ARM: SMDK6410: Fix build with WM1190 disabled and WM1192 enabled
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 ARM: SMDK6410: Fix build with WM1190 disabled and WM1192 enabled
Avoid relying on implicit inclusion of machine.h
--- arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smdk6410.c | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smdk6410.c +1 -0
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@#include <linux/delay.h> #include <linux/smsc911x.h> #include <linux/regulator/fixed.h> +#include <linux/regulator/machine.h> #ifdef CONFIG_SMDK6410_WM1190_EV1 #include <linux/mfd/wm8350/core.h>
Signature · 1 line
1.7.2.3
PATCH 1/1 ARM: SMDK6410: Fix build with WM1190 disabled and WM1192 enabled
Quoted 13 lines · Mark Brown
Avoid relying on implicit inclusion of
machine.hSigned-off-by Mark Brown <[email protected]>Cc stable at kernel.org--- arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smdk6410.c | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smdk6410.c +0
-0
arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smdk6410.c line 31
Quoted 4 lines
arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smdk6410.c +1
-0@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@#include <linux/delay.h> #include <linux/smsc911x.h> #include <linux/regulator/fixed.h> +#include <linux/regulator/machine.h>
Why is this a -stable patch? Is the build broken somehow right now in a released kernel without this patch?
confused,
greg k-h
PATCH 1/1 ARM: SMDK6410: Fix build with WM1190 disabled and WM1192 enabled
Quoted 6 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 1 line · Mark Brown
+#include <
linux/regulator/machine.h>Why is this a -stable patch? Is the build broken somehow right now in a released kernel without this patch?
I believe the build breakage affects existing released kernels with the appropriate set of configuration options chosen (1192 enabled and 1190 disabled), yes. This is a pretty obscure combination so it's unlikely anyone will run into it in practice.
PATCH 1/1 ARM: SMDK6410: Fix build with WM1190 disabled and WM1192 enabled
Quoted 5 lines · Mark Brown
Quoted 3 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 1 line · Mark Brown
+#include <
linux/regulator/machine.h>
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Why is this a -stable patch? Is the build broken somehow right now in a released kernel without this patch?
I believe the build breakage affects existing released kernels with the appropriate set of configuration options chosen (1192 enabled and 1190 disabled), yes. This is a pretty obscure combination so it's unlikely anyone will run into it in practice.
Ok, then it probably shouldn't be a -stable patch :)
thanks,
greg k-h
PATCH 1/1 ARM: SMDK6410: Fix build with WM1190 disabled and WM1192 enabled
Quoted 8 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 4 lines · Mark Brown
I believe the build breakage affects existing released kernels with the appropriate set of configuration options chosen (1192 enabled and 1190 disabled), yes. This is a pretty obscure combination so it's unlikely anyone will run into it in practice.
Ok, then it probably shouldn't be a -stable patch :)
Oh, OK. It seemed like it was sufficiently safe to make the risk/value for the change reasonable.