ASoC: Remove impossible case from wm8994_hw_params
Subsystems (3)
PATCH RESEND 1/1 ASoC: Remove impossible case from wm8994_hw_params
We set hw_params callback for wm8994_aif3_dai_ops to wm8994_aif3_hw_params. Thus no need to check wm8994-aif3 in wm8994_hw_params.
--- sound/soc/codecs/wm8994.c | 10 ---------- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
sound/soc/codecs/wm8994.c +0 -10
@@ -2235,7 +2235,6 @@ static int wm8994_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, struct snd_soc_dai *dai) {struct snd_soc_codec *codec = dai->codec; -struct wm8994 *control = codec->control_data;struct wm8994_priv *wm8994 =snd_soc_codec_get_drvdata (codec);int aif1_reg;int aif2_reg;
@@ -2278,15 +2277,6 @@ static int wm8994_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,dev_dbg (codec->dev,"AIF2 using split LRCLK\n" ); }break ; -case 3 : -switch (control->type) { -case WM1811 : -case WM8958 : - aif1_reg =WM8958_AIF3_CONTROL_1 ; -break ; -default : -return 0 ; - }default :return -EINVAL ; }
Signature · 1 line
1.7.4.1
2011/10/6 Axel Lin <[email protected]>:
Quoted 4 lines
We set
hw_paramscallback forwm8994_aif3_dai_opstowm8994_aif3_hw_params. Thus no need to check wm8994-aif3 inwm8994_hw_params.Signed-off-by Axel Lin <[email protected]>
hi Mark,
Seems this patch is missed. This resend should be appliable to current code.
Thanks,
Axel
Quoted 1 line · Axel Lin
Seems this patch is missed. This resend should be appliable to current code.
I'll have ignored the original patch because it was flagged as a resend, there's no point in resending patches unless there's been some noticable interval.
2011/10/11 Mark Brown <[email protected]>:
Quoted 8 lines · Axel Lin
Quoted 2 lines
Seems this patch is missed. This resend should be appliable to current code.
I'll have ignored the original patch because it was flagged as a resend, there's no point in resending patches unless there's been some noticable interval.
It's because the original one does not applied to your tree.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/10/5/235
So. I resent the patch. ( Maybe I should just mark it as v2 )
Regards,
Axel