Makefile.autotools.in: add libtool v2.4 support

commit: http://git.buildroot.net/buildroot/commit/?id=f055b266f11f8b72c60cf3b46bf081aaf97f5f6d
branch: http://git.buildroot.net/buildroot/commit/?id=refs/heads/master

Packages (like avahi) are now using libtool 2.4, so extend the libtool handling to support those as well.

---
 package/Makefile.autotools.in        |    2 +
 package/buildroot-libtool-v2.4.patch |   47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 package/buildroot-libtool-v2.4.patch

index d445348..88a06ea 100644
@@ -145,6 +145,8 @@ define LIBTOOL_PATCH_HOOK
 				toolchain/patch-kernel.sh $$$${i%/*} package buildroot-libtool-v1.5.patch; \
 			elif test $$$${ltmain_version} = "2.2"; then\
 				toolchain/patch-kernel.sh $$$${i%/*} package buildroot-libtool-v2.2.patch; \
+			elif test $$$${ltmain_version} = "2.4"; then\
+				toolchain/patch-kernel.sh $$$${i%/*} package buildroot-libtool-v2.4.patch; \
 			fi \
 		done \
 	fi

1.7.3.4

I thought libtool v2.4 was supposed to support --sysroot and therefore to not need any of our dirty cross-compilation tricks. Am I wrong ?

Regards,

Thomas

Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com

Thomas> On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 21:45:06 +0200

Thomas> I thought libtool v2.4 was supposed to support --sysroot and therefore Thomas> to not need any of our dirty cross-compilation tricks. Am I wrong ?

Well, avahi failed for me atleast with dependent libs (it tried to relink during installation against native libs) - With the patch it works here, but I must admit I didn't look into the details.

Bye, Peter Korsgaard

Peter Korsgaard <[email protected]> wrote in news:20110328194623.C0431819DC at busybox.osuosl.org:

Hi,

just a small note: ltmain.sh supplied by freetype 2.5.3 is incompatible with support/libtool/buildroot-libtool-v2.4.patch

Regards, Bernd