Skip to contentSkip to conversation

ARM/AT91 build failure: Error: symbol *ABS* is in a different section

DISCUSSION Thomas Petazzoni 2 participants 2 messages Jun 12, 2010 – Jun 13, 2010 Arm (32-bit)

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Hello,

In barebox 2010.05, the at91sam9263ek defconfig was building properly with my 2009q1 CodeSourcery ARM toolchain. Barebox 2010.06 no longer builds with the same defconfig/toolchain. The build failure is:

CC arch/arm/cpu/start.o
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:37: Error: symbol *ABS* is in a different section

The commit that introduced the regression is 78104ae181f78d83664fdc7522eb632d9c3b2ec9 (i.e "arm: reimplement startup code in C").

The part causing the problem is in board_init_lowlevel_return(), more precisely

    /* Get runtime address of this function */
    __asm__ __volatile__("adr %0, 0":"=r"(r));

I have investigated further for the moment.

Best regards,

Thomas

Signature · 9 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
#1 lore raw

Hi Thomas,

Quoted 14 lines · Thomas Petazzoni

Hello,

In barebox 2010.05, the at91sam9263ek defconfig was building properly with my 2009q1 CodeSourcery ARM toolchain. Barebox 2010.06 no longer builds with the same defconfig/toolchain. The build failure is:

CC arch/arm/cpu/start.o
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:37: Error: symbol *ABS* is in a different section

The commit that introduced the regression is 78104ae181f78d83664fdc7522eb632d9c3b2ec9 (i.e "arm: reimplement startup code in C").

Quoted 7 lines

The part causing the problem is in board_init_lowlevel_return(), more precisely

    /* Get runtime address of this function */
    __asm__ __volatile__("adr %0, 0":"=r"(r));

I have investigated further for the moment.

This was mentioned before and the result was the following patch. Sorry, somehow I forgot to check it in. It's now in the master branch.

Sascha

commit c21a7fb9f15ee1fb213e22c0e7a9d0f53b274cb2

Author: Sascha Hauer <[email protected]>
Date:   Wed May 19 13:23:43 2010 +0200

arm start.c: Make runtime function address calculation tolerant for more compilers

arch/arm/cpu/start.c +10 -7
index 67d54a6..eea7dcf 100644
@@ -81,21 +81,24 @@ void __naked __bare_init reset(void)
  */
 void __naked __bare_init board_init_lowlevel_return(void)
 {
-	uint32_t r;
+	uint32_t r, addr;
+
+	/*
+	 * Get runtime address of this function. Do not
+	 * put any code above this.
+	 */
+	__asm__ __volatile__("1: adr %0, 1b":"=r"(addr));
 
 	/* Setup the stack */
 	r = STACK_BASE + STACK_SIZE - 16;
 	__asm__ __volatile__("mov sp, %0" : : "r"(r));
 
-	/* Get runtime address of this function */
-	__asm__ __volatile__("adr %0, 0":"=r"(r));
-
 	/* Get start of binary image */
-	r -= (uint32_t)&board_init_lowlevel_return - TEXT_BASE;
+	addr -= (uint32_t)&board_init_lowlevel_return - TEXT_BASE;
 
 	/* relocate to link address if necessary */
-	if (r != TEXT_BASE)
-		memcpy((void *)TEXT_BASE, (void *)r,
+	if (addr != TEXT_BASE)
+		memcpy((void *)TEXT_BASE, (void *)addr,
 				(unsigned int)&__bss_start - TEXT_BASE);
 
 	/* clear bss */
Signature · 9 lines
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox