IPVS: replace sprintf to snprintf to avoid stack buffer overflow
Subsystems (4)
PATCH 1/1 IPVS: replace sprintf to snprintf to avoid stack buffer overflow
IPVS not check the length of pp->name, use sprintf will cause stack buffer overflow. struct ip_vs_protocol{} declare name as char *, if register a protocol as:
struct ip_vs_protocol ip_vs_test = {
.name = "aaaaaaaa....128...aaa",
.debug_packet = ip_vs_tcpudp_debug_packet,
};
when called ip_vs_tcpudp_debug_packet(), sprintf(buf, "%s TRUNCATED", pp->name); will cause stack buffer overflow.
--- net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto.c | 16 ++++++++-------- net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_ah_esp.c | 8 ++++---- 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto.c +8 -8
@@ -166,9 +166,9 @@ ip_vs_tcpudp_debug_packet_v4(struct ip_vs_protocol *pp, ih =skb_header_pointer (skb, offset,sizeof (_iph), &_iph);if (ih ==NULL ) -sprintf (buf,"%s TRUNCATED" , pp->name); +snprintf (buf,sizeof (buf),"%s TRUNCATED" , pp->name);else if (ih->frag_off &htons (IP_OFFSET )) -sprintf (buf,"%s %pI4->%pI4 frag" , +snprintf (buf,sizeof (buf),"%s %pI4->%pI4 frag" , pp->name, &ih->saddr, &ih->daddr);else {__be16 _ports[2 ], *pptr
@@ -176,10 +176,10 @@ ip_vs_tcpudp_debug_packet_v4(struct ip_vs_protocol *pp, pptr =skb_header_pointer (skb, offset + ih->ihl*4 ,sizeof (_ports), _ports);if (pptr ==NULL ) -sprintf (buf,"%s TRUNCATED %pI4->%pI4" , +snprintf (buf,sizeof (buf),"%s TRUNCATED %pI4->%pI4" , pp->name, &ih->saddr, &ih->daddr);else -sprintf (buf,"%s %pI4:%u->%pI4:%u" , +snprintf (buf,sizeof (buf),"%s %pI4:%u->%pI4:%u" , pp->name, &ih->saddr,ntohs (pptr[0 ]), &ih->daddr,ntohs (pptr[1 ]));
@@ -200,9 +200,9 @@ ip_vs_tcpudp_debug_packet_v6(struct ip_vs_protocol *pp, ih =skb_header_pointer (skb, offset,sizeof (_iph), &_iph);if (ih ==NULL ) -sprintf (buf,"%s TRUNCATED" , pp->name); +snprintf (buf,sizeof (buf),"%s TRUNCATED" , pp->name);else if (ih->nexthdr ==IPPROTO_FRAGMENT ) -sprintf (buf,"%s %pI6->%pI6 frag" , +snprintf (buf,sizeof (buf),"%s %pI6->%pI6 frag" , pp->name, &ih->saddr, &ih->daddr);else {__be16 _ports[2 ], *pptr;
@@ -210,10 +210,10 @@ ip_vs_tcpudp_debug_packet_v6(struct ip_vs_protocol *pp, pptr =skb_header_pointer (skb, offset +sizeof (struct ipv6hdr ),sizeof (_ports), _ports);if (pptr ==NULL ) -sprintf (buf,"%s TRUNCATED %pI6->%pI6" , +snprintf (buf,sizeof (buf),"%s TRUNCATED %pI6->%pI6" , pp->name, &ih->saddr, &ih->daddr);else -sprintf (buf,"%s %pI6:%u->%pI6:%u" , +snprintf (buf,sizeof (buf),"%s %pI6:%u->%pI6:%u" , pp->name, &ih->saddr,ntohs (pptr[0 ]), &ih->daddr,ntohs (pptr[1 ]));
net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_ah_esp.c +4 -4
@@ -136,9 +136,9 @@ ah_esp_debug_packet_v4(struct ip_vs_protocol *pp, const struct sk_buff *skb, ih =skb_header_pointer (skb, offset,sizeof (_iph), &_iph);if (ih ==NULL ) -sprintf (buf,"%s TRUNCATED" , pp->name); +snprintf (buf,sizeof (buf),"%s TRUNCATED" , pp->name);else -sprintf (buf,"%s %pI4->%pI4" , +snprintf (buf,sizeof (buf),"%s %pI4->%pI4" , pp->name, &ih->saddr, &ih->daddr);pr_debug ("%s: %s\n" , msg, buf);
@@ -154,9 +154,9 @@ ah_esp_debug_packet_v6(struct ip_vs_protocol *pp, const struct sk_buff *skb, ih =skb_header_pointer (skb, offset,sizeof (_iph), &_iph);if (ih ==NULL ) -sprintf (buf,"%s TRUNCATED" , pp->name); +snprintf (buf,sizeof (buf),"%s TRUNCATED" , pp->name);else -sprintf (buf,"%s %pI6->%pI6" , +snprintf (buf,sizeof (buf),"%s %pI6->%pI6" , pp->name, &ih->saddr, &ih->daddr);pr_debug ("%s: %s\n" , msg, buf);
Signature · 1 line
1.6.5.3
Quoted 10 lines · On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:50 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
IPVS not check the length of
pp->name, use sprintf will cause stack buffer overflow. struct ip_vs_protocol{} declare name as char *, if register a protocol as:
structip_vs_protocolip_vs_test= {
.name = "aaaaaaaa....128...aaa",
.debug_packet =ip_vs_tcpudp_debug_packet,
};when called
ip_vs_tcpudp_debug_packet(),sprintf(buf, "%s TRUNCATED", pp->name); will cause stack buffer overflow.
Long messages will be truncated instead of buffer overflow. We need to find a way to handle long messages elegantly.
Signature · 2 lines
Regards, Changli Gao([email protected])
Simon Horman
maintainerQuoted 8 lines · Changli Gao
Quoted 7 lines · On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:50 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
IPVS not check the length of
pp->name, use sprintf will cause stack buffer overflow. struct ip_vs_protocol{} declare name as char *, if register a protocol as:
structip_vs_protocolip_vs_test= {
.name = "aaaaaaaa....128...aaa",
.debug_packet =ip_vs_tcpudp_debug_packet,
};
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
when called
ip_vs_tcpudp_debug_packet(),sprintf(buf, "%s TRUNCATED", pp->name); will cause stack buffer overflow.Long messages will be truncated instead of buffer overflow. We need to find a way to handle long messages elegantly.
Its really a corner case. In practice protocol modules don't have really long names. And if one was merged that did, the buffer size could be increased at that time.
So while I think its reasonable to protect against something unexpected in a protocol-module name crashing the system. Especially as that can be achieved without any real overhead. I don't think we need to sanitise the output.
Quoted 11 lines · On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 10:50:20AM +0800, [email protected] wrote:
IPVS not check the length of
pp->name, use sprintf will cause stack buffer overflow. struct ip_vs_protocol{} declare name as char *, if register a protocol as:
structip_vs_protocolip_vs_test= {
.name = "aaaaaaaa....128...aaa",
.debug_packet =ip_vs_tcpudp_debug_packet,
};when called
ip_vs_tcpudp_debug_packet(),sprintf(buf, "%s TRUNCATED", pp->name); will cause stack buffer overflow.Signed-off-by Zhitong Wang <[email protected]>
I think that the simple answer is, don't do that.
But your patch seems entirely reasonable to me.
Patrick, please consider merging this.
Quoted 8 lines · Simon Horman
Quoted 7 lines · On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 10:50:20AM +0800, [email protected] wrote:
IPVS not check the length of
pp->name, use sprintf will cause stack buffer overflow. struct ip_vs_protocol{} declare name as char *, if register a protocol as:
structip_vs_protocolip_vs_test= {
.name = "aaaaaaaa....128...aaa",
.debug_packet =ip_vs_tcpudp_debug_packet,
};
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
when called
ip_vs_tcpudp_debug_packet(),sprintf(buf, "%s TRUNCATED", pp->name); will cause stack buffer overflow.Signed-off-by Zhitong Wang <[email protected]>I think that the simple answer is, don't do that.
Indeed.
Quoted 5 lines
But your patch seems entirely reasonable to me.
Acked-by Simon Horman <[email protected]>Patrick, please consider merging this.
I think this fix is a bit silly, we can simply print the name in the pr_debug() statement and avoid both the potential overflow and truncation.
How does this look?
net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto.c +12 -16
@@ -166,26 +166,24 @@ ip_vs_tcpudp_debug_packet_v4(struct ip_vs_protocol *pp, ih =skb_header_pointer (skb, offset,sizeof (_iph), &_iph);if (ih ==NULL ) -sprintf (buf,"%s TRUNCATED" , pp->name); +sprintf (buf,"TRUNCATED" );else if (ih->frag_off &htons (IP_OFFSET )) -sprintf (buf,"%s %pI4->%pI4 frag" , - pp->name, &ih->saddr, &ih->daddr); +sprintf (buf,"%pI4->%pI4 frag" , &ih->saddr, &ih->daddr);else {__be16 _ports[2 ], *pptr ; pptr =skb_header_pointer (skb, offset + ih->ihl*4 ,sizeof (_ports), _ports);if (pptr ==NULL ) -sprintf (buf,"%s TRUNCATED %pI4->%pI4" , - pp->name, &ih->saddr, &ih->daddr); +sprintf (buf,"TRUNCATED %pI4->%pI4" , + &ih->saddr, &ih->daddr);else -sprintf (buf,"%s %pI4:%u->%pI4:%u" , - pp->name, +sprintf (buf,"%pI4:%u->%pI4:%u" , &ih->saddr,ntohs (pptr[0 ]), &ih->daddr,ntohs (pptr[1 ])); } -pr_debug ("%s: %s\n" , msg, buf); +pr_debug ("%s: %s %s\n" , msg, pp->name, buf); }#ifdef CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6
@@ -200,26 +198,24 @@ ip_vs_tcpudp_debug_packet_v6(struct ip_vs_protocol *pp, ih =skb_header_pointer (skb, offset,sizeof (_iph), &_iph);if (ih ==NULL ) -sprintf (buf,"%s TRUNCATED" , pp->name); +sprintf (buf,"TRUNCATED" );else if (ih->nexthdr ==IPPROTO_FRAGMENT ) -sprintf (buf,"%s %pI6->%pI6 frag" , - pp->name, &ih->saddr, &ih->daddr); +sprintf (buf,"%pI6->%pI6 frag" , &ih->saddr, &ih->daddr);else {__be16 _ports[2 ], *pptr; pptr =skb_header_pointer (skb, offset +sizeof (struct ipv6hdr ),sizeof (_ports), _ports);if (pptr ==NULL ) -sprintf (buf,"%s TRUNCATED %pI6->%pI6" , - pp->name, &ih->saddr, &ih->daddr); +sprintf (buf,"TRUNCATED %pI6->%pI6" , + &ih->saddr, &ih->daddr);else -sprintf (buf,"%s %pI6:%u->%pI6:%u" , - pp->name, +sprintf (buf,"%pI6:%u->%pI6:%u" , &ih->saddr,ntohs (pptr[0 ]), &ih->daddr,ntohs (pptr[1 ])); } - pr_debug("%s: %s\n", msg, buf); + pr_debug("%s: %s %s\n", msg, pp->name, buf); }#endif
net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_ah_esp.c +6 -8
@@ -136,12 +136,11 @@ ah_esp_debug_packet_v4(struct ip_vs_protocol *pp, const struct sk_buff *skb, ih =skb_header_pointer (skb, offset,sizeof (_iph), &_iph);if (ih ==NULL ) -sprintf (buf,"%s TRUNCATED" , pp->name); +sprintf (buf,"TRUNCATED" );else -sprintf (buf,"%s %pI4->%pI4" , - pp->name, &ih->saddr, &ih->daddr); +sprintf (buf,"%pI4->%pI4" , &ih->saddr, &ih->daddr); -pr_debug ("%s: %s\n" , msg, buf); +pr_debug ("%s: %s %s\n" , msg, pp->name, buf); }#ifdef CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6
@@ -154,12 +153,11 @@ ah_esp_debug_packet_v6(struct ip_vs_protocol *pp, const struct sk_buff *skb, ih =skb_header_pointer (skb, offset,sizeof (_iph), &_iph);if (ih ==NULL ) -sprintf (buf,"%s TRUNCATED" , pp->name); +sprintf (buf,"TRUNCATED" );else -sprintf (buf,"%s %pI6->%pI6" , - pp->name, &ih->saddr, &ih->daddr); +sprintf (buf,"%pI6->%pI6" , &ih->saddr, &ih->daddr); - pr_debug("%s: %s\n", msg, buf); + pr_debug("%s: %s %s\n", msg, pp->name, buf); }#endif
Quoted 22 lines · Patrick McHardy
Quoted 8 lines · Simon Horman
Quoted 7 lines · On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 10:50:20AM +0800, [email protected] wrote:
IPVS not check the length of
pp->name, use sprintf will cause stack buffer overflow. struct ip_vs_protocol{} declare name as char *, if register a protocol as:
structip_vs_protocolip_vs_test= {
.name = "aaaaaaaa....128...aaa",
.debug_packet =ip_vs_tcpudp_debug_packet,
};Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
when called
ip_vs_tcpudp_debug_packet(),sprintf(buf, "%s TRUNCATED", pp->name); will cause stack buffer overflow.Signed-off-by Zhitong Wang <[email protected]>I think that the simple answer is, don't do that.
Indeed.
Quoted 4 lines
But your patch seems entirely reasonable to me.
Acked-by Simon Horman <[email protected]>
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 1 line
Patrick, please consider merging this.
I think this fix is a bit silly, we can simply print the name in the
pr_debug()statement and avoid both the potential overflow and truncation.How does this look?
Looks good to me:
Quoted 26 lines · Simon Horman
Quoted 25 lines · Patrick McHardy
Quoted 8 lines · Simon Horman
Quoted 7 lines · On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 10:50:20AM +0800, [email protected] wrote:
IPVS not check the length of
pp->name, use sprintf will cause stack buffer overflow. struct ip_vs_protocol{} declare name as char *, if register a protocol as:
structip_vs_protocolip_vs_test= {
.name = "aaaaaaaa....128...aaa",
.debug_packet =ip_vs_tcpudp_debug_packet,
};Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 4 lines
when called
ip_vs_tcpudp_debug_packet(),sprintf(buf, "%s TRUNCATED", pp->name); will cause stack buffer overflow.Signed-off-by Zhitong Wang <[email protected]>I think that the simple answer is, don't do that.
Indeed.
Quoted 5 lines
But your patch seems entirely reasonable to me.
Acked-by Simon Horman <[email protected]>Patrick, please consider merging this.
I think this fix is a bit silly, we can simply print the name in the
pr_debug()statement and avoid both the potential overflow and truncation.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line
How does this look?
Looks good to me:
Acked-by Simon Horman <[email protected]>
Thanks, I've applied the patch.