ARM: at91: AT91CAP9 has a macb device
PATCH 1/1 ARM: at91: AT91CAP9 has a macb device
commit
ee621dd (net: atmel_macb Kconfig: remove long dependency line)
replaced a list of several explicit machines in the dependencies of MACB by a single symbol that is selected by the respective machines. ee621dd missed to let ARCH_AT91CAP9 select HAVE_NET_MACB though which is fixed here.
--- arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig +1 -0
@@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ config ARCH_AT91CAP9 select CPU_ARM926T select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS select HAVE_FB_ATMEL + select HAVE_NET_MACB config ARCH_AT572D940HF bool "AT572D940HF"
Signature · 1 line
1.7.4.1
PATCH 1/1 ARM: at91: AT91CAP9 has a macb device
hi,
Quoted 9 lines
commit
? ? ? ?ee621dd (net:
atmel_macbKconfig: remove long dependency line)replaced a list of several explicit machines in the dependencies of MACB by a single symbol that is selected by the respective machines. ee621dd missed to let
ARCH_AT91CAP9selectHAVE_NET_MACBthough which is fixed here.Signed-off-by Uwe Kleine-K?nig <[email protected]>
PATCH 1/1 ARM: at91: AT91CAP9 has a macb device
In reply to Uwe Kleine-KönigQuoted 9 lines · Uwe Kleine-K?nig
commit
ee621dd (net:
atmel_macbKconfig: remove long dependency line)replaced a list of several explicit machines in the dependencies of MACB by a single symbol that is selected by the respective machines. ee621dd missed to let
ARCH_AT91CAP9selectHAVE_NET_MACBthough which is fixed here.Signed-off-by Uwe Kleine-K?nig <[email protected]>
Best Regards,
J.
PATCH 1/1 ARM: at91: AT91CAP9 has a macb device
Quoted 11 lines · Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
Quoted 9 lines · Uwe Kleine-K?nig
commit
ee621dd (net:
atmel_macbKconfig: remove long dependency line)replaced a list of several explicit machines in the dependencies of MACB by a single symbol that is selected by the respective machines. ee621dd missed to let
ARCH_AT91CAP9selectHAVE_NET_MACBthough which is fixed here.Signed-off-by Uwe Kleine-K?nig <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[email protected]>
I don't understand why you reply with a S-o-b. Does that mean you took the patch somehow? If not, I think an Ack would be more appropriate. With path should this patch go? Patch system?
Thanks
Uwe
Signature · 2 lines
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
PATCH 1/1 ARM: at91: AT91CAP9 has a macb device
Quoted 10 lines · Uwe Kleine-K?nig
Quoted 9 lines · Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
Quoted 8 lines · Uwe Kleine-K?nig
commit
ee621dd (net:
atmel_macbKconfig: remove long dependency line)replaced a list of several explicit machines in the dependencies of MACB by a single symbol that is selected by the respective machines. ee621dd missed to let
ARCH_AT91CAP9selectHAVE_NET_MACBthough which is fixed here.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 1 line
Signed-off-by Uwe Kleine-K?nig <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[email protected]>I don't understand why you reply with a S-o-b. Does that mean you took the patch somehow? If not, I think an Ack would be more appropriate. With path should this patch go? Patch system?
I'll put it via our own tree
and send the pull request end of the week
with other fix
Best Regards,
J.