notice error exit from pager
If the pager fails to run, git produces no output, e.g.:
$ GIT_PAGER=not-a-command git log
The error reporting fails for two reasons:
(1) start_command: There is a mechanism that detects errors during execvp introduced in 2b541bf8 (start_command: detect execvp failures early). The child writes one byte to a pipe only if execvp fails. The parent waits for either EOF, when the successful execvp automatically closes the pipe (see FD_CLOEXEC in fcntl(1)), or it reads a single byte, in which case it knows that the execvp failed. This mechanism is incompatible with the workaround introduced in 35ce8622 (pager: Work around window resizing bug in 'less'), which waits for input from the parent before the exec. Since both the parent and the child are waiting for input from each other, that would result in a deadlock. In order to avoid that, the mechanism is disabled by closing the child_notifier file descriptor. That is my best guess, at least, from reading the code. Hannes, can you confirm if this analysis is correct?
(2) finish_command: The parent correctly detects the 127 exit status from the child, but the error output goes nowhere, since by that time it is already being redirected to the child.
No simple solution for (1) comes to mind. I am not sure if this bug is still relevant. I could not reproduce it here with less version
436. If this bug was fixed a long time ago, maybe we can remove the workaround by now?
Number (2) can be solved by not sending error output to the pager. But I am not completely satisfied with that solution. Not redirecting error output to the pager can result in the pager overwriting error output with standard output. Right now, I can't think of any common situations where this would be the case. But, for example, a git log on a broken repo with some missing commits will abort at some point with "error: could not read <sha1> [...]". With this patch, if there is at least one page of standard output before that error, the error message is not visible at all and the output simply stops as if git log had reached the root commit.
The easiest solution is to produce the error output in the child. Below is a patch for that. The previous code seems to go through some pain to let the parent handle the error output. But I don't see the point. Is there more to this than meets my eye?
Clemens
--- run-command.c | 11 ++++++----- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
run-command.c +6 -5
@@ -127,9 +127,6 @@ static int wait_or_whine(pid_t pid, const char *argv0, int silent_exec_failure)if (code ==127 ) { code =-1 ; failed_errno =ENOENT ; -if (!silent_exec_failure) -error ("cannot run %s: %s" , argv0, -strerror (ENOENT )); } }else {error ("waitpid is confused (%s)" , argv0);
@@ -287,10 +284,14 @@ fail_pipe:* Do not check for cmd->silent_exec_failure; the parent * process will check it when it sees this exit code. */ -if (errno ==ENOENT ) +if (errno ==ENOENT ) { +if (!cmd->silent_exec_failure) +error ("cannot run %s: %s" , cmd->argv[0 ], +strerror (ENOENT ));exit (127 ); -else + }else {die_errno ("cannot exec '%s'" , cmd->argv[0 ]); + } }if (cmd->pid <0 ) error("cannot fork() for %s: %s", cmd->argv[0],
Signature · 1 line
1.7.3.1.105.g84915
Quoted 5 lines · Clemens Buchacher
No simple solution for (1) comes to mind. I am not sure if this bug is still relevant. I could not reproduce it here with less version
436. If this bug was fixed a long time ago, maybe we can remove the workaround by now?
Hmm. I can confirm that it doesn't happen for me either any more, although I don't know if that is an actual less bugfix, or it was timing-dependent.
That said, the workaround has other nice properties too, like delaying the screen cleaning that "less" often does. So I don't know if we really want to get rid of it.
Quoted 1 line
Number (2) can be solved by not sending error output to the pager.
I think your patch looks reasonable.
Linus
Am 26.07.2011 23:04, schrieb Clemens Buchacher:
Quoted 11 lines
If the pager fails to run, git produces no output, e.g.:
$ GIT_PAGER=not-a-command git logThe error reporting fails for two reasons:
(1)
start_command: There is a mechanism that detects errors during execvp introduced in2b541bf8(start_command: detect execvp failures early). ... This mechanism is
incompatible with the workaround introduced in35ce8622(pager: Work around window resizing bug in 'less')
You analysis is correct. I think the bug in less was fixed shortly after this workaround was introduced. I would like to remove this workaround for a different reason, but it seems there are people who are quite fond of it ;)
Quoted 15 lines
run-command.c +0
-3@@ -127,9 +127,6 @@ static int wait_or_whine(pid_t pid, const char *argv0, int silent_exec_failure)if (code ==127 ) { code =-1 ; failed_errno =ENOENT ; -if (!silent_exec_failure) -error ("cannot run %s: %s" , argv0, -strerror (ENOENT )); } }else {error ("waitpid is confused (%s)" , argv0);
run-command.c fail_pipe: · line 290
Quoted 8 lines
run-command.c +4
-1@@ -287,10 +284,14 @@ fail_pipe:* Do not check for cmd->silent_exec_failure; the parent * process will check it when it sees this exit code. */ -if (errno ==ENOENT ) +if (errno ==ENOENT ) { +if (!cmd->silent_exec_failure) +error ("cannot run %s: %s" , cmd->argv[0 ], +strerror (ENOENT ));
This change is not good enough: There is no guarantee that this message goes to the right channel (stderr in the child can be redirected). Look
carefully: We set a special die routine in the forked child that ensures that the die() messages are written to the right channel; we do not have a similar facility for error() messages (or do we?).
run-command.c fail_pipe: · line 297
Quoted 8 lines
run-command.c +2
-1exit (127 ); - else + }else {die_errno ("cannot exec '%s'" , cmd->argv[0 ]); + } }if (cmd->pid <0 ) error("cannot fork() for %s: %s", cmd->argv[0],
-- Hannes
PATCH 1/1 error_routine: use parent's stderr if exec fails
The new process's error output may be redirected elsewhere, but if the exec fails, output should still go to the parent's stderr. This has already been done for the die_routine. Do the same for error_routine.
---
Quoted 3 lines · Johannes Sixt
This change is not good enough: There is no guarantee that this message goes to the right channel (stderr in the child can be redirected).
Ah, good point. I skipped over that part thinking it was not relevant. This should take care of it.
Clemens
git-compat-util.h | 2 ++ run-command.c | 15 +++++++-------- usage.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
git-compat-util.h +2 -0
@@ -240,6 +240,7 @@ extern char *gitbasename(char *);/* General helper functions */ extern void vreportf (const char *prefix,const char *err,va_list params); +extern void vwritef (int fd,const char *prefix,const char *err,va_list params); extern NORETURN void usage(const char *err); extern NORETURN void usagef(const char *err, ...) __attribute__((format (printf, 1, 2))); extern NORETURN void die(const char *err, ...) __attribute__((format (printf, 1, 2)));
@@ -248,6 +249,7 @@ extern int error(const char *err, ...) __attribute__((format (printf, 1, 2)));extern void warning (const char *err, ...) __attribute__((format (printf,1 ,2 ))); extern void set_die_routine(NORETURN_PTR void (*routine)(const char *err, va_list params)); +extern void set_error_routine (void (*routine)(const char *err,va_list params));extern int prefixcmp (const char *str,const char *prefix);extern int suffixcmp (const char *str,const char *suffix);
run-command.c +7 -8
@@ -77,16 +77,14 @@ static void notify_parent(void) static NORETURN void die_child(const char *err, va_list params) { -char msg[4096 ]; -int len =vsnprintf (msg,sizeof (msg), err, params); -if (len >sizeof (msg)) - len =sizeof (msg); - -write_in_full (child_err,"fatal: " ,7 ); -write_in_full (child_err, msg, len); -write_in_full (child_err,"\n" ,1 ); +vwritef (child_err,"fatal: " , err, params);exit (128 ); } + +static void error_child (const char *err,va_list params) +{ +vwritef (child_err,"error: " , err, params); +}#endif static inline void set_cloexec (int fd)
@@ -214,6 +212,7 @@ fail_pipe:set_cloexec (child_err); }set_die_routine (die_child); +set_error_routine (error_child);close (notify_pipe[0 ]);set_cloexec (notify_pipe[1 ]);
usage.c +18 -0
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@* Copyright (C) Linus Torvalds, 2005 */ #include "git-compat-util.h" +#include "cache.h" void vreportf (const char *prefix,const char *err,va_list params) {
@@ -12,6 +13,18 @@ void vreportf(const char *prefix, const char *err, va_list params)fprintf (stderr,"%s%s\n" , prefix, msg); } +void vwritef (int fd,const char *prefix,const char *err,va_list params) +{ +char msg[4096 ]; +int len =vsnprintf (msg,sizeof (msg), err, params); +if (len >sizeof (msg)) + len =sizeof (msg); + +write_in_full (fd, prefix,strlen (prefix)); +write_in_full (fd, msg, len); +write_in_full (fd,"\n" ,1 ); +} + static NORETURN void usage_builtin(const char *err, va_list params) {vreportf ("usage: " , err, params);
@@ -46,6 +59,11 @@ void set_die_routine(NORETURN_PTR void (*routine)(const char *err, va_list param die_routine = routine; } +void set_error_routine (void (*routine)(const char *err,va_list params)) +{ + error_routine = routine; +} + void NORETURN usagef(const char *err, ...) {va_list params;
Signature · 1 line
1.7.3.1.105.g84915
PATCH 1/1 notice error exit from pager
In reply to Clemens BuchacherIf the pager fails to run, git produces no output, e.g.:
$ GIT_PAGER=not-a-command git log
The error reporting fails for two reasons:
(1) start_command: There is a mechanism that detects errors during execvp introduced in 2b541bf8 (start_command: detect execvp failures early). The child writes one byte to a pipe only if execvp fails. The parent waits for either EOF, when the successful execvp automatically closes the pipe (see FD_CLOEXEC in fcntl(1)), or it reads a single byte, in which case it knows that the execvp failed. This mechanism is incompatible with the workaround introduced in 35ce8622 (pager: Work around window resizing bug in 'less'), which waits for input from the parent before the exec. Since both the parent and the child are waiting for input from each other, that would result in a deadlock. In order to avoid that, the mechanism is disabled by closing the child_notifier file descriptor.
(2) finish_command: The parent correctly detects the 127 exit status from the child, but the error output goes nowhere, since by that time it is already being redirected to the child.
No simple solution for (1) comes to mind.
Number (2) can be solved by not sending error output to the pager. Not redirecting error output to the pager can result in the pager overwriting error output with standard output, however.
Since there is no reliable way to handle error reporting in the parent, produce the output in the child instead.
---
Nothing new compared to the RFC, just a slightly trimmed commit message.
run-command.c | 15 ++++++--------- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
run-command.c +6 -9
@@ -125,9 +125,6 @@ static int wait_or_whine(pid_t pid, const char *argv0, int silent_exec_failure)if (code ==127 ) { code =-1 ; failed_errno =ENOENT ; -if (!silent_exec_failure) -error ("cannot run %s: %s" , argv0, -strerror (ENOENT )); } }else {error ("waitpid is confused (%s)" , argv0);
@@ -282,14 +279,14 @@ fail_pipe: }else {execvp (cmd->argv[0 ], (char *const *) cmd->argv); } -/* -* Do not check for cmd->silent_exec_failure; the parent -* process will check it when it sees this exit code. -*/ -if (errno ==ENOENT ) +if (errno ==ENOENT ) { +if (!cmd->silent_exec_failure) +error ("cannot run %s: %s" , cmd->argv[0 ], +strerror (ENOENT ));exit (127 ); -else + }else {die_errno ("cannot exec '%s'" , cmd->argv[0 ]); + } }if (cmd->pid <0 ) error("cannot fork() for %s: %s", cmd->argv[0],
Signature · 1 line
1.7.3.1.105.g84915
Quoted 2 lines · Clemens Buchacher
Since there is no reliable way to handle error reporting in the parent, produce the output in the child instead.
Hmm, how does this interact with your earlier "error_routine: use parent's stderr if exec fails" patch?
Quoted 35 lines
run-command.c +6
-9@@ -125,9 +125,6 @@ static int wait_or_whine(pid_t pid, const char *argv0, int silent_exec_failure)if (code ==127 ) { code =-1 ; failed_errno =ENOENT ; -if (!silent_exec_failure) -error ("cannot run %s: %s" , argv0, -strerror (ENOENT )); } }else {error ("waitpid is confused (%s)" , argv0);@@ -282,14 +279,14 @@ fail_pipe: }else {execvp (cmd->argv[0 ], (char *const *) cmd->argv); } -/* -* Do not check for cmd->silent_exec_failure; the parent -* process will check it when it sees this exit code. -*/ -if (errno ==ENOENT ) +if (errno ==ENOENT ) { +if (!cmd->silent_exec_failure) +error ("cannot run %s: %s" , cmd->argv[0 ], +strerror (ENOENT ));exit (127 ); -else + }else {die_errno ("cannot exec '%s'" , cmd->argv[0 ]); + } }if (cmd->pid <0 ) error("cannot fork() for %s: %s", cmd->argv[0],
Quoted 7 lines · Junio C Hamano
Quoted 2 lines · Clemens Buchacher
Since there is no reliable way to handle error reporting in the parent, produce the output in the child instead.
Hmm, how does this interact with your earlier "
error_routine: use parent's stderr if exec fails" patch?
The use case addressed in this patch (i.e., the pager) does not strictly dependent on the previous patch. But Johannes noted that in general, error output of the child could be redirected, hiding the execve failure again. The error_routine patch avoids that by writing to the parent's stderr stream.
Clemens