Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Patch series from Dec 2009 which needs reviewing/applying

DISCUSSION Jack Morgenstein 2 participants 5 messages Feb 4, 2010 – Feb 10, 2010 4 messages not in the archive InfiniBand

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Roland,

Could you please review (and hopefully apply) the following patch series I submitted on Dec 17, 2009? These are really small patches.

The series seems to have "fallen between the cracks".

Thanks!
-Jack

[PATCH 0/2] fix SRQ WQE buffer initialization in liblmx4 and in mlx4_ib
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rdma/msg01911.html

[PATCH 1/2] libmlx4: initialize SRQ scatter entries when creating an SRQ
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rdma/msg01912.html

[PATCH 2/2] mlx4_ib: initialize SRQ scatter entries when creating an SRQ
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rdma/msg01910.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 201002041059.09368.jackm-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org

#2 lore raw
Quoted 2 lines

[PATCH 0/2] fix SRQ WQE buffer initialization in liblmx4 and in mlx4_ib
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rdma/msg01911.html

This isn't a patch AFAICT.

Quoted 2 lines

[PATCH 1/2] libmlx4: initialize SRQ scatter entries when creating an SRQ
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rdma/msg01912.html

Just applied this.

Quoted 2 lines

[PATCH 2/2] mlx4_ib: initialize SRQ scatter entries when creating an SRQ
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rdma/msg01910.html

Has been upstream as 4c425588 for a few weeks.

Signature · 7 lines
Roland Dreier  <[email protected]>
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): adapr4fwt68.fsf-BjVyx320WGW9gfZ95n9DRSW4+XlvGpQz@public.gmane.org

#4 lore raw
Quoted 5 lines · Roland Dreier

 > [PATCH 0/2] fix SRQ WQE buffer initialization in liblmx4 and in mlx4_ib > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rdma/msg01911.html

This isn't a patch AFAICT.

You are right, it isn't. Generally, when I submit a patch series, I do a [PATCH 0/??] to contain overall explanatory notes.
If you would rather I call the submission something else, that is no problem.

What would you like to see in the subject line for an e-mail which introduces a patch series?

-Jack
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 201002091920.41978.jackm-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org

#6 lore raw
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 5 lines

 > [PATCH 0/2] fix SRQ WQE buffer initialization in liblmx4 and in mlx4_ib > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rdma/msg01911.html

This isn't a patch AFAICT.

You are right, it isn't. Generally, when I submit a patch series, I do a [PATCH 0/??] to contain overall explanatory notes.
If you would rather I call the submission something else, that is no problem.

What would you like to see in the subject line for an e-mail which introduces a patch series?

The series is fine. I was just saying that the first email you pointed to had nothing to merge. As far as I know, the kernel mlx4_ib patch was already merged, and I merged the libmlx4 patch yesterday, so the SRQ initialization fixes are in place, right?

Signature · 7 lines
Roland Dreier  <[email protected]>
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): adamxziiat8.fsf-BjVyx320WGW9gfZ95n9DRSW4+XlvGpQz@public.gmane.org