Skip to contentSkip to conversation

New: resume from suspend to ram broken after suspend to disk

Bugme-new Andrew Morton 2 participants 2 messages Oct 10, 2009 1 message not in the archive ACPI

lore
Share & tools
lore

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]/

#1 lore raw
Quoted 17 lines · On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 13:40:45 GMT [email protected] wrote:

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14365

Summary: resume from suspend to ram broken after suspend to
disk
Product: Power Management
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 2.6.31
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: Hibernation/Suspend
AssignedTo: [email protected]
ReportedBy: [email protected]
Regression: No

It worries me that we have both "Power management, Hibernation/Suspend" and acpi-power-sleep-wake.

Are these duplicative?

Should we kill one off?

Do the acpi developers monitor the "Power Management" category?

Thanks.

#2 lore raw
Quoted 20 lines · Andrew Morton
Quoted 17 lines · On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 13:40:45 GMT [email protected] wrote:

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14365

Summary: resume from suspend to ram broken after suspend to
disk
Product: Power Management
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 2.6.31
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: Hibernation/Suspend
AssignedTo: [email protected]
ReportedBy: [email protected]
Regression: No

Quoted 4 lines

It worries me that we have both "Power management, Hibernation/Suspend" and acpi-power-sleep-wake.

Are these duplicative?

acpi-power-sleep-wake is more specific. Hibernation/Suspend bugs need not be. about ACPI.

Quoted 1 line

Should we kill one off?

I don't think that's necessary.

Quoted 1 line

Do the acpi developers monitor the "Power Management" category?

Yes, they do, to my knowledge.