Fix Thumb-2 undef handling for mixed-arch kernels
cover Fix Thumb-2 undef handling for mixed-arch kernels
In kernels which support v6 and v7 platforms in a single binary such as omap2plus_defconfig for example, undefined instruction exceptions taken on Thumb instructions are not processed correctly, because the kernel assumes at build-time that Thumb-2 won't be supported in userspace.
This series implements a workaround, by allowing the __und_usr handler to check the CPU architecture at runtime, in affected kernels.
Changes since RFC:
* Renamed the global variable to __cpu_architecture and provided cpu_architecture() as in inline function in <asm/system.h>. This brings back the old API, but more efficiently.
* Dropped all the patches required to handle the reverted API change.
* cpu_architecture is now declared __pure, which may lead to slightly more efficient code in some cases.
* Added BUG_ON() to cpu_architecture() so that if __cpu_architecture is not set early enough, it gets noticed.
Thanks to Tixy and Nicolas Pitre for their helpful feedback which helped slim down this series.
Dave Martin (3):
ARM: Make cpu_alignment into a global variable
ARM: entry: Remove unnecessary masking when decoding Thumb-2
instructions
ARM: entry: Fix Thumb-2 undef handling for multi-CPU kernels
arch/arm/include/asm/system.h | 11 +++++++++- arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- arch/arm/kernel/setup.c | 5 +++- 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--
1.7.4.1
PATCH 1/3 ARM: Make cpu_alignment into a global variable
The CPU architecture really should not be changing at runtime, so make it a global variable instead of a function.
The cpu_architecture() function in <asm/system.h> remains the correct way to read this variable from C code.
--- arch/arm/include/asm/system.h | 11 ++++++++++- arch/arm/kernel/setup.c | 5 ++++- 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
arch/arm/include/asm/system.h +10 -1
@@ -57,6 +57,8 @@#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ +#include <linux/bug.h> +#include <linux/compiler.h> #include <linux/linkage.h> #include <linux/irqflags.h>
@@ -104,7 +106,14 @@ struct mm_struct;extern void show_pte (struct mm_struct *mm,unsigned long addr);extern void __show_regs (struct pt_regs *); -extern int cpu_architecture (void ); +extern int __cpu_architecture; + +static inline int __pure cpu_architecture (void ) +{ +BUG_ON (__cpu_architecture ==CPU_ARCH_UNKNOWN ); +return __cpu_architecture; +} +extern void cpu_init (void );void arm_machine_restart (char mode,const char *cmd);
arch/arm/kernel/setup.c +4 -1
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@#include <asm/cacheflush.h> #include <asm/cachetype.h> #include <asm/tlbflush.h> +#include <asm/system.h> #include <asm/prom.h> #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
@@ -114,6 +115,7 @@ struct cpu_cache_fns cpu_cache __read_mostly;struct outer_cache_fns outer_cache__read_mostly ;EXPORT_SYMBOL (outer_cache);#endif +int __cpu_architecture__read_mostly =CPU_ARCH_UNKNOWN ;struct stack {u32 irq[3 ];
@@ -210,7 +212,7 @@ static const char *proc_arch[] = { "?(17)", }; -int cpu_architecture (void ) +static int __init __get_cpu_architecture (void ) {int cpu_arch;
@@ -413,6 +415,7 @@ static void __init setup_processor(void) } cpu_name = list->cpu_name; + __cpu_architecture =__get_cpu_architecture ();#ifdef MULTI_CPU processor = *list->proc;
Signature · 1 line
1.7.4.1
PATCH 1/3 ARM: Make cpu_alignment into a global variable
Quoted 7 lines · Dave Martin
The CPU architecture really should not be changing at runtime, so make it a global variable instead of a function.
The
cpu_architecture()function in <asm/system.h> remains the correct way to read this variable from C code.Signed-off-by Dave Martin <[email protected]>
Quoted 74 lines
--- arch/arm/include/asm/system.h | 11 ++++++++++- arch/arm/kernel/setup.c | 5 ++++- 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)arch/arm/include/asm/system.h +10
-1@@ -57,6 +57,8 @@#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ +#include <linux/bug.h> +#include <linux/compiler.h> #include <linux/linkage.h> #include <linux/irqflags.h> @@ -104,7 +106,14 @@ struct mm_struct;extern void show_pte (struct mm_struct *mm,unsigned long addr);extern void __show_regs (struct pt_regs *); -extern int cpu_architecture (void ); +extern int __cpu_architecture; + +static inline int __pure cpu_architecture (void ) +{ +BUG_ON (__cpu_architecture ==CPU_ARCH_UNKNOWN ); +return __cpu_architecture; +} +extern void cpu_init (void );void arm_machine_restart (char mode,const char *cmd);arch/arm/kernel/setup.c +4
-1@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@#include <asm/cacheflush.h> #include <asm/cachetype.h> #include <asm/tlbflush.h> +#include <asm/system.h> #include <asm/prom.h> #include <asm/mach/arch.h> @@ -114,6 +115,7 @@ struct cpu_cache_fns cpu_cache __read_mostly;struct outer_cache_fns outer_cache__read_mostly ;EXPORT_SYMBOL (outer_cache);#endif +int __cpu_architecture__read_mostly =CPU_ARCH_UNKNOWN ;struct stack {u32 irq[3 ];@@ -210,7 +212,7 @@ static const char *proc_arch[] = { "?(17)", }; -int cpu_architecture (void ) +static int __init __get_cpu_architecture (void ) {int cpu_arch;@@ -413,6 +415,7 @@ static void __init setup_processor(void) } cpu_name = list->cpu_name; + __cpu_architecture =__get_cpu_architecture ();#ifdef MULTI_CPU processor = *list->proc;Signature · 1 line
1.7.4.1
PATCH 1/3 ARM: Make cpu_alignment into a global variable
Quoted 11 lines · Nicolas Pitre
Quoted 7 lines · Dave Martin
The CPU architecture really should not be changing at runtime, so make it a global variable instead of a function.
The
cpu_architecture()function in <asm/system.h> remains the correct way to read this variable from C code.Signed-off-by Dave Martin <[email protected]>Acked-by Nicolas Pitre <[email protected]>
Thanks
---Dave
Quoted 75 lines
Quoted 75 lines
--- arch/arm/include/asm/system.h | 11 ++++++++++- arch/arm/kernel/setup.c | 5 ++++- 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)arch/arm/include/asm/system.h +10
-1@@ -57,6 +57,8 @@#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ +#include <linux/bug.h> +#include <linux/compiler.h> #include <linux/linkage.h> #include <linux/irqflags.h> @@ -104,7 +106,14 @@ struct mm_struct;extern void show_pte (struct mm_struct *mm,unsigned long addr);extern void __show_regs (struct pt_regs *); -extern int cpu_architecture (void ); +extern int __cpu_architecture; + +static inline int __pure cpu_architecture (void ) +{ +BUG_ON (__cpu_architecture ==CPU_ARCH_UNKNOWN ); +return __cpu_architecture; +} +extern void cpu_init (void );void arm_machine_restart (char mode,const char *cmd);arch/arm/kernel/setup.c +4
-1@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@#include <asm/cacheflush.h> #include <asm/cachetype.h> #include <asm/tlbflush.h> +#include <asm/system.h> #include <asm/prom.h> #include <asm/mach/arch.h> @@ -114,6 +115,7 @@ struct cpu_cache_fns cpu_cache __read_mostly;struct outer_cache_fns outer_cache__read_mostly ;EXPORT_SYMBOL (outer_cache);#endif +int __cpu_architecture__read_mostly =CPU_ARCH_UNKNOWN ;struct stack {u32 irq[3 ];@@ -210,7 +212,7 @@ static const char *proc_arch[] = { "?(17)", }; -int cpu_architecture (void ) +static int __init __get_cpu_architecture (void ) {int cpu_arch;@@ -413,6 +415,7 @@ static void __init setup_processor(void) } cpu_name = list->cpu_name; + __cpu_architecture =__get_cpu_architecture ();#ifdef MULTI_CPU processor = *list->proc;Signature · 1 line
1.7.4.1
PATCH 1/3 ARM: Make cpu_alignment into a global variable
In reply to Dave MartinHello.
Quoted 7 lines · Dave Martin
The CPU architecture really should not be changing at runtime, so make it a global variable instead of a function.
The
cpu_architecture()function in<asm/system.h> remains the correct way to read this variable from C code.Signed-off-by Dave Martin<[email protected]>
You're talking of the CPU architecture here but the subject has
"cpu_alignment"...
WBR, Sergei
PATCH 1/3 ARM: Make cpu_alignment into a global variable
Quoted 7 lines · Sergei Shtylyov
Hello.
Quoted 2 lines · Dave Martin
The CPU architecture really should not be changing at runtime, so make it a global variable instead of a function.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
The
cpu_architecture()function in<asm/system.h> remains the correct way to read this variable from C code.Signed-off-by Dave Martin<[email protected]>You're talking of the CPU architecture here but the subject has
"cpu_alignment"...
Hmmm, I guess my brain was on autopilot when I wrote that...
You're right, it should say cpu_architecture in the subject. I'll fix this before I repost.
Thanks
---Dave
PATCH 2/3 ARM: entry: Remove unnecessary masking when decoding Thumb-2 instructions
In reply to Dave MartinWhen testing whether a Thumb-2 instruction is 32 bits long or not, the masking done in order to test bits 11-15 of the first instruction halfword won't affect the result of the comparison, so remove it.
--- arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S | 6 ++---- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S +2 -4
@@ -262,8 +262,7 @@ __und_svc: ldr r0, [r4, #-4] #else ldrh r0, [r4, #-2] @ Thumb instruction at LR - 2 - and r9, r0, #0xf800 - cmp r9, #0xe800 @ 32-bit instruction if xx >= 0 + cmp r0, #0xe800 @ 32-bit instruction if xx >= 0 ldrhhs r9, [r4] @ bottom 16 bits orrhs r0, r9, r0, lsl #16 #endif
@@ -445,8 +444,7 @@ __und_usr: ARM( ldrht r5, [r4], #2 ) THUMB( ldrht r5, [r4] ) THUMB( add r4, r4, #2 ) - and r0, r5, #0xf800 @ mask bits 111x x... .... .... - cmp r0, #0xe800 @ 32bit instruction if xx != 0 + cmp r5, #0xe800 @ 32bit instruction if xx != 0 blo __und_usr_unknown 3: ldrht r0, [r4] add r2, r2, #2 @ r2 is PC + 2, make it PC + 4
Signature · 1 line
1.7.4.1
PATCH 2/3 ARM: entry: Remove unnecessary masking when decoding Thumb-2 instructions
Quoted 6 lines · Dave Martin
When testing whether a Thumb-2 instruction is 32 bits long or not, the masking done in order to test bits 11-15 of the first instruction halfword won't affect the result of the comparison, so remove it.
Signed-off-by Dave Martin <[email protected]>
Quoted 31 lines
--- arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S | 6 ++---- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S +2
-4@@ -262,8 +262,7 @@ __und_svc: ldr r0, [r4, #-4] #else ldrh r0, [r4, #-2] @ Thumb instruction at LR - 2 - and r9, r0, #0xf800 - cmp r9, #0xe800 @ 32-bit instruction if xx >= 0 + cmp r0, #0xe800 @ 32-bit instruction if xx >= 0 ldrhhs r9, [r4] @ bottom 16 bits orrhs r0, r9, r0, lsl #16 #endif@@ -445,8 +444,7 @@ __und_usr: ARM( ldrht r5, [r4], #2 ) THUMB( ldrht r5, [r4] ) THUMB( add r4, r4, #2 ) - and r0, r5, #0xf800 @ mask bits 111x x... .... .... - cmp r0, #0xe800 @ 32bit instruction if xx != 0 + cmp r5, #0xe800 @ 32bit instruction if xx != 0 blo __und_usr_unknown 3: ldrht r0, [r4] add r2, r2, #2 @ r2 is PC + 2, make it PC + 4Signature · 1 line
1.7.4.1
PATCH 2/3 ARM: entry: Remove unnecessary masking when decoding Thumb-2 instructions
Quoted 11 lines · Nicolas Pitre
Quoted 6 lines · Dave Martin
When testing whether a Thumb-2 instruction is 32 bits long or not, the masking done in order to test bits 11-15 of the first instruction halfword won't affect the result of the comparison, so remove it.
Signed-off-by Dave Martin <[email protected]>Acked-by Nicolas Pitre <[email protected]>
Thanks
---Dave
Quoted 32 lines
Quoted 32 lines
--- arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S | 6 ++---- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S +2
-4@@ -262,8 +262,7 @@ __und_svc: ldr r0, [r4, #-4] #else ldrh r0, [r4, #-2] @ Thumb instruction at LR - 2 - and r9, r0, #0xf800 - cmp r9, #0xe800 @ 32-bit instruction if xx >= 0 + cmp r0, #0xe800 @ 32-bit instruction if xx >= 0 ldrhhs r9, [r4] @ bottom 16 bits orrhs r0, r9, r0, lsl #16 #endif@@ -445,8 +444,7 @@ __und_usr: ARM( ldrht r5, [r4], #2 ) THUMB( ldrht r5, [r4] ) THUMB( add r4, r4, #2 ) - and r0, r5, #0xf800 @ mask bits 111x x... .... .... - cmp r0, #0xe800 @ 32bit instruction if xx != 0 + cmp r5, #0xe800 @ 32bit instruction if xx != 0 blo __und_usr_unknown 3: ldrht r0, [r4] add r2, r2, #2 @ r2 is PC + 2, make it PC + 4Signature · 1 line
1.7.4.1
PATCH 3/3 ARM: entry: Fix Thumb-2 undef handling for multi-CPU kernels
In reply to Dave MartinWhen v6 and >=v7 boards are supported in the same kernel, the __und_usr code currently makes a build-time assumption that Thumb-2 instructions occurring in userspace don't need to be supported. Strictly speaking this is incorrect.
This patch fixes the above case by doing a run-time check on the CPU architecture in these cases. This only affects kernels which support v6 and >=v7 CPUs together: plain v6 and plain v7 kernels are unaffected.
--- arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S +37 -1
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ #include <asm/unwind.h> #include <asm/unistd.h> #include <asm/tls.h> +#include <asm/system.h> #include "entry-header.S" #include <asm/entry-macro-multi.S>
@@ -439,7 +440,27 @@ __und_usr: #endif beq call_fpe @ Thumb instruction -#if __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ >= 7 +#if CONFIG_ARM_THUMB && __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ >= 6 && CONFIG_CPU_V7 +/* + * Thumb-2 instruction handling. Note that because pre-v6 and >= v6 platforms + * can never be supported in a single kernel, this code is not applicable at + * all when __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ < 6. This allows simplifying assumptions to be + * made about .arch directives. + */ +#if __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ < 7 +/* If the target CPU may not be Thumb-2-capable, a run-time check is needed: */ +#define NEED_CPU_ARCHITECTURE + ldr r5, .LCcpu_architecture + ldr r5, [r5] + cmp r5, #CPU_ARCH_ARMv7 + blo __und_usr_unknown +/* + * The following code won't get run unless the running CPU really is v7, so + * coding round the lack of ldrht on older arches is pointless. Temporarily + * override the assembler target arch with the minimum required instead: + */ + .arch armv6t2 +#endif 2: ARM( ldrht r5, [r4], #2 ) THUMB( ldrht r5, [r4] )
@@ -449,7 +470,16 @@ __und_usr: 3: ldrht r0, [r4] add r2, r2, #2 @ r2 is PC + 2, make it PC + 4 orr r0, r0, r5, lsl #16 + +#if __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ < 7 +/* If the target arch was overridden, change it back: */ +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_32v6K + .arch armv6k #else + .arch armv6 +#endif +#endif /* __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ < 7 */ +#else /* !(CONFIG_ARM_THUMB && __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ >= 6 && CONFIG_CPU_V7) */ b __und_usr_unknown #endif UNWIND(.fnend )
@@ -576,6 +606,12 @@ call_fpe: movw_pc lr @ CP#14 (Debug) movw_pc lr @ CP#15 (Control) +#ifdef NEED_CPU_ARCHITECTURE + .align 2 +.LCcpu_architecture: + .word __cpu_architecture +#endif + #ifdef CONFIG_NEON .align 6
Signature · 1 line
1.7.4.1
PATCH 3/3 ARM: entry: Fix Thumb-2 undef handling for multi-CPU kernels
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 15:14 +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
[...]
arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S call_fpe: · line 613
Quoted 5 lines
arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S +5
-0+#ifdef NEED_CPU_ARCHITECTURE + .align 2 +.LCcpu_architecture: + .word __cpu_architecture +#endif
What's the convention about the prefix '.LC' as opposed to just '.L'?
Signature · 1 line
Tixy
PATCH 3/3 ARM: entry: Fix Thumb-2 undef handling for multi-CPU kernels
Quoted 9 lines · Tixy
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 15:14 +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
[...]arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S call_fpe: · line 613
Quoted 5 lines
arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S +5
-0+#ifdef NEED_CPU_ARCHITECTURE + .align 2 +.LCcpu_architecture: + .word __cpu_architecture +#endifWhat's the convention about the prefix '.LC' as opposed to just '.L'?
The .Lfoo format is more widely used than .LCfoo in the tree.
Nicolas
PATCH 3/3 ARM: entry: Fix Thumb-2 undef handling for multi-CPU kernels
Quoted 12 lines · Nicolas Pitre
Quoted 9 lines · Tixy
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 15:14 +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
[...]arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S call_fpe: · line 613
Quoted 5 lines
arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S +5
-0+#ifdef NEED_CPU_ARCHITECTURE + ? .align ?2 +.LCcpu_architecture: + ? .word ? __cpu_architecture +#endifWhat's the convention about the prefix '.LC' as opposed to just '.L'?
Quoted 1 line
The .Lfoo format is more widely used than .LCfoo in the tree.
...but .LCfoo is more widely used in entry-armv.S, for exactly the same kind of thing.
I thought it best to blend in... anyway, apart from the magic prefix '.L', it's just a name.
Any concerns about this, or can we leave it as-is?
Cheers
---Dave
PATCH 3/3 ARM: entry: Fix Thumb-2 undef handling for multi-CPU kernels
Quoted 13 lines · Dave Martin
Quoted 12 lines · Nicolas Pitre
Quoted 9 lines · Tixy
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 15:14 +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
[...]arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S call_fpe: · line 613
Quoted 5 lines
arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S +5
-0+#ifdef NEED_CPU_ARCHITECTURE + ? .align ?2 +.LCcpu_architecture: + ? .word ? __cpu_architecture +#endifWhat's the convention about the prefix '.LC' as opposed to just '.L'?
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 1 line
The .Lfoo format is more widely used than .LCfoo in the tree.
...but .LCfoo is more widely used in
entry-armv.S, for exactly the same kind of thing.
Just use the same style then.
Nicolas
PATCH 3/3 ARM: entry: Fix Thumb-2 undef handling for multi-CPU kernels
Quoted 15 lines · Nicolas Pitre
Quoted 13 lines · Dave Martin
Quoted 12 lines · Nicolas Pitre
Quoted 9 lines · Tixy
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 15:14 +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
[...]arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S call_fpe: · line 613
Quoted 5 lines
arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S +5
-0+#ifdef NEED_CPU_ARCHITECTURE + ? .align ?2 +.LCcpu_architecture: + ? .word ? __cpu_architecture +#endifWhat's the convention about the prefix '.LC' as opposed to just '.L'?
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 1 line
The .Lfoo format is more widely used than .LCfoo in the tree.
...but .LCfoo is more widely used in
entry-armv.S, for exactly the same kind of thing.Just use the same style then.
OK, done.
Cheers
---Dave
cover Fix Thumb-2 undef handling for mixed-arch kernels
In reply to Dave MartinQuoted 30 lines · Dave Martin
In kernels which support v6 and v7 platforms in a single binary such as
omap2plus_defconfigfor example, undefined instruction exceptions taken on Thumb instructions are not processed correctly, because the kernel assumes at build-time that Thumb-2 won't be supported in userspace.This series implements a workaround, by allowing the
__und_usrhandler to check the CPU architecture at runtime, in affected kernels.Changes since RFC:
* Renamed the global variable to__cpu_architectureand providedcpu_architecture()as in inline function in <asm/system.h>. This brings back the old API, but more efficiently.
* Dropped all the patches required to handle the reverted API change.
*cpu_architectureis now declared__pure, which may lead to slightly more efficient code in some cases.
* AddedBUG_ON()tocpu_architecture()so that if__cpu_architectureis not set early enough, it gets noticed.Thanks to Tixy and Nicolas Pitre for their helpful feedback which helped slim down this series.
Dave Martin (3):
ARM: Makecpu_alignmentinto a global variable
ARM: entry: Remove unnecessary masking when decoding Thumb-2
instructions
ARM: entry: Fix Thumb-2 undef handling for multi-CPU kernels
Quoted 5 lines
arch/arm/include/asm/system.h | 11 +++++++++- arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- arch/arm/kernel/setup.c | 5 +++- 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Looks good to me.
Signature · 1 line
Tixy
cover Fix Thumb-2 undef handling for mixed-arch kernels
Quoted 31 lines · Tixy
Quoted 30 lines · Dave Martin
In kernels which support v6 and v7 platforms in a single binary such as
omap2plus_defconfigfor example, undefined instruction exceptions taken on Thumb instructions are not processed correctly, because the kernel assumes at build-time that Thumb-2 won't be supported in userspace.This series implements a workaround, by allowing the
__und_usrhandler to check the CPU architecture at runtime, in affected kernels.Changes since RFC:
? * Renamed the global variable to__cpu_architectureand provided ? ?cpu_architecture()as in inline function in <asm/system.h>. ? ? This brings back the old API, but more efficiently. ? * Dropped all the patches required to handle the reverted API ? ? change.
? *cpu_architectureis now declared__pure, which may lead to ? ? slightly more efficient code in some cases.
? * AddedBUG_ON()tocpu_architecture()so that if
? ?__cpu_architectureis not set early enough, it gets noticed.Thanks to Tixy and Nicolas Pitre for their helpful feedback which helped slim down this series.
Dave Martin (3):
? ARM: Makecpu_alignmentinto a global variable
? ARM: entry: Remove unnecessary masking when decoding Thumb-2 ? ? instructions
? ARM: entry: Fix Thumb-2 undef handling for multi-CPU kernels
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
?arch/arm/include/asm/system.h | ? 11 +++++++++- ?arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S ?| ? 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- ?arch/arm/kernel/setup.c ? ? ? | ? ?5 +++-?3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Looks good to me.
Thanks for looking over it.
Is that a Reviewed-by, or will you go for an Ack?
Cheers
---Dave
cover Fix Thumb-2 undef handling for mixed-arch kernels
Quoted 7 lines · Dave Martin
Quoted 1 line · Tixy
Looks good to me.
Thanks for looking over it.
Is that a Reviewed-by, or will you go for an Ack?
It's certainly a Reviewed-by: Jon Medhurst <[email protected]> for all three patches.
I've been re-reading Documentation/SubmittingPatches to try and work out when it's appropriate to use Acked-by, but it seems a bit woolly - mostly for maintainers?
Signature · 1 line
Tixy