vt/console: try harder to print output when panicing
Subsystems (9)
Dave Airlie
maintainerPATCH 1/1 vt/console: try harder to print output when panicing
From: Jesse Barnes <[email protected]>
Jesse's initial patch commit said:
"At panic time (i.e. when oops_in_progress is set) we should try a bit harder to update the screen and make sure output gets to the VT, since some drivers are capable of flipping back to it.
So make sure we try to unblank and update the display if called from a panic context."
I've enhanced this to add a flag to the vc that console layer can set to indicate they want this behaviour to occur. This also adds support to fbcon for that flag and adds an fb flag for drivers to indicate they want to use the support. It enables this for KMS drivers.
--- drivers/char/vt.c | 13 +++++++++---- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fb.c | 4 +--- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fb.c | 2 +- drivers/video/console/fbcon.c | 4 +++- include/linux/console_struct.h | 1 + include/linux/fb.h | 4 ++++ include/linux/vt_kern.h | 7 +++++++ 8 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
drivers/char/vt.c +9 -4
@@ -698,7 +698,10 @@ void redraw_screen(struct vc_data *vc, int is_switch)update_attr (vc);clear_buffer_attributes (vc); } -if (update && vc->vc_mode !=KD_GRAPHICS ) + +/* Forcibly update if we're panicing */ +if ((update && vc->vc_mode !=KD_GRAPHICS ) || +vt_force_oops_output (vc))do_update_region (vc, vc->vc_origin, vc->vc_screenbuf_size /2 ); }set_cursor (vc);
@@ -736,6 +739,7 @@ static void visual_init(struct vc_data *vc, int num, int init) vc->vc_hi_font_mask =0 ; vc->vc_complement_mask =0 ; vc->vc_can_do_color =0 ; + vc->vc_panic_force_write = false; vc->vc_sw->con_init (vc, init);if (!vc->vc_complement_mask) vc->vc_complement_mask = vc->vc_can_do_color ?0x7700 :0x0800 ;
@@ -2498,7 +2502,7 @@ static void vt_console_print(struct console *co, const char *b, unsigned count) goto quit; } -if (vc->vc_mode !=KD_TEXT ) +if (vc->vc_mode !=KD_TEXT && !vt_force_oops_output (vc)) goto quit;/* undraw cursor first */
@@ -3703,7 +3707,8 @@ void do_unblank_screen(int leaving_gfx)return ; } vc = vc_cons[fg_console].d; -if (vc->vc_mode !=KD_TEXT ) +/* Try to unblank in oops case too */ +if (vc->vc_mode !=KD_TEXT && !vt_force_oops_output (vc))return ;/* but leave console_blanked != 0 */ if (blankinterval) {
@@ -3712,7 +3717,7 @@ void do_unblank_screen(int leaving_gfx) } console_blanked =0 ; -if (vc->vc_sw->con_blank (vc,0 , leaving_gfx)) +if (vc->vc_sw->con_blank (vc,0 , leaving_gfx) ||vt_force_oops_output (vc))/* Low-level driver cannot restore -> do it ourselves */ update_screen (vc);if (console_blank_hook)
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fb.c +1 -3
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static int intelfb_create(struct intel_fbdev *ifbdev,strcpy (info->fix.id,"inteldrmfb" ); - info->flags =FBINFO_DEFAULT ; + info->flags =FBINFO_DEFAULT |FBINFO_CAN_FORCE_OUTPUT ; info->fbops = &intelfb_ops;/* setup aperture base/size for vesafb takeover */
@@ -146,8 +146,6 @@ static int intelfb_create(struct intel_fbdev *ifbdev, info->fix.smem_start = dev->mode_config.fb_base + obj_priv->gtt_offset; info->fix.smem_len = size; - info->flags =FBINFO_DEFAULT ; - info->screen_base =ioremap_wc (dev->agp->base + obj_priv->gtt_offset, size);if (!info->screen_base) {
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c +1 -0
@@ -250,6 +250,7 @@ nouveau_fbcon_create(struct nouveau_fbdev *nfbdev, info->flags =FBINFO_DEFAULT |FBINFO_HWACCEL_COPYAREA |FBINFO_HWACCEL_FILLRECT |FBINFO_HWACCEL_IMAGEBLIT ; + info->flags |=FBINFO_CAN_FORCE_OUTPUT ; info->fbops = &nouveau_fbcon_ops; info->fix.smem_start = dev->mode_config.fb_base + nvbo->bo.offset - dev_priv->vm_vram_base;
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fb.c +1 -1
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ static int radeonfb_create(struct radeon_fbdev *rfbdev,drm_fb_helper_fill_fix (info, fb->pitch, fb->depth); - info->flags =FBINFO_DEFAULT ; + info->flags =FBINFO_DEFAULT |FBINFO_CAN_FORCE_OUTPUT ; info->fbops = &radeonfb_ops; tmp =radeon_bo_gpu_offset (rbo) - rdev->mc.vram_start;
drivers/video/console/fbcon.c +3 -1
@@ -283,7 +283,8 @@ static inline int fbcon_is_inactive(struct vc_data *vc, struct fb_info *info)struct fbcon_ops *ops = info->fbcon_par;return (info->state !=FBINFO_STATE_RUNNING || - vc->vc_mode !=KD_TEXT || ops->graphics); + vc->vc_mode !=KD_TEXT || ops->graphics) && + !vt_force_oops_output (vc); } static inline int get_color(struct vc_data *vc, struct fb_info *info,
@@ -1073,6 +1074,7 @@ static void fbcon_init(struct vc_data *vc, int init)if (p->userfont) charcnt =FNTCHARCNT (p->fontdata); + vc->vc_panic_force_write = !!(info->flags &FBINFO_CAN_FORCE_OUTPUT ); vc->vc_can_do_color = (fb_get_color_depth (&info->var, &info->fix)!=1 ); vc->vc_complement_mask = vc->vc_can_do_color ?0x7700 :0x0800 ;if (charcnt =256 ) {
include/linux/console_struct.h +1 -0
@@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ struct vc_data {struct vc_data **vc_display_fg;/* [!] Ptr to var holding fg console for this display */ unsigned long vc_uni_pagedir;unsigned long *vc_uni_pagedir_loc;/* [!] Location of uni_pagedir variable for this console */ +bool vc_panic_force_write;/* when oops/panic this VC can accept forced output/blanking */ /* additional information is in vt_kern.h */ };
include/linux/fb.h +4 -0
@@ -812,6 +812,10 @@ struct fb_tile_ops {*/ #define FBINFO_BE_MATH 0x100000 +/* report to the VT layer that this fb driver can accept forced console +output like oopses */ +#define FBINFO_CAN_FORCE_OUTPUT 0x200000 +struct fb_info {int node;int flags;
include/linux/vt_kern.h +7 -0
@@ -100,6 +100,13 @@ extern int unbind_con_driver(const struct consw *csw, int first, int last, int deflt);int vty_init (const struct file_operations *console_fops); +static inline bool vt_force_oops_output (struct vc_data *vc) +{ +if (oops_in_progress && vc->vc_panic_force_write) +return true; +return false; +} +/* * vc_screen.c shares this temporary buffer with the console write code so that * we can easily avoid touching user space while holding the console spinlock.
Signature · 1 line
1.7.1
Quoted 11 lines · On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:12:59 +1000 Dave Airlie <[email protected]> wrote:
From: Jesse Barnes <[email protected]>
Jesse's initial patch commit said:
"At panic time (i.e. when
oops_in_progressis set) we should try a bit harder to update the screen and make sure output gets to the VT, since some drivers are capable of flipping back to it.So make sure we try to unblank and update the display if called from a panic context."
Quoted 7 lines
I've enhanced this to add a flag to the vc that console layer can set to indicate they want this behaviour to occur. This also adds support to fbcon for that flag and adds an fb flag for drivers to indicate they want to use the support. It enables this for KMS drivers.
Signed-off-by Dave Airlie <[email protected]>---
Yeah this looks a little nicer, thanks.
Signature · 1 line
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
Quoted 11 lines · On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:12:59 +1000 Dave Airlie <[email protected]> wrote:
From: Jesse Barnes <[email protected]>
Jesse's initial patch commit said:
"At panic time (i.e. when
oops_in_progressis set) we should try a bit harder to update the screen and make sure output gets to the VT, since some drivers are capable of flipping back to it.So make sure we try to unblank and update the display if called from a panic context."
Quoted 7 lines
I've enhanced this to add a flag to the vc that console layer can set to indicate they want this behaviour to occur. This also adds support to fbcon for that flag and adds an fb flag for drivers to indicate they want to use the support. It enables this for KMS drivers.
Signed-off-by Dave Airlie <[email protected]>---
Yeah this looks a little nicer, thanks.
Signature · 8 lines
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo --
Quoted 12 lines
From: Jesse Barnes <[email protected]>
Jesse's initial patch commit said:
"At panic time (i.e. when
oops_in_progressis set) we should try a bit harder to update the screen and make sure output gets to the VT, since some drivers are capable of flipping back to it.So make sure we try to unblank and update the display if called from a panic context."
Quoted 6 lines
I've enhanced this to add a flag to the vc that console layer can set to indicate they want this behaviour to occur. This also adds support to fbcon for that flag and adds an fb flag for drivers to indicate they want to use the support. It enables this for KMS drivers.
Signed-off-by Dave Airlie <[email protected]>
I really like the fact that the console driver has a flag to turn this on or off.
Quoted 185 lines
--- drivers/char/vt.c | 13 +++++++++---- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fb.c | 4 +--- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fb.c | 2 +- drivers/video/console/fbcon.c | 4 +++- include/linux/console_struct.h | 1 + include/linux/fb.h | 4 ++++ include/linux/vt_kern.h | 7 +++++++ 8 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)drivers/char/vt.c +9
-4@@ -698,7 +698,10 @@ void redraw_screen(struct vc_data *vc, int is_switch)update_attr (vc);clear_buffer_attributes (vc); } -if (update && vc->vc_mode !=KD_GRAPHICS ) + +/* Forcibly update if we're panicing */ +if ((update && vc->vc_mode !=KD_GRAPHICS ) || +vt_force_oops_output (vc))do_update_region (vc, vc->vc_origin, vc->vc_screenbuf_size /2 ); }set_cursor (vc);@@ -736,6 +739,7 @@ static void visual_init(struct vc_data *vc, int num, int init) vc->vc_hi_font_mask =0 ; vc->vc_complement_mask =0 ; vc->vc_can_do_color =0 ; + vc->vc_panic_force_write = false; vc->vc_sw->con_init (vc, init);if (!vc->vc_complement_mask) vc->vc_complement_mask = vc->vc_can_do_color ?0x7700 :0x0800 ;@@ -2498,7 +2502,7 @@ static void vt_console_print(struct console *co, const char *b, unsigned count) goto quit; } -if (vc->vc_mode !=KD_TEXT ) +if (vc->vc_mode !=KD_TEXT && !vt_force_oops_output (vc)) goto quit;/* undraw cursor first */ @@ -3703,7 +3707,8 @@ void do_unblank_screen(int leaving_gfx)return ; } vc = vc_cons[fg_console].d; -if (vc->vc_mode !=KD_TEXT ) +/* Try to unblank in oops case too */ +if (vc->vc_mode !=KD_TEXT && !vt_force_oops_output (vc))return ;/* but leave console_blanked != 0 */ if (blankinterval) {@@ -3712,7 +3717,7 @@ void do_unblank_screen(int leaving_gfx) } console_blanked =0 ; -if (vc->vc_sw->con_blank (vc,0 , leaving_gfx)) +if (vc->vc_sw->con_blank (vc,0 , leaving_gfx) ||vt_force_oops_output (vc))/* Low-level driver cannot restore -> do it ourselves */ update_screen (vc);if (console_blank_hook)drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fb.c +1
-3@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static int intelfb_create(struct intel_fbdev *ifbdev,strcpy (info->fix.id,"inteldrmfb" ); - info->flags =FBINFO_DEFAULT ; + info->flags =FBINFO_DEFAULT |FBINFO_CAN_FORCE_OUTPUT ; info->fbops = &intelfb_ops;/* setup aperture base/size for vesafb takeover */ @@ -146,8 +146,6 @@ static int intelfb_create(struct intel_fbdev *ifbdev, info->fix.smem_start = dev->mode_config.fb_base + obj_priv->gtt_offset; info->fix.smem_len = size; - info->flags =FBINFO_DEFAULT ; - info->screen_base =ioremap_wc (dev->agp->base + obj_priv->gtt_offset, size);if (!info->screen_base) {drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c +1
-0@@ -250,6 +250,7 @@ nouveau_fbcon_create(struct nouveau_fbdev *nfbdev, info->flags =FBINFO_DEFAULT |FBINFO_HWACCEL_COPYAREA |FBINFO_HWACCEL_FILLRECT |FBINFO_HWACCEL_IMAGEBLIT ; + info->flags |=FBINFO_CAN_FORCE_OUTPUT ; info->fbops = &nouveau_fbcon_ops; info->fix.smem_start = dev->mode_config.fb_base + nvbo->bo.offset - dev_priv->vm_vram_base;drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fb.c +1
-1@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ static int radeonfb_create(struct radeon_fbdev *rfbdev,drm_fb_helper_fill_fix (info, fb->pitch, fb->depth); - info->flags =FBINFO_DEFAULT ; + info->flags =FBINFO_DEFAULT |FBINFO_CAN_FORCE_OUTPUT ; info->fbops = &radeonfb_ops; tmp =radeon_bo_gpu_offset (rbo) - rdev->mc.vram_start;drivers/video/console/fbcon.c +3
-1@@ -283,7 +283,8 @@ static inline int fbcon_is_inactive(struct vc_data *vc, struct fb_info *info)struct fbcon_ops *ops = info->fbcon_par;return (info->state !=FBINFO_STATE_RUNNING || - vc->vc_mode !=KD_TEXT || ops->graphics); + vc->vc_mode !=KD_TEXT || ops->graphics) && + !vt_force_oops_output (vc); } static inline int get_color(struct vc_data *vc, struct fb_info *info,@@ -1073,6 +1074,7 @@ static void fbcon_init(struct vc_data *vc, int init)if (p->userfont) charcnt =FNTCHARCNT (p->fontdata); + vc->vc_panic_force_write = !!(info->flags &FBINFO_CAN_FORCE_OUTPUT ); vc->vc_can_do_color = (fb_get_color_depth (&info->var, &info->fix)!=1 ); vc->vc_complement_mask = vc->vc_can_do_color ?0x7700 :0x0800 ;if (charcnt =256 ) {include/linux/console_struct.h +1
-0@@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ struct vc_data {struct vc_data **vc_display_fg;/* [!] Ptr to var holding fg console for this display */ unsigned long vc_uni_pagedir;unsigned long *vc_uni_pagedir_loc;/* [!] Location of uni_pagedir variable for this console */ +bool vc_panic_force_write;/* when oops/panic this VC can accept forced output/blanking */ /* additional information is in vt_kern.h */ };include/linux/fb.h +4
-0@@ -812,6 +812,10 @@ struct fb_tile_ops {*/ #define FBINFO_BE_MATH 0x100000 +/* report to the VT layer that this fb driver can accept forced console +output like oopses */ +#define FBINFO_CAN_FORCE_OUTPUT 0x200000 +struct fb_info {int node;int flags;include/linux/vt_kern.h +7
-0@@ -100,6 +100,13 @@ extern int unbind_con_driver(const struct consw *csw, int first, int last, int deflt);int vty_init (const struct file_operations *console_fops); +static inline bool vt_force_oops_output (struct vc_data *vc) +{ +if (oops_in_progress && vc->vc_panic_force_write) +return true; +return false; +} +/* * vc_screen.c shares this temporary buffer with the console write code so that * we can easily avoid touching user space while holding the console spinlock. Signature · 6 lines
1.7.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Quoted 12 lines
From: Jesse Barnes <[email protected]>
Jesse's initial patch commit said:
"At panic time (i.e. when
oops_in_progressis set) we should try a bit harder to update the screen and make sure output gets to the VT, since some drivers are capable of flipping back to it.So make sure we try to unblank and update the display if called from a panic context."
Quoted 6 lines
I've enhanced this to add a flag to the vc that console layer can set to indicate they want this behaviour to occur. This also adds support to fbcon for that flag and adds an fb flag for drivers to indicate they want to use the support. It enables this for KMS drivers.
Signed-off-by Dave Airlie <[email protected]>
I really like the fact that the console driver has a flag to turn this on or off.
Quoted 185 lines
--- drivers/char/vt.c | 13 +++++++++---- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fb.c | 4 +--- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fb.c | 2 +- drivers/video/console/fbcon.c | 4 +++- include/linux/console_struct.h | 1 + include/linux/fb.h | 4 ++++ include/linux/vt_kern.h | 7 +++++++ 8 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)drivers/char/vt.c +9
-4@@ -698,7 +698,10 @@ void redraw_screen(struct vc_data *vc, int is_switch)update_attr (vc);clear_buffer_attributes (vc); } -if (update && vc->vc_mode !=KD_GRAPHICS ) + +/* Forcibly update if we're panicing */ +if ((update && vc->vc_mode !=KD_GRAPHICS ) || +vt_force_oops_output (vc))do_update_region (vc, vc->vc_origin, vc->vc_screenbuf_size /2 ); }set_cursor (vc);@@ -736,6 +739,7 @@ static void visual_init(struct vc_data *vc, int num, int init) vc->vc_hi_font_mask =0 ; vc->vc_complement_mask =0 ; vc->vc_can_do_color =0 ; + vc->vc_panic_force_write = false; vc->vc_sw->con_init (vc, init);if (!vc->vc_complement_mask) vc->vc_complement_mask = vc->vc_can_do_color ?0x7700 :0x0800 ;@@ -2498,7 +2502,7 @@ static void vt_console_print(struct console *co, const char *b, unsigned count) goto quit; } -if (vc->vc_mode !=KD_TEXT ) +if (vc->vc_mode !=KD_TEXT && !vt_force_oops_output (vc)) goto quit;/* undraw cursor first */ @@ -3703,7 +3707,8 @@ void do_unblank_screen(int leaving_gfx)return ; } vc = vc_cons[fg_console].d; -if (vc->vc_mode !=KD_TEXT ) +/* Try to unblank in oops case too */ +if (vc->vc_mode !=KD_TEXT && !vt_force_oops_output (vc))return ;/* but leave console_blanked != 0 */ if (blankinterval) {@@ -3712,7 +3717,7 @@ void do_unblank_screen(int leaving_gfx) } console_blanked =0 ; -if (vc->vc_sw->con_blank (vc,0 , leaving_gfx)) +if (vc->vc_sw->con_blank (vc,0 , leaving_gfx) ||vt_force_oops_output (vc))/* Low-level driver cannot restore -> do it ourselves */ update_screen (vc);if (console_blank_hook)drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fb.c +1
-3@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static int intelfb_create(struct intel_fbdev *ifbdev,strcpy (info->fix.id,"inteldrmfb" ); - info->flags =FBINFO_DEFAULT ; + info->flags =FBINFO_DEFAULT |FBINFO_CAN_FORCE_OUTPUT ; info->fbops = &intelfb_ops;/* setup aperture base/size for vesafb takeover */ @@ -146,8 +146,6 @@ static int intelfb_create(struct intel_fbdev *ifbdev, info->fix.smem_start = dev->mode_config.fb_base + obj_priv->gtt_offset; info->fix.smem_len = size; - info->flags =FBINFO_DEFAULT ; - info->screen_base =ioremap_wc (dev->agp->base + obj_priv->gtt_offset, size);if (!info->screen_base) {drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c +1
-0@@ -250,6 +250,7 @@ nouveau_fbcon_create(struct nouveau_fbdev *nfbdev, info->flags =FBINFO_DEFAULT |FBINFO_HWACCEL_COPYAREA |FBINFO_HWACCEL_FILLRECT |FBINFO_HWACCEL_IMAGEBLIT ; + info->flags |=FBINFO_CAN_FORCE_OUTPUT ; info->fbops = &nouveau_fbcon_ops; info->fix.smem_start = dev->mode_config.fb_base + nvbo->bo.offset - dev_priv->vm_vram_base;drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fb.c +1
-1@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ static int radeonfb_create(struct radeon_fbdev *rfbdev,drm_fb_helper_fill_fix (info, fb->pitch, fb->depth); - info->flags =FBINFO_DEFAULT ; + info->flags =FBINFO_DEFAULT |FBINFO_CAN_FORCE_OUTPUT ; info->fbops = &radeonfb_ops; tmp =radeon_bo_gpu_offset (rbo) - rdev->mc.vram_start;drivers/video/console/fbcon.c +3
-1@@ -283,7 +283,8 @@ static inline int fbcon_is_inactive(struct vc_data *vc, struct fb_info *info)struct fbcon_ops *ops = info->fbcon_par;return (info->state !=FBINFO_STATE_RUNNING || - vc->vc_mode !=KD_TEXT || ops->graphics); + vc->vc_mode !=KD_TEXT || ops->graphics) && + !vt_force_oops_output (vc); } static inline int get_color(struct vc_data *vc, struct fb_info *info,@@ -1073,6 +1074,7 @@ static void fbcon_init(struct vc_data *vc, int init)if (p->userfont) charcnt =FNTCHARCNT (p->fontdata); + vc->vc_panic_force_write = !!(info->flags &FBINFO_CAN_FORCE_OUTPUT ); vc->vc_can_do_color = (fb_get_color_depth (&info->var, &info->fix)!=1 ); vc->vc_complement_mask = vc->vc_can_do_color ?0x7700 :0x0800 ;if (charcnt ==256 ) {include/linux/console_struct.h +1
-0@@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ struct vc_data {struct vc_data **vc_display_fg;/* [!] Ptr to var holding fg console for this display */ unsigned long vc_uni_pagedir;unsigned long *vc_uni_pagedir_loc;/* [!] Location of uni_pagedir variable for this console */ +bool vc_panic_force_write;/* when oops/panic this VC can accept forced output/blanking */ /* additional information is in vt_kern.h */ };include/linux/fb.h +4
-0@@ -812,6 +812,10 @@ struct fb_tile_ops {*/ #define FBINFO_BE_MATH 0x100000 +/* report to the VT layer that this fb driver can accept forced console +output like oopses */ +#define FBINFO_CAN_FORCE_OUTPUT 0x200000 +struct fb_info {int node;int flags;include/linux/vt_kern.h +7
-0@@ -100,6 +100,13 @@ extern int unbind_con_driver(const struct consw *csw, int first, int last, int deflt);int vty_init (const struct file_operations *console_fops); +static inline bool vt_force_oops_output (struct vc_data *vc) +{ +if (oops_in_progress && vc->vc_panic_force_write) +return true; +return false; +} +/* * vc_screen.c shares this temporary buffer with the console write code so that * we can easily avoid touching user space while holding the console spinlock. Signature · 6 lines
1.7.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
--
Quoted 6 lines · On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:12:59 +1000 Dave Airlie <[email protected]> wrote:
Jesse's initial patch commit said:
"At panic time (i.e. when
oops_in_progressis set) we should try a bit harder to update the screen and make sure output gets to the VT, since some drivers are capable of flipping back to it.
Quoted 7 lines
So make sure we try to unblank and update the display if called from a panic context."
I've enhanced this to add a flag to the vc that console layer can set to indicate they want this behaviour to occur. This also adds support to fbcon for that flag and adds an fb flag for drivers to indicate they want to use the support. It enables this for KMS drivers.
Interesting. Getting real oops traces from machines running X will make Rusty happy, and that's what we're all here for.
How well does this all work? How reliable is it? What's the success rate?
What's the downside here? After all, not all oopses are catastrophic - sometimes the machine will go blurt and keep running so the user can take a look in the logs then perform an orderly reboot, etc. As I understand it, those non-catastrophic oopses will now flip the machine from X and into the vt display, yes? Can the user get it back to X mode?
Worse, there's also a risk that doing all this new work within the oopsing context will screw the machine up, so the user will be _deprived_ of an oops report which he otherwise would have been able to get from the logs. This is particularly the case when it's the DRI stuff which oopsed, which is not exactly an uncommon occurrence lately ;)
Oh well, the best way to tell is to ship-it-and-see.
Quoted 24 lines · On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:56:05 -0700 Andrew Morton <[email protected]>…
Quoted 6 lines · On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:12:59 +1000 Dave Airlie <[email protected]> wrote:
Jesse's initial patch commit said:
"At panic time (i.e. when
oops_in_progressis set) we should try a bit harder to update the screen and make sure output gets to the VT, since some drivers are capable of flipping back to it.Quoted 7 lines
So make sure we try to unblank and update the display if called from a panic context."
I've enhanced this to add a flag to the vc that console layer can set to indicate they want this behaviour to occur. This also adds support to fbcon for that flag and adds an fb flag for drivers to indicate they want to use the support. It enables this for KMS drivers.
Interesting. Getting real oops traces from machines running X will make Rusty happy, and that's what we're all here for.
How well does this all work? How reliable is it? What's the success rate?
Quoted 6 lines
What's the downside here? After all, not all oopses are catastrophic - sometimes the machine will go blurt and keep running so the user can take a look in the logs then perform an orderly reboot, etc. As I understand it, those non-catastrophic oopses will now flip the machine from X and into the vt display, yes? Can the user get it back to X mode?
No, we'll only flip from the panic notifier chain. However if oops_in_progress is set (as it is whenever bust_spinlocks(1) is called, i.e. from panic() and oops_begin()) we'll try to print into the fbcon buffer. In the oops case this should still be safe since the buffer is pinned, at least in the KMS world.
Quoted 7 lines
Worse, there's also a risk that doing all this new work within the oopsing context will screw the machine up, so the user will be _deprived_ of an oops report which he otherwise would have been able to get from the logs. This is particularly the case when it's the DRI stuff which oopsed, which is not exactly an uncommon occurrence lately ;)
Oh well, the best way to tell is to ship-it-and-see.
To avoid the oops part (which as I said should still be safe) we could add a new panic_in_progress flag, that would make sure things were no worse than they are currently.
Signature · 1 line
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
Quoted 27 lines · On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:05:47 -0700 Jesse Barnes <[email protected]>…
Quoted 24 lines · On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:56:05 -0700 Andrew Morton <[email protected]>…
Quoted 6 lines · On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:12:59 +1000 Dave Airlie <[email protected]> wrote:
Jesse's initial patch commit said:
"At panic time (i.e. when
oops_in_progressis set) we should try a bit harder to update the screen and make sure output gets to the VT, since some drivers are capable of flipping back to it.Quoted 7 lines
So make sure we try to unblank and update the display if called from a panic context."
I've enhanced this to add a flag to the vc that console layer can set to indicate they want this behaviour to occur. This also adds support to fbcon for that flag and adds an fb flag for drivers to indicate they want to use the support. It enables this for KMS drivers.
Interesting. Getting real oops traces from machines running X will make Rusty happy, and that's what we're all here for.
How well does this all work? How reliable is it? What's the success rate?
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
What's the downside here? After all, not all oopses are catastrophic - sometimes the machine will go blurt and keep running so the user can take a look in the logs then perform an orderly reboot, etc. As I understand it, those non-catastrophic oopses will now flip the machine from X and into the vt display, yes? Can the user get it back to X mode?
No, we'll only flip from the panic notifier chain.
So we still don't get to see the output from BUGs and random oopses? I don't think panics are all that common.
So am I correct in believing that if a user is getting invisible-oopses then he can set /proc/sys/kernel/panic_on_oops, and then the oops should be visible?
(Shouldn't all this stuff be explained in the changlog?)
Quoted 37 lines · On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:36:37 -0700 Andrew Morton <[email protected]>…
Quoted 34 lines · On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:05:47 -0700 Jesse Barnes <[email protected]>…
Quoted 30 lines · On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:56:05 -0700 Andrew Morton <[email protected]>…
Quoted 6 lines · On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:12:59 +1000 Dave Airlie <[email protected]> wrote:
Jesse's initial patch commit said:
"At panic time (i.e. when
oops_in_progressis set) we should try a bit harder to update the screen and make sure output gets to the VT, since some drivers are capable of flipping back to it.Quoted 7 lines
So make sure we try to unblank and update the display if called from a panic context."
I've enhanced this to add a flag to the vc that console layer can set to indicate they want this behaviour to occur. This also adds support to fbcon for that flag and adds an fb flag for drivers to indicate they want to use the support. It enables this for KMS drivers.
Interesting. Getting real oops traces from machines running X will make Rusty happy, and that's what we're all here for.
How well does this all work? How reliable is it? What's the success rate?
What's the downside here? After all, not all oopses are catastrophic - sometimes the machine will go blurt and keep running so the user can take a look in the logs then perform an orderly reboot, etc. As I understand it, those non-catastrophic oopses will now flip the machine from X and into the vt display, yes? Can the user get it back to X mode?
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 1 line
No, we'll only flip from the panic notifier chain.
So we still don't get to see the output from BUGs and random oopses? I don't think panics are all that common.
No, BUG() ends up in panic iirc by doing an bad pointer ref which should fault and panic. Random oopses won't show up though (but they're not supposed to be fatal and can be seen in the log).
Quoted 3 lines
So am I correct in believing that if a user is getting invisible-oopses then he can set
/proc/sys/kernel/panic_on_oops, and then the oops should be visible?
Yep.
Quoted 1 line
(Shouldn't all this stuff be explained in the changlog?)
Maybe? Linux oops/panic handling is pretty ad-hoc, a separate document would probably be best.
Signature · 1 line
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
Quoted 37 lines · On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:36:37 -0700 Andrew Morton <[email protected]>…
Quoted 34 lines · On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:05:47 -0700 Jesse Barnes <[email protected]>…
Quoted 30 lines · On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:56:05 -0700 Andrew Morton <[email protected]>…
Quoted 6 lines · On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:12:59 +1000 Dave Airlie <[email protected]> wrote:
Jesse's initial patch commit said:
"At panic time (i.e. when
oops_in_progressis set) we should try a bit harder to update the screen and make sure output gets to the VT, since some drivers are capable of flipping back to it.Quoted 7 lines
So make sure we try to unblank and update the display if called from a panic context."
I've enhanced this to add a flag to the vc that console layer can set to indicate they want this behaviour to occur. This also adds support to fbcon for that flag and adds an fb flag for drivers to indicate they want to use the support. It enables this for KMS drivers.
Interesting. Getting real oops traces from machines running X will make Rusty happy, and that's what we're all here for.
How well does this all work? How reliable is it? What's the success rate?
What's the downside here? After all, not all oopses are catastrophic - sometimes the machine will go blurt and keep running so the user can take a look in the logs then perform an orderly reboot, etc. As I understand it, those non-catastrophic oopses will now flip the machine from X and into the vt display, yes? Can the user get it back to X mode?
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 1 line
No, we'll only flip from the panic notifier chain.
So we still don't get to see the output from BUGs and random oopses? I don't think panics are all that common.
No, BUG() ends up in panic iirc by doing an bad pointer ref which should fault and panic. Random oopses won't show up though (but they're not supposed to be fatal and can be seen in the log).
Quoted 3 lines
So am I correct in believing that if a user is getting invisible-oopses then he can set
/proc/sys/kernel/panic_on_oops, and then the oops should be visible?
Yep.
Quoted 1 line
(Shouldn't all this stuff be explained in the changlog?)
Maybe? Linux oops/panic handling is pretty ad-hoc, a separate document would probably be best.
Signature · 8 lines
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo --
Quoted 27 lines · On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:05:47 -0700 Jesse Barnes <[email protected]>…
Quoted 24 lines · On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:56:05 -0700 Andrew Morton <[email protected]>…
Quoted 6 lines · On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:12:59 +1000 Dave Airlie <[email protected]> wrote:
Jesse's initial patch commit said:
"At panic time (i.e. when
oops_in_progressis set) we should try a bit harder to update the screen and make sure output gets to the VT, since some drivers are capable of flipping back to it.Quoted 7 lines
So make sure we try to unblank and update the display if called from a panic context."
I've enhanced this to add a flag to the vc that console layer can set to indicate they want this behaviour to occur. This also adds support to fbcon for that flag and adds an fb flag for drivers to indicate they want to use the support. It enables this for KMS drivers.
Interesting. Getting real oops traces from machines running X will make Rusty happy, and that's what we're all here for.
How well does this all work? How reliable is it? What's the success rate?
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
What's the downside here? After all, not all oopses are catastrophic - sometimes the machine will go blurt and keep running so the user can take a look in the logs then perform an orderly reboot, etc. As I understand it, those non-catastrophic oopses will now flip the machine from X and into the vt display, yes? Can the user get it back to X mode?
No, we'll only flip from the panic notifier chain.
So we still don't get to see the output from BUGs and random oopses? I don't think panics are all that common.
So am I correct in believing that if a user is getting invisible-oopses then he can set /proc/sys/kernel/panic_on_oops, and then the oops should be visible?
(Shouldn't all this stuff be explained in the changlog?)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
--
Quoted 24 lines · On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:56:05 -0700 Andrew Morton <[email protected]>…
Quoted 6 lines · On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:12:59 +1000 Dave Airlie <[email protected]> wrote:
Jesse's initial patch commit said:
"At panic time (i.e. when
oops_in_progressis set) we should try a bit harder to update the screen and make sure output gets to the VT, since some drivers are capable of flipping back to it.Quoted 7 lines
So make sure we try to unblank and update the display if called from a panic context."
I've enhanced this to add a flag to the vc that console layer can set to indicate they want this behaviour to occur. This also adds support to fbcon for that flag and adds an fb flag for drivers to indicate they want to use the support. It enables this for KMS drivers.
Interesting. Getting real oops traces from machines running X will make Rusty happy, and that's what we're all here for.
How well does this all work? How reliable is it? What's the success rate?
Quoted 6 lines
What's the downside here? After all, not all oopses are catastrophic - sometimes the machine will go blurt and keep running so the user can take a look in the logs then perform an orderly reboot, etc. As I understand it, those non-catastrophic oopses will now flip the machine from X and into the vt display, yes? Can the user get it back to X mode?
No, we'll only flip from the panic notifier chain. However if oops_in_progress is set (as it is whenever bust_spinlocks(1) is called, i.e. from panic() and oops_begin()) we'll try to print into the fbcon buffer. In the oops case this should still be safe since the buffer is pinned, at least in the KMS world.
Quoted 7 lines
Worse, there's also a risk that doing all this new work within the oopsing context will screw the machine up, so the user will be _deprived_ of an oops report which he otherwise would have been able to get from the logs. This is particularly the case when it's the DRI stuff which oopsed, which is not exactly an uncommon occurrence lately ;)
Oh well, the best way to tell is to ship-it-and-see.
To avoid the oops part (which as I said should still be safe) we could add a new panic_in_progress flag, that would make sure things were no worse than they are currently.
Signature · 8 lines
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo --
Quoted 6 lines · On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:12:59 +1000 Dave Airlie <[email protected]> wrote:
Jesse's initial patch commit said:
"At panic time (i.e. when
oops_in_progressis set) we should try a bit harder to update the screen and make sure output gets to the VT, since some drivers are capable of flipping back to it.
Quoted 7 lines
So make sure we try to unblank and update the display if called from a panic context."
I've enhanced this to add a flag to the vc that console layer can set to indicate they want this behaviour to occur. This also adds support to fbcon for that flag and adds an fb flag for drivers to indicate they want to use the support. It enables this for KMS drivers.
Interesting. Getting real oops traces from machines running X will make Rusty happy, and that's what we're all here for.
How well does this all work? How reliable is it? What's the success rate?
What's the downside here? After all, not all oopses are catastrophic - sometimes the machine will go blurt and keep running so the user can take a look in the logs then perform an orderly reboot, etc. As I understand it, those non-catastrophic oopses will now flip the machine from X and into the vt display, yes? Can the user get it back to X mode?
Worse, there's also a risk that doing all this new work within the oopsing context will screw the machine up, so the user will be _deprived_ of an oops report which he otherwise would have been able to get from the logs. This is particularly the case when it's the DRI stuff which oopsed, which is not exactly an uncommon occurrence lately ;)
Oh well, the best way to tell is to ship-it-and-see.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
--