PL330: Add common core driver
PATCH 1/7 PL330: Add common core driver
From: Jassi Brar <[email protected]>
PL330 is a configurable DMA controller PrimeCell device. The register map of the device is well defined. The configuration of a particular implementation can be read from the six configuration registers CR0-4,Dn.
This patch implements a driver for the specification:-
http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ddi0424a/DDI0424A_dmac_pl330_r0p0_trm.pdf
The exported interface should be sufficient to implement a driver for any DMA API.
---
Design:-
o The DMA API driver submits 'request' to PL330 engine.
A request is a sequence of DMA 'xfers' to be done before the DMA API driver wants to be notified.
A 'xfer' is the finest grain of DMA transaction that specifies how many _bytes_ are to be move from 'source address' to 'destination address'. A req can be a scatter-Gather-List.
o PL330 engine accepts requests from DMA API drivers in ping-pong manner, i.e, at any time maximum two reqs can be queued. Other reqs have to be buffered by DMA API drivers and enqueued whenever a req-finish callback is made.
o Only necessary resources for a DMAC are allocated according to the configuration read from DMAC during startup.
Since MicroCode(MC) buffers are a channel's resource, they are allocated just once during startup and reused every time. A channel has its MC buff divided into two equal parts - one for each ping-pong request. The DMA API driver can specify the size of MC buffer that each channel (hence req) has, which decides the maximum possible total xfer size that the channel can do in one request.
o It is possible to do DMA request at different channel configuration every time; this feature can be used by DMA API drivers for implementing 'server' channels that are not dedicated to a particular client but accept requests from any client. Of course, such channels won't be able to guarantee any QOS.
o Privilege options can be specified for each submitted request. Whereas, this core driver automatically set appropriate security level of the channel for each request, after taking into account the security level of the DMAC and the peripheral the request is destined for.
o TODO: Desirable is to implement true LLI using MicroCode modification during each request enqueue, so that the xfer continues even while IRQ is handled and callbacks made. That should avoid discontinuity of a few usecs between active requests.
To me, there doesn't seem to be a way to flush ICACHE of a channel without halting it, so we can't modify MicroCode in runtime. Using two channels per client to achieve true LLI is the last resort.
So currently, cpu intervention is required to trigger each request.
o TODO: PAUSE/RESUME support. Currently the DMA API driver has to emulate it.
Testing:-
The implementation has been tested with the S3C DMA API driver submitted toady.
This exact driver, and slightly modified version of S3C DMA API Driver, has been tested rigorously for scenarios like 8 concurrent Mem->Mem transfers at various burst sizes while also playing AUDIO over another DMAC.
The implementation is efficient enough to play smooth CD quality audio with a period size as small as 12 bytes and buffer of 2 periods(best case scenario). Also, the driver recovers gracefully if some channel locks due to resource starvation and the next request submission has chance no lesser than the last successful one.
arch/arm/common/Kconfig | 3 + arch/arm/common/Makefile | 1 + arch/arm/common/pl330.c | 1966 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/pl330.h | 217 ++++ 4 files changed, 2187 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 arch/arm/common/pl330.c create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/pl330.h
arch/arm/common/Kconfig +3 -0
@@ -40,3 +40,6 @@ config SHARP_SCOOP config COMMON_CLKDEV bool + +config PL330 + bool
arch/arm/common/Makefile +1 -0
@@ -17,3 +17,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_IXP2000) += uengine.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_IXP23XX) += uengine.o obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_HOST_ITE8152) += it8152.o obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLKDEV) += clkdev.o +obj-$(CONFIG_PL330) += pl330.o
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +1966 -0
1,966 lines not on this page · raw message
arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/pl330.h new file +217 -0
217 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
1.6.2.5
PATCH 1/7 PL330: Add common core driver
2010/4/21 <[email protected]>:
Quoted 4 lines
PL330 is a configurable DMA controller PrimeCell device. The register map of the device is well defined. The configuration of a particular implementation can be read from the six configuration registers CR0-4,Dn.
I think this looks better for every iteration and is definately ripe for merge, so FWIW:
Quoted 2 lines
The exported interface should be sufficient to implement a driver for any DMA API.
Will you make an attempt at doing this in time for the next merge window as well? That would be perfect.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
PATCH 1/7 PL330: Add common core driver
Quoted 10 lines · Linus Walleij
2010/4/21 ?<[email protected]>:
Quoted 4 lines
PL330 is a configurable DMA controller PrimeCell device. The register map of the device is well defined. The configuration of a particular implementation can be read from the six configuration registers CR0-4,Dn.
I think this looks better for every iteration and is definately ripe for merge, so FWIW:
Acked-by Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Thanks.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines
The exported interface should be sufficient to implement a driver for any DMA API.
Will you make an attempt at doing this in time for the next merge window as well? That would be perfect.
Actually I said "any DMA API" i.e, some platform, like S3C, may choose to implement their own API.
You mean the DMA engine driver for PL330, right? Since Joonyoung's driver was pre-empted by these patches, he might want to re-write parts of his driver for this backend. If he doesn't show any interest in a few days, I'll do it.
Btw, I think that driver should be divided in two files drivers/dma/api-pl330.c with common code and drivers/dma/<soc>-pl330.c for platform specific stuff like IRQ, registers base mapping and other quirks(if any). Any opinions?
PATCH 1/7 PL330: Add common core driver
2010/4/24 jassi brar <[email protected]>:
Quoted 4 lines
You mean the DMA engine driver for PL330, right? Since Joonyoung's driver was pre-empted by these patches, he might want to re-write parts of his driver for this backend. If he doesn't show any interest in a few days, I'll do it.
Great, my interest here is mainly that this PrimeCell has a DMAengine API, if it e.g. runs the DMAengine tests nicely, we know it works.
Quoted 4 lines
Btw, I think that driver should be divided in two files
drivers/dma/api-pl330.cwith common code and drivers/dma/<soc>-pl330.c for platform specific stuff like IRQ, registers base mapping and other quirks(if any). Any opinions?
Sounds like a plan, this design pattern is already in a lot of shared peripherals like drivers/usb/musb for example.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
PATCH 1/7 PL330: Add common core driver
Quoted 10 lines · Linus Walleij
2010/4/24 jassi brar <[email protected]>:
Quoted 4 lines
You mean the DMA engine driver for PL330, right? Since Joonyoung's driver was pre-empted by these patches, he might want to re-write parts of his driver for this backend. If he doesn't show any interest in a few days, I'll do it.
Great, my interest here is mainly that this PrimeCell has a DMAengine API, if it e.g. runs the DMAengine tests nicely, we know it works.
I'd like to make a decision once and for-all about whether to go with DMAengine or try7 and design something that SoC types can agree on.
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Btw, I think that driver should be divided in two files
drivers/dma/api-pl330.cwith common code and drivers/dma/<soc>-pl330.c for platform specific stuff like IRQ, registers base mapping and other quirks(if any). Any opinions?
Possibly, but I think it may be better to pass these things via platform device for registers and irqs, and platform data for the quirks.
Signature · 4 lines
Ben Q: What's a light-year? A: One-third less calories than a regular year.
PATCH 1/7 PL330: Add common core driver
Quoted 9 lines · Ben Dooks
Quoted 5 lines · Linus Walleij
2010/4/24 jassi brar <[email protected]>:
Quoted 4 lines
Btw, I think that driver should be divided in two files
drivers/dma/api-pl330.cwith common code and drivers/dma/<soc>-pl330.c for platform specific stuff like IRQ, registers base mapping and other quirks(if any). Any opinions?Possibly, but I think it may be better to pass these things via platform device for registers and irqs, and platform data for the quirks.
Some platforms implement just one i/f either secure or non-secure, others might implement both. Having a separate file for platforms would make it possible to switch between secure and non-secure i/fs acc to the needs of the platform. Similarly for the DMAC reset mechanism.
Also, I am afraid, managing quirks in common code might get trickier over time.
PATCH 1/7 PL330: Add common core driver
In reply to jassisinghbrar at gmail.comQuoted 196 lines · jassisinghbrar at gmail.com
From: Jassi Brar <[email protected]>
PL330 is a configurable DMA controller PrimeCell device. The register map of the device is well defined. The configuration of a particular implementation can be read from the six configuration registers CR0-4,Dn.
This patch implements a driver for the specification:-
http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ddi0424a/DDI0424A_dmac_pl330_r0p0_trm.pdfThe exported interface should be sufficient to implement a driver for any DMA API.
Signed-off-by Jassi Brar <[email protected]>---
Design:-
o The DMA API driver submits 'request' to PL330 engine.
A request is a sequence of DMA 'xfers' to be done before the DMA API driver wants to be notified.
A 'xfer' is the finest grain of DMA transaction that specifies how many _bytes_ are to be move from 'source address' to 'destination address'. A req can be a scatter-Gather-List.o PL330 engine accepts requests from DMA API drivers in ping-pong manner, i.e, at any time maximum two reqs can be queued. Other reqs have to be buffered by DMA API drivers and enqueued whenever a req-finish callback is made.
o Only necessary resources for a DMAC are allocated according to the configuration read from DMAC during startup.
Since MicroCode(MC) buffers are a channel's resource, they are allocated just once during startup and reused every time. A channel has its MC buff divided into two equal parts - one for each ping-pong request. The DMA API driver can specify the size of MC buffer that each channel (hence req) has, which decides the maximum possible total xfer size that the channel can do in one request.o It is possible to do DMA request at different channel configuration every time; this feature can be used by DMA API drivers for implementing 'server' channels that are not dedicated to a particular client but accept requests from any client. Of course, such channels won't be able to guarantee any QOS.
o Privilege options can be specified for each submitted request. Whereas, this core driver automatically set appropriate security level of the channel for each request, after taking into account the security level of the DMAC and the peripheral the request is destined for.
o TODO: Desirable is to implement true LLI using MicroCode modification during each request enqueue, so that the xfer continues even while IRQ is handled and callbacks made. That should avoid discontinuity of a few usecs between active requests.
To me, there doesn't seem to be a way to flush ICACHE of a channel without halting it, so we can't modify MicroCode in runtime. Using two channels per client to achieve true LLI is the last resort.
So currently, cpu intervention is required to trigger each request.
o TODO: PAUSE/RESUME support. Currently the DMA API driver has to emulate it.Testing:-
The implementation has been tested with the S3C DMA API driver submitted toady.This exact driver, and slightly modified version of S3C DMA API Driver, has been tested rigorously for scenarios like 8 concurrent
Mem->Memtransfers at various burst sizes while also playing AUDIO over another DMAC.The implementation is efficient enough to play smooth CD quality audio with a period size as small as 12 bytes and buffer of 2 periods(best case scenario). Also, the driver recovers gracefully if some channel locks due to resource starvation and the next request submission has chance no lesser than the last successful one.
arch/arm/common/Kconfig | 3 + arch/arm/common/Makefile | 1 + arch/arm/common/pl330.c | 1966 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/pl330.h | 217 ++++ 4 files changed, 2187 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 arch/arm/common/pl330.c create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/pl330.harch/arm/common/Kconfig +3
-0@@ -40,3 +40,6 @@ config SHARP_SCOOP config COMMON_CLKDEV bool + +config PL330 + boolarch/arm/common/Makefile +1
-0@@ -17,3 +17,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_IXP2000) += uengine.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_IXP23XX) += uengine.o obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_HOST_ITE8152) += it8152.o obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLKDEV) += clkdev.o +obj-$(CONFIG_PL330) += pl330.oarch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +88
-0@@ -0,0 +1,1966 @@ +/* linux/arch/arm/common/pl330.c +* +* Copyright (C) 2010 Samsung Electronics Co Ltd. +* Jaswinder Singh <[email protected]> +* +* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify +* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by +* the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or +* (at your option) any later version. +* +* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, +* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of +* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the +* GNU General Public License for more details. +* +* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License +* along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software +* Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. +*/ + +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/init.h> +#include <linux/slab.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/string.h> +#include <linux/io.h> +#include <linux/delay.h> +#include <linux/interrupt.h> +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h> + +#include <asm/hardware/pl330.h> + +/* Register and Bit field Definitions */ +#define DS 0x0 +#define DS_ST_STOP 0x0 +#define DS_ST_EXEC 0x1 +#define DS_ST_CMISS 0x2 +#define DS_ST_UPDTPC 0x3 +#define DS_ST_WFE 0x4 +#define DS_ST_ATBRR 0x5 +#define DS_ST_QBUSY 0x6 +#define DS_ST_WFP 0x7 +#define DS_ST_KILL 0x8 +#define DS_ST_CMPLT 0x9 +#define DS_ST_FLTCMP 0xe +#define DS_ST_FAULT 0xf + +#define DPC 0x4 +#define INTEN 0x20 +#define ES 0x24 +#define INTSTATUS 0x28 +#define INTCLR 0x2c +#define FSM 0x30 +#define FSC 0x34 +#define FTM 0x38 + +#define _FTC 0x40 +#define FTC (n) (_FTC + (n)*0x4) + +#define _CS 0x100 +#define CS (n) (_CS + (n)*0x8) +#define CS_CNS (1 << 21) + +#define _CPC 0x104 +#define CPC (n) (_CPC + (n)*0x8) + +#define _SA 0x400 +#define SA (n) (_SA + (n)*0x20) + +#define _DA 0x404 +#define DA (n) (_DA + (n)*0x20) + +#define _CC 0x408 +#define CC (n) (_CC + (n)*0x20) + +#define CC_SRCINC (1 << 0) +#define CC_DSTINC (1 << 14) +#define CC_SRCPRI (1 << 8) +#define CC_DSTPRI (1 << 22) +#define CC_SRCNS (1 << 9) +#define CC_DSTNS (1 << 23) +#define CC_SRCIA (1 << 10) +#define CC_DSTIA (1 << 24) +#define CC_SRCBRSTLEN_SHFT 4 +#define CC_DSTBRSTLEN_SHFT 18 +#define CC_SRCBRSTSIZE_SHFT 1 +#define CC_DSTBRSTSIZE_SHFT 15 +#define CC_SRCCCTRL_SHFT 11
arch/arm/common/pl330.c line 98
Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +10
-0+#define CC_SRCCCTRL_MASK 0x7 +#define CC_DSTCCTRL_SHFT 25 +#define CC_DRCCCTRL_MASK 0x7 +#define CC_SWAP_SHFT 28 + +#define _LC0 0x40c +#define LC0 (n) (_LC0 + (n)*0x20) + +#define _LC1 0x410 +#define LC1 (n) (_LC1 + (n)*0x20)
do we really need the _ versions of each of these, or can they be merged into thier non _ counterparts?
Quoted 21 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +21
-0+#define DBGSTATUS 0xd00 +#define DBG_BUSY (1 << 0) + +#define DBGCMD 0xd04 +#define DBGINST0 0xd08 +#define DBGINST1 0xd0c + +#define CR0 0xe00 +#define CR1 0xe04 +#define CR2 0xe08 +#define CR3 0xe0c +#define CR4 0xe10 +#define CRD 0xe14 + +#define PERIPH_ID 0xfe0 +#define PCELL_ID 0xff0 + +#define CR0_PERIPH_REQ_SET (1 << 0) +#define CR0_BOOT_EN_SET (1 << 1) +#define CR0_BOOT_MAN_NS (1 << 2) +#define CR0_NUM_CHANS_SHIFT 4
arch/arm/common/pl330.c line 130
Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +10
-0+#define CR0_NUM_CHANS_MASK 0x7 +#define CR0_NUM_PERIPH_SHIFT 12 +#define CR0_NUM_PERIPH_MASK 0x1f +#define CR0_NUM_EVENTS_SHIFT 17 +#define CR0_NUM_EVENTS_MASK 0x1f + +#define CR1_ICACHE_LEN_SHIFT 0 +#define CR1_ICACHE_LEN_MASK 0x7 +#define CR1_NUM_ICACHELINES_SHIFT 4 +#define CR1_NUM_ICACHELINES_MASK 0xf
are these aligned, or is it my mail client ignoring the formatting?
Quoted 93 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +93
-0+#define CRD_DATA_WIDTH_SHIFT 0 +#define CRD_DATA_WIDTH_MASK 0x7 +#define CRD_WR_CAP_SHIFT 4 +#define CRD_WR_CAP_MASK 0x7 +#define CRD_WR_Q_DEP_SHIFT 8 +#define CRD_WR_Q_DEP_MASK 0xf +#define CRD_RD_CAP_SHIFT 12 +#define CRD_RD_CAP_MASK 0x7 +#define CRD_RD_Q_DEP_SHIFT 16 +#define CRD_RD_Q_DEP_MASK 0xf +#define CRD_DATA_BUFF_SHIFT 20 +#define CRD_DATA_BUFF_MASK 0x3ff + +#define PART 0x330 +#define DESIGNER 0x41 +#define REVISION 0x0 +#define INTEG_CFG 0x0 +#define PERIPH_ID_VAL ((PART << 0) | (DESIGNER << 12) \ + | (REVISION << 20) | (INTEG_CFG << 24)) + +#define PCELL_ID_VAL 0xb105f00d + +#define PL330_STATE_STOPPED (1 << 0) +#define PL330_STATE_EXECUTING (1 << 1) +#define PL330_STATE_WFE (1 << 2) +#define PL330_STATE_FAULTING (1 << 3) +#define PL330_STATE_COMPLETING (1 << 4) +#define PL330_STATE_WFP (1 << 5) +#define PL330_STATE_KILLING (1 << 6) +#define PL330_STATE_FAULT_COMPLETING (1 << 7) +#define PL330_STATE_CACHEMISS (1 << 8) +#define PL330_STATE_UPDTPC (1 << 9) +#define PL330_STATE_ATBARRIER (1 << 10) +#define PL330_STATE_QUEUEBUSY (1 << 11) +#define PL330_STATE_INVALID (1 << 15) + +#define PL330_STABLE_STATES (PL330_STATE_STOPPED | PL330_STATE_EXECUTING \ + | PL330_STATE_WFE | PL330_STATE_FAULTING) + +#define CMD_DMAADDH 0x54 +#define CMD_DMAEND 0x00 +#define CMD_DMAFLUSHP 0x35 +#define CMD_DMAGO 0xa0 +#define CMD_DMALD 0x04 +#define CMD_DMALDP 0x25 +#define CMD_DMALP 0x20 +#define CMD_DMALPEND 0x28 +#define CMD_DMAKILL 0x01 +#define CMD_DMAMOV 0xbc +#define CMD_DMANOP 0x18 +#define CMD_DMARMB 0x12 +#define CMD_DMASEV 0x34 +#define CMD_DMAST 0x08 +#define CMD_DMASTP 0x29 +#define CMD_DMASTZ 0x0c +#define CMD_DMAWFE 0x36 +#define CMD_DMAWFP 0x30 +#define CMD_DMAWMB 0x13 + +#define SZ_DMAADDH 3 +#define SZ_DMAEND 1 +#define SZ_DMAFLUSHP 2 +#define SZ_DMALD 1 +#define SZ_DMALDP 2 +#define SZ_DMALP 2 +#define SZ_DMALPEND 2 +#define SZ_DMAKILL 1 +#define SZ_DMAMOV 6 +#define SZ_DMANOP 1 +#define SZ_DMARMB 1 +#define SZ_DMASEV 2 +#define SZ_DMAST 1 +#define SZ_DMASTP 2 +#define SZ_DMASTZ 1 +#define SZ_DMAWFE 2 +#define SZ_DMAWFP 2 +#define SZ_DMAWMB 1 +#define SZ_DMAGO 6 + +#define BRST_LEN (ccr) ((((ccr) >> CC_SRCBRSTLEN_SHFT) & 0xf) + 1) +#define BRST_SIZE (ccr) (1 << (((ccr) >> CC_SRCBRSTSIZE_SHFT) & 0x7)) + +#define BYTE_TO_BURST (b, ccr) ((b) / BRST_SIZE(ccr) / BRST_LEN(ccr)) +#define BURST_TO_BYTE (c, ccr) ((c) * BRST_SIZE(ccr) * BRST_LEN(ccr)) + +/* +* With 256 bytes, we can do more than 2.5MB and 5MB xfers per req +* at 1byte/burst for P<->M and M<->M respectively. +* For typical scenario, at 1word/burst, 10MB and 20MB xfers per req +* should be enough for P<->M and M<->M respectively. +*/ +#define MCODE_BUFF_PER_REQ 256 +
arch/arm/common/pl330.c line 234
Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +10
-0+/* +* Mark a _pl330_req as free. +* We do it by writing DMAEND as the first instruction +* because no valid request is going to have DMAEND as +* its first instruction to execute. +*/ +#define MARK_FREE (req) do { \ + _emit_END(0, (req)->mc_cpu); \ + (req)->mc_len = 0; \ + } while (0)
I think inline functions for these would be easier to read.
Quoted 14 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +14
-0+/* If the _pl330_req is available to the client */ +#define IS_FREE (req) (*((u8 *)((req)->mc_cpu)) == CMD_DMAEND) + +/* Use this _only_ to wait on transient states */ +#define UNTIL (t, s) while (!(_state(t) & (s))) cpu_relax(); + +#ifdef PL330_DEBUG_MCGEN +static unsigned cmd_line; +#define PL330_DBGCMD_DUMP(off, x...) do { \ + printk("%x:", cmd_line); \ + printk(x); \ + cmd_line += off; \ + } while (0) +#define PL330_DBGMC_START (addr) (cmd_line = addr)
arch/arm/common/pl330.c line 259
Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +10
-0+#else +#define PL330_DBGCMD_DUMP(off, x...) do {} while (0) +#define PL330_DBGMC_START (addr) do {} while (0) +#endif + +struct _xfer_spec { +u32 ccr; +struct pl330_req *r; +struct pl330_xfer *x; +};
would have been nice to kerneldoc this or at-least document it.
Quoted 85 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +85
-0+enum dmamov_dst { +SAR =0 , +CCR , +DAR , +}; + +enum pl330_dst { +SRC =0 , +DST , +}; + +enum pl330_cond { +SINGLE , +BURST , +ALWAYS , +}; + +struct _pl330_req { +u32 mc_bus; +void *mc_cpu; +/* Number of bytes taken to setup MC for the req */ +u32 mc_len; +struct pl330_req *r; +/* Hook to attach to DMAC's list of reqs with due callback */ +struct list_head rqd; +}; + +/* ToBeDone for tasklet */ +struct _pl330_tbd { +bool reset_dmac; +bool reset_mngr; +u8 reset_chan; +}; + +/* A DMAC Thread */ +struct pl330_thread { +u8 id; +int ev; +/* If the channel is not yet acquired by any client */ +bool free; +/* Parent DMAC */ +struct pl330_dmac *dmac; +/* Only two at a time */ +struct _pl330_req req[2 ]; +/* Index of the last submitted request */ +unsigned lstenq; +}; + +enum pl330_dmac_state { +UNINIT , +INIT , +DYING , +}; + +/* A DMAC */ +struct pl330_dmac { +spinlock_t lock; +/* Holds list of reqs with due callbacks */ +struct list_head req_done; +/* Pointer to platform specific stuff */ +struct pl330_info *pinfo; +/* Maximum possible events/irqs */ +int events[32 ]; +/* BUS address of MicroCode buffer */ +u32 mcode_bus; +/* CPU address of MicroCode buffer */ +void *mcode_cpu; +/* List of all Channel threads */ +struct pl330_thread *channels; +/* Pointer to the MANAGER thread */ +struct pl330_thread *manager; +/* To handle bad news in interrupt */ +struct tasklet_struct tasks; +struct _pl330_tbd dmac_tbd; +/* State of DMAC operation */ +enum pl330_dmac_state state; +}; + +static inline void _callback (struct pl330_req *r,enum pl330_op_err err) +{ +if (r && r->xfer_cb) + r->xfer_cb (r->token, err); +} + +static inline bool _queue_empty (struct pl330_thread *thrd)
arch/arm/common/pl330.c line 355
Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +10
-0+{ +return (IS_FREE (&thrd->req[0 ]) &&IS_FREE (&thrd->req[1 ])) + ? true : false; +} + +static inline bool _queue_full (struct pl330_thread *thrd) +{ +return (IS_FREE (&thrd->req[0 ]) ||IS_FREE (&thrd->req[1 ])) + ? false : true; +}
return !(IS_FREE(&thrd->req[0]) || IS_FREE(&thrd->req[1]) should also work here.
Quoted 25 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +25
-0+static inline bool is_manager (struct pl330_thread *thrd) +{ +struct pl330_dmac *pl330 = thrd->dmac; + +/* MANAGER is indexed at the end */ +if (thrd->id == pl330->pinfo->pcfg.num_chan) +return true; +else +return false; +} + +/* If manager of the thread is in Non-Secure mode */ +static inline bool _manager_ns (struct pl330_thread *thrd) +{ +struct pl330_dmac *pl330 = thrd->dmac; + +return (pl330->pinfo->pcfg.mode &DMAC_MODE_NS ) ? true : false; +} + +static inline u32 get_id (struct pl330_info *pi,u32 off) +{ +void __iomem *regs = pi->base; +u32 id =0 ; + + id |= (readb (regs + off +0x0 ) <<0 );
arch/arm/common/pl330.c line 391
Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +10
-0+ id |= (readb (regs + off +0x4 ) <<8 ); + id |= (readb (regs + off +0x8 ) <<16 ); + id |= (readb (regs + off +0xc ) <<24 ); + +return id; +} + +static inline u32 _emit_ADDH (unsigned dry_run,u8 buf[], +enum pl330_dst da,u16 val) +{
think that should be u8 *buf.
Quoted 41 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +41
-0+return SZ_DMAADDH ; + + buf[0 ] =CMD_DMAADDH ; + buf[0 ] |= (da <<1 ); + *((u16 *)&buf[1 ]) = val; + +PL330_DBGCMD_DUMP (SZ_DMAADDH ,"\tDMAADDH %s %u\n" , + da ==1 ?"DA" :"SA" , val); + +return SZ_DMAADDH ; +} + +static inline u32 _emit_END (unsigned dry_run,u8 buf[]) +{ +if (dry_run) +return SZ_DMAEND ; + + buf[0 ] =CMD_DMAEND ; + +PL330_DBGCMD_DUMP (SZ_DMAEND ,"\tDMAEND\n" ); + +return SZ_DMAEND ; +} + +static inline u32 _emit_FLUSHP (unsigned dry_run,u8 buf[],u8 peri) +{ +if (dry_run) +return SZ_DMAFLUSHP ; + + buf[0 ] =CMD_DMAFLUSHP ; + + peri &=0x1f ; + peri <<=3 ; + buf[1 ] = peri; + +PL330_DBGCMD_DUMP (SZ_DMAFLUSHP ,"\tDMAFLUSHP %u\n" , peri >>3 ); + +return SZ_DMAFLUSHP ; +} + +static inline u32 _emit_LD (unsigned dry_run,u8 buf[],enum pl330_cond cond)
arch/arm/common/pl330.c line 443
Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +10
-0+{ +if (dry_run) +return SZ_DMALD ; + + buf[0 ] =CMD_DMALD ; + +if (cond ==SINGLE ) + buf[0 ] |= (0 <<1 ) | (1 <<0 ); +else if (cond ==BURST ) + buf[0 ] |= (1 <<1 ) | (1 <<0 );
easir to merge CMD_DMALD into these to and just set buf[0] to the value in the first place.
Quoted 20 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +20
-0+PL330_DBGCMD_DUMP (SZ_DMALD ,"\tDMALD%c\n" , + cond ==SINGLE ?'S' : (cond ==BURST ?'B' :'A' )); + +return SZ_DMALD ; +} + +static inline u32 _emit_LDP (unsigned dry_run,u8 buf[], +enum pl330_cond cond,u8 peri) +{ +if (dry_run) +return SZ_DMALDP ; + + buf[0 ] =CMD_DMALDP ; + +if (cond ==BURST ) + buf[0 ] |= (1 <<1 ); + + peri &=0x1f ; + peri <<=3 ; + buf[1 ] = peri;
arch/arm/common/pl330.c line 474
Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +10
-0+ +PL330_DBGCMD_DUMP (SZ_DMALDP ,"\tDMALDP%c %u\n" , + cond ==SINGLE ?'S' :'B' , peri >>3 ); + +return SZ_DMALDP ; +} + +static inline u32 _emit_LP (unsigned dry_run,u8 buf[], +unsigned loop,u8 cnt) +{
could loop be a bool? dry_run certainly should be.
arch/arm/common/pl330.c line 469
Quoted 2 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +2
-0+if (dry_run) +return SZ_DMALP ;
I'm just wondering if these shouldn't be if (!dry_run) { } return SZ_;\
arch/arm/common/pl330.c line 481
Quoted 4 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +4
-0+ buf[0 ] =CMD_DMALP ; + +if (loop) + buf[0 ] |= (1 <<1 );
again, you could probably do
buf[0] = loop ? CMD_DMALP | (1 << 1) : CMD_DMALP;
Quoted 99 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +99
-0+ cnt--;/* DMAC increments by 1 internally */ + buf[1 ] = cnt; + +PL330_DBGCMD_DUMP (SZ_DMALP ,"\tDMALP_%c %u\n" , loop ?'1' :'0' , cnt); + +return SZ_DMALP ; +} + +struct _arg_LPEND { +enum pl330_cond cond; +bool forever; +unsigned loop; +u8 bjump; +}; + +static inline u32 _emit_LPEND (unsigned dry_run,u8 buf[], +const struct _arg_LPEND *arg) +{ +enum pl330_cond cond = arg->cond; +bool forever = arg->forever; +unsigned loop = arg->loop; +u8 bjump = arg->bjump; + +if (dry_run) +return SZ_DMALPEND ; + + buf[0 ] =CMD_DMALPEND ; + +if (loop) + buf[0 ] |= (1 <<2 ); + +if (!forever) + buf[0 ] |= (1 <<4 ); + +if (cond ==SINGLE ) + buf[0 ] |= (0 <<1 ) | (1 <<0 ); +else if (cond ==BURST ) + buf[0 ] |= (1 <<1 ) | (1 <<0 ); + + buf[1 ] = bjump; + +PL330_DBGCMD_DUMP (SZ_DMALPEND ,"\tDMALP%s%c_%c bjmpto_%x\n" , + forever ?"FE" :"END" , + cond ==SINGLE ?'S' : (cond ==BURST ?'B' :'A' ), + loop ?'1' :'0' , + bjump); + +return SZ_DMALPEND ; +} + +static inline u32 _emit_KILL (unsigned dry_run,u8 buf[]) +{ +if (dry_run) +return SZ_DMAKILL ; + + buf[0 ] =CMD_DMAKILL ; + +return SZ_DMAKILL ; +} + +static inline u32 _emit_MOV (unsigned dry_run,u8 buf[], +enum dmamov_dst dst,u32 val) +{ +if (dry_run) +return SZ_DMAMOV ; + + buf[0 ] =CMD_DMAMOV ; + buf[1 ] = dst; + *((u32 *)&buf[2 ]) = val; + +PL330_DBGCMD_DUMP (SZ_DMAMOV ,"\tDMAMOV %s 0x%x\n" , + dst ==SAR ?"SAR" : (dst ==DAR ?"DAR" :"CCR" ), val); + +return SZ_DMAMOV ; +} + +static inline u32 _emit_NOP (unsigned dry_run,u8 buf[]) +{ +if (dry_run) +return SZ_DMANOP ; + + buf[0 ] =CMD_DMANOP ; + +PL330_DBGCMD_DUMP (SZ_DMANOP ,"\tDMANOP\n" ); + +return SZ_DMANOP ; +} + +static inline u32 _emit_RMB (unsigned dry_run,u8 buf[]) +{ +if (dry_run) +return SZ_DMARMB ; + + buf[0 ] =CMD_DMARMB ; + +PL330_DBGCMD_DUMP (SZ_DMARMB ,"\tDMARMB\n" ); + +return SZ_DMARMB ; +}
arch/arm/common/pl330.c line 591
Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +10
-0+ +static inline u32 _emit_SEV (unsigned dry_run,u8 buf[],u8 ev) +{ +if (dry_run) +return SZ_DMASEV ; + + buf[0 ] =CMD_DMASEV ; + + ev &=0x1f ; + ev <<=3 ;
is this some common op that should have some form of macro/inline defn?
Quoted 124 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +124
-0+ buf[1 ] = ev; + +PL330_DBGCMD_DUMP (SZ_DMASEV ,"\tDMASEV %u\n" , ev >>3 ); + +return SZ_DMASEV ; +} + +static inline u32 _emit_ST (unsigned dry_run,u8 buf[],enum pl330_cond cond) +{ +if (dry_run) +return SZ_DMAST ; + + buf[0 ] =CMD_DMAST ; + +if (cond ==SINGLE ) + buf[0 ] |= (0 <<1 ) | (1 <<0 ); +else if (cond ==BURST ) + buf[0 ] |= (1 <<1 ) | (1 <<0 ); + +PL330_DBGCMD_DUMP (SZ_DMAST ,"\tDMAST%c\n" , + cond ==SINGLE ?'S' : (cond ==BURST ?'B' :'A' )); + +return SZ_DMAST ; +} + +static inline u32 _emit_STP (unsigned dry_run,u8 buf[], +enum pl330_cond cond,u8 peri) +{ +if (dry_run) +return SZ_DMASTP ; + + buf[0 ] =CMD_DMASTP ; + +if (cond ==BURST ) + buf[0 ] |= (1 <<1 ); + + peri &=0x1f ; + peri <<=3 ; + buf[1 ] = peri; + +PL330_DBGCMD_DUMP (SZ_DMASTP ,"\tDMASTP%c %u\n" , + cond ==SINGLE ?'S' :'B' , peri >>3 ); + +return SZ_DMASTP ; +} + +static inline u32 _emit_STZ (unsigned dry_run,u8 buf[]) +{ +if (dry_run) +return SZ_DMASTZ ; + + buf[0 ] =CMD_DMASTZ ; + +PL330_DBGCMD_DUMP (SZ_DMASTZ ,"\tDMASTZ\n" ); + +return SZ_DMASTZ ; +} + +static inline u32 _emit_WFE (unsigned dry_run,u8 buf[],u8 ev, +unsigned invalidate) +{ +if (dry_run) +return SZ_DMAWFE ; + + buf[0 ] =CMD_DMAWFE ; + + ev &=0x1f ; + ev <<=3 ; + buf[1 ] = ev; + +if (invalidate) + buf[1 ] |= (1 <<1 ); + +PL330_DBGCMD_DUMP (SZ_DMAWFE ,"\tDMAWFE %u%s\n" , + ev >>3 , invalidate ?", I" :"" ); + +return SZ_DMAWFE ; +} + +static inline u32 _emit_WFP (unsigned dry_run,u8 buf[], +enum pl330_cond cond,u8 peri) +{ +if (dry_run) +return SZ_DMAWFP ; + + buf[0 ] =CMD_DMAWFP ; + +if (cond ==SINGLE ) + buf[0 ] |= (0 <<1 ) | (0 <<0 ); +else if (cond ==BURST ) + buf[0 ] |= (1 <<1 ) | (0 <<0 ); +else + buf[0 ] |= (0 <<1 ) | (1 <<0 ); + + peri &=0x1f ; + peri <<=3 ; + buf[1 ] = peri; + +PL330_DBGCMD_DUMP (SZ_DMAWFP ,"\tDMAWFP%c %u\n" , + cond ==SINGLE ?'S' : (cond ==BURST ?'B' :'P' ), peri >>3 ); + +return SZ_DMAWFP ; +} + +static inline u32 _emit_WMB (unsigned dry_run,u8 buf[]) +{ +if (dry_run) +return SZ_DMAWMB ; + + buf[0 ] =CMD_DMAWMB ; + +PL330_DBGCMD_DUMP (SZ_DMAWMB ,"\tDMAWMB\n" ); + +return SZ_DMAWMB ; +} + +struct _arg_GO { +u8 chan; +u32 addr; +unsigned ns; +}; + +static inline u32 _emit_GO (unsigned dry_run,u8 buf[], +const struct _arg_GO *arg)
arch/arm/common/pl330.c line 725
Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +10
-0+{ +u8 chan = arg->chan; +u32 addr = arg->addr; +unsigned ns = arg->ns; + +if (dry_run) +return SZ_DMAGO ; + + buf[0 ] =CMD_DMAGO ; + buf[0 ] |= (ns <<1 );
again, you could have probably merged these two into one.
Quoted 71 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +71
-0+ buf[1 ] = chan &0x7 ; + + *((u32 *)&buf[2 ]) = addr; + +return SZ_DMAGO ; +} + +#define msecs_to_loops (t) (loops_per_jiffy / 1000 * HZ * t) + +/* Returns Time-Out */ +static bool _until_dmac_idle (struct pl330_thread *thrd) +{ +void __iomem *regs = thrd->dmac->pinfo->base; +unsigned long loops =msecs_to_loops (5 ); + +do { +/* Until Manager is Idle */ +if (!(readl (regs +DBGSTATUS ) &DBG_BUSY )) +break ; + +cpu_relax (); + }while (--loops); + +if (!loops) +return true; + +return false; +} + +static inline void _execute_DBGINSN (struct pl330_thread *thrd, +u8 insn[],bool as_manager) +{ +void __iomem *regs = thrd->dmac->pinfo->base; +u32 val; + + val = (insn[0 ] <<16 ) | (insn[1 ] <<24 ); +if (!as_manager) { + val |= (1 <<0 ); + val |= (thrd->id <<8 );/* Channel Number */ + } +writel (val, regs +DBGINST0 ); + + val = *((u32 *)&insn[2 ]); +writel (val, regs +DBGINST1 ); + +/* If timed out due to halted state-machine */ +if (_until_dmac_idle (thrd)) { +dev_err (thrd->dmac->pinfo->dev,"DMAC halted!\n" ); +return ; + } + +/* Get going */ +writel (0 , regs +DBGCMD ); +} + +static inline u32 _state (struct pl330_thread *thrd) +{ +void __iomem *regs = thrd->dmac->pinfo->base; +u32 val; + +if (is_manager (thrd)) + val =readl (regs +DS ) &0xf ; +else + val =readl (regs +CS (thrd->id)) &0xf ; + +switch (val) { +case DS_ST_STOP : +return PL330_STATE_STOPPED ; +case DS_ST_EXEC : +return PL330_STATE_EXECUTING ; +case DS_ST_CMISS :
arch/arm/common/pl330.c line 807
Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +10
-0+return PL330_STATE_CACHEMISS ; +case DS_ST_UPDTPC : +return PL330_STATE_UPDTPC ; +case DS_ST_WFE : +return PL330_STATE_WFE ; +case DS_ST_FAULT : +return PL330_STATE_FAULTING ; +case DS_ST_ATBRR : +if (is_manager (thrd)) +return PL330_STATE_INVALID ;
might be more code efficient to break the case into two and have a is_manager() check between the two switches.
Quoted 34 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +34
-0+else +return PL330_STATE_ATBARRIER ; +case DS_ST_QBUSY : +if (is_manager (thrd)) +return PL330_STATE_INVALID ; +else +return PL330_STATE_QUEUEBUSY ; +case DS_ST_WFP : +if (is_manager (thrd)) +return PL330_STATE_INVALID ; +else +return PL330_STATE_WFP ; +case DS_ST_KILL : +if (is_manager (thrd)) +return PL330_STATE_INVALID ; +else +return PL330_STATE_KILLING ; +case DS_ST_CMPLT : +if (is_manager (thrd)) +return PL330_STATE_INVALID ; +else +return PL330_STATE_COMPLETING ; +case DS_ST_FLTCMP : +if (is_manager (thrd)) +return PL330_STATE_INVALID ; +else +return PL330_STATE_FAULT_COMPLETING ; +default : +return PL330_STATE_INVALID ; + } +} + +/* If the request 'req' of thread 'thrd' is currently active */ +static inline bool _req_active(struct pl330_thread *thrd,
arch/arm/common/pl330.c line 851
Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +10
-0+ struct _pl330_req *req) +{ +void __iomem *regs = thrd->dmac->pinfo->base; +u32 buf = req->mc_bus, pc =readl (regs +CPC (thrd->id)); + +if (IS_FREE (req)) +return false; + +return (pc >= buf && pc <= buf + req->mc_len) ? true : false; +}
hmm, doesn't linux bool allow just a
return (pc >= buf && pc <= buf + req->mc_len); ?
Quoted 637 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +637
-0+/* Returns 0 if the thread is inactive, ID of active req + 1 otherwise */ +static inline unsigned _thrd_active (struct pl330_thread *thrd) +{ +if (_req_active (thrd, &thrd->req[0 ])) +return 1 ;/* First req active */ + +if (_req_active (thrd, &thrd->req[1 ])) +return 2 ;/* Second req active */ + +return 0 ; +} + +static void _stop (struct pl330_thread *thrd) +{ +void __iomem *regs = thrd->dmac->pinfo->base; +u8 insn[6 ] = {0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 }; + +if (_state (thrd) ==PL330_STATE_FAULT_COMPLETING ) +UNTIL (thrd,PL330_STATE_FAULTING |PL330_STATE_KILLING ); + +/* Return if nothing needs to be done */ +if (_state (thrd) ==PL330_STATE_COMPLETING + ||_state (thrd) ==PL330_STATE_KILLING + ||_state (thrd) ==PL330_STATE_STOPPED ) +return ; + +_emit_KILL (0 , insn); + +/* Stop generating interrupts for SEV */ +writel (readl (regs +INTEN ) & ~(1 << thrd->ev), regs +INTEN ); + +_execute_DBGINSN (thrd, insn,is_manager (thrd)); +} + +/* Start doing req 'idx' of thread 'thrd' */ +static bool _trigger (struct pl330_thread *thrd) +{ +void __iomem *regs = thrd->dmac->pinfo->base; +struct _pl330_req *req; +struct pl330_req *r; +struct _arg_GO go; +unsigned ns; +u8 insn[6 ] = {0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 }; + +/* Return if already ACTIVE */ +if (_state (thrd) !=PL330_STATE_STOPPED ) +return true; + +if (!IS_FREE (&thrd->req[1 - thrd->lstenq])) + req = &thrd->req[1 - thrd->lstenq]; +else if (!IS_FREE (&thrd->req[thrd->lstenq])) + req = &thrd->req[thrd->lstenq]; +else + req =NULL ; + +/* Return if no request */ +if (!req || !req->r) +return true; + + r = req->r; + +if (r->cfg) + ns = r->cfg->nonsecure ?1 :0 ; +else if (readl (regs +CS (thrd->id)) &CS_CNS ) + ns =1 ; +else + ns =0 ; + +/* See 'Abort Sources' point-4 at Page 2-25 */ +if (_manager_ns (thrd) && !ns) +dev_info (thrd->dmac->pinfo->dev,"%s:%d Recipe for ABORT!\n" , + __func__, __LINE__); + + go.chan = thrd->id; + go.addr = req->mc_bus; + go.ns = ns; +_emit_GO (0 , insn, &go); + +/* Set to generate interrupts for SEV */ +writel (readl (regs +INTEN ) | (1 << thrd->ev), regs +INTEN ); + +/* Only manager can execute GO */ +_execute_DBGINSN (thrd, insn, true); + +return true; +} + +static bool _start (struct pl330_thread *thrd) +{ +switch (_state (thrd)) { +case PL330_STATE_FAULT_COMPLETING : +UNTIL (thrd,PL330_STATE_FAULTING |PL330_STATE_KILLING ); + +if (_state (thrd) ==PL330_STATE_KILLING ) + UNTIL(thrd, PL330_STATE_STOPPED) + +case PL330_STATE_FAULTING : +_stop (thrd); + +case PL330_STATE_KILLING : +case PL330_STATE_COMPLETING : + UNTIL(thrd, PL330_STATE_STOPPED) + +case PL330_STATE_STOPPED : +return _trigger (thrd); + +case PL330_STATE_WFP : +case PL330_STATE_QUEUEBUSY : +case PL330_STATE_ATBARRIER : +case PL330_STATE_UPDTPC : +case PL330_STATE_CACHEMISS : +case PL330_STATE_EXECUTING : +return true; + +case PL330_STATE_WFE :/* For RESUME, nothing yet */ +default : +return false; + } +} + +static inline int _ldst_memtomem (unsigned dry_run,u8 buf[], +const struct _xfer_spec *pxs,int cyc) +{ +int off =0 ; + +while (cyc--) { + off +=_emit_LD (dry_run, &buf[off],ALWAYS ); + off +=_emit_RMB (dry_run, &buf[off]); + off +=_emit_ST (dry_run, &buf[off],ALWAYS ); + off +=_emit_WMB (dry_run, &buf[off]); + } + +return off; +} + +static inline int _ldst_devtomem (unsigned dry_run,u8 buf[], +const struct _xfer_spec *pxs,int cyc) +{ +int off =0 ; + +while (cyc--) { + off +=_emit_WFP (dry_run, &buf[off],SINGLE , pxs->r->peri); + off +=_emit_LDP (dry_run, &buf[off],SINGLE , pxs->r->peri); + off +=_emit_ST (dry_run, &buf[off],ALWAYS ); + off +=_emit_FLUSHP (dry_run, &buf[off], pxs->r->peri); + } + +return off; +} + +static inline int _ldst_memtodev (unsigned dry_run,u8 buf[], +const struct _xfer_spec *pxs,int cyc) +{ +int off =0 ; + +while (cyc--) { + off +=_emit_WFP (dry_run, &buf[off],SINGLE , pxs->r->peri); + off +=_emit_LD (dry_run, &buf[off],ALWAYS ); + off +=_emit_STP (dry_run, &buf[off],SINGLE , pxs->r->peri); + off +=_emit_FLUSHP (dry_run, &buf[off], pxs->r->peri); + } + +return off; +} + +static int _bursts (unsigned dry_run,u8 buf[], +const struct _xfer_spec *pxs,int cyc) +{ +int off =0 ; + +switch (pxs->r->rqtype) { +case MEMTODEV : + off +=_ldst_memtodev (dry_run, &buf[off], pxs, cyc); +break ; +case DEVTOMEM : + off +=_ldst_devtomem (dry_run, &buf[off], pxs, cyc); +break ; +case MEMTOMEM : + off +=_ldst_memtomem (dry_run, &buf[off], pxs, cyc); +break ; +default : + off +=0x40000000 ;/* Scare off the Client */ +break ; + } + +return off; +} + +/* Returns bytes consumed and updates bursts */ +static inline int _loop (unsigned dry_run,u8 buf[], +unsigned long *bursts,const struct _xfer_spec *pxs) +{ +int cyc, cycmax, szlp, szlpend, szbrst, off; +unsigned lcnt0, lcnt1, ljmp0, ljmp1; +struct _arg_LPEND lpend; + +/* Max iterations possibile in DMALP is 256 */ +if (*bursts >=256 *256 ) { + lcnt1 =256 ; + lcnt0 =256 ; + cyc = *bursts / lcnt1 / lcnt0; + }else if (*bursts >256 ) { + lcnt1 =256 ; + lcnt0 = *bursts / lcnt1; + cyc =1 ; + }else { + lcnt1 = *bursts; + lcnt0 =0 ; + cyc =1 ; + } + + szlp =_emit_LP (1 , buf,0 ,0 ); + szbrst =_bursts (1 , buf, pxs,1 ); + + lpend.cond =ALWAYS ; + lpend.forever = false; + lpend.loop =0 ; + lpend.bjump =0 ; + szlpend =_emit_LPEND (1 , buf, &lpend); + +if (lcnt0) { + szlp *=2 ; + szlpend *=2 ; + } + +/* +* Max bursts that we can unroll due to limit on the +* size of backward jump that can be encoded in DMALPEND +* which is 8-bits and hence 255 +*/ + cycmax = (255 - (szlp + szlpend)) / szbrst; + + cyc = (cycmax < cyc) ? cycmax : cyc; + + off =0 ; + +if (lcnt0) { + off +=_emit_LP (dry_run, &buf[off],0 , lcnt0); + ljmp0 = off; + } + + off +=_emit_LP (dry_run, &buf[off],1 , lcnt1); + ljmp1 = off; + + off +=_bursts (dry_run, &buf[off], pxs, cyc); + + lpend.cond =ALWAYS ; + lpend.forever = false; + lpend.loop =1 ; + lpend.bjump = off - ljmp1; + off +=_emit_LPEND (dry_run, &buf[off], &lpend); + +if (lcnt0) { + lpend.cond =ALWAYS ; + lpend.forever = false; + lpend.loop =0 ; + lpend.bjump = off - ljmp0; + off +=_emit_LPEND (dry_run, &buf[off], &lpend); + } + + *bursts = lcnt1 * cyc; +if (lcnt0) + *bursts *= lcnt0; + +return off; +} + +static inline int _setup_loops (unsigned dry_run,u8 buf[], +const struct _xfer_spec *pxs) +{ +struct pl330_xfer *x = pxs->x; +u32 ccr = pxs->ccr; +unsigned long c, bursts =BYTE_TO_BURST (x->bytes, ccr); +int off =0 ; + +while (bursts) { + c = bursts; + off +=_loop (dry_run, &buf[off], &c, pxs); + bursts -= c; + } + +return off; +} + +static inline int _setup_xfer (unsigned dry_run,u8 buf[], +const struct _xfer_spec *pxs) +{ +struct pl330_xfer *x = pxs->x; +int off =0 ; + +/* DMAMOV SAR, x->src_addr */ + off +=_emit_MOV (dry_run, &buf[off],SAR , x->src_addr); +/* DMAMOV DAR, x->dst_addr */ + off +=_emit_MOV (dry_run, &buf[off],DAR , x->dst_addr); + +/* Setup Loop(s) */ + off +=_setup_loops (dry_run, &buf[off], pxs); + +return off; +} + +/* +* A req is a sequence of one or more xfer units. +* Returns the number of bytes taken to setup the MC for the req. +*/ +static int _setup_req (unsigned dry_run,struct pl330_thread *thrd, +unsigned index,struct _xfer_spec *pxs) +{ +struct _pl330_req *req = &thrd->req[index]; +struct pl330_xfer *x; +u8 *buf = req->mc_cpu; +int off =0 ; + +PL330_DBGMC_START (req->mc_bus); + +/* DMAMOV CCR, ccr */ + off +=_emit_MOV (dry_run, &buf[off],CCR , pxs->ccr); + + x = pxs->r->x; +do { +/* Error if xfer length is not aligned at burst size */ +if (x->bytes % (BRST_SIZE (pxs->ccr) *BRST_LEN (pxs->ccr))) +return -EINVAL ; + + pxs->x = x; + off +=_setup_xfer (dry_run, &buf[off], pxs); + + x = x->next; + }while (x); + +/* DMASEV peripheral/event */ + off +=_emit_SEV (dry_run, &buf[off], thrd->ev); +/* DMAEND */ + off +=_emit_END (dry_run, &buf[off]); + +return off; +} + +static inline u32 _prepare_ccr (const struct pl330_reqcfg *rqc) +{ +u32 ccr =0 ; + +if (rqc->src_inc) + ccr |=CC_SRCINC ; + +if (rqc->dst_inc) + ccr |=CC_DSTINC ; + +/* We set same protection levels for Src and DST for now */ +if (rqc->privileged) + ccr |=CC_SRCPRI |CC_DSTPRI ; +if (rqc->nonsecure) + ccr |=CC_SRCNS |CC_DSTNS ; +if (rqc->insnaccess) + ccr |=CC_SRCIA |CC_DSTIA ; + + ccr |= (((rqc->brst_len -1 ) &0xf ) <<CC_SRCBRSTLEN_SHFT ); + ccr |= (((rqc->brst_len -1 ) &0xf ) <<CC_DSTBRSTLEN_SHFT ); + + ccr |= (rqc->brst_size <<CC_SRCBRSTSIZE_SHFT ); + ccr |= (rqc->brst_size <<CC_DSTBRSTSIZE_SHFT ); + + ccr |= (rqc->dcctl <<CC_SRCCCTRL_SHFT ); + ccr |= (rqc->scctl <<CC_DSTCCTRL_SHFT ); + + ccr |= (rqc->swap <<CC_SWAP_SHFT ); + +return ccr; +} + +static inline bool _is_valid (u32 ccr) +{ +enum pl330_dstcachectrl dcctl; +enum pl330_srccachectrl scctl; + + dcctl = (ccr >>CC_DSTCCTRL_SHFT ) &CC_DRCCCTRL_MASK ; + scctl = (ccr >>CC_SRCCCTRL_SHFT ) &CC_SRCCCTRL_MASK ; + +if (dcctl ==DINVALID1 || dcctl ==DINVALID2 + || scctl ==SINVALID1 || scctl ==SINVALID2 ) +return false; +else +return true; +} + +/* +* Submit a list of xfers after which the client wants notification. +* Client is not notified after each xfer unit, just once after all +* xfer units are done or some error occurs. +*/ +int pl330_submit_req (void *ch_id,struct pl330_req *r) +{ +struct pl330_thread *thrd = ch_id; +struct pl330_dmac *pl330; +struct pl330_info *pi; +struct _xfer_spec xs; +unsigned long flags; +void __iomem *regs; +unsigned idx; +u32 ccr; +int ret =0 ; + +/* No Req or Unacquired Channel or DMAC */ +if (!r || !thrd || thrd->free) +return -EINVAL ; + + pl330 = thrd->dmac; + pi = pl330->pinfo; + regs = pi->base; + +if (pl330->state ==DYING + || pl330->dmac_tbd.reset_chan & (1 << thrd->id)) { +dev_info (thrd->dmac->pinfo->dev,"%s:%d\n" , + __func__, __LINE__); +return -EAGAIN ; + } + +/* If request for non-existing peripheral */ +if (r->rqtype !=MEMTOMEM && r->peri >= pi->pcfg.num_peri) { +dev_info (thrd->dmac->pinfo->dev, +"%s:%d Invalid peripheral(%u)!\n" , + __func__, __LINE__, r->peri); +return -EINVAL ; + } + +spin_lock_irqsave (&pl330->lock, flags); + +if (_queue_full (thrd)) { + ret = -EAGAIN ; + goto xfer_exit; + } + +/* Prefer Secure Channel */ +if (!_manager_ns (thrd)) + r->cfg->nonsecure =0 ; +else + r->cfg->nonsecure =1 ; + +/* Use last settings, if not provided */ +if (r->cfg) + ccr =_prepare_ccr (r->cfg); +else + ccr =readl (regs +CC (thrd->id)); + +/* If this req doesn't have valid xfer settings */ +if (!_is_valid (ccr)) { + ret = -EINVAL ; +dev_info (thrd->dmac->pinfo->dev,"%s:%d Invalid CCR(%x)!\n" , + __func__, __LINE__, ccr); + goto xfer_exit; + } + + idx =IS_FREE (&thrd->req[0 ]) ?0 :1 ; + + xs.ccr = ccr; + xs.r = r; + +/* First dry run to check if req is acceptable */ + ret =_setup_req (1 , thrd, idx, &xs); +if (ret <0 ) + goto xfer_exit; + +if (ret > pi->mcbufsz /2 ) { +dev_info (thrd->dmac->pinfo->dev, +"%s:%d Trying increasing mcbufsz\n" , + __func__, __LINE__); + ret = -ENOMEM ; + goto xfer_exit; + } + +/* Hook the request */ + thrd->lstenq = idx; + thrd->req[idx].mc_len =_setup_req (0 , thrd, idx, &xs); + thrd->req[idx].r = r; + + ret =0 ; + +xfer_exit: +spin_unlock_irqrestore (&pl330->lock, flags); + +return ret; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL (pl330_submit_req); + +static void pl330_dotask (unsigned long data) +{ +struct pl330_dmac *pl330 = (struct pl330_dmac *) data; +struct pl330_info *pi = pl330->pinfo; +unsigned long flags; +int i; + +spin_lock_irqsave (&pl330->lock, flags); + +/* The DMAC itself gone nuts */ +if (pl330->dmac_tbd.reset_dmac) { + pl330->state =DYING ; +/* Reset the manager too */ + pl330->dmac_tbd.reset_mngr = true; +/* Clear the reset flag */ + pl330->dmac_tbd.reset_dmac = false; + } + +if (pl330->dmac_tbd.reset_mngr) { +_stop (pl330->manager); +/* Reset all channels */ + pl330->dmac_tbd.reset_chan = (1 << pi->pcfg.num_chan) -1 ; +/* Clear the reset flag */ + pl330->dmac_tbd.reset_mngr = false; + } + +for (i =0 ; i < pi->pcfg.num_chan; i++) { + +if (pl330->dmac_tbd.reset_chan & (1 << i)) { +struct pl330_thread *thrd = &pl330->channels[i]; +void __iomem *regs = pi->base; +enum pl330_op_err err; + +_stop (thrd); + +if (readl (regs +FSC ) & (1 << thrd->id)) + err =PL330_ERR_FAIL ; +else + err =PL330_ERR_ABORT ; + +spin_unlock_irqrestore (&pl330->lock, flags); + +_callback (thrd->req[1 - thrd->lstenq].r, err); +_callback (thrd->req[thrd->lstenq].r, err); + +spin_lock_irqsave (&pl330->lock, flags); + + thrd->req[0 ].r =NULL ; + thrd->req[1 ].r =NULL ; +MARK_FREE (&thrd->req[0 ]); +MARK_FREE (&thrd->req[1 ]); + +/* Clear the reset flag */ + pl330->dmac_tbd.reset_chan &= ~(1 << i); + } + } + +spin_unlock_irqrestore (&pl330->lock, flags); + +return ; +} + +/* Returns 1 if state was updated, 0 otherwise */ +int pl330_update (const struct pl330_info *pi) +{ +struct _pl330_req *rqdone; +struct pl330_dmac *pl330; +unsigned long flags; +void __iomem *regs; +u32 val; +int id, ev, ret =0 ; + +if (!pi || !pi->pl330_data) +return 0 ; + + regs = pi->base; + pl330 = pi->pl330_data; + +spin_lock_irqsave (&pl330->lock, flags); + + val =readl (regs +FSM ) &0x1 ; +if (val) + pl330->dmac_tbd.reset_mngr = true; +else + pl330->dmac_tbd.reset_mngr = false; + + val =readl (regs +FSC ) & ((1 << pi->pcfg.num_chan) -1 ); + pl330->dmac_tbd.reset_chan |= val; +if (val) { +int i =0 ; +while (i < pi->pcfg.num_chan) { +if (val & (1 << i)) { +dev_info (pi->dev, +"Reset Channel-%d\t CS-%x FTC-%x\n" , + i,readl (regs +CS (i)), +readl (regs +FTC (i))); +_stop (&pl330->channels[i]); + } + i++; + } + } + +/* Check which event happened i.e, thread notified */ + val =readl (regs +ES ); +if (pi->pcfg.num_events <32 + && val & ~((1 << pi->pcfg.num_events) -1 )) { + pl330->dmac_tbd.reset_dmac = true; +dev_err (pi->dev,"%s:%d Unexpected!\n" , __func__, __LINE__); + ret =1 ; + goto updt_exit; + } + +for (ev =0 ; ev < pi->pcfg.num_events; ev++) { +if (val & (1 << ev)) {/* Event occured */ +struct pl330_thread *thrd; +u32 inten =readl (regs +INTEN ); +int active; + +/* Clear the event */ +if (inten & (1 << ev)) +writel (1 << ev, regs +INTCLR ); + + ret =1 ; + + id = pl330->events[ev]; + + thrd = &pl330->channels[id]; + + active =_thrd_active (thrd); +if (!active)/* Aborted */ +continue ; + + active -=1 ; + + rqdone = &thrd->req[active]; +MARK_FREE (rqdone); + +/* Get going again ASAP */ +_start (thrd); + +/* For now, just make a list of callbacks to be done */ +list_add_tail (&rqdone->rqd, &pl330->req_done); + } + } + +/* Now that we are in no hurry, do the callbacks */ +while (!list_empty (&pl330->req_done)) { + rqdone =container_of (pl330->req_done.next, + struct _pl330_req, rqd); + +list_del_init (&rqdone->rqd); + +spin_unlock_irqrestore (&pl330->lock, flags);
arch/arm/common/pl330.c line 1499
Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +10
-0+_callback (rqdone->r,PL330_ERR_NONE ); +spin_lock_irqsave (&pl330->lock, flags); + } + +updt_exit: +spin_unlock_irqrestore (&pl330->lock, flags); + +if (pl330->dmac_tbd.reset_dmac + || pl330->dmac_tbd.reset_mngr + || pl330->dmac_tbd.reset_chan) {
iirc, style is:
if (a ||
b ||
c)could be wrong, definetly prefer the above.
Quoted 312 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +312
-0+ ret =1 ; +tasklet_schedule (&pl330->tasks); + } + +return ret; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL (pl330_update); + +int pl330_chan_ctrl (void *ch_id,enum pl330_chan_op op) +{ +struct pl330_thread *thrd = ch_id; +struct pl330_dmac *pl330; +unsigned long flags; +int ret =0 , active; + +if (!thrd || thrd->free || thrd->dmac->state ==DYING ) +return -EINVAL ; + + pl330 = thrd->dmac; + +spin_lock_irqsave (&pl330->lock, flags); + +switch (op) { +case PL330_OP_FLUSH : +/* Make sure the channel is stopped */ +_stop (thrd); + + thrd->req[0 ].r =NULL ; + thrd->req[1 ].r =NULL ; +MARK_FREE (&thrd->req[0 ]); +MARK_FREE (&thrd->req[1 ]); +break ; + +case PL330_OP_ABORT : + active =_thrd_active (thrd); + +/* Make sure the channel is stopped */ +_stop (thrd); + +/* ABORT is only for the active req */ +if (!active) +break ; + + active--; + + thrd->req[active].r =NULL ; +MARK_FREE (&thrd->req[active]); + +/* Start the next */ +case PL330_OP_START : +if (!_start (thrd)) + ret = -EIO ; +break ; + +default : + ret = -EINVAL ; + } + +spin_unlock_irqrestore (&pl330->lock, flags); +return ret; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL (pl330_chan_ctrl); + +int pl330_chan_status (void *ch_id,struct pl330_chanstatus *pstatus) +{ +struct pl330_thread *thrd = ch_id; +struct pl330_dmac *pl330; +struct pl330_info *pi; +void __iomem *regs; +int active; +u32 val; + +if (!pstatus || !thrd || thrd->free) +return -EINVAL ; + + pl330 = thrd->dmac; + pi = pl330->pinfo; + regs = pi->base; + +/* The client should remove the DMAC and add again */ +if (pl330->state ==DYING ) + pstatus->dmac_halted = true; +else + pstatus->dmac_halted = false; + + val =readl (regs +FSC ); +if (val & (1 << thrd->id)) + pstatus->faulting = true; +else + pstatus->faulting = false; + + active =_thrd_active (thrd); + +if (!active) { +/* Indicate that the thread is not running */ + pstatus->top_req =NULL ; + pstatus->wait_req =NULL ; + }else { + active--; + pstatus->top_req = thrd->req[active].r; + pstatus->wait_req = !IS_FREE (&thrd->req[1 - active]) + ? thrd->req[1 - active].r :NULL ; + } + + pstatus->src_addr =readl (regs +SA (thrd->id)); + pstatus->dst_addr =readl (regs +DA (thrd->id)); + +return 0 ; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL (pl330_chan_status); + +/* Reserve an event */ +static inline int _alloc_event (struct pl330_thread *thrd) +{ +struct pl330_dmac *pl330 = thrd->dmac; +struct pl330_info *pi = pl330->pinfo; +int ev; + +for (ev =0 ; ev < pi->pcfg.num_events; ev++) +if (pl330->events[ev] ==-1 ) { + pl330->events[ev] = thrd->id; +return ev; + } + +return -1 ; +} + +/* Upon success, returns IdentityToken for the +* allocated channel, NULL otherwise. +*/ +void *pl330_request_channel (const struct pl330_info *pi) +{ +struct pl330_thread *thrd =NULL ; +struct pl330_dmac *pl330; +unsigned long flags; +int chans, i; + +if (!pi || !pi->pl330_data) +return NULL ; + + pl330 = pi->pl330_data; + +if (pl330->state ==DYING ) +return NULL ; + + chans = pi->pcfg.num_chan; + +spin_lock_irqsave (&pl330->lock, flags); + +for (i =0 ; i < chans; i++) { + thrd = &pl330->channels[i]; +if (thrd->free) { + thrd->ev =_alloc_event (thrd); +if (thrd->ev >=0 ) { + thrd->free = false; + thrd->lstenq =1 ; + thrd->req[0 ].r =NULL ; +MARK_FREE (&thrd->req[0 ]); + thrd->req[1 ].r =NULL ; +MARK_FREE (&thrd->req[1 ]); +break ; + } + } + thrd =NULL ; + } + +spin_unlock_irqrestore (&pl330->lock, flags); + +return thrd; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL (pl330_request_channel); + +/* Release an event */ +static inline void _free_event (struct pl330_thread *thrd,int ev) +{ +struct pl330_dmac *pl330 = thrd->dmac; +struct pl330_info *pi = pl330->pinfo; + +/* If the event is valid and was held by the thread */ +if (ev >=0 && ev < pi->pcfg.num_events + && pl330->events[ev] == thrd->id) + pl330->events[ev] =-1 ; +} + +void pl330_release_channel (void *ch_id) +{ +struct pl330_thread *thrd = ch_id; +struct pl330_dmac *pl330; +unsigned long flags; + +if (!thrd || thrd->free) +return ; + +_stop (thrd); + +_callback (thrd->req[1 - thrd->lstenq].r,PL330_ERR_ABORT ); +_callback (thrd->req[thrd->lstenq].r,PL330_ERR_ABORT ); + + pl330 = thrd->dmac; + +spin_lock_irqsave (&pl330->lock, flags); +_free_event (thrd, thrd->ev); + thrd->free = true; +spin_unlock_irqrestore (&pl330->lock, flags); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL (pl330_release_channel); + +/* Initialize the structure for PL330 configuration, that can be used +* by the client driver the make best use of the DMAC +*/ +static void read_dmac_config (struct pl330_info *pi) +{ +void __iomem *regs = pi->base; +u32 val; + + val =readl (regs +CRD ) >>CRD_DATA_WIDTH_SHIFT ; + val &=CRD_DATA_WIDTH_MASK ; + pi->pcfg.data_bus_width =8 * (1 << val); + + val =readl (regs +CRD ) >>CRD_DATA_BUFF_SHIFT ; + val &=CRD_DATA_BUFF_MASK ; + pi->pcfg.data_buf_dep = val +1 ; + + val =readl (regs +CR0 ) >>CR0_NUM_CHANS_SHIFT ; + val &=CR0_NUM_CHANS_MASK ; + val +=1 ; + pi->pcfg.num_chan = val; + + val =readl (regs +CR0 ); +if (val &CR0_PERIPH_REQ_SET ) { + val = (val >>CR0_NUM_PERIPH_SHIFT ) &CR0_NUM_PERIPH_MASK ; + val +=1 ; + pi->pcfg.num_peri = val; + pi->pcfg.peri_ns =readl (regs +CR4 ); + }else { + pi->pcfg.num_peri =0 ; + } + + val =readl (regs +CR0 ); +if (val &CR0_BOOT_MAN_NS ) + pi->pcfg.mode |=DMAC_MODE_NS ; +else + pi->pcfg.mode &= ~DMAC_MODE_NS ; + + val =readl (regs +CR0 ) >>CR0_NUM_EVENTS_SHIFT ; + val &=CR0_NUM_EVENTS_MASK ; + val +=1 ; + pi->pcfg.num_events = val; + + pi->pcfg.irq_ns =readl (regs +CR3 ); + + pi->pcfg.periph_id =get_id (pi,PERIPH_ID ); + pi->pcfg.pcell_id =get_id (pi,PCELL_ID ); +} + +static inline void _reset_thread (struct pl330_thread *thrd) +{ +struct pl330_dmac *pl330 = thrd->dmac; +struct pl330_info *pi = pl330->pinfo; + + thrd->req[0 ].mc_cpu = pl330->mcode_cpu + + (thrd->id * pi->mcbufsz); + thrd->req[0 ].mc_bus = pl330->mcode_bus + + (thrd->id * pi->mcbufsz); + thrd->req[0 ].r =NULL ; +MARK_FREE (&thrd->req[0 ]); + + thrd->req[1 ].mc_cpu = thrd->req[0 ].mc_cpu + + pi->mcbufsz /2 ; + thrd->req[1 ].mc_bus = thrd->req[0 ].mc_bus + + pi->mcbufsz /2 ; + thrd->req[1 ].r =NULL ; +MARK_FREE (&thrd->req[1 ]); +} + +static int dmac_alloc_threads (struct pl330_dmac *pl330) +{ +struct pl330_info *pi = pl330->pinfo; +int chans = pi->pcfg.num_chan; +struct pl330_thread *thrd; +int i; + +/* Allocate 1 Manager and 'chans' Channel threads */ + pl330->channels =kzalloc ((1 + chans) *sizeof (*thrd), +GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!pl330->channels) +return -ENOMEM ; + +/* Init Channel threads */ +for (i =0 ; i < chans; i++) { + thrd = &pl330->channels[i]; + thrd->id = i; + thrd->dmac = pl330; +_reset_thread (thrd); + thrd->free = true; + } + +/* MANAGER is indexed at the end */ + thrd = &pl330->channels[chans]; + thrd->id = chans; + thrd->dmac = pl330; + thrd->free = false; + pl330->manager = thrd; + +return 0 ; +} + +static int dmac_alloc_resources (struct pl330_dmac *pl330) +{ +struct pl330_info *pi = pl330->pinfo; +int chans = pi->pcfg.num_chan; +int ret;
arch/arm/common/pl330.c line 1821
Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +10
-0+ +/* +* Alloc MicroCode buffer for 'chans' Channel threads. +* A channel's buffer offset is (Channel_Id * MCODE_BUFF_PERCHAN) +*/ + pl330->mcode_cpu =dma_alloc_coherent (pi->dev, + chans * pi->mcbufsz, + &pl330->mcode_bus,GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!pl330->mcode_cpu) { + dev_err(pi->dev, "%s:%d Can't allocate memory!\n",
no need to add an ! at the end of the line.
Quoted 34 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +34
-0+ __func__, __LINE__); +return -ENOMEM ; + } + + ret =dmac_alloc_threads (pl330); +if (ret) { +dev_err (pi->dev,"%s:%d Can't to create channels for DMAC!\n" , + __func__, __LINE__); +dma_free_coherent (pi->dev, + chans * pi->mcbufsz, + pl330->mcode_cpu, pl330->mcode_bus); +return ret; + } + +return 0 ; +} + +int pl330_add (struct pl330_info *pi) +{ +struct pl330_dmac *pl330; +void __iomem *regs; +int i, ret; + +if (!pi || !pi->dev) +return -EINVAL ; + +/* If already added */ +if (pi->pl330_data) +return -EINVAL ; + +/* +* If the SoC can perform reset on the DMAC, then do it +* before reading its configuration. +*/
arch/arm/common/pl330.c line 1865
Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +10
-0+if (pi->dmac_reset) + pi->dmac_reset (pi); + + regs = pi->base; + +/* Check if we can handle this DMAC */ +if (get_id (pi,PERIPH_ID ) !=PERIPH_ID_VAL + ||get_id (pi,PCELL_ID ) !=PCELL_ID_VAL ) { +dev_err (pi->dev,"PERIPH_ID 0x%x, PCELL_ID 0x%x !\n" , +readl (regs +PERIPH_ID ),readl (regs +PCELL_ID ));
get_id and readl() ?
Also, please don;'t keep getting suprised by errors, erro messages don't need a ! in them.
Quoted 160 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +101
-0+return -EINVAL ; + } + +/* Read the configuration of the DMAC */ +read_dmac_config (pi); + +if (pi->pcfg.num_events ==0 ) { +dev_err (pi->dev,"%s:%d Can't work without events!\n" , + __func__, __LINE__); +return -EINVAL ; + } + + pl330 =kzalloc (sizeof (*pl330),GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!pl330) { +dev_err (pi->dev,"%s:%d Can't allocate memory!\n" , + __func__, __LINE__); +return -ENOMEM ; + } + +/* Assign the info structure and private data */ + pl330->pinfo = pi; + pi->pl330_data = pl330; + +spin_lock_init (&pl330->lock); + +INIT_LIST_HEAD (&pl330->req_done); + +/* Use default MC buffer size if not provided */ +if (!pi->mcbufsz) + pi->mcbufsz =MCODE_BUFF_PER_REQ *2 ; + +/* Mark all events as free */ +for (i =0 ; i < pi->pcfg.num_events; i++) + pl330->events[i] =-1 ; + +/* Allocate resources needed by the DMAC */ + ret =dmac_alloc_resources (pl330); +if (ret) { +dev_err (pi->dev,"Unable to create channels for DMAC\n" ); +kfree (pl330); +return ret; + } + +tasklet_init (&pl330->tasks, pl330_dotask, (unsigned long ) pl330); + + pl330->state =INIT ; + +return 0 ; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL (pl330_add); + +static int dmac_free_threads (struct pl330_dmac *pl330) +{ +struct pl330_info *pi = pl330->pinfo; +int chans = pi->pcfg.num_chan; +struct pl330_thread *thrd; +int i; + +/* Release Channel threads */ +for (i =0 ; i < chans; i++) { + thrd = &pl330->channels[i]; +pl330_release_channel ((void *)thrd); + } + +/* Free memory */ +kfree (pl330->channels); + +return 0 ; +} + +static void dmac_free_resources (struct pl330_dmac *pl330) +{ +struct pl330_info *pi = pl330->pinfo; +int chans = pi->pcfg.num_chan; + +dmac_free_threads (pl330); + +dma_free_coherent (pi->dev, chans * pi->mcbufsz, + pl330->mcode_cpu, pl330->mcode_bus); +} + +void pl330_del (struct pl330_info *pi) +{ +struct pl330_dmac *pl330; + +if (!pi || !pi->pl330_data) +return ; + + pl330 = pi->pl330_data; + + pl330->state =UNINIT ; + +tasklet_kill (&pl330->tasks); + +/* Free DMAC resources */ +dmac_free_resources (pl330); + +kfree (pl330); + pi->pl330_data =NULL ; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL (pl330_del);arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/pl330.h new file +53
-0@@ -0,0 +1,217 @@ +/* linux/include/asm/hardware/pl330.h +* +* Copyright (C) 2010 Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. +* Jaswinder Singh <[email protected]> +* +* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify +* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by +* the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or +* (at your option) any later version. +* +* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, +* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of +* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the +* GNU General Public License for more details. +* +* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License +* along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software +* Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. +*/ + +#ifndef __PL330_CORE_H +#define __PL330_CORE_H + +#define PL330_MAX_CHAN 8 +#define PL330_MAX_IRQS 32 +#define PL330_MAX_PERI 32 + +enum pl330_srccachectrl { + SCCTRL0 = 0, /* Noncacheable and nonbufferable */ + SCCTRL1, /* Bufferable only */ + SCCTRL2, /* Cacheable, but do not allocate */ + SCCTRL3, /* Cacheable and bufferable, but do not allocate */ + SINVALID1, + SINVALID2, + SCCTRL6, /* Cacheable write-through, allocate on reads only */ + SCCTRL7, /* Cacheable write-back, allocate on reads only */ +}; + +enum pl330_dstcachectrl { + DCCTRL0 = 0, /* Noncacheable and nonbufferable */ + DCCTRL1, /* Bufferable only */ + DCCTRL2, /* Cacheable, but do not allocate */ + DCCTRL3, /* Cacheable and bufferable, but do not allocate */ + DINVALID1 = 8, + DINVALID2, + DCCTRL6, /* Cacheable write-through, allocate on writes only */ + DCCTRL7, /* Cacheable write-back, allocate on writes only */ +}; + +/* Populated by the PL330 core driver for DMA API driver's info */ +struct pl330_config { + u32 periph_id; + u32 pcell_id;
arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/pl330.h line 63
Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/pl330.h new file +10
-0+#define DMAC_MODE_NS (1 << 0) +unsigned int mode; + unsigned int data_bus_width:10; /* In number of bits */ + unsigned int data_buf_dep:10; + unsigned int num_chan:4; + unsigned int num_peri:6; +u32 peri_ns; + unsigned int num_events:6; +u32 irq_ns; +};
If this is matching an in-memory structure, then please don't use :x to define these. Also you'll need to ensure it is packed.
If not matching an in memory structure, then unsigned char or u8s would probably generate more efficient code without sacrificing a lot of memory space.
Quoted 41 lines
arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/pl330.h new file +41
-0+/* Handle to the DMAC provided to the PL330 core */ +struct pl330_info { +/* Owning device */ +struct device *dev; +/* Size of MicroCode buffers for each channel. */ +unsigned mcbufsz; +/* ioremap'ed address of PL330 registers. */ +void __iomem *base; +/* Client can freely use it. */ +void *client_data; +/* PL330 core data, Client must not touch it. */ +void *pl330_data; +/* Populated by the PL330 core driver during pl330_add */ +struct pl330_config pcfg; +/* +* If the DMAC has some reset mechanism, then the +* client may want to provide pointer to the method. +*/ +void (*dmac_reset)(struct pl330_info *pi); +}; + +enum pl330_byteswap { +SWAP_NO =0 , +SWAP_2 , +SWAP_4 , +SWAP_8 , +SWAP_16 , +}; + +/** +* Request Configuration. +* The PL330 core does not modify this and uses the last +* working configuration if the request doesn't provide any. +* +* The Client may want to provide this info only for the +* first request and a request with new settings. +*/ +struct pl330_reqcfg { +/* Address Incrementing */ +unsigned dst_inc:1 ; +unsigned src_inc:1 ;
arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/pl330.h line 115
Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/pl330.h new file +10
-0+ +/* +* For now, the SRC & DST protection levels +* and burst size/length are assumed same. +*/ +bool nonsecure; +bool privileged; +bool insnaccess; + unsigned brst_len:5; + unsigned brst_size:3; /* in power of 2 */
see previous comments.
Quoted 104 lines
arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/pl330.h new file +101
-0+enum pl330_dstcachectrl dcctl; +enum pl330_srccachectrl scctl; +enum pl330_byteswap swap; +}; + +/* +* One cycle of DMAC operation. +* There may be more than one xfer in a request. +*/ +struct pl330_xfer { +u32 src_addr; +u32 dst_addr; +/* Size to xfer */ +u32 bytes; +/* +* Pointer to next xfer in the list. +* The last xfer in the req must point to NULL. +*/ +struct pl330_xfer *next; +}; + +/* The xfer callbacks are made with one of these arguments. */ +enum pl330_op_err { +/* The all xfers in the request were success. */ +PL330_ERR_NONE , +/* If req aborted due to global error. */ +PL330_ERR_ABORT , +/* If req failed due to problem with Channel. */ +PL330_ERR_FAIL , +}; + +enum pl330_reqtype { +MEMTOMEM , +MEMTODEV , +DEVTOMEM , +DEVTODEV , +}; + +/* A request defining Scatter-Gather List ending with NULL xfer. */ +struct pl330_req { +enum pl330_reqtype rqtype; +/* Index of peripheral for the xfer. */ +unsigned peri:5 ; +/* Unique token for this xfer, set by the client. */ +void *token; +/* Callback to be called after xfer. */ +void (*xfer_cb)(void *token,enum pl330_op_err err); +/* If NULL, req will be done at last set parameters. */ +struct pl330_reqcfg *cfg; +/* Pointer to first xfer in the request. */ +struct pl330_xfer *x; +}; + +/* +* To know the status of the channel and DMAC, the client +* provides a pointer to this structure. The PL330 core +* fills it with current information. +*/ +struct pl330_chanstatus { +/* +* If the DMAC engine halted due to some error, +* the client should remove-add DMAC. +*/ +bool dmac_halted; +/* +* If channel is halted due to some error, +* the client should ABORT/FLUSH and START the channel. +*/ +bool faulting; +/* Location of last load */ +u32 src_addr; +/* Location of last store */ +u32 dst_addr; +/* +* Pointer to the currently active req, NULL if channel is +* inactive, even though the requests may be present. +*/ +struct pl330_req *top_req; +/* Pointer to req waiting second in the queue if any. */ +struct pl330_req *wait_req; +}; + +enum pl330_chan_op { +/* Start the channel */ +PL330_OP_START , +/* Abort the active xfer */ +PL330_OP_ABORT , +/* Stop xfer and flush queue */ +PL330_OP_FLUSH , +}; + +extern int pl330_add (struct pl330_info *); +extern void pl330_del (struct pl330_info *pi); +extern int pl330_update (const struct pl330_info *pi); +extern void pl330_release_channel (void *ch_id); +extern void *pl330_request_channel (const struct pl330_info *pi); +extern int pl330_chan_status (void *ch_id,struct pl330_chanstatus *pstatus); +extern int pl330_chan_ctrl (void *ch_id,enum pl330_chan_op op); +extern int pl330_submit_req (void *ch_id,struct pl330_req *r); + +#endif /* __PL330_CORE_H */ Signature · 1 line
1.6.2.5
Signature · 4 lines
Ben Q: What's a light-year? A: One-third less calories than a regular year.
PATCH 1/7 PL330: Add common core driver
Quoted 2 lines · Ben Dooks
Quoted 1 line · jassisinghbrar at gmail.com
From: Jassi Brar <[email protected]>
.....
Quoted 38 lines
Quoted 38 lines
(quoted diff) +38
-0+ +#define _FTC ? ? ? ? 0x40 +#define FTC(n) ? ? ? ? ? ? ? (_FTC + (n)*0x4) + +#define _CS ? ? ? ? ?0x100 +#define CS(n) ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?(_CS + (n)*0x8) +#define CS_CNS ? ? ? ? ? ? ? (1 << 21) + +#define _CPC ? ? ? ? 0x104 +#define CPC(n) ? ? ? ? ? ? ? (_CPC + (n)*0x8) + +#define _SA ? ? ? ? ?0x400 +#define SA(n) ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?(_SA + (n)*0x20) + +#define _DA ? ? ? ? ?0x404 +#define DA(n) ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?(_DA + (n)*0x20) + +#define _CC ? ? ? ? ?0x408 +#define CC(n) ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?(_CC + (n)*0x20) + +#define CC_SRCINC ? ?(1 << 0) +#define CC_DSTINC ? ?(1 << 14) +#define CC_SRCPRI ? ?(1 << 8) +#define CC_DSTPRI ? ?(1 << 22) +#define CC_SRCNS ? ? (1 << 9) +#define CC_DSTNS ? ? (1 << 23) +#define CC_SRCIA ? ? (1 << 10) +#define CC_DSTIA ? ? (1 << 24) +#define CC_SRCBRSTLEN_SHFT ? 4 +#define CC_DSTBRSTLEN_SHFT ? 18 +#define CC_SRCBRSTSIZE_SHFT ?1 +#define CC_DSTBRSTSIZE_SHFT ?15 +#define CC_SRCCCTRL_SHFT ? ? 11 +#define CC_SRCCCTRL_MASK ? ? 0x7 +#define CC_DSTCCTRL_SHFT ? ? 25 +#define CC_DRCCCTRL_MASK ? ? 0x7 +#define CC_SWAP_SHFT 28 +
Quoted 8 lines
Review
Quoted 5 lines
(quoted diff) +5
-0+#define _LC0 ? ? ? ? 0x40c +#define LC0(n) ? ? ? ? ? ? ? (_LC0 + (n)*0x20) + +#define _LC1 ? ? ? ? 0x410 +#define LC1(n) ? ? ? ? ? ? ? (_LC1 + (n)*0x20)do we really need the _ versions of each of these, or can they be merged into thier non _ counterparts?
Yes, they could be merged.
.....
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
(quoted diff) +8
-0+#define CR0_PERIPH_REQ_SET ? (1 << 0) +#define CR0_BOOT_EN_SET ? ? ? ? ? ? ?(1 << 1) +#define CR0_BOOT_MAN_NS ? ? ? ? ? ? ?(1 << 2) +#define CR0_NUM_CHANS_SHIFT ?4 +#define CR0_NUM_CHANS_MASK ? 0x7 +#define CR0_NUM_PERIPH_SHIFT 12 +#define CR0_NUM_PERIPH_MASK ?0x1f +#define CR0_NUM_EVENTS_SHIFT 17
Quoted 8 lines
Review
Quoted 6 lines
(quoted diff) +6
-0+#define CR0_NUM_EVENTS_MASK ?0x1f + +#define CR1_ICACHE_LEN_SHIFT 0 +#define CR1_ICACHE_LEN_MASK ?0x7 +#define CR1_NUM_ICACHELINES_SHIFT ? ?4 +#define CR1_NUM_ICACHELINES_MASK ? ? 0xfare these aligned, or is it my mail client ignoring the formatting?
They are aligned. Maybe it's your mail client.
........
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +5
-0+ +/* +* Mark a _pl330_req as free. +* We do it by writing DMAEND as the first instruction +* because no valid request is going to have DMAEND as
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
+ * its first instruction to execute.
+ */
+#defineMARK_FREE(req)? ? ? do { \
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?_emit_END(0, (req)->mc_cpu); \
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? (req)->mc_len = 0; \
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? } while (0)I think inline functions for these would be easier to read.
you mean alignment that we see here? it's actually correctly aligned in an editor.
.....
Quoted 7 lines
Review
Quoted 5 lines
(quoted diff) +5
-0+struct _xfer_spec { + ? ? u32 ccr; + ? ? struct pl330_req *r; + ? ? struct pl330_xfer *x; +};would have been nice to kerneldoc this or at-least document it.
It is totally an internal and temporary thing made only to have to not pass three args. Except for the func that use it, it doesn't matter to any other part.
.....
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +6
-0+static inline bool _queue_empty (struct pl330_thread *thrd) +{ + ? ? return (IS_FREE(&thrd->req[0]) && IS_FREE(&thrd->req[1])) + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? true : false; +} +
Quoted 8 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c line 355
Quoted 5 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +5
-0+static inline bool _queue_full (struct pl330_thread *thrd) +{ + ? ? return (IS_FREE(&thrd->req[0]) || IS_FREE(&thrd->req[1])) + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? false : true; +}return !(IS_FREE(&thrd->req[0]) ||
IS_FREE(&thrd->req[1])should also work here.
Of course.
sometimes some people have an itch to return a 'true' or 'false' for a function that returns bool :)
.....
Quoted 6 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c line 391
Quoted 4 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +4
-0+ +static inline u32 _emit_ADDH (unsigned dry_run,u8 buf[], + ? ? ? ? ? ? enum pl330_dst da, u16 val) +{think that should be u8 *buf.
The 'buf' in all _emit_XXX functions is passed as an offset on dma consistent buffer and hence always contiguous. Since, it is easier to, and I do, manipulate that buffer like an array, they are taken as array.
Or am i overlooking something?
.....
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
(quoted diff) +6
-0+static inline u32 _emit_LD(unsigned dry_run, u8 buf[], ? ? ? enum pl330_cond cond) +{ + ? ? if (dry_run) + ? ? ? ? ? ? return SZ_DMALD; + + ? ? buf[0] = CMD_DMALD;
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
+
+ ? ? if (cond == SINGLE)
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? buf[0] |= (0 << 1) | (1 << 0);
+ ? ? else if (cond == BURST)
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? buf[0] |= (1 << 1) | (1 << 0);easir to merge
CMD_DMALDinto these to and just set buf[0] to the value in the first place.
Ok.
......
Quoted 23 lines
Quoted 23 lines
+ ? ? PL330_DBGCMD_DUMP(SZ_DMALD, "\tDMALD%c\n",
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? cond == SINGLE ? 'S' : (cond == BURST ? 'B' : 'A'));(quoted diff) +21
-0+ + ? ? return SZ_DMALD; +} + +static inline u32 _emit_LDP(unsigned dry_run, u8 buf[], + ? ? ? ? ? ? enum pl330_cond cond, u8 peri) +{ + ? ? if (dry_run) + ? ? ? ? ? ? return SZ_DMALDP; + + ? ? buf[0] = CMD_DMALDP; + + ? ? if (cond == BURST) + ? ? ? ? ? ? buf[0] |= (1 << 1); + + ? ? peri &= 0x1f; + ? ? peri <<= 3; + ? ? buf[1] = peri; + + ? ? PL330_DBGCMD_DUMP(SZ_DMALDP, "\tDMALDP%c %u\n", + ? ? ? ? ? ? cond == SINGLE ? 'S' : 'B', peri >> 3);
Quoted 8 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c line 474
Quoted 7 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +7
-0+ + ? ? return SZ_DMALDP; +} + +static inline u32 _emit_LP (unsigned dry_run,u8 buf[], + ? ? ? ? ? ? unsigned loop, u8 cnt) +{could loop be a bool?
dry_runcertainly should be.
I'd better do
buf[0] |= (loop << 1);
rather than
if (loop)
buf[0] |= (1 << 1);Yes, dry_run should be bool.
.......
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
+ ? ? if (
dry_run)
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? returnSZ_DMALP;I'm just wondering if these shouldn't be if (!dry_run) { } return SZ_;\
Just wanted to avoid another level of indent.
........
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
+ ? ? buf[0] =
CMD_DMALP;
+
+ ? ? if (loop)
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? buf[0] |= (1 << 1);again, you could probably do
? ? ? buf[0] = loop ?
CMD_DMALP| (1 << 1) :CMD_DMALP;
Since loop is the index, it'd better be
buf[0] = CMD_DMALP | (loop << 1) ;
.......
Quoted 11 lines
Review
Quoted 9 lines
(quoted diff) +9
-0+static inline u32 _emit_SEV(unsigned dry_run, u8 buf[], u8 ev) +{ + ? ? if (dry_run) + ? ? ? ? ? ? return SZ_DMASEV; + + ? ? buf[0] = CMD_DMASEV; + + ? ? ev &= 0x1f; + ? ? ev <<= 3;is this some common op that should have some form of macro/inline defn?
Strictly speaking, we could define a macro for preparing such mask for a few different instructions which happen to do the same thing.
......
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
(quoted diff) +6
-0+static inline u32 _emit_GO(unsigned dry_run, u8 buf[], + ? ? ? ? ? ? const struct _arg_GO *arg) +{ + ? ? u8 chan = arg->chan; + ? ? u32 addr = arg->addr; + ? ? unsigned ns = arg->ns;
Quoted 8 lines
Review
Quoted 6 lines
(quoted diff) +6
-0+ + ? ? if (dry_run) + ? ? ? ? ? ? return SZ_DMAGO; + + ? ? buf[0] = CMD_DMAGO; + ? ? buf[0] |= (ns << 1);again, you could have probably merged these two into one.
Ok
......
Quoted 21 lines
Quoted 21 lines
(quoted diff) +21
-0+static inline u32 _state(struct pl330_thread *thrd) +{ + ? ? void __iomem *regs = thrd->dmac->pinfo->base; + ? ? u32 val; + + ? ? if (is_manager(thrd)) + ? ? ? ? ? ? val = readl(regs + DS) & 0xf; + ? ? else + ? ? ? ? ? ? val = readl(regs + CS(thrd->id)) & 0xf; + + ? ? switch (val) { + ? ? case DS_ST_STOP: + ? ? ? ? ? ? return PL330_STATE_STOPPED; + ? ? case DS_ST_EXEC: + ? ? ? ? ? ? return PL330_STATE_EXECUTING; + ? ? case DS_ST_CMISS: + ? ? ? ? ? ? return PL330_STATE_CACHEMISS; + ? ? case DS_ST_UPDTPC: + ? ? ? ? ? ? return PL330_STATE_UPDTPC; + ? ? case DS_ST_WFE: + ? ? ? ? ? ? return PL330_STATE_WFE;
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
+ ? ? case
DS_ST_FAULT:
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? returnPL330_STATE_FAULTING;
+ ? ? caseDS_ST_ATBRR:
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? if (is_manager(thrd))
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? returnPL330_STATE_INVALID;might be more code efficient to break the case into two and have a
is_manager()check between the two switches.
ok
......
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +8
-0+ +/* If the request 'req' of thread 'thrd' is currently active */ +static inline bool _req_active (struct pl330_thread *thrd, + ? ? ? ? ? ? struct _pl330_req *req) +{ + ? ? void __iomem *regs = thrd->dmac->pinfo->base; + ? ? u32 buf = req->mc_bus, pc = readl(regs + CPC(thrd->id)); +
Quoted 8 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c line 343
Quoted 5 lines
+ ? ? if (
IS_FREE(req))
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? return false;arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +3
-0+ + ? ? return (pc >= buf && pc <= buf + req->mc_len) ? true : false; +}hmm, doesn't linux bool allow just a
? ? ?return (pc >= buf && pc <= buf +req->mc_len); ?
remember my itch ? :)
.....
Quoted 8 lines
Review
Quoted 6 lines
(quoted diff) +6
-0+updt_exit: + ? ? spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pl330->lock, flags); + + ? ? if (pl330->dmac_tbd.reset_dmac + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? || pl330->dmac_tbd.reset_mngr + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? || pl330->dmac_tbd.reset_chan) {iirc, style is:
Quoted 5 lines
? ? ?if (a || ? ? ? ? ?b ||? ? ? ? ?c)
could be wrong, definetly prefer the above.
Ok, though there doesn't seem to be any hard-fast rule.
.......
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
+ ? ? if (!pl330->mcode_cpu) {
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? dev_err(pi->dev, "%s:%d Can't allocate memory!\n",no need to add an ! at the end of the line.
Ok.
........
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
+
+ ? ? /* Check if we can handle this DMAC */
+ ? ? if (get_id(pi, PERIPH_ID)!=PERIPH_ID_VAL
+ ? ? ? ?||get_id(pi, PCELL_ID)!=PCELL_ID_VAL) {
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? dev_err(pi->dev, "PERIPH_ID0x%x,PCELL_ID0x%x !\n",
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?readl(regs + PERIPH_ID),readl(regs + PCELL_ID));
get_idandreadl()?
should be only get_id
Quoted 2 lines
Also, please don;'t keep getting suprised by errors, erro messages don't need a ! in them.
ok
......
Quoted 18 lines
Quoted 4 lines
(quoted diff) +4
-0+/* Populated by the PL330 core driver for DMA API driver's info */ +struct pl330_config { + ? ? u32 ? ? periph_id; + ? ? u32 ? ? pcell_id;Review
Quoted 10 lines
(quoted diff) +10
-0+#define DMAC_MODE_NS (1 << 0) + ? ? unsigned int ? ?mode; + ? ? unsigned int ? ?data_bus_width:10; /* In number of bits */ + ? ? unsigned int ? ?data_buf_dep:10; + ? ? unsigned int ? ?num_chan:4; + ? ? unsigned int ? ?num_peri:6; + ? ? u32 ? ? ? ? ? ? peri_ns; + ? ? unsigned int ? ?num_events:6; + ? ? u32 ? ? ? ? ? ? irq_ns; +};If this is matching an in-memory structure, then please don't use :x to define these. Also you'll need to ensure it is packed.
Quoted 3 lines
If not matching an in memory structure, then unsigned char or u8s would probably generate more efficient code without sacrificing a lot of memory space.
It is not matching any memory structure. I used fields only to stress the values they can take.
Ok, will convert to u8
.......
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 11 lines
+ * The Client may want to provide this info only for the
+ * first request and a request with new settings.
+ */(quoted diff) +8
-0+struct pl330_reqcfg { + ? ? /* Address Incrementing */ + ? ? unsigned dst_inc:1; + ? ? unsigned src_inc:1; + + ? ? /* + ? ? ?* For now, the SRC & DST protection levels + ? ? ?* and burst size/length are assumed same.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
+ ? ? ?*/
+ ? ? bool nonsecure;
+ ? ? bool privileged;
+ ? ? bool insnaccess;
+ ? ? unsigned brst_len:5;
+ ? ? unsigned brst_size:3; /* in power of 2 */see previous comments.
ok
Thanks.
PATCH 1/7 PL330: Add common core driver\
Quoted 72 lines · jassi brar
Quoted 2 lines · Ben Dooks
Quoted 1 line · jassisinghbrar at gmail.com
From: Jassi Brar <[email protected]>
.....
Quoted 38 lines
Quoted 38 lines
(quoted diff) +38
-0+ +#define _FTC ? ? ? ? 0x40 +#define FTC(n) ? ? ? ? ? ? ? (_FTC + (n)*0x4) + +#define _CS ? ? ? ? ?0x100 +#define CS(n) ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?(_CS + (n)*0x8) +#define CS_CNS ? ? ? ? ? ? ? (1 << 21) + +#define _CPC ? ? ? ? 0x104 +#define CPC(n) ? ? ? ? ? ? ? (_CPC + (n)*0x8) + +#define _SA ? ? ? ? ?0x400 +#define SA(n) ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?(_SA + (n)*0x20) + +#define _DA ? ? ? ? ?0x404 +#define DA(n) ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?(_DA + (n)*0x20) + +#define _CC ? ? ? ? ?0x408 +#define CC(n) ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?(_CC + (n)*0x20) + +#define CC_SRCINC ? ?(1 << 0) +#define CC_DSTINC ? ?(1 << 14) +#define CC_SRCPRI ? ?(1 << 8) +#define CC_DSTPRI ? ?(1 << 22) +#define CC_SRCNS ? ? (1 << 9) +#define CC_DSTNS ? ? (1 << 23) +#define CC_SRCIA ? ? (1 << 10) +#define CC_DSTIA ? ? (1 << 24) +#define CC_SRCBRSTLEN_SHFT ? 4 +#define CC_DSTBRSTLEN_SHFT ? 18 +#define CC_SRCBRSTSIZE_SHFT ?1 +#define CC_DSTBRSTSIZE_SHFT ?15 +#define CC_SRCCCTRL_SHFT ? ? 11 +#define CC_SRCCCTRL_MASK ? ? 0x7 +#define CC_DSTCCTRL_SHFT ? ? 25 +#define CC_DRCCCTRL_MASK ? ? 0x7 +#define CC_SWAP_SHFT 28 +Quoted 8 lines
Review
Quoted 5 lines
(quoted diff) +5
-0+#define _LC0 ? ? ? ? 0x40c +#define LC0(n) ? ? ? ? ? ? ? (_LC0 + (n)*0x20) + +#define _LC1 ? ? ? ? 0x410 +#define LC1(n) ? ? ? ? ? ? ? (_LC1 + (n)*0x20)do we really need the _ versions of each of these, or can they be merged into thier non _ counterparts?
Yes, they could be merged.
.....
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
(quoted diff) +8
-0+#define CR0_PERIPH_REQ_SET ? (1 << 0) +#define CR0_BOOT_EN_SET ? ? ? ? ? ? ?(1 << 1) +#define CR0_BOOT_MAN_NS ? ? ? ? ? ? ?(1 << 2) +#define CR0_NUM_CHANS_SHIFT ?4 +#define CR0_NUM_CHANS_MASK ? 0x7 +#define CR0_NUM_PERIPH_SHIFT 12 +#define CR0_NUM_PERIPH_MASK ?0x1f +#define CR0_NUM_EVENTS_SHIFT 17Quoted 8 lines
Review
Quoted 6 lines
(quoted diff) +6
-0+#define CR0_NUM_EVENTS_MASK ?0x1f + +#define CR1_ICACHE_LEN_SHIFT 0 +#define CR1_ICACHE_LEN_MASK ?0x7 +#define CR1_NUM_ICACHELINES_SHIFT ? ?4 +#define CR1_NUM_ICACHELINES_MASK ? ? 0xfare these aligned, or is it my mail client ignoring the formatting?
Quoted 1 line
They are aligned. Maybe it's your mail client.
Ok, hope to sort this out once the computer is fixed.
Quoted 15 lines
........
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +5
-0+ +/* +* Mark a _pl330_req as free. +* We do it by writing DMAEND as the first instruction +* because no valid request is going to have DMAEND as Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
+ * its first instruction to execute.
+ */
+#defineMARK_FREE(req)? ? ? do { \
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?_emit_END(0, (req)->mc_cpu); \
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? (req)->mc_len = 0; \
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? } while (0)I think inline functions for these would be easier to read.
Quoted 2 lines
you mean alignment that we see here? it's actually correctly aligned in an editor.
firstly, on the grounds it avoids the whole \
and secondly on the grounds inline functions get checked by the compiler whether they're used or not.
I belive any macro over a couple of lines is probably doing too much work.
Quoted 29 lines
.....
Quoted 7 lines
Review
Quoted 5 lines
(quoted diff) +5
-0+struct _xfer_spec { + ? ? u32 ccr; + ? ? struct pl330_req *r; + ? ? struct pl330_xfer *x; +};would have been nice to kerneldoc this or at-least document it.
It is totally an internal and temporary thing made only to have to not pass three args. Except for the func that use it, it doesn't matter to any other part.
.....
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +6
-0+static inline bool _queue_empty (struct pl330_thread *thrd) +{ + ? ? return (IS_FREE(&thrd->req[0]) && IS_FREE(&thrd->req[1])) + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? true : false; +} +Quoted 8 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c line 355
Quoted 5 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +5
-0+static inline bool _queue_full (struct pl330_thread *thrd) +{ + ? ? return (IS_FREE(&thrd->req[0]) || IS_FREE(&thrd->req[1])) + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? false : true; +}return !(IS_FREE(&thrd->req[0]) ||
IS_FREE(&thrd->req[1])should also work here.
Quoted 3 lines
Of course.
sometimes some people have an itch to return a 'true' or 'false' for a function that returns bool :)
ok, but that's one strange itch. you should go see a doctor.
Quoted 8 lines
.....
Quoted 6 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c line 391
Quoted 4 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +4
-0+ +static inline u32 _emit_ADDH (unsigned dry_run,u8 buf[], + ? ? ? ? ? ? enum pl330_dst da, u16 val) +{think that should be u8 *buf.
Quoted 5 lines
The 'buf' in all
_emit_XXXfunctions is passed as an offset on dma consistent buffer and hence always contiguous. Since, it is easier to, and I do, manipulate that buffer like an array, they are taken as array.
Or am i overlooking something?
u8 *ptr; ptr[x] is valid.
Quoted 51 lines
.....
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
(quoted diff) +6
-0+static inline u32 _emit_LD(unsigned dry_run, u8 buf[], ? ? ? enum pl330_cond cond) +{ + ? ? if (dry_run) + ? ? ? ? ? ? return SZ_DMALD; + + ? ? buf[0] = CMD_DMALD;Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
+
+ ? ? if (cond == SINGLE)
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? buf[0] |= (0 << 1) | (1 << 0);
+ ? ? else if (cond == BURST)
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? buf[0] |= (1 << 1) | (1 << 0);easir to merge
CMD_DMALDinto these to and just set buf[0] to the value in the first place.Ok.
......
Quoted 23 lines
Quoted 23 lines
+ ? ? PL330_DBGCMD_DUMP(SZ_DMALD, "\tDMALD%c\n",
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? cond == SINGLE ? 'S' : (cond == BURST ? 'B' : 'A'));(quoted diff) +21
-0+ + ? ? return SZ_DMALD; +} + +static inline u32 _emit_LDP(unsigned dry_run, u8 buf[], + ? ? ? ? ? ? enum pl330_cond cond, u8 peri) +{ + ? ? if (dry_run) + ? ? ? ? ? ? return SZ_DMALDP; + + ? ? buf[0] = CMD_DMALDP; + + ? ? if (cond == BURST) + ? ? ? ? ? ? buf[0] |= (1 << 1); + + ? ? peri &= 0x1f; + ? ? peri <<= 3; + ? ? buf[1] = peri; + + ? ? PL330_DBGCMD_DUMP(SZ_DMALDP, "\tDMALDP%c %u\n", + ? ? ? ? ? ? cond == SINGLE ? 'S' : 'B', peri >> 3);Quoted 8 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c line 474
Quoted 7 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +7
-0+ + ? ? return SZ_DMALDP; +} + +static inline u32 _emit_LP (unsigned dry_run,u8 buf[], + ? ? ? ? ? ? unsigned loop, u8 cnt) +{could loop be a bool?
dry_runcertainly should be.
Quoted 3 lines
I'd better do
buf[0] |= (loop << 1);
ok, as long as you ensure loop is always 0 or 1. you could also then merge in the original instruction.
Quoted 21 lines
rather than
if (loop) buf[0] |= (1 << 1);Yes,
dry_runshould be bool........
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
+ ? ? if (
dry_run)
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? returnSZ_DMALP;I'm just wondering if these shouldn't be if (!dry_run) { } return SZ_;\
Just wanted to avoid another level of indent.
........
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 4 lines
+ ? ? buf[0] =
CMD_DMALP;
+
+ ? ? if (loop)
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? buf[0] |= (1 << 1);
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines
again, you could probably do
? ? ? buf[0] = loop ?
CMD_DMALP| (1 << 1) :CMD_DMALP;Since loop is the index, it'd better be
buf[0] = CMD_DMALP | (loop << 1) ;
ok, seems sensible.
Quoted 13 lines
.......
Quoted 11 lines
Review
Quoted 9 lines
(quoted diff) +9
-0+static inline u32 _emit_SEV(unsigned dry_run, u8 buf[], u8 ev) +{ + ? ? if (dry_run) + ? ? ? ? ? ? return SZ_DMASEV; + + ? ? buf[0] = CMD_DMASEV; + + ? ? ev &= 0x1f; + ? ? ev <<= 3;is this some common op that should have some form of macro/inline defn?
Quoted 2 lines
Strictly speaking, we could define a macro for preparing such mask for a few different instructions which happen to do the same thing.
I'm also wodnering if you could have a overall generate instruction with this form of arguments, instead of having a whole pile of really similar code.
Quoted 69 lines
......
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
(quoted diff) +6
-0+static inline u32 _emit_GO(unsigned dry_run, u8 buf[], + ? ? ? ? ? ? const struct _arg_GO *arg) +{ + ? ? u8 chan = arg->chan; + ? ? u32 addr = arg->addr; + ? ? unsigned ns = arg->ns;Quoted 8 lines
Review
Quoted 6 lines
(quoted diff) +6
-0+ + ? ? if (dry_run) + ? ? ? ? ? ? return SZ_DMAGO; + + ? ? buf[0] = CMD_DMAGO; + ? ? buf[0] |= (ns << 1);again, you could have probably merged these two into one.
Ok
......
Quoted 21 lines
Quoted 21 lines
(quoted diff) +21
-0+static inline u32 _state(struct pl330_thread *thrd) +{ + ? ? void __iomem *regs = thrd->dmac->pinfo->base; + ? ? u32 val; + + ? ? if (is_manager(thrd)) + ? ? ? ? ? ? val = readl(regs + DS) & 0xf; + ? ? else + ? ? ? ? ? ? val = readl(regs + CS(thrd->id)) & 0xf; + + ? ? switch (val) { + ? ? case DS_ST_STOP: + ? ? ? ? ? ? return PL330_STATE_STOPPED; + ? ? case DS_ST_EXEC: + ? ? ? ? ? ? return PL330_STATE_EXECUTING; + ? ? case DS_ST_CMISS: + ? ? ? ? ? ? return PL330_STATE_CACHEMISS; + ? ? case DS_ST_UPDTPC: + ? ? ? ? ? ? return PL330_STATE_UPDTPC; + ? ? case DS_ST_WFE: + ? ? ? ? ? ? return PL330_STATE_WFE;Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
+ ? ? case
DS_ST_FAULT:
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? returnPL330_STATE_FAULTING;
+ ? ? caseDS_ST_ATBRR:
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? if (is_manager(thrd))
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? returnPL330_STATE_INVALID;might be more code efficient to break the case into two and have a
is_manager()check between the two switches.ok
......
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +8
-0+ +/* If the request 'req' of thread 'thrd' is currently active */ +static inline bool _req_active (struct pl330_thread *thrd, + ? ? ? ? ? ? struct _pl330_req *req) +{ + ? ? void __iomem *regs = thrd->dmac->pinfo->base; + ? ? u32 buf = req->mc_bus, pc = readl(regs + CPC(thrd->id)); +Quoted 8 lines
arch/arm/common/pl330.c line 343
Quoted 5 lines
+ ? ? if (
IS_FREE(req))
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? return false;arch/arm/common/pl330.c new file +3
-0+ + ? ? return (pc >= buf && pc <= buf + req->mc_len) ? true : false; +}hmm, doesn't linux bool allow just a
? ? ?return (pc >= buf && pc <= buf +req->mc_len); ?
Quoted 1 line
remember my itch ? :)
brainscrub, isle 3.
Quoted 14 lines
.....
Quoted 12 lines
Review
Quoted 6 lines
(quoted diff) +6
-0+updt_exit: + ? ? spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pl330->lock, flags); + + ? ? if (pl330->dmac_tbd.reset_dmac + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? || pl330->dmac_tbd.reset_mngr + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? || pl330->dmac_tbd.reset_chan) {iirc, style is:
? ? ?if (a || ? ? ? ? ?b ||? ? ? ? ?c)
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 1 line
could be wrong, definetly prefer the above.
Ok, though there doesn't seem to be any hard-fast rule.
this is why I wasn't being definite.
Quoted 7 lines
.......
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
+ ? ? if (!pl330->mcode_cpu) {
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? dev_err(pi->dev, "%s:%d Can't allocate memory!\n",no need to add an ! at the end of the line.
Ok.
again, not a rule as such, just genrally accepted practice.
Quoted 11 lines
........
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
+
+ ? ? /* Check if we can handle this DMAC */
+ ? ? if (get_id(pi, PERIPH_ID)!=PERIPH_ID_VAL
+ ? ? ? ?||get_id(pi, PCELL_ID)!=PCELL_ID_VAL) {
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? dev_err(pi->dev, "PERIPH_ID0x%x,PCELL_ID0x%x !\n",
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?readl(regs + PERIPH_ID),readl(regs + PCELL_ID));
get_idandreadl()?should be only
get_id
did seem wrong.
Quoted 52 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Also, please don;'t keep getting suprised by errors, erro messages don't need a ! in them.
ok
......
Quoted 18 lines
Quoted 4 lines
(quoted diff) +4
-0+/* Populated by the PL330 core driver for DMA API driver's info */ +struct pl330_config { + ? ? u32 ? ? periph_id; + ? ? u32 ? ? pcell_id;Review
Quoted 10 lines
(quoted diff) +10
-0+#define DMAC_MODE_NS (1 << 0) + ? ? unsigned int ? ?mode; + ? ? unsigned int ? ?data_bus_width:10; /* In number of bits */ + ? ? unsigned int ? ?data_buf_dep:10; + ? ? unsigned int ? ?num_chan:4; + ? ? unsigned int ? ?num_peri:6; + ? ? u32 ? ? ? ? ? ? peri_ns; + ? ? unsigned int ? ?num_events:6; + ? ? u32 ? ? ? ? ? ? irq_ns; +};If this is matching an in-memory structure, then please don't use :x to define these. Also you'll need to ensure it is packed.
Quoted 3 lines
If not matching an in memory structure, then unsigned char or u8s would probably generate more efficient code without sacrificing a lot of memory space.
It is not matching any memory structure. I used fields only to stress the values they can take.
Ok, will convert to u8.......
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 11 lines
+ * The Client may want to provide this info only for the
+ * first request and a request with new settings.
+ */(quoted diff) +8
-0+struct pl330_reqcfg { + ? ? /* Address Incrementing */ + ? ? unsigned dst_inc:1; + ? ? unsigned src_inc:1; + + ? ? /* + ? ? ?* For now, the SRC & DST protection levels + ? ? ?* and burst size/length are assumed same.Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
+ ? ? ?*/
+ ? ? bool nonsecure;
+ ? ? bool privileged;
+ ? ? bool insnaccess;
+ ? ? unsigned brst_len:5;
+ ? ? unsigned brst_size:3; /* in power of 2 */see previous comments.
Quoted 3 lines
ok
Thanks.
good to see things moving along.
Signature · 4 lines
Ben Q: What's a light-year? A: One-third less calories than a regular year.
PATCH 1/7 PL330: Add common core driver\
Quoted 14 lines · Ben Dooks
Quoted 13 lines · jassi brar
Quoted 12 lines · Ben Dooks
Quoted 10 lines · jassisinghbrar at gmail.com
From: Jassi Brar <[email protected]>
+ * Mark a_pl330_reqas free.
+ * We do it by writing DMAEND as the first instruction
+ * because no valid request is going to have DMAEND as
+ * its first instruction to execute.
+ */
+#defineMARK_FREE(req)? ? ? do { \
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?_emit_END(0, (req)->mc_cpu); \
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? (req)->mc_len = 0; \
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? } while (0)
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line
I think inline functions for these would be easier to read.
you mean alignment that we see here? it's actually correctly aligned in an editor.
firstly, on the grounds it avoids the whole \
and secondly on the grounds inline functions get checked by the compiler whether they're used or not.
...thirdly any macro that evaluates its arguments more than once is potentially dangerous for cases like MARK_FREE(req++).
Quoted 4 lines
I belive any macro over a couple of lines is probably doing too much work.
--
Dan
PATCH 1/7 PL330: Add common core driver\
Quoted 19 lines · Dan Williams
Quoted 18 lines · Ben Dooks
Quoted 16 lines · jassi brar
Quoted 12 lines · Ben Dooks
Quoted 10 lines · jassisinghbrar at gmail.com
From: Jassi Brar <[email protected]>
+ * Mark a_pl330_reqas free.
+ * We do it by writing DMAEND as the first instruction
+ * because no valid request is going to have DMAEND as
+ * its first instruction to execute.
+ */
+#defineMARK_FREE(req)? ? ? do { \
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?_emit_END(0, (req)->mc_cpu); \
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? (req)->mc_len = 0; \
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? } while (0)Quoted 1 line
I think inline functions for these would be easier to read.
you mean alignment that we see here? it's actually correctly aligned in an editor.
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 3 lines
firstly, on the grounds it avoids the whole \
and secondly on the grounds inline functions get checked by the compiler whether they're used or not....thirdly any macro that evaluates its arguments more than once is potentially dangerous for cases like
MARK_FREE(req++).Quoted 3 lines
I belive any macro over a couple of lines is probably doing too much work.
Well, the three points are valid and we might have even more against using macros _generally_. But just for the sake of clarification/learning..
a) We do have many multi-line macros in the kernel
b) The macro MARK_FREE does two independent things, where as a function usually does a sequence of logical steps. The macro MARK_FREE is clearly being used in our case.
c) Since the driver uses exactly two requests and we always explicitly free req[0] or req[1], I think we are in no danger of referencing invalid memory here.
Though having been asked by two maintainers, I will change it to inline func though.
Thanks.