regression - 2.6.36 -> 2.6.37 - kvm - 32bit SMP guests don't boot
Hello Avi et al,
seems like I've hit regression in 2.6.37:
32bit SMP centos guest stopped booting, they just hang during initrd phase. (haven't tried different distros)
UP guest are OK.
when I (forcibly) compiled kvm-kmod-2.6.36.2 and used it in 2.6.37, even the SMP guests boot fine.
does somebody have a tip on where the problem could be, or should I bisect this? I tried on 2 different machines, host is x86_64, qemu-kvm 0.13.0, 0.14.0. If I shall provide more information (or bisect), please let me know. cheers!
nik
Signature · 14 lines
------------------------------------- Ing. Nikola CIPRICH LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o. 28. rijna 168, 709 01 Ostrava tel.: +420 596 603 142 fax: +420 596 621 273 mobil: +420 777 093 799 www.linuxbox.cz mobil servis: +420 737 238 656 email servis: [email protected] -------------------------------------
Quoted 10 lines · Nikola Ciprich
Hello Avi et al,
seems like I've hit regression in 2.6.37:
32bit SMP centos guest stopped booting, they just hang during initrd phase. (haven't tried different distros)
UP guest are OK.
when I (forcibly) compiled kvm-kmod-2.6.36.2 and used it in 2.6.37, even the SMP guests boot fine.
does somebody have a tip on where the problem could be, or should I bisect this? I tried on 2 different machines, host isx86_64, qemu-kvm 0.13.0, 0.14.0. If I shall provide more information (or bisect), please let me know.
Bisect is of course great, if laborious. Meanwhile can you post 'info registers' for all cpus? Is the guest consuming cpu? kvm_stat output?
Signature · 1 line
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
Quoted 12 lines · Avi Kivity
Quoted 10 lines · Nikola Ciprich
Hello Avi et al,
seems like I've hit regression in 2.6.37:
32bit SMP centos guest stopped booting, they just hang during initrd phase. (haven't tried different distros)
UP guest are OK.
when I (forcibly) compiled kvm-kmod-2.6.36.2 and used it in 2.6.37, even the SMP guests boot fine.
does somebody have a tip on where the problem could be, or should I bisect this? I tried on 2 different machines, host isx86_64, qemu-kvm 0.13.0, 0.14.0. If I shall provide more information (or bisect), please let me know.
Quoted 2 lines
Bisect is of course great, if laborious. Meanwhile can you post 'info registers' for all cpus? Is the guest consuming cpu?
kvm_statoutput?
yes, it's eating 100% of one CPU core.
kvm_stat for few seconds (hunged guest is the only one running on the host):
kvm_entry 29327 9091 kvm_exit 29357 9090 kvm_inj_virq 24588 7609 kvm_apic_accept_irq 17146 5310 kvm_emulate_insn 12682 3931 kvm_apic 12530 3879 kvm_mmio 12525 3879 kvm_exit(APIC_ACCESS) 12525 3879 kvm_exit(HLT) 11262 3466 kvm_ioapic_set_irq 6532 2024 kvm_set_irq 6538 2024 kvm_pic_set_irq 6536 2024 kvm_exit(EXTERNAL_INTERRUPT) 4255 1300 kvm_ack_irq 2442 756 kvm_exit(PENDING_INTERRUPT) 1030 335 kvm_exit(IO_INSTRUCTION) 313 104 kvm_pio 312 104 kvm_age_page 18 6 kvm_exit(EPT_VIOLATION) 14 4 kvm_page_fault 12 4 kvm_exit(INVALID_STATE) 4 0 kvm_exit(VMLAUNCH) 3 0 kvm_exit(CPUID) 3 0 kvm_exit(DR_ACCESS) 2 0 kvm_exit(MSR_READ) 2 0 kvm_exit(PAUSE_INSTRUCTION) 1 0
info registers:
EAX=00000000 EBX=6a000000 ECX=0000000a EDX=000f41a8
ESI=000f41a8 EDI=00000000 EBP=c0690320 ESP=c0769f58
EIP=c042d137 EFL=00000002 [-------] CPL=0 II=0 A20=1 SMM=0 HLT=0
ES =007b 00000000 ffffffff 00c0f300 DPL=3 DS [-WA]
CS =0060 00000000 ffffffff 00c09b00 DPL=0 CS32 [-RA]
SS =0068 00000000 ffffffff 00c09300 DPL=0 DS [-WA]
DS =007b 00000000 ffffffff 00c0f300 DPL=3 DS [-WA]
FS =0000 00000000 ffffffff 00000000
GS =0000 00000000 ffffffff 00000000
LDT=0088 c0747020 00000027 00008200 DPL=0 LDT
TR =0080 c300f380 00002073 00008b00 DPL=0 TSS32-busy
GDT= c302b000 000000ff
IDT= c06f7000 000007ff
CR0=8005003b CR2=ffc46000 CR3=00743000 CR4=000006d0 DR0=0000000000000000 DR1=0000000000000000 DR2=0000000000000000 DR3=0000000000000000 DR6=00000000ffff0ff0 DR7=0000000000000400
EFER=0000000000000000
FCW=037f FSW=0000 [ST=0] FTW=00 MXCSR=00001f80
FPR0=0000000000000000 0000 FPR1=0000000000000000 0000 FPR2=0000000000000000 0000 FPR3=0000000000000000 0000 FPR4=0000000000000000 0000 FPR5=0000000000000000 0000 FPR6=800bf60000000000 4015 FPR7=0000000000000000 0000 XMM00=00000000000000000000000000000000 XMM01=00000000000000000000000000000000 XMM02=00000000000000000000000000000000 XMM03=00000000000000000000000000000000 XMM04=00000000000000000000000000000000 XMM05=00000000000000000000000000000000 XMM06=00000000000000000000000000000000 XMM07=00000000000000000000000000000000
I'll wait a bit with bisect whether You'll spot some obvious bug or not ;) thanks for Your time!
PS: I still owe You the kvm_stat comparison about this slow windows chkdsk problem, I'm aware of it, I just had to postpone this due to more urgent matters :( but I'll get back to it sooner or later..
Quoted 9 lines
Signature · 7 lines
-- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Signature · 13 lines
------------------------------------- Ing. Nikola CIPRICH LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o. 28. rijna 168, 709 01 Ostrava tel.: +420 596 603 142 fax: +420 596 621 273 mobil: +420 777 093 799 www.linuxbox.cz mobil servis: +420 737 238 656 email servis: [email protected] -------------------------------------
Quoted 37 lines · Nikola Ciprich
Quoted 12 lines · Avi Kivity
Quoted 10 lines · Nikola Ciprich
Hello Avi et al,
seems like I've hit regression in 2.6.37:
32bit SMP centos guest stopped booting, they just hang during initrd phase. (haven't tried different distros)
UP guest are OK.
when I (forcibly) compiled kvm-kmod-2.6.36.2 and used it in 2.6.37, even the SMP guests boot fine.
does somebody have a tip on where the problem could be, or should I bisect this? I tried on 2 different machines, host isx86_64, qemu-kvm 0.13.0, 0.14.0. If I shall provide more information (or bisect), please let me know.Quoted 2 lines
Bisect is of course great, if laborious. Meanwhile can you post 'info registers' for all cpus? Is the guest consuming cpu?
kvm_statoutput?yes, it's eating 100% of one CPU core.
kvm_statfor few seconds (hunged guest is the only one running on the host):kvm_entry 29327 9091 kvm_exit 29357 9090 kvm_inj_virq 24588 7609 kvm_apic_accept_irq 17146 5310 kvm_emulate_insn 12682 3931 kvm_apic 12530 3879 kvm_mmio 12525 3879 kvm_exit(APIC_ACCESS) 12525 3879 kvm_exit(HLT) 11262 3466 kvm_ioapic_set_irq 6532 2024 kvm_set_irq 6538 2024 kvm_pic_set_irq 6536 2024 kvm_exit(EXTERNAL_INTERRUPT) 4255 1300 kvm_ack_irq 2442 756 kvm_exit(PENDING_INTERRUPT) 1030 335 kvm_exit(IO_INSTRUCTION) 313 104 kvm_pio 312 104 kvm_age_page 18 6
Quoted 9 lines
kvm_exit(EPT_VIOLATION) 14 4 kvm_page_fault 12 4 kvm_exit(INVALID_STATE) 4 0 kvm_exit(VMLAUNCH) 3 0 kvm_exit(CPUID) 3 0 kvm_exit(DR_ACCESS) 2 0 kvm_exit(MSR_READ) 2 0 kvm_exit(PAUSE_INSTRUCTION) 1 0
Guest is churning along.
Quoted 5 lines
info registers:
EAX=00000000 EBX=6a000000 ECX=0000000a EDX=000f41a8 ESI=000f41a8 EDI=00000000 EBP=c0690320 ESP=c0769f58 EIP=c042d137 EFL=00000002 [-------] CPL=0 II=0 A20=1 SMM=0 HLT=0
Not very useful when the guest is making progress, I'm afraid.
Quoted 2 lines
I'll wait a bit with bisect whether You'll spot some obvious bug or not ;) thanks for Your time!
Can you try a little trace-cmd -e kvm -b 20000?
Quoted 3 lines
PS: I still owe You the
kvm_statcomparison about this slow windows chkdsk problem, I'm aware of it, I just had to postpone this due to more urgent matters :( but I'll get back to it sooner or later..
Sure. Something similar that came up - sometimes Windows IDE drivers fall back to PIO mode. Are you using IDE? If so, please check whether it's using DMA or PIO.
Signature · 1 line
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
Quoted 1 line
Not very useful when the guest is making progress, I'm afraid.
can perf report help here?
Quoted 1 line
Can you try a little trace-cmd -e kvm -b 20000?
ugh, I'm afraid I'll have some dumb questions here :-[
You mean this: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/trace-cmd.git ? and then re-execute qemu-kvm using it? or I'm totally wrong?
Quoted 3 lines
Sure. Something similar that came up - sometimes Windows IDE drivers fall back to PIO mode. Are you using IDE? If so, please check whether it's using DMA or PIO.
I'll check, but this problem occurs only during fsck phase, when to guest boots, then it runs pretty fast.. so maybe during boot it might fall back to PIO, but from guest, I guess I won't have a chance to find out.. can I somehow check it from host?
Quoted 9 lines
Signature · 7 lines
-- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Signature · 13 lines
------------------------------------- Ing. Nikola CIPRICH LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o. 28. rijna 168, 709 01 Ostrava tel.: +420 596 603 142 fax: +420 596 621 273 mobil: +420 777 093 799 www.linuxbox.cz mobil servis: +420 737 238 656 email servis: [email protected] -------------------------------------
Quoted 6 lines · Nikola Ciprich
Quoted 1 line
Not very useful when the guest is making progress, I'm afraid.
can perf report help here?
Quoted 1 line
Can you try a little trace-cmd -e kvm -b 20000?
ugh, I'm afraid I'll have some dumb questions here :-[
You mean this:git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/trace-cmd.git?
Yes. If you have udis86 and udis86-devel installed when building it, it's even better.
Quoted 1 line
and then re-execute qemu-kvm using it? or I'm totally wrong?
You don't have to execute qemu-kvm under it, if you have a running instance you can run trace-cmd in parallel and it will record whatever's happening.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Sure. Something similar that came up - sometimes Windows IDE drivers fall back to PIO mode. Are you using IDE? If so, please check whether it's using DMA or PIO.
I'll check, but this problem occurs only during fsck phase, when to guest boots, then it runs pretty fast.. so maybe during boot it might fall back to PIO, but from guest, I guess I won't have a chance to find out.. can I somehow check it from host?
The trace-cmd output will show. Please run trace-cmd report afterwards and post the results somewhere.
Signature · 1 line
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
Quoted 2 lines
Yes. If you have udis86 and udis86-devel installed when building it, it's even better.
yes, now I remember! I've done some tracing for You already..
Quoted 3 lines
You don't have to execute qemu-kvm under it, if you have a running instance you can run trace-cmd in parallel and it will record whatever's happening.
I've uploaded the report for You here:
nelide.cz/downloads/nik/report.txt.xz
Quoted 2 lines
The trace-cmd output will show. Please run trace-cmd report afterwards and post the results somewhere.
OK, I'll prepare some new windows testing machine, try and report..
Signature · 13 lines
------------------------------------- Ing. Nikola CIPRICH LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o. 28. rijna 168, 709 01 Ostrava tel.: +420 596 603 142 fax: +420 596 621 273 mobil: +420 777 093 799 www.linuxbox.cz mobil servis: +420 737 238 656 email servis: [email protected] -------------------------------------
Quoted 10 lines · Nikola Ciprich
Quoted 2 lines
Yes. If you have udis86 and udis86-devel installed when building it, it's even better.
yes, now I remember! I've done some tracing for You already..
Quoted 3 lines
You don't have to execute qemu-kvm under it, if you have a running instance you can run trace-cmd in parallel and it will record whatever's happening.
I've uploaded the report for You here:
nelide.cz/downloads/nik/report.txt.xz
The only activity I can see is the timer interrupt, so I'm afraid a bisect is needed.
If you let git bisect just kvm, it'll be a bit faster:
$ git bisect $BAD $GOOD virt/kvm arch/x86/kvm
Signature · 1 line
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
Quoted 2 lines
The only activity I can see is the timer interrupt, so I'm afraid a bisect is needed.
OK, nevermind, it's easy to reproduce, so I'll just bisect it and report. n.
Quoted 13 lines
If you let git bisect just kvm, it'll be a bit faster:
$ git bisect $BAD $GOOD virt/kvm arch/x86/kvmSignature · 6 lines
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Signature · 13 lines
------------------------------------- Ing. Nikola CIPRICH LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o. 28. rijna 168, 709 01 Ostrava tel.: +420 596 603 142 fax: +420 596 621 273 mobil: +420 777 093 799 www.linuxbox.cz mobil servis: +420 737 238 656 email servis: [email protected] -------------------------------------
(CC: Zachary)
Hello,
Zachary, in case You haven't noticed the thread, we're trying to find out the reason why 32bit SMP guests stopped working in 2.6.37.
bisect shows this as the culprit:
e48672fa25e879f7ae21785c7efd187738139593 is first bad commit commit e48672fa25e879f7ae21785c7efd187738139593
Author: Zachary Amsden <[email protected]> Date: Thu Aug 19 22:07:23 2010 -1000
KVM: x86: Unify TSC logic
Move the TSC control logic from the vendor backends into x86.c by adding adjust_tsc_offset to x86 ops. Now all TSC decisions can be done in one place.
Unfortunately I couldn't try 2.6.37 with just this one reverted, certainly other patches rely on it, but hopefully I've not screwed something while bisecting...
so what now?
n.
Signature · 13 lines
------------------------------------- Ing. Nikola CIPRICH LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o. 28. rijna 168, 709 01 Ostrava tel.: +420 596 603 142 fax: +420 596 621 273 mobil: +420 777 093 799 www.linuxbox.cz mobil servis: +420 737 238 656 email servis: [email protected] -------------------------------------
Quoted 8 lines · Nikola Ciprich
(CC: Zachary)
Hello,
Zachary, in case You haven't noticed the thread, we're trying to find out the reason why 32bit SMP guests stopped working in 2.6.37.
bisect shows this as the culprit:
I was not aware of the thread. Please cc me directly, or add a keyword I track - timekeeping, TSC..
Quoted 5 lines
e48672fa25e879f7ae21785c7efd187738139593is first bad commit commite48672fa25e879f7ae21785c7efd187738139593Author: Zachary Amsden<[email protected]> Date: Thu Aug 19 22:07:23 2010 -1000
Quoted 9 lines
KVM: x86: Unify TSC logic
Move the TSC control logic from the vendor backends into
x86.cby addingadjust_tsc_offsetto x86 ops. Now all TSC decisions can be done in one place.Signed-off-by Zachary Amsden<[email protected]>Signed-off-by Marcelo Tosatti<[email protected]>
That change alone may not bisect well; without further fixes on top of it, you may end up with a hang or stall, which is likely to manifest in a vendor-specific way.
Basically there were a few differences in the platform code about how TSC was dealt with on systems which did not have stable clocks, this brought the logic into one location, but there was a slight change to the logic here.
Note very carefully, the logic on SVM is gated by a condition before this change:
if (unlikely(cpu != vcpu->cpu)) {- u64 delta;
-
- if (check_tsc_unstable()) {
- /*
- * Make sure that the guest sees a monotonically - * increasing TSC. - */ - delta = vcpu->arch.host_tsc - native_read_tsc(); - svm->vmcb->control.tsc_offset += delta; - if (is_nested(svm)) - svm->nested.hsave->control.tsc_offset += delta; - } - vcpu->cpu = cpu; - kvm_migrate_timers(vcpu);
So this only happens with a system which reports TSC as unstable. After the change, KVM itself may report the TSC as unstable:
+ if (unlikely(vcpu->cpu != cpu)) {
+ /* Make sure TSC doesn't go backwards */
+ s64 tsc_delta = !vcpu->arch.last_host_tsc ? 0 :
+ native_read_tsc() - vcpu->arch.last_host_tsc;
+ if (tsc_delta < 0)
+ mark_tsc_unstable("KVM discovered backwards TSC");
+ if (check_tsc_unstable())
+ kvm_x86_ops->adjust_tsc_offset(vcpu, -tsc_delta);
+ kvm_migrate_timers(vcpu);
+ vcpu->cpu = cpu;
+ }
If the platform has very small TSC deltas across CPUs, but indicates the TSC is stable, this could result in KVM marking the TSC unstable. If that is the case, this compensation logic will kick in to avoid backwards TSCs.
Note however, that the logic is not perfect; time which passes while not running on any CPU will be erased, as the delta compensation removes not just backwards, but any elapsed time from the TSC. In extreme cases, this could result in time appearing to stand still.... with guests failing to boot.
This was addressed with a later change, which catches up the missing time:
commit c285545f813d7b0ce989fd34e42ad1fe785dc65d
Author: Zachary Amsden <[email protected]> Date: Sat Sep 18 14:38:15 2010 -1000
KVM: x86: TSC catchup mode
Negate the effects of AN TYM spell while kvm thread is preempted by
tracking
conversion factor to the highest TSC rate and catching the TSC up
when it has
fallen behind the kernel view of time. Note that once triggered,
we don't
turn off catchup mode.
A slightly more clever version of this is possible, which only does
catchup
when TSC rate drops, and which specifically targets only CPUs with
broken
TSC, but since these all are considered unstable_tsc(), this patch
covers
all necessary cases.
Quoted 2 lines
I was not aware of the thread. Please cc me directly, or add a keyword I track - timekeeping, TSC..
Hello Zachary, thanks for Your time looking at this!
Quoted 3 lines
That change alone may not bisect well; without further fixes on top of it, you may end up with a hang or stall, which is likely to manifest in a vendor-specific way.
I'm not sure I really understand You here, but this change is exactly to what I got while bisecting. With later revisions, including this one, 32bit SMP guests don't boot, before it, they do..
Quoted 54 lines
Basically there were a few differences in the platform code about how TSC was dealt with on systems which did not have stable clocks, this brought the logic into one location, but there was a slight change to the logic here.
Note very carefully, the logic on SVM is gated by a condition before this change:
if (unlikely(cpu != vcpu->cpu)) {(quoted diff) +0
-11- u64 delta; - - if (check_tsc_unstable()) { - /* - * Make sure that the guest sees a monotonically - * increasing TSC. - */ - delta = vcpu->arch.host_tsc - native_read_tsc(); - svm->vmcb->control.tsc_offset += delta; - if (is_nested(svm)) - svm->nested.hsave->control.tsc_offset +=delta;
(quoted diff) +0
-3- } - vcpu->cpu = cpu; - kvm_migrate_timers(vcpu);So this only happens with a system which reports TSC as unstable. After the change, KVM itself may report the TSC as unstable:
(quoted diff) +4
-0+ if (unlikely(vcpu->cpu != cpu)) { + /* Make sure TSC doesn't go backwards */ + s64 tsc_delta = !vcpu->arch.last_host_tsc ? 0 : + native_read_tsc() -
vcpu->arch.last_host_tsc;(quoted diff) +7
-0+ if (tsc_delta < 0) + mark_tsc_unstable("KVM discovered backwards TSC"); + if (check_tsc_unstable()) + kvm_x86_ops->adjust_tsc_offset(vcpu, -tsc_delta); + kvm_migrate_timers(vcpu); + vcpu->cpu = cpu; + }If the platform has very small TSC deltas across CPUs, but indicates the TSC is stable, this could result in KVM marking the TSC unstable. If that is the case, this compensation logic will kick in to avoid backwards TSCs.
Note however, that the logic is not perfect; time which passes while not running on any CPU will be erased, as the delta compensation removes not just backwards, but any elapsed time from the TSC. In extreme cases, this could result in time appearing to stand still.... with guests failing to boot.
Quoted 3 lines
This was addressed with a later change, which catches up the missing time:
commit
c285545f813d7b0ce989fd34e42ad1fe785dc65d
yes, but this change is already included in 2.6.37, so maybe some other fix is needed? if You have some idea what could be changed, I'll gladly test whatever You recommend, but I'm afraid that's all I can do, since this is a bit of a rocket science for me, sorry :( nik
Quoted 29 lines
Author: Zachary Amsden <[email protected]> Date: Sat Sep 18 14:38:15 2010 -1000KVM: x86: TSC catchup mode
Negate the effects of AN TYM spell while kvm thread is preempted by
tracking
conversion factor to the highest TSC rate and catching the TSC up
when it has
fallen behind the kernel view of time. Note that once triggered, we
don't
turn off catchup mode.A slightly more clever version of this is possible, which only does
catchup
when TSC rate drops, and which specifically targets only CPUs with
broken
TSC, but since these all are consideredunstable_tsc(), this patch
covers
all necessary cases.Signed-off-by Zachary Amsden <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Marcelo Tosatti <[email protected]>--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Signature · 14 lines
------------------------------------- Ing. Nikola CIPRICH LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o. 28. rijna 168, 709 01 Ostrava tel.: +420 596 603 142 fax: +420 596 621 273 mobil: +420 777 093 799 www.linuxbox.cz mobil servis: +420 737 238 656 email servis: [email protected] -------------------------------------
Quoted 5 lines · Nikola Ciprich
Quoted 3 lines
I was not aware of the thread. Please cc me directly, or add a keyword I track - timekeeping, TSC..
Hello Zachary, thanks for Your time looking at this!
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
That change alone may not bisect well; without further fixes on top of it, you may end up with a hang or stall, which is likely to manifest in a vendor-specific way.
I'm not sure I really understand You here, but this change is exactly to what I got while bisecting. With later revisions, including this one, 32bit SMP guests don't boot, before it, they do..
Does the bug you are hitting manifest on both Intel and AMD platforms?
Further, do the systems you are hitting this on have stable or unstable TSCs?
Thanks,
Zach
Quoted 1 line
Does the bug you are hitting manifest on both Intel and AMD platforms?
I don't have any AMD box here, I'll try this out at my home box.
Quoted 3 lines
Further, do the systems you are hitting this on have stable or unstable TSCs?
how do I find this out? I don't see any warning about TSC in guest, but I've just started it..
n.
Quoted 9 lines
Thanks,
Zach
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Signature · 13 lines
------------------------------------- Ing. Nikola CIPRICH LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o. 28. rijna 168, 709 01 Ostrava tel.: +420 596 603 142 fax: +420 596 621 273 mobil: +420 777 093 799 www.linuxbox.cz mobil servis: +420 737 238 656 email servis: [email protected] -------------------------------------
Quoted 11 lines · Nikola Ciprich
Quoted 2 lines
Does the bug you are hitting manifest on both Intel and AMD platforms?
I don't have any AMD box here, I'll try this out at my home box.
Quoted 3 lines
Further, do the systems you are hitting this on have stable or unstable TSCs?
how do I find this out? I don't see any warning about TSC in guest, but I've just started it..
n.
Before worrying about the guest, is the host TSC stable? What is the host clocksource?
Quoted 9 lines · Zachary Amsden
Quoted 8 lines · Nikola Ciprich
Quoted 2 lines
Does the bug you are hitting manifest on both Intel and AMD platforms?
I don't have any AMD box here, I'll try this out at my home box.
Quoted 3 lines
Further, do the systems you are hitting this on have stable or unstable TSCs?
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
how do I find this out? I don't see any warning about TSC in guest, but I've just started it..
n.Before worrying about the guest, is the host TSC stable? What is the host clocksource?
not sure, I'm not setting anything specifically, is this snippet of dmesg relevant:
[ 1.148829] HPET: 8 timers in total, 5 timers will be used for per-cpu timer [ 1.148934] hpet0: at MMIO 0xfed00000, IRQs 2, 8, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 0 [ 1.149331] hpet0: 8 comparators, 64-bit 14.318180 MHz counter [ 1.151831] hpet: hpet2 irq 40 for MSI [ 1.151962] hpet: hpet3 irq 41 for MSI [ 1.155930] hpet: hpet4 irq 42 for MSI [ 1.159937] hpet: hpet5 irq 43 for MSI [ 1.163943] hpet: hpet6 irq 44 for MSI [ 1.175955] Switching to clocksource tsc
so I guess I'm using hpet?
n.
Quoted 5 lines
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Signature · 13 lines
------------------------------------- Ing. Nikola CIPRICH LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o. 28. rijna 168, 709 01 Ostrava tel.: +420 596 603 142 fax: +420 596 621 273 mobil: +420 777 093 799 www.linuxbox.cz mobil servis: +420 737 238 656 email servis: [email protected] -------------------------------------
Quoted 35 lines · Zachary Amsden
Quoted 14 lines · Nikola Ciprich
Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Does the bug you are hitting manifest on both Intel and AMD platforms?
I don't have any AMD box here, I'll try this out at my home box.
Quoted 4 lines
Further, do the systems you are hitting this on have stable or unstable TSCs?
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
how do I find this out? I don't see any warning about TSC in guest, but I've just started it..
n.Before worrying about the guest, is the host TSC stable? What is the host clocksource?
not sure, I'm not setting anything specifically, is this snippet of dmesg relevant:
[ 1.148829] HPET: 8 timers in total, 5 timers will be used for per-cpu timer [ 1.148934] hpet0: at MMIO 0xfed00000, IRQs 2, 8, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 0 [ 1.149331] hpet0: 8 comparators, 64-bit 14.318180 MHz counter [ 1.151831] hpet: hpet2 irq 40 for MSI [ 1.151962] hpet: hpet3 irq 41 for MSI [ 1.155930] hpet: hpet4 irq 42 for MSI [ 1.159937] hpet: hpet5 irq 43 for MSI [ 1.163943] hpet: hpet6 irq 44 for MSI [ 1.175955] Switching to clocksource tsc
Quoted 5 lines
so I guess I'm using hpet?
n.
Looks like you are using tsc based on the last line. Can you tell us please
cat /proc/cpuinfo
cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/current_clocksource
and grep -i dmesg for these keywords: TSC, clock, hpet, stable, khz, kvm
Quoted 1 line
cat
/proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 30
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3440 @ 2.53GHz
stepping : 5
cpu MHz : 2533.185
cache size : 8192 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 8
core id : 0
cpu cores : 4
apicid : 0
initial apicid : 0
fpu : yesfpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 11
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt lahf_lm ida dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips : 5066.37
clflush size : 64cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
.
.
.
.
.
processor : 7vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 30
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3440 @ 2.53GHz
stepping : 5
cpu MHz : 2533.185
cache size : 8192 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 8
core id : 3
cpu cores : 4
apicid : 7
initial apicid : 7
fpu : yesfpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 11
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt lahf_lm ida dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips : 5066.35
clflush size : 64cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
Quoted 1 line
cat
/sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/current_clocksource
[root@vbox5 ~]# cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/current_clocksource tsc
Quoted 2 lines
and grep -i dmesg for these keywords: TSC, clock, hpet, stable, khz, kvm
[root@vbox5 ~]# dmesg | grep -i "tsc\|clock\|hpet\|stable\|stable\|khz\|kvm"
[ 0.000000] ACPI: HPET 00000000bf7aa5f0 00038 (v01 052710 OEMHPET 20100527 MSFT 00000097) [ 0.000000] ACPI: HPET id: 0x8086a701 base: 0xfed00000 [ 0.000000] hpet clockevent registered [ 0.000000] Fast TSC calibration using PIT [ 1.148829] HPET: 8 timers in total, 5 timers will be used for per-cpu timer [ 1.148934] hpet0: at MMIO 0xfed00000, IRQs 2, 8, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 0 [ 1.149331] hpet0: 8 comparators, 64-bit 14.318180 MHz counter [ 1.151831] hpet: hpet2 irq 40 for MSI [ 1.151962] hpet: hpet3 irq 41 for MSI [ 1.155930] hpet: hpet4 irq 42 for MSI [ 1.159937] hpet: hpet5 irq 43 for MSI [ 1.163943] hpet: hpet6 irq 44 for MSI [ 1.175955] Switching to clocksource tsc [ 1.260015] CE: hpet3 increased min_delta_ns to 7500 nsec [ 1.260117] CE: hpet3 increased min_delta_ns to 11250 nsec [ 1.294150] Real Time Clock Driver v1.12b [ 7.564355] CE: hpet4 increased min_delta_ns to 7500 nsec [ 7.564367] CE: hpet4 increased min_delta_ns to 11250 nsec [ 299.307242] CE: hpet2 increased min_delta_ns to 7500 nsec [ 299.307251] CE: hpet2 increased min_delta_ns to 11250 nsec [ 1414.616685] CE: hpet5 increased min_delta_ns to 7500 nsec [ 1414.616694] CE: hpet5 increased min_delta_ns to 11250 nsec [ 5241.474310] CE: hpet6 increased min_delta_ns to 7500 nsec [ 5241.474321] CE: hpet6 increased min_delta_ns to 11250 nsec
Signature · 14 lines
------------------------------------- Ing. Nikola CIPRICH LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o. 28. rijna 168, 709 01 Ostrava tel.: +420 596 603 142 fax: +420 596 621 273 mobil: +420 777 093 799 www.linuxbox.cz mobil servis: +420 737 238 656 email servis: [email protected] -------------------------------------
(resend, sorry for the mess)
Quoted 1 line
cat
/proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 30
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3440 @ 2.53GHz
stepping : 5
cpu MHz : 2533.185
cache size : 8192 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 8
core id : 0
cpu cores : 4
apicid : 0
initial apicid : 0
fpu : yesfpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 11
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca c=
mov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rd= tscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl xtopology nonstop_= tsc aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pd= cm sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt lahf_lm ida dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vp= id
bogomips : 5066.37
clflush size : 64cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
.
.
.
.
processor : 7vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 30
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3440 @ 2.53GHz
stepping : 5
cpu MHz : 2533.185
cache size : 8192 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 8
core id : 3
cpu cores : 4
apicid : 7
initial apicid : 7
fpu : yesfpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 11
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca c=
mov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rd= tscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl xtopology nonstop_= tsc aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pd= cm sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt lahf_lm ida dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vp= id
bogomips : 5066.35
clflush size : 64cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
Quoted 1 line
cat
/sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/current_clocksource
[root@vbox5 ~]# cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/current_cl= ocksource
tsc
Quoted 2 lines
and grep -i dmesg for these keywords: TSC, clock, hpet, stable, khz, kvm
[root@vbox5 ~]# dmesg | grep -i "tsc\|clock\|hpet\|stable\|stable\|khz\|kvm"
[ 0.000000] ACPI: HPET 00000000bf7aa5f0 00038 (v01 052710 OEMHPET 20100= 527 MSFT 00000097) [ 0.000000] ACPI: HPET id: 0x8086a701 base: 0xfed00000 [ 0.000000] hpet clockevent registered [ 0.000000] Fast TSC calibration using PIT [ 1.148829] HPET: 8 timers in total, 5 timers will be used for per-cpu t= imer [ 1.148934] hpet0: at MMIO 0xfed00000, IRQs 2, 8, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 0 [ 1.149331] hpet0: 8 comparators, 64-bit 14.318180 MHz counter [ 1.151831] hpet: hpet2 irq 40 for MSI [ 1.151962] hpet: hpet3 irq 41 for MSI [ 1.155930] hpet: hpet4 irq 42 for MSI [ 1.159937] hpet: hpet5 irq 43 for MSI [ 1.163943] hpet: hpet6 irq 44 for MSI [ 1.175955] Switching to clocksource tsc [ 1.260015] CE: hpet3 increased min_delta_ns to 7500 nsec [ 1.260117] CE: hpet3 increased min_delta_ns to 11250 nsec [ 1.294150] Real Time Clock Driver v1.12b [ 7.564355] CE: hpet4 increased min_delta_ns to 7500 nsec [ 7.564367] CE: hpet4 increased min_delta_ns to 11250 nsec [ 299.307242] CE: hpet2 increased min_delta_ns to 7500 nsec [ 299.307251] CE: hpet2 increased min_delta_ns to 11250 nsec [ 1414.616685] CE: hpet5 increased min_delta_ns to 7500 nsec [ 1414.616694] CE: hpet5 increased min_delta_ns to 11250 nsec [ 5241.474310] CE: hpet6 increased min_delta_ns to 7500 nsec [ 5241.474321] CE: hpet6 increased min_delta_ns to 11250 nsec
Signature · 14 lines
------------------------------------- Ing. Nikola CIPRICH LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o. 28. rijna 168, 709 01 Ostrava tel.: +420 596 603 142 fax: +420 596 621 273 mobil: +420 777 093 799 www.linuxbox.cz mobil servis: +420 737 238 656 email servis: [email protected] -------------------------------------
Quoted 3 lines
(resend, sorry for the mess)
No worries. What mess?
I have two things you can try:
first is running a single VCPU guest, if you have not done so already.
Second is adding the bootparameter "clocksource=acpi_pm" to your guest kernel.
If either of those fixes the problem, it very well have to do with this change and not that you may be missing later dependent patches. This change should be nearly a 1-1 transformation, and if it is not, something is wrong.
What branch are you bisecting on, the kvm branch or the kernel tree itself? It would be helpful to see the exact code in case any surrouding logic changed.
Thanks,
Zach
Quoted 1 line
No worries. What mess?
twice sending the same mail, nevermind :)
Quoted 4 lines
I have two things you can try:
first is running a single VCPU guest, if you have not done so already.
yup, UP guest is fine, just SMP doesn't work.
Quoted 2 lines
Second is adding the bootparameter "clocksource=acpi_pm" to your guest kernel.
yes, this makes SMP work too! I just realized when You were asking about current clocksource, I told You only host source, not the guest. So I checked now, and (at least for UP, I guess for SMP it's the same), the clocksource is kvm-clock! So seems like it got broken with the TSC changes?
Quoted 9 lines
If either of those fixes the problem, it very well have to do with this change and not that you may be missing later dependent patches. This change should be nearly a 1-1 transformation, and if it is not, something is wrong.
What branch are you bisecting on, the kvm branch or the kernel tree itself? It would be helpful to see the exact code in case any surrouding logic changed.
I was bisecting linus' linux-2.6.git main branch, between 2.6.36..2.6.37
Quoted 9 lines
Thanks,
Zach
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Signature · 13 lines
------------------------------------- Ing. Nikola CIPRICH LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o. 28. rijna 168, 709 01 Ostrava tel.: +420 596 603 142 fax: +420 596 621 273 mobil: +420 777 093 799 www.linuxbox.cz mobil servis: +420 737 238 656 email servis: [email protected] -------------------------------------
Quoted 12 lines · Nikola Ciprich
Quoted 2 lines
No worries. What mess?
twice sending the same mail, nevermind :)
Quoted 4 lines
I have two things you can try:
first is running a single VCPU guest, if you have not done so already.
yup, UP guest is fine, just SMP doesn't work.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Second is adding the bootparameter "clocksource=acpi_pm" to your guest kernel.
yes, this makes SMP work too! I just realized when You were asking about current clocksource, I told You only host source, not the guest. So I checked now, and (at least for UP, I guess for SMP it's the same), the clocksource is kvm-clock! So seems like it got broken with the TSC changes?
What is the exact kernel version you are using in the guest.
It appears that some earlier 32-bit versions of kvm-clock enabled kernels are still missing the required atomic check for backwards-time protection which would be needed on SMP. This explains why 64-bit is fine, 32-bit is not.
Why this change triggers that problem still is a slight mystery, logically it should only affect the system if you have an unstable TSC.
Zach
Quoted 1 line
What is the exact kernel version you are using in the guest.
It's latest centos (2.6.18-194.32.1.el5), so I guess there are a lot of fixes, but it's possible the kvm-clock is broken in it.
I can't influence what kernel is used there (at least not on customer's guests), but I guess asking for adding clocksource kernel parameter is not problem.
Signature · 14 lines
------------------------------------- Ing. Nikola CIPRICH LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o. 28. rijna 168, 709 01 Ostrava tel.: +420 596 603 142 fax: +420 596 621 273 mobil: +420 777 093 799 www.linuxbox.cz mobil servis: +420 737 238 656 email servis: [email protected] -------------------------------------
Quoted 9 lines · Nikola Ciprich
Quoted 2 lines
What is the exact kernel version you are using in the guest.
It's latest centos (2.6.18-194.32.1.el5), so I guess there are a lot of fixes, but it's possible the kvm-clock is broken in it.
I can't influence what kernel is used there (at least not on customer's guests), but I guess asking for adding clocksource kernel parameter is not problem.
That sounds like a kernel which will be vulnerable to broken KVM clock on 32-bit. There's a kernel side fix that is needed, but why the server side change triggers the problem needs more investigation.
Zach
Quoted 3 lines
That sounds like a kernel which will be vulnerable to broken KVM clock on 32-bit. There's a kernel side fix that is needed, but why the server side change triggers the problem needs more investigation.
OK, it's important for me that I can fix this by kernel parameter, but if I can help somehow with debugging, please let me know. thanks for Your time!
nik
Quoted 7 lines
Zach
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Signature · 14 lines
------------------------------------- Ing. Nikola CIPRICH LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o. 28. rijna 168, 709 01 Ostrava tel.: +420 596 603 142 fax: +420 596 621 273 mobil: +420 777 093 799 www.linuxbox.cz mobil servis: +420 737 238 656 email servis: [email protected] -------------------------------------
Quoted 9 lines · Nikola Ciprich
Quoted 4 lines
That sounds like a kernel which will be vulnerable to broken KVM clock on 32-bit. There's a kernel side fix that is needed, but why the server side change triggers the problem needs more investigation.
OK, it's important for me that I can fix this by kernel parameter, but if I can help somehow with debugging, please let me know. thanks for Your time!
nik
You don't see any messages about TSC being unstable or switching clocksource after loading the KVM module? And you are not suspending the host or anything?
Can you try using "processor.max_cstate=1" on the host as a kernel parameter and see if it makes a difference?
Hello Zachary,
Quoted 3 lines
You don't see any messages about TSC being unstable or switching clocksource after loading the KVM module? And you are not suspending the host or anything?
no messages, no suspending, nothing.
Quoted 2 lines
Can you try using "processor.max_cstate=1" on the host as a kernel parameter and see if it makes a difference?
I tried it, no change..
n.
Signature · 14 lines
------------------------------------- Ing. Nikola CIPRICH LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o. 28. rijna 168, 709 01 Ostrava tel.: +420 596 603 142 fax: +420 596 621 273 mobil: +420 777 093 799 www.linuxbox.cz mobil servis: +420 737 238 656 email servis: [email protected] -------------------------------------
Quoted 5 lines · Nikola Ciprich
Hello Zachary,
Quoted 3 lines
You don't see any messages about TSC being unstable or switching clocksource after loading the KVM module? And you are not suspending the host or anything?
Quoted 7 lines
no messages, no suspending, nothing.
Quoted 2 lines
Can you try using "processor.max_cstate=1" on the host as a kernel parameter and see if it makes a difference?
I tried it, no change..
n.
Zach,
I don't understand 100 % the logic behind all your tsc changes. But kvm-clock-wise, most of the problems we had in the past were related to the difference in resolution between the tsc and the host clocksource (hpet, acpi_pm, etc), which in his case, it is a non-issue.
It does seem to me like some compensation logic kicked in, dismantling an otherwise good tsc. He does have nonstop_tsc, which means it can't get any better.
One thing I noticed when reading the culprit patch in bisect, is that in vcpu_load(), there were previously a call to
kvm_request_guest_time_update(vcpu)
that was removed without a counterpart addition. Any idea about why it was done?
Nikola, does adding that line back alleviate the problem for you ?
Quoted 14 lines
Zach,
I don't understand 100 % the logic behind all your tsc changes. But kvm-clock-wise, most of the problems we had in the past were related to the difference in resolution between the tsc and the host clocksource (hpet,
acpi_pm, etc), which in his case, it is a non-issue.It does seem to me like some compensation logic kicked in, dismantling an otherwise good tsc. He does have
nonstop_tsc, which means it can't get any better.One thing I noticed when reading the culprit patch in bisect, is that in
vcpu_load(), there were previously a call to
Quoted 6 lines
kvm_request_guest_time_update(vcpu)that was removed without a counterpart addition. Any idea about why it was done?
Nikola, does adding that line back alleviate the problem for you ?
Hello Glauber,kvm_request_guest_time_update seems to have been renamed and then removed since then, but I've added kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_CLOCK_UPDATE, vcpu);
instead and now the guest boots!
So maybe missing clock update is really the culprit here? What do You guys think?
n.
Quoted 6 lines
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Signature · 14 lines
------------------------------------- Ing. Nikola CIPRICH LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o. 28. rijna 168, 709 01 Ostrava tel.: +420 596 603 142 fax: +420 596 621 273 mobil: +420 777 093 799 www.linuxbox.cz mobil servis: +420 737 238 656 email servis: [email protected] -------------------------------------
Quoted 20 lines · Nikola Ciprich
Quoted 14 lines
Zach,
I don't understand 100 % the logic behind all your tsc changes. But kvm-clock-wise, most of the problems we had in the past were related to the difference in resolution between the tsc and the host clocksource (hpet,
acpi_pm, etc), which in his case, it is a non-issue.It does seem to me like some compensation logic kicked in, dismantling an otherwise good tsc. He does have
nonstop_tsc, which means it can't get any better.One thing I noticed when reading the culprit patch in bisect, is that in
vcpu_load(), there were previously a call toQuoted 6 lines
kvm_request_guest_time_update(vcpu)that was removed without a counterpart addition. Any idea about why it was done?
Nikola, does adding that line back alleviate the problem for you ?
Quoted 8 lines
Hello Glauber,
kvm_request_guest_time_updateseems to have been renamed and then removed since then, but I've addedkvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_CLOCK_UPDATE, vcpu);
instead and now the guest boots!
So maybe missing clock update is really the culprit here? What do You guys think?
n.
I think although the long term plan is to just do this update once in your case (stable tsc), this update is needed.
Why don't you send a patch to re-include it ?
Quoted 6 lines
I think although the long term plan is to just do this update once in your case (stable tsc), this update is needed.
Why don't you send a patch to re-include it ?
Yes, I'll gladly submit patch, one question, is this OK
to just add calling kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_CLOCK_UPDATE, vcpu) before the conditional (as I did in my test), or should it go somewhere to else {..} section? it's called inside the conditional again, which will cause it to be called twice in some cases, is it OK?
n.
Signature · 14 lines
------------------------------------- Ing. Nikola CIPRICH LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o. 28. rijna 168, 709 01 Ostrava tel.: +420 596 603 142 fax: +420 596 621 273 mobil: +420 777 093 799 www.linuxbox.cz mobil servis: +420 737 238 656 email servis: [email protected] -------------------------------------
Quoted 6 lines · Nikola Ciprich
Quoted 6 lines
I think although the long term plan is to just do this update once in your case (stable tsc), this update is needed.
Why don't you send a patch to re-include it ?
Quoted 7 lines
Yes, I'll gladly submit patch, one question, is this OK
to just add callingkvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_CLOCK_UPDATE, vcpu)before the conditional (as I did in my test), or should it go somewhere to else {..} section? it's called inside the conditional again, which will cause it to be called twice in some cases, is it OK?
n.
Let me write a patch to fix this..
Quoted 6 lines · Nikola Ciprich
Quoted 6 lines
I think although the long term plan is to just do this update once in your case (stable tsc), this update is needed.
Why don't you send a patch to re-include it ?
Quoted 8 lines
Yes, I'll gladly submit patch, one question, is this OK
to just add callingkvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_CLOCK_UPDATE, vcpu)before the conditional (as I did in my test), or should it go somewhere to else {..} section? it's called inside the conditional again, which will cause it to be called twice in some cases, is it OK?
n.
Can you try this patch to see if it fixes the problem?
Thanks,
Zach
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c +1 -0
@@ -1866,6 +1866,7 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu) } kvm_x86_ops->vcpu_load (vcpu, cpu); +kvm_request_guest_time_update (vcpu);if (unlikely (vcpu->cpu != cpu)) {/* Make sure TSC doesn't go backwards */ s64 tsc_delta = !vcpu->arch.last_host_tsc ? 0 :
Quoted 3 lines
Can you try this patch to see if it fixes the problem?
You haven't read my replies, did you? ;-) kvm_request_guest_time_update seems to have been removed, and kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_CLOCK_UPDATE, vcpu) seems to be used instead, adding it fixes the problem. That's what I was going to use in the patch... :)
Quoted 17 lines
Thanks,
Zach
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c +1
-0@@ -1866,6 +1866,7 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu) } kvm_x86_ops->vcpu_load (vcpu, cpu); +kvm_request_guest_time_update (vcpu);if (unlikely (vcpu->cpu != cpu)) {/* Make sure TSC doesn't go backwards */ s64 tsc_delta = !vcpu->arch.last_host_tsc ? 0 :
Signature · 14 lines
------------------------------------- Ing. Nikola CIPRICH LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o. 28. rijna 168, 709 01 Ostrava tel.: +420 596 603 142 fax: +420 596 621 273 mobil: +420 777 093 799 www.linuxbox.cz mobil servis: +420 737 238 656 email servis: [email protected] -------------------------------------
Quoted 9 lines · Nikola Ciprich
Quoted 3 lines
Can you try this patch to see if it fixes the problem?
You haven't read my replies, did you? ;-)
kvm_request_guest_time_updateseems to have been removed, andkvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_CLOCK_UPDATE, vcpu)seems to be used instead, adding it fixes the problem. That's what I was going to use in the patch... :)
I did read your mail, but I was working on an old tree... because of that transformation, this fix will unfortunately have to be back and forward ported by hand.
Did you try just that change right applied on top of the patch (e48672fa25e879f7ae21785c7efd187738139593) implicated by bisect?
It will be great to know if that change alone fixes the problem, if so, the fix you propose is probably the right one for upstream.
Thanks,
Zach
Quoted 3 lines
I did read your mail, but I was working on an old tree... because of that transformation, this fix will unfortunately have to be back and forward ported by hand.
OK, sorry, I didn't mean to be adverse...
Quoted 4 lines
Did you try just that change right applied on top of the patch (
e48672fa25e879f7ae21785c7efd187738139593) implicated by bisect?
yes, with host running e48672fa25e879f7ae21785c7efd187738139593, 32bit SMP guest doesn't boot, when I add kvm_request_guest_time_update(vcpu), it helps.
Quoted 3 lines
It will be great to know if that change alone fixes the problem, if so, the fix you propose is probably the right one for upstream.
ok, so shell I submit patch adding kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_CLOCK_UPDATE, vcpu)? this fixes things for me for 2.6.37.
Quoted 9 lines
Thanks,
Zach
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Signature · 14 lines
------------------------------------- Ing. Nikola CIPRICH LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o. 28. rijna 168, 709 01 Ostrava tel.: +420 596 603 142 fax: +420 596 621 273 mobil: +420 777 093 799 www.linuxbox.cz mobil servis: +420 737 238 656 email servis: [email protected] -------------------------------------
Quoted 30 lines · Glauber Costa
Quoted 11 lines · Nikola Ciprich
Hello Zachary,
Quoted 4 lines
You don't see any messages about TSC being unstable or switching clocksource after loading the KVM module? And you are not suspending the host or anything?
no messages, no suspending, nothing.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Can you try using "processor.max_cstate=1" on the host as a kernel parameter and see if it makes a difference?
I tried it, no change..
n.Zach,
I don't understand 100 % the logic behind all your tsc changes. But kvm-clock-wise, most of the problems we had in the past were related to the difference in resolution between the tsc and the host clocksource (hpet,
acpi_pm, etc), which in his case, it is a non-issue.It does seem to me like some compensation logic kicked in, dismantling an otherwise good tsc. He does have
nonstop_tsc, which means it can't get any better.
Quoted 8 lines
One thing I noticed when reading the culprit patch in bisect, is that in
vcpu_load(), there were previously a call to
kvm_request_guest_time_update(vcpu)that was removed without a counterpart addition. Any idea about why it was done?
That's probably the source of the bug... I've been looking for that exact line, though, and I can't find it missing.