cpuset: fix the problem that cpuset_mem_spread_node() returns an offline node(was: Re: [regression] cpuset,mm: update tasks' mems_allowed in time (58568d2))
PATCH 1/4 cpuset: fix the problem that cpuset_mem_spread_node() returns an offline node(was: Re: [regression] cpuset,mm: update tasks' mems_allowed in time (58568d2))
cpuset_mem_spread_node() returns an offline node, and causes an oops.
This patch fixes it by initializing task->mems_allowed to node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY], and updating task->mems_allowed when doing memory hotplug.
--- init/main.c | 2 +- kernel/cpuset.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------- kernel/kthread.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
init/main.c +1 -1
@@ -848,7 +848,7 @@ static int __init kernel_init(void * unused)/* * init can allocate pages on any node */ -set_mems_allowed (node_possible_map); +set_mems_allowed (node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY ]);/* * init can run on any cpu. */
kernel/cpuset.c +22 -8
@@ -920,9 +920,6 @@ static int update_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs,* call to guarantee_online_mems(), as we know no one is changing * our task's cpuset. * -* Hold callback_mutex around the two modifications of our tasks -* mems_allowed to synchronize with cpuset_mems_allowed(). -* * While the mm_struct we are migrating is typically from some * other task, the task_struct mems_allowed that we are hacking * is for our current task, which must allocate new pages for that
@@ -936,9 +933,23 @@ static void cpuset_migrate_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, const nodemask_t *from, tsk->mems_allowed = *to; +/* +* After current->mems_allowed is set to a new value, current will +* allocate new pages for the migrating memory region. So we must +* ensure that update of current->mems_allowed have been completed +* by this moment. +*/ +smp_wmb ();do_migrate_pages (mm, from, to,MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL );guarantee_online_mems (task_cs (tsk),&tsk->mems_allowed); + +/* +* After doing migrate pages, current will allocate new pages for +* itself not the other tasks. So we must ensure that update of +* current->mems_allowed have been completed by this moment. +*/ +smp_wmb (); }/*
@@ -1391,11 +1402,10 @@ static void cpuset_attach(struct cgroup_subsys *ss, struct cgroup *cont,if (cs == &top_cpuset) {cpumask_copy (cpus_attach, cpu_possible_mask); - to = node_possible_map; }else {guarantee_online_cpus (cs, cpus_attach); -guarantee_online_mems (cs, &to); } +guarantee_online_mems (cs, &to);/* do per-task migration stuff possibly for each in the threadgroup */ cpuset_attach_task (tsk, &to, cs);
@@ -2090,15 +2100,19 @@ static int cpuset_track_online_cpus(struct notifier_block *unused_nb,static int cpuset_track_online_nodes (struct notifier_block *self,unsigned long action,void *arg) { +nodemask_t oldmems; +cgroup_lock ();switch (action) {case MEM_ONLINE : -case MEM_OFFLINE : + oldmems = top_cpuset.mems_allowed;mutex_lock (&callback_mutex); top_cpuset.mems_allowed = node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY ];mutex_unlock (&callback_mutex); -if (action ==MEM_OFFLINE ) -scan_for_empty_cpusets (&top_cpuset); +update_tasks_nodemask (&top_cpuset, &oldmems,NULL ); +break ; +case MEM_OFFLINE : +scan_for_empty_cpusets (&top_cpuset);break ;default :break ;
kernel/kthread.c +1 -1
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ int kthreadd(void *unused)set_task_comm (tsk,"kthreadd" );ignore_signals (tsk);set_cpus_allowed_ptr (tsk, cpu_all_mask); -set_mems_allowed (node_possible_map); +set_mems_allowed (node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY ]); current->flags |=PF_NOFREEZE |PF_FREEZER_NOSIG ;
Signature · 8 lines
1.6.5.2 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Quoted 5 lines · Miao Xie
cpuset_mem_spread_node()returns an offline node, and causes an oops.This patch fixes it by initializing
task->mems_allowedto node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY], and updatingtask->mems_allowedwhen doing memory hotplug.
Thanks for these.
Quoted 46 lines
Signed-off-by Miao Xie <[email protected]>--- init/main.c | 2 +- kernel/cpuset.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------- kernel/kthread.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)init/main.c +1
-1@@ -848,7 +848,7 @@ static int __init kernel_init(void * unused)/* * init can allocate pages on any node */ -set_mems_allowed (node_possible_map); +set_mems_allowed (node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY ]);/* * init can run on any cpu. */ kernel/cpuset.c +7
-3@@ -920,9 +920,6 @@ static int update_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs,* call to guarantee_online_mems(), as we know no one is changing * our task's cpuset. * -* Hold callback_mutex around the two modifications of our tasks -* mems_allowed to synchronize with cpuset_mems_allowed(). -* * While the mm_struct we are migrating is typically from some * other task, the task_struct mems_allowed that we are hacking * is for our current task, which must allocate new pages for that @@ -936,9 +933,23 @@ static void cpuset_migrate_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, const nodemask_t *from, tsk->mems_allowed = *to; +/* +* After current->mems_allowed is set to a new value, current will +* allocate new pages for the migrating memory region. So we must +* ensure that update of current->mems_allowed have been completed +* by this moment. +*/ +smp_wmb ();
kernel/cpuset.c static void cpuset_migrate_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, const nodemask_t *from, · line 952
Quoted 10 lines
kernel/cpuset.c +7
-0do_migrate_pages (mm, from, to,MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL );guarantee_online_mems (task_cs (tsk),&tsk->mems_allowed); + +/* +* After doing migrate pages, current will allocate new pages for +* itself not the other tasks. So we must ensure that update of +* current->mems_allowed have been completed by this moment. +*/ +smp_wmb ();
The comments don't really make sense. A task always sees its own memory operations in program order. You keep saying *current* allocates pages so *current*->mems_allowed must be updated. This doesn't make sense. Do you mean to say tsk->?
Secondly, memory ordering operations do not ensure anything is completed. They only ensure ordering. So to make sense to use them, you generally need corresponding barriers in other code that can run concurrently.
So you need to comment what is being ordered (ie. at least 2 memory operations). And what other code might be running that requires this ordering.
You need to comment to all these sites and operations. Sprinkling of memory barriers just gets unmaintainable.
Quoted 55 lines
kernel/cpuset.c +8
-5}/* @@ -1391,11 +1402,10 @@ static void cpuset_attach(struct cgroup_subsys *ss, struct cgroup *cont,if (cs == &top_cpuset) {cpumask_copy (cpus_attach, cpu_possible_mask); - to = node_possible_map; }else {guarantee_online_cpus (cs, cpus_attach); -guarantee_online_mems (cs, &to); } +guarantee_online_mems (cs, &to);/* do per-task migration stuff possibly for each in the threadgroup */ cpuset_attach_task (tsk, &to, cs);@@ -2090,15 +2100,19 @@ static int cpuset_track_online_cpus(struct notifier_block *unused_nb,static int cpuset_track_online_nodes (struct notifier_block *self,unsigned long action,void *arg) { +nodemask_t oldmems; +cgroup_lock ();switch (action) {case MEM_ONLINE : -case MEM_OFFLINE : + oldmems = top_cpuset.mems_allowed;mutex_lock (&callback_mutex); top_cpuset.mems_allowed = node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY ];mutex_unlock (&callback_mutex); -if (action ==MEM_OFFLINE ) -scan_for_empty_cpusets (&top_cpuset); +update_tasks_nodemask (&top_cpuset, &oldmems,NULL ); +break ; +case MEM_OFFLINE : +scan_for_empty_cpusets (&top_cpuset);break ;default :break ;kernel/kthread.c +1
-1@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ int kthreadd(void *unused)set_task_comm (tsk,"kthreadd" );ignore_signals (tsk);set_cpus_allowed_ptr (tsk, cpu_all_mask); -set_mems_allowed (node_possible_map); +set_mems_allowed (node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY ]); current->flags |=PF_NOFREEZE |PF_FREEZER_NOSIG ;Signature · 1 line
1.6.5.2
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
on 2010-3-4 11:22, Nick Piggin wrote:
...
Quoted 28 lines
Quoted 7 lines
kernel/cpuset.c +7
-0+/* +* After current->mems_allowed is set to a new value, current will +* allocate new pages for the migrating memory region. So we must +* ensure that update of current->mems_allowed have been completed +* by this moment. +*/ +smp_wmb ();kernel/cpuset.c static void cpuset_migrate_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, const nodemask_t *from, · line 952
Quoted 10 lines
kernel/cpuset.c +7
-0do_migrate_pages (mm, from, to,MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL );guarantee_online_mems (task_cs (tsk),&tsk->mems_allowed); + +/* +* After doing migrate pages, current will allocate new pages for +* itself not the other tasks. So we must ensure that update of +* current->mems_allowed have been completed by this moment. +*/ +smp_wmb ();The comments don't really make sense. A task always sees its own memory operations in program order. You keep saying *current* allocates pages so *current*->mems_allowed must be updated. This doesn't make sense. Do you mean to say tsk->?
Secondly, memory ordering operations do not ensure anything is completed. They only ensure ordering. So to make sense to use them, you generally need corresponding barriers in other code that can run concurrently.
Quoted 6 lines
So you need to comment what is being ordered (ie. at least 2 memory operations). And what other code might be running that requires this ordering.
You need to comment to all these sites and operations. Sprinkling of memory barriers just gets unmaintainable.
My thought is wrong.
I thought the kernel might call do_migrate_pages() before updating ->mems_allowed, so I used smp_wmb() to ensure this order.
In fact, this problem which I worried can't occur, so these smp_wmb() is unnecessary.
Thanks!
Miao
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>