ext4: fix redirty_page_for_writepage() typo in comment
PATCH 1/1 ext4: fix redirty_page_for_writepage() typo in comment
Signed-off-by Wu Fengguang <[email protected]>
---
fs/ext4/inode.c +1 -1
@@ -3357,7 +3357,7 @@ int ext4_alloc_da_blocks(struct inode *inode)* doing I/O at all. * * We could call write_cache_pages(), and then redirty all of -* the pages by calling redirty_page_for_writeback() but that +* the pages by calling redirty_page_for_writepage() but that * would be ugly in the extreme. So instead we would need to * replicate parts of the code in the above functions, * simplifying them becuase we wouldn't actually intend to
Quoted 8 lines · Wu Fengguang
Signed-off-by Wu Fengguang <[email protected]>---
fs/ext4/inode.c +0
-0
fs/ext4/inode.c int ext4_alloc_da_blocks(struct inode *inode) · line 3363
Quoted 8 lines
fs/ext4/inode.c +1
-1@@ -3357,7 +3357,7 @@ int ext4_alloc_da_blocks(struct inode *inode)* doing I/O at all. * * We could call write_cache_pages(), and then redirty all of -* the pages by calling redirty_page_for_writeback() but that +* the pages by calling redirty_page_for_writepage() but that * would be ugly in the extreme. So instead we would need to * replicate parts of the code in the above functions, * simplifying them becuase we wouldn't actually intend to
This fix doesn't seem to be present in linux-next as of today, so I have picked it up. Thanks,
Signature · 2 lines
Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.