Skip to contentSkip to conversation

ecryptfs build failure

PATCH Sergey Senozhatsky 2 participants 3 messages Jan 13, 2011 – Jan 14, 2011 Ecrypt file system

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Hello,

Recent kernel failed to build due to ecryptfs/main.
2 of 3 errors could be fixed with the following patch. The third is:
we make an assignment `lower_inode = lower_dentry->d_inode;' in ecryptfs_get_inode, yet ecryptfs_get_inode knows nothing about lower_dentry.

---

 fs/ecryptfs/main.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
fs/ecryptfs/main.c +2 -2
index 9ed4769..5694d65 100644
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ int ecryptfs_init_persistent_file(struct dentry *ecryptfs_dentry)
 	return rc;
 }
 
-static inode *ecryptfs_get_inode(struct inode *lower_inode,
+static struct inode *ecryptfs_get_inode(struct inode *lower_inode,
 		       struct super_block *sb)
 {
 	struct inode *inode;
@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ int ecryptfs_interpose(struct dentry *lower_dentry, struct dentry *dentry,
 {
 	struct inode *lower_inode = lower_dentry->d_inode;
 	struct inode *inode = ecryptfs_get_inode(lower_inode, sb);
-	if (IS_ERR(inode)
+	if (IS_ERR(inode))
 		return PTR_ERR(inode);
 	if (flags & ECRYPTFS_INTERPOSE_FLAG_D_ADD)
 		d_add(dentry, inode);
#1 lore raw
Quoted 6 lines · Sergey Senozhatsky

Hello,

Recent kernel failed to build due to ecryptfs/main.
2 of 3 errors could be fixed with the following patch. The third is:
we make an assignment `lower_inode = lower_dentry->d_inode;' in ecryptfs_get_inode, yet ecryptfs_get_inode knows nothing about lower_dentry.

Thanks - This was mentioned just a little bit ago on LKML by Eric Dumazet ([BUG] ECRYPT_FS) and Christoph responded with a patch. FWIW, it doesn't look like the patch below addresses the lower_dentry issue in ecryptfs_get_inode().

Tyler

Quoted 35 lines

---

 fs/ecryptfs/main.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
fs/ecryptfs/main.c +2 -3
index 9ed4769..5694d65 100644
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ int ecryptfs_init_persistent_file(struct dentry *ecryptfs_dentry)
 	return rc;
 }
 
-static inode *ecryptfs_get_inode(struct inode *lower_inode,
+static struct inode *ecryptfs_get_inode(struct inode *lower_inode,
 		       struct super_block *sb)
 {
 	struct inode *inode;
@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ int ecryptfs_interpose(struct dentry *lower_dentry, struct dentry *dentry,
 {
 	struct inode *lower_inode = lower_dentry->d_inode;
 	struct inode *inode = ecryptfs_get_inode(lower_inode, sb);
-	if (IS_ERR(inode)
+	if (IS_ERR(inode))
 		return PTR_ERR(inode);
 	if (flags & ECRYPTFS_INTERPOSE_FLAG_D_ADD)
 		d_add(dentry, inode);
 
--

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

#2 lore raw
Quoted 10 lines · Tyler Hicks
Quoted 6 lines · Sergey Senozhatsky

Hello,

Recent kernel failed to build due to ecryptfs/main.
2 of 3 errors could be fixed with the following patch. The third is:
we make an assignment `lower_inode = lower_dentry->d_inode;' in ecryptfs_get_inode, yet ecryptfs_get_inode knows nothing about lower_dentry.

Thanks - This was mentioned just a little bit ago on LKML by Eric Dumazet ([BUG] ECRYPT_FS) and Christoph responded with a patch.

Fixed now. Cool.

Quoted 3 lines

FWIW, it doesn't look like the patch below addresses the lower_dentry issue in ecryptfs_get_inode().

Oops. Sorry. Nevermind, sent you v1 instead of v2.

Thanks,
Sergey