Beagleboard patches, going upstream?

I'm looking to include the following patches from TI's meta-texasinstruments OE layer recipe for u-boot. They have been sent to the list, two of them Acked, but have otherwise received no response and but I don't see them in the git repository. Are these going to be included upstream (git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git) ?

OMAP3-Beagle-Pin-Mux-initialization-glitch-fix.patch
Jason said will pull in for ti tree
OMAP-Remove-omapfb.debug-y-from-Beagle-and-Overo-env.patch OMAP3-Add-DSS-driver-for-OMAP3.patch BeagleBoard-Added-userbutton-command.patch Enable-DSS-driver-for-Beagle.patch Corrected-LED-name-match-finding-avoiding-extraneous.patch omap3_beagle-Switch-default-console-from-ttyS2-to-tt.patch
Acked-by on list
BeagleBoard-Load-kernel-via-MMC-ext2-not-fat.patch

The following patches I do not see on the list. Koen, Jason, will these be sent upstream?

OMAP3-beagle-pass-expansionboard-name-in-bootargs.patch from Koen OMAP3-BeagleBoard-updated-default-configuration.patch from Jason

Is there another repository I should be looking at for the upstream status of these patches?

Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel

I'm on travel for the next week, but I should respond next week. I started work at fixing up the patches based on comments and resubmitting what all is left, but I ran into a bug in my simplified implementation of the LED command to address Wolfgang's comments.

My current work is at:
https://gitorious.org/beagleboard-validation/u-boot/commits/validation-20110504

Before submitting upstream, I need to fix 2 bugs:
* I cannot set STATUS_LED_BIT1's LED
* The GPIO state readback to provide toggling without maintaining state in the software does not work

It would be most useful if some of the other patches were accepted or commented upon.

The reason i did not apply the patches were because atleast for some of them, i needed an ACK from other maintainers.

Also i was waiting for your updated patches. I thought it would be better if i'll apply all the patches together after getting the required ACK's.

I am fine with your patches. I'd like to apply them after you send in updates.

Let me know if you think otherwise.

Thanks,
Sandeep

Hi,

These patches have been sent when the merge window was closed, it seems. Also the submitter didn't put the responsible custodian for OMAP ARM arch on CC.

DSS related patches are assigned to me, please see below.

...

Probably it makes sense to look at the patch status in patchwork [1]. Video related patches are under review now [2],[3]. I hope to find time to comment on these, soon.

[1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/
[2] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/92343/
[3] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/92344/

Anatolij