Phylib polling when doing mdio_read will cause system response and transfer speed drop
Subsystems (2)
Hi Andy and David,
After I posted a patch to add phylib supporting in drivers/net/fec.c, we found performance drop regressions on Freescale i.MX51 babbage board.
Bug tracker is here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-fsl-imx51/+bug/546649
I found the root cause is the polling operation in the mdio_read function. When we transfer large files, we experienced many times of timeout issue. So I got several question here:
1. Need I return -ETIMEDOUT when polling timeout. If I don't return -ETIMEOUT, the performance improved a lot. And after check other drivers, some don't return anything, some return 0, some return negative value. What's the rule for this mdio_read polling timeout case.
2. How to do polling busy waiting? Normally, we won't buys wait very long in polling. But hardware is not perfect every time. Running cpu_relax() 10000 times in polling will cause our system response very bad when hardware don't set the flag as we expected. Maybe udelay(25) 10 times or msleep(1) 10 times is better than that.
I got a patch to recover this issue, http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=roc/ubuntu-lucid.git;a=commitdiff;h=5d77e3409b319ca84183bf1d2fd158a9c864e03f.
Thanks a lot,
Signature · 5 lines
Bryan Wu <[email protected]> Kernel Developer +86.138-1617-6545 Mobile Ubuntu Kernel Team | Hardware Enablement Team Canonical Ltd. www.canonical.com Ubuntu - Linux for human beings | www.ubuntu.com
Quoted 3 lines · Bryan Wu
I found the root cause is the polling operation in the
mdio_readfunction. When we transfer large files, we experienced many times of timeout issue. So I got several question here:
Same here, I saw the 'MDIO Timeout' Message occasionally.
Quoted 5 lines
1. Need I return
-ETIMEDOUTwhen polling timeout. If I don't return-ETIMEOUT, the performance improved a lot. And after check other drivers, some don't return anything, some return 0, some return negative value. What's the rule for thismdio_readpolling timeout case.
Quoted 8 lines
2. How to do polling busy waiting? Normally, we won't buys wait very long in polling. But hardware is not perfect every time. Running
cpu_relax()10000 times in polling will cause our system response very bad when hardware don't set the flag as we expected. Maybe udelay(25) 10 times or msleep(1) 10 times is better than that.I got a patch to recover this issue,
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=roc/ubuntu-lucid.git;a=commitdiff;h=5d77e3409b319ca84183bf1d2fd158a9c864e03f.
Can't help with the details, but the patch seems to help here, too (and not only because of the removed printk ;)).
Regards,
Wolfram
Signature · 2 lines
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |