Skip to contentSkip to conversation

vhost: potential integer overflows

PATCH In review Dan Carpenter 3 participants 4 messages Oct 11, 2010 – Oct 12, 2010

Subsystems (6)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/2 vhost: potential integer overflows

I did an audit for potential integer overflows of values which get passed to access_ok() and here are the results.

drivers/vhost/vhost.c +20 -4
index dd3d6f7..c2aa12c 100644
@@ -429,6 +429,14 @@ static int vq_access_ok(unsigned int num,
 			struct vring_avail __user *avail,
 			struct vring_used __user *used)
 {
+
+	if (num > UINT_MAX / sizeof *desc)
+		return 0;
+	if (num > UINT_MAX / sizeof *avail->ring - sizeof *avail)
+		return 0;
+	if (num > UINT_MAX / sizeof *used->ring - sizeof *used)
+		return 0;
+
 	return access_ok(VERIFY_READ, desc, num * sizeof *desc) &&
 	       access_ok(VERIFY_READ, avail,
 			 sizeof *avail + num * sizeof *avail->ring) &&
@@ -447,6 +455,9 @@ int vhost_log_access_ok(struct vhost_dev *dev)
 /* Caller should have vq mutex and device mutex */
 static int vq_log_access_ok(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, void __user *log_base)
 {
+	if (vq->num > UINT_MAX / sizeof *vq->used->ring - sizeof *vq->used)
+		return 0;
+
 	return vq_memory_access_ok(log_base, vq->dev->memory,
 			    vhost_has_feature(vq->dev, VHOST_F_LOG_ALL)) &&
 		(!vq->log_used || log_access_ok(log_base, vq->log_addr,
@@ -606,12 +617,17 @@ static long vhost_set_vring(struct vhost_dev *d, int ioctl, void __user *argp)
 			}
 
 			/* Also validate log access for used ring if enabled. */
-			if ((a.flags & (0x1 << VHOST_VRING_F_LOG)) &&
-			    !log_access_ok(vq->log_base, a.log_guest_addr,
+			if (a.flags & (0x1 << VHOST_VRING_F_LOG)) {
+				if (vq->num > UINT_MAX / sizeof *vq->used->ring - sizeof *vq->used) {
+					r = -EINVAL;
+					break;
+				}
+				if (!log_access_ok(vq->log_base, a.log_guest_addr,
 					   sizeof *vq->used +
 					   vq->num * sizeof *vq->used->ring)) {
-				r = -EINVAL;
-				break;
+					r = -EINVAL;
+					break;
+				}
 			}
 		}
 
#1 lore raw
Quoted 2 lines · Dan Carpenter

I did an audit for potential integer overflows of values which get passed to access_ok() and here are the results.

FWIW, UINT_MAX is wrong here. What you want is maximal size_t value.

Quoted 57 lines
drivers/vhost/vhost.c +20 -5
index dd3d6f7..c2aa12c 100644
@@ -429,6 +429,14 @@ static int vq_access_ok(unsigned int num,
 			struct vring_avail __user *avail,
 			struct vring_used __user *used)
 {
+
+	if (num > UINT_MAX / sizeof *desc)
+		return 0;
+	if (num > UINT_MAX / sizeof *avail->ring - sizeof *avail)
+		return 0;
+	if (num > UINT_MAX / sizeof *used->ring - sizeof *used)
+		return 0;
+
 	return access_ok(VERIFY_READ, desc, num * sizeof *desc) &&
 	       access_ok(VERIFY_READ, avail,
 			 sizeof *avail + num * sizeof *avail->ring) &&
@@ -447,6 +455,9 @@ int vhost_log_access_ok(struct vhost_dev *dev)
 /* Caller should have vq mutex and device mutex */
 static int vq_log_access_ok(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, void __user *log_base)
 {
+	if (vq->num > UINT_MAX / sizeof *vq->used->ring - sizeof *vq->used)
+		return 0;
+
 	return vq_memory_access_ok(log_base, vq->dev->memory,
 			    vhost_has_feature(vq->dev, VHOST_F_LOG_ALL)) &&
 		(!vq->log_used || log_access_ok(log_base, vq->log_addr,
@@ -606,12 +617,17 @@ static long vhost_set_vring(struct vhost_dev *d, int ioctl, void __user *argp)
 			}
 
 			/* Also validate log access for used ring if enabled. */
-			if ((a.flags & (0x1 << VHOST_VRING_F_LOG)) &&
-			    !log_access_ok(vq->log_base, a.log_guest_addr,
+			if (a.flags & (0x1 << VHOST_VRING_F_LOG)) {
+				if (vq->num > UINT_MAX / sizeof *vq->used->ring - sizeof *vq->used) {
+					r = -EINVAL;
+					break;
+				}
+				if (!log_access_ok(vq->log_base, a.log_guest_addr,
 					   sizeof *vq->used +
 					   vq->num * sizeof *vq->used->ring)) {
-				r = -EINVAL;
-				break;
+					r = -EINVAL;
+					break;
+				}
 			}
 		}
 
--

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

#2 lore raw
In reply to Dan Carpenter
Quoted 46 lines · Dan Carpenter

I did an audit for potential integer overflows of values which get passed to access_ok() and here are the results.

drivers/vhost/vhost.c +17 -2
index dd3d6f7..c2aa12c 100644
@@ -429,6 +429,14 @@ static int vq_access_ok(unsigned int num,
 			struct vring_avail __user *avail,
 			struct vring_used __user *used)
 {
+
+	if (num > UINT_MAX / sizeof *desc)
+		return 0;
+	if (num > UINT_MAX / sizeof *avail->ring - sizeof *avail)
+		return 0;
+	if (num > UINT_MAX / sizeof *used->ring - sizeof *used)
+		return 0;
+
 	return access_ok(VERIFY_READ, desc, num * sizeof *desc) &&
 	       access_ok(VERIFY_READ, avail,
 			 sizeof *avail + num * sizeof *avail->ring) &&
@@ -447,6 +455,9 @@ int vhost_log_access_ok(struct vhost_dev *dev)
 /* Caller should have vq mutex and device mutex */
 static int vq_log_access_ok(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, void __user *log_base)
 {
+	if (vq->num > UINT_MAX / sizeof *vq->used->ring - sizeof *vq->used)
+		return 0;
+
 	return vq_memory_access_ok(log_base, vq->dev->memory,
 			    vhost_has_feature(vq->dev, VHOST_F_LOG_ALL)) &&
 		(!vq->log_used || log_access_ok(log_base, vq->log_addr,
@@ -606,12 +617,17 @@ static long vhost_set_vring(struct vhost_dev *d, int ioctl, void __user *argp)
 			}
 
 			/* Also validate log access for used ring if enabled. */
-			if ((a.flags & (0x1 << VHOST_VRING_F_LOG)) &&
-			    !log_access_ok(vq->log_base, a.log_guest_addr,
+			if (a.flags & (0x1 << VHOST_VRING_F_LOG)) {
+				if (vq->num > UINT_MAX / sizeof *vq->used->ring - sizeof *vq->used) {
+					r = -EINVAL;
+					break;
+				}
+				if (!log_access_ok(vq->log_base, a.log_guest_addr,

drivers/vhost/vhost.c static long vhost_set_vring(struct vhost_dev *d, int ioctl, void __user *argp) · line 633

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/vhost/vhost.c +3 -2
 					   sizeof *vq->used +
 					   vq->num * sizeof *vq->used->ring)) {
-				r = -EINVAL;
-				break;
+					r = -EINVAL;
+					break;
+				}
 			}
 		}
 

As far as I can see, maximum value for num is 64K - 1:

                if (!s.num || s.num > 0xffff || (s.num & (s.num - 1))) {
                        r = -EINVAL;
                        break;
                }

How can any of the above two trigger?
It seems easier to check value for sanity at a single place where it's passed from userspace to kernel.

Signature · 1 line
MST
#3 lore raw
Quoted 12 lines · Michael S. Tsirkin

As far as I can see, maximum value for num is 64K - 1:

                if (!s.num || s.num > 0xffff || (s.num & (s.num - 1))) {
                        r = -EINVAL;
                        break;
                }

How can any of the above two trigger?
It seems easier to check value for sanity at a single place where it's passed from userspace to kernel.

Gar. Sorry for that. My mistake.

regards,
dan carpenter