part_efi: fix build warning
PATCH 1/1 part_efi: fix build warning
part_efi.c: In function 'print_part_efi':
part_efi.c:133: warning: passing argument 3 of 'is_gpt_valid' from incompatible pointer type
part_efi.c:95: note: expected 'struct gpt_header *' but argument is of type 'struct gpt_header **'part_efi.c: In function 'get_partition_info_efi':
part_efi.c:172: warning: passing argument 3 of 'is_gpt_valid' from incompatible pointer type
part_efi.c:95: note: expected 'struct gpt_header *' but argument is of type 'struct gpt_header **'
--- disk/part_efi.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
disk/part_efi.c +2 -2
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ void print_part_efi(block_dev_desc_t * dev_desc) }/* This function validates AND fills in the GPT header and PTE */ if (is_gpt_valid (dev_desc,GPT_PRIMARY_PARTITION_TABLE_LBA , - &(gpt_head), &gpt_pte) !=1 ) { + gpt_head, &gpt_pte) !=1 ) {printf ("%s: *** ERROR: Invalid GPT ***\n" , __func__);return ; }
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ int get_partition_info_efi(block_dev_desc_t * dev_desc, int part,/* This function validates AND fills in the GPT header and PTE */ if (is_gpt_valid (dev_desc,GPT_PRIMARY_PARTITION_TABLE_LBA , - &(gpt_head), &gpt_pte) !=1 ) { + gpt_head, &gpt_pte) !=1 ) {printf ("%s: *** ERROR: Invalid GPT ***\n" , __func__);return -1 ; }
Signature · 1 line
1.7.0.4
PATCH 1/1 part_efi: fix build warning
Hi,
Quoted 11 lines · On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 08:07:05 -0700 Lei Wen <[email protected]> wrote:
part_efi.c: In function 'print_part_efi':
part_efi.c:133: warning: passing argument 3 of 'is_gpt_valid' from incompatible pointer type
part_efi.c:95: note: expected 'structgpt_header*' but argument is of type 'structgpt_header**'part_efi.c: In function 'get_partition_info_efi':
part_efi.c:172: warning: passing argument 3 of 'is_gpt_valid' from incompatible pointer type
part_efi.c:95: note: expected 'structgpt_header*' but argument is of type 'structgpt_header**'
Quoted 4 lines
Signed-off-by Lei Wen <[email protected]>--- disk/part_efi.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
A patch for this bug already exists: [1].
Thanks anyway,
Anatolij