Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Empty critical section issue in Bluetooth Linux driver code

DISCUSSION Tegawendé F. Bissyandé 2 participants 2 messages Jul 13, 2010 Kernel janitors

lore
Share & tools
lore

Tegawendé F. Bissyandé

#0 lore raw

Hi,

I have been using Coccinelle to validate some trivial rules of kernel API use by device drivers.
I came accross the definition of an empty critical section in the 'bfusb_close' function in file drivers/bluetooth/bfusb.c

static int bfusb_close(struct hci_dev *hdev)

{
     ...
     write_lock_irqsave(&data->lock, flags);
     write_unlock_irqrestore(&data->lock, flags);

     bfusb_unlink_urbs(data);
     bfusb_flush(hdev);

     return 0;
}

This excerpt is from Linux 2.6.34, but the same code has been prevailing
long before (I've seen it in 2.6.5)
So I was wondering if there is some code that is supposed to go between
write_lock_irqsave and write_unlock_irqsave,
or if the two statements should simply removed?
I also supposed that this was just meant to allow to wait for a release of the lock by another thread. In this case, wouldn't spin_lock or mutex_lock be more appropriate as write_lock can be confusing even though I suppose it has the same effect?? but I am not sure.

best regards,

Signature · 8 lines
Tegawendé F. Bissyandé
PhD student at LaBRI - France


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
#1 lore raw
Quoted 7 lines · Tegawendé F. Bissyandé

Hi,

I have been using Coccinelle to validate some trivial rules of kernel API use by device drivers.
I came accross the definition of an empty critical section in the 'bfusb_close' function in file drivers/bluetooth/bfusb.c

Quoted 6 lines

static int bfusb_close(struct hci_dev *hdev)

{
    ...
    write_lock_irqsave(&data->lock, flags);
    write_unlock_irqrestore(&data->lock, flags);

This is in the _close() function. It's waiting for all the readers to finish. Presumably it's already ensured that no new reader threads will launch.

regards,
dan carpenter

Quoted 5 lines
    bfusb_unlink_urbs(data);
    bfusb_flush(hdev);

    return 0;
}

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html