DAVINCI_LPSC_I2C ); +} +#endif
Signature · 1 line
1.6.0.4
PATCH 1/1 ARM: DaVinci: DaVinci DM365 SOC specific code
Quoted 10 lines · s-paulraj at ti.com
From: Sandeep Paulraj <[email protected]>
This patch adds support for DaVinci DM365 SOC.
Signed-off-by Sandeep Paulraj <[email protected]>--- cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/Makefile | 1 + cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/dm365.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/dm365.c
apply to u-boot-arm next
Best Regards,
J.
PATCH 1/1 ARM: DaVinci: DaVinci DM365 SOC specific code
I don't see a next branch in u-boot-arm. Am I missing something?
Thanks
John
Quoted 21 lines · Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
Quoted 8 lines · s-paulraj at ti.com
From: Sandeep Paulraj <[email protected]>
This patch adds support for DaVinci DM365 SOC.
Signed-off-by Sandeep Paulraj <[email protected]>--- cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/Makefile | 1 + cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/dm365.c | 35+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Quoted 2 lines
2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/dm365.capply to u-boot-arm next
Best Regards,
J.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot at lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Paulraj
PATCH 1/1 ARM: DaVinci: DaVinci DM365 SOC specific code
John,
Yesterday night after J-C mentioned that he applied 2 of my patches to u-boot-arm next I tried to checkout that branch
to add some more stuff on top of my Dm365 patches.
I could not see it either. But I have used that branch in the recent past. I don't know what is wrong.
Thanks,
Sandeep
________________________________
From: John Rigby [mailto:jcrigby at gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 11:21 AM
To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
Cc: Paulraj, Sandeep; u-boot at lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: DaVinci: DaVinci DM365 SOC specific code
I don't see a next branch in u-boot-arm. Am I missing something?
Thanks
John
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj at jcrosoft.com<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Quoted 10 lines · s-paulraj at ti.com
From: Sandeep Paulraj <s-paulraj at ti.com<mailto:[email protected]>>
This patch adds support for DaVinci DM365 SOC.
Signed-off-by Sandeep Paulraj <s-paulraj at ti.com<mailto:[email protected]>>--- cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/Makefile | 1 + cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/dm365.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/dm365.c
apply to u-boot-arm next
Best Regards,
J.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot at lists.denx.de<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
PATCH 1/1 ARM: DaVinci: DaVinci DM365 SOC specific code
Dear "Paulraj, Sandeep",
Quoted 7 lines · In message <[email protected]> you…
Yesterday night after J-C mentioned that he applied 2 of my patches to u-bo ot-arm next I tried to checkout that branch
to add some more stuff on top of my Dm365 patches.I could not see it either. But I have used that branch in the recent past. I don't know what is wrong.
Unfortunately the U-Boot ARM repository is in a really poor state. Commits and branches come and go more or less at ramdom.
I apologize for the inconveninces caused by that.
Jean-Christophe, we really need more consistency here.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
Signature · 5 lines
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de The nice thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from. - Andrew S. Tanenbaum
PATCH 1/1 ARM: DaVinci: DaVinci DM365 SOC specific code
Quoted 11 lines · Wolfgang Denk
Dear "Paulraj, Sandeep",
Quoted 7 lines · In message <[email protected]> you…
Yesterday night after J-C mentioned that he applied 2 of my patches to u-bo ot-arm next I tried to checkout that branch
to add some more stuff on top of my Dm365 patches.I could not see it either. But I have used that branch in the recent past. I don't know what is wrong.
Quoted 7 lines
Unfortunately the U-Boot ARM repository is in a really poor state. Commits and branches come and go more or less at ramdom.
I apologize for the inconveninces caused by that.
Jean-Christophe, we really need more consistency here.
I'm rebase the next now so yes I remove the old one which was for the precedent merge
Best Regards,
J.