libibverbs and versions
Hey Roland,
I have this library I'm writing that uses libibverbs. Somehow it seems to be using the 1.0 version instead of the newer version (I'm guessing). When I call ibv_create_cq() I get a seg fault and the stack looks like this:
#0 0x000000319d80871d in pthread_mutex_lock () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 #1 0x00007f60e93fac9a in __ibv_create_cq (context=0x7f60e8597c51, cqe=256,
cq_context=0x0, channel=0x0, comp_vector=0) at src/verbs.c:278
#2 0x00007f60e93f727f in __ibv_create_cq_1_0 (context=0x61db30, cqe=256,
cq_context=0x0, channel=0x0, comp_vector=0) at src/compat-1_0.c:649
At the __ibv_create_cq_1_0 stack frame, context looks good:
(gdb) p *context
$3 = {device = 0x61ede0, ops = {
query_device = 0x7f60e8596c98 <c4iw_query_device>, query_port = 0x7f60e8596d35 <c4iw_query_port>, alloc_pd = 0x7f60e8596d66 <c4iw_alloc_pd>, dealloc_pd = 0x7f60e8596dd9 <c4iw_free_pd>, reg_mr = 0x7f60e8596f77 <c4iw_reg_mr>, dereg_mr = 0, create_cq = 0x7f60e8596fae <c4iw_dereg_mr>, poll_cq = 0, req_notify_cq = 0, cq_event = 0,
<stuff truncated>
But context->real_context looks bad:
(gdb) p *context->real_context
$5 = {device = 0x30ec8348e5894855, ops = {query_device = 0xe0758948e87d8948,
query_port = 0xe87d8b48dc558966, alloc_pd = 0x458948fffffdf2e8, dealloc_pd = 0xc78148f07d8b48f0, reg_mr = 0xffaa4ee800000130, rereg_mr = 0xc78148f07d8b48ff, dereg_mr = 0xfffddce8000000b0, alloc_mw = 0x7d8b480974c085ff, bind_mw = 0xb70fffffed72e8f0, dealloc_mw = 0x8b48e0758b48dc55, create_cq = 0x89ffffac70e8e87d, poll_cq = 0x358d48fc558bfc45, req_notify_cq = 0xb43d8d48000016a3,
<stuff truncated>
When I walk through a different program that does work, I don't see the __ibv_create_cq_1_0() call. The program seems to call __ibv_create_cq() directly.
What am I doing wrong? How does the loader determine which version is needed?
Thanks in advance,
Stevo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 4C067DE0.8020508-7bPotxP6k4+P2YhJcF5u+vpXobYPEAuW@public.gmane.org
Quoted 10 lines
I have this library I'm writing that uses libibverbs. Somehow it seems to be using the 1.0 version instead of the newer version (I'm guessing). When I call
ibv_create_cq()I get a seg fault and the stack looks like this:#0
0x000000319d80871dinpthread_mutex_lock() from/lib64/libpthread.so.0#10x00007f60e93fac9ain__ibv_create_cq(context=0x7f60e8597c51, cqe=256,
cq_context=0x0, channel=0x0, comp_vector=0) atsrc/verbs.c:278
#20x00007f60e93f727fin__ibv_create_cq_1_0(context=0x61db30, cqe=256,
cq_context=0x0, channel=0x0, comp_vector=0) atsrc/compat-1_0.c:649
Code compiled against libibverbs 1.1 shouldn't ever hit the 1.0 compatibility code. libibverbs is using versioned symbols, so if your library is built/linked correctly, it should pick up the 1.1 versions. How are you building your library?
- R.
Signature · 6 lines
Roland Dreier <[email protected]> || For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): adaeigptma8.fsf-BjVyx320WGW9gfZ95n9DRSW4+XlvGpQz@public.gmane.org
Quoted 11 lines · Roland Dreier
Quoted 10 lines
I have this library I'm writing that uses libibverbs. Somehow it seems to be using the 1.0 version instead of the newer version (I'm guessing). When I call
ibv_create_cq()I get a seg fault and the stack looks like this:#0
0x000000319d80871dinpthread_mutex_lock() from/lib64/libpthread.so.0#10x00007f60e93fac9ain__ibv_create_cq(context=0x7f60e8597c51, cqe=256,
cq_context=0x0, channel=0x0, comp_vector=0) atsrc/verbs.c:278
#20x00007f60e93f727fin__ibv_create_cq_1_0(context=0x61db30, cqe=256,
cq_context=0x0, channel=0x0, comp_vector=0) atsrc/compat-1_0.c:649
Quoted 7 lines
Code compiled against libibverbs 1.1 shouldn't ever hit the 1.0 compatibility code. libibverbs is using versioned symbols, so if your library is built/linked correctly, it should pick up the 1.1 versions. How are you building your library?
- R.
Apparently I'm building it incorrectly. :) I stole the Makefile.am and configure.in from one of my other libs.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Quoted 4 lines · Steve Wise
I have this library I'm writing that uses libibverbs. Somehow it seems to be using the 1.0 version instead of the newer version (I'm guessing). When I call
ibv_create_cq()I get a seg fault and the stack looks like this:
Make sure you link your library to libibverbs and do not rely on linking the app to libibverbs to resolve the symbols. Check with ldd foo.so
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 20100602173245.GG15969-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org
Quoted 11 lines · Jason Gunthorpe
Quoted 2 lines · Steve Wise
I have this library I'm writing that uses libibverbs. Somehow it seems to be using the 1.0 version instead of the newer version (I'm guessing). When I call
ibv_create_cq()I get a seg fault and the stack looks like this:Make sure you link your library to libibverbs and do not rely on linking the app to libibverbs to resolve the symbols. Check with ldd foo.so
Jason
This was the issue. My library wasn't explicitly linking via -libverbs. When I added that, it worked.
But how did it manage to link to the old version I wonder?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 4C069774.4050402-7bPotxP6k4+P2YhJcF5u+vpXobYPEAuW@public.gmane.org
Quoted 5 lines · Steve Wise
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
I have this library I'm writing that uses libibverbs. Somehow it seems to be using the 1.0 version instead of the newer version (I'm guessing). When I call
ibv_create_cq()I get a seg fault and the stack looks like this:
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Make sure you link your library to libibverbs and do not rely on linking the app to libibverbs to resolve the symbols. Check with ldd foo.so
This was the issue. My library wasn't explicitly linking via -libverbs. When I added that, it worked.
But how did it manage to link to the old version I wonder?
If the linker doesn't have the library to look through an external symbol is simply set as 'ibv_create_cq' in the symbol table. That is the same name an app using libibverbs 1.0 would use to refer to the old symbol. When linker has the library it sees that the proper name for the symbol is now [email protected] and puts that in the symbol table instead.
It is critical that all library are explicitly linked to all their dependent libraries, otherwise a variety of bad things can happen.
Hmm.. Also, this reveals that it was a mistake to change the the argument objects and use versioned symbols to cover that up - versioned symbols cannot be used that way, it makes a really big mess in real use cases. Curious that nobody has noticed this before..
Basically what Steve did is linked his library to verbs 1.0 and linked the app to 1.1, and then passed an ibv_context across his library's function call boundary.. Kablooie.
Makes me wonder if the versioned symbol bother is even worth the trouble.
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html