writeback: show writeback reason with __print_symbolic
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 writeback: show writeback reason with __print_symbolic
This makes the traces friendly to trace-cmd, at the cost of a bit code duplication.
--- include/trace/events/writeback.h | 17 +++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
include/trace/events/writeback.h +15 -2
@@ -21,6 +21,18 @@ {I_REFERENCED, "I_REFERENCED"} \ ) +#define show_work_reason (reason) \ + __print_symbolic(reason, \ + {WB_REASON_BACKGROUND, "background"}, \ + {WB_REASON_TRY_TO_FREE_PAGES, "try_to_free_pages"}, \ + {WB_REASON_SYNC, "sync"}, \ + {WB_REASON_PERIODIC, "periodic"}, \ + {WB_REASON_LAPTOP_TIMER, "laptop_timer"}, \ + {WB_REASON_FREE_MORE_MEM, "free_more_memory"}, \ + {WB_REASON_FS_FREE_SPACE, "fs_free_space"}, \ + {WB_REASON_FORKER_THREAD, "forker_thread"} \ + ) +struct wb_writeback_work ; DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(writeback_work_class,
@@ -55,7 +67,7 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(writeback_work_class __entry->for_kupdate, __entry->range_cyclic, __entry->for_background, - wb_reason_name[__entry->reason] +show_work_reason (__entry->reason) ) );#define DEFINE_WRITEBACK_WORK_EVENT (name) \
@@ -184,7 +196,8 @@ TRACE_EVENT(writeback_queue_io, __entry->older,/* older_than_this in jiffies */ __entry->age,/* older_than_this in relative milliseconds */ __entry->moved, - wb_reason_name[__entry->reason]) +show_work_reason (__entry->reason) + ) ); TRACE_EVENT(global_dirty_state,
Steven Rostedt
maintainerRFC PATCH 1/1 writeback: Unduplicate writeback reason
Names of the writeback reasons are used in both the main kernel as well as for parsing the tracepoint format file. Instead of duplicating the names in two locations making it likely that they may become out of sync, use some macro magic to make sure all the names stay in sync. Any update only needs to happen in one spot for it to take place in all locations.
Note, this is an RFC patch, and it probably needs much better comments (well, it currently has no comments), and the C() macro probably should have a different name too.
fs/fs-writeback.c +3 -8
@@ -47,15 +47,10 @@ struct wb_writeback_work {struct completion *done;/* set if the caller waits */ }; +#undef C +#define C (a, b) [a] = bconst char *wb_reason_name[] = { - [WB_REASON_BACKGROUND ] ="background" , - [WB_REASON_TRY_TO_FREE_PAGES ] ="try_to_free_pages" , - [WB_REASON_SYNC ] ="sync" , - [WB_REASON_PERIODIC ] ="periodic" , - [WB_REASON_LAPTOP_TIMER ] ="laptop_timer" , - [WB_REASON_FREE_MORE_MEM ] ="free_more_memory" , - [WB_REASON_FS_FREE_SPACE ] ="fs_free_space" , - [WB_REASON_FORKER_THREAD ] ="forker_thread" +WB_ENUM_REASONS };/*
include/linux/writeback.h +13 -11
@@ -38,21 +38,23 @@ enum writeback_sync_modes { WB_SYNC_ALL, /* Wait on every mapping */ }; +#define WB_ENUM_REASONS \ + C(WB_REASON_BACKGROUND, "background"), \ + C(WB_REASON_TRY_TO_FREE_PAGES, "try_to_free_pages"), \ + C(WB_REASON_SYNC, "sync"), \ + C(WB_REASON_PERIODIC, "periodic"), \ + C(WB_REASON_LAPTOP_TIMER, "laptop_timer"), \ + C(WB_REASON_FREE_MORE_MEM, "free_more_memory"), \ + C(WB_REASON_FS_FREE_SPACE, "fs_free_space"), \ + C(WB_REASON_FORKER_THREAD, "forker_thread") +/* * why some writeback work was initiated */ -enum wb_reason { -WB_REASON_BACKGROUND , -WB_REASON_TRY_TO_FREE_PAGES , -WB_REASON_SYNC , -WB_REASON_PERIODIC , -WB_REASON_LAPTOP_TIMER , -WB_REASON_FREE_MORE_MEM , -WB_REASON_FS_FREE_SPACE , -WB_REASON_FORKER_THREAD , +#undef C +#define C (a, b) a +enum wb_reason {WB_ENUM_REASONS ,WB_REASONS_MAX }; -WB_REASON_MAX , -};extern const char *wb_reason_name[];/*
include/trace/events/writeback.h +3 -8
@@ -21,16 +21,11 @@ {I_REFERENCED, "I_REFERENCED"} \ ) +#undef C +#define C (a, b) {a, b}#define show_work_reason (reason) \ __print_symbolic(reason, \ - {WB_REASON_BACKGROUND, "background"}, \ - {WB_REASON_TRY_TO_FREE_PAGES, "try_to_free_pages"}, \ - {WB_REASON_SYNC, "sync"}, \ - {WB_REASON_PERIODIC, "periodic"}, \ - {WB_REASON_LAPTOP_TIMER, "laptop_timer"}, \ - {WB_REASON_FREE_MORE_MEM, "free_more_memory"}, \ - {WB_REASON_FS_FREE_SPACE, "fs_free_space"}, \ - {WB_REASON_FORKER_THREAD, "forker_thread"} \ + WB_ENUM_REASONS \ )struct wb_writeback_work ;
Re: [RFC][PATCH] writeback: Unduplicate writeback reason
Hi Steven,
Quoted 6 lines · Steven Rostedt
Names of the writeback reasons are used in both the main kernel as well as for parsing the tracepoint format file. Instead of duplicating the names in two locations making it likely that they may become out of sync, use some macro magic to make sure all the names stay in sync. Any update only needs to happen in one spot for it to take place in all locations.
It looks a bit hacky, but does the nice job of de-duplicating code. And it compiles. So I like it and would like to take it with the below rename :-)
Quoted 3 lines
Note, this is an RFC patch, and it probably needs much better comments (well, it currently has no comments), and the
C()macro probably should have a different name too.
C => WB_ENUM_REASONS_ITEM? It may look unpleasantly long, however is unique enough to make the many #define/#undef safe.
Thanks!
Fengguang
Quoted 89 lines
Signed-off-by Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>Index:
linux-trace.git/fs/fs-writeback.c
===================================================================fs/fs-writeback.c +3
-8@@ -47,15 +47,10 @@ struct wb_writeback_work {struct completion *done;/* set if the caller waits */ }; +#undef C +#define C (a, b) [a] = bconst char *wb_reason_name[] = { - [WB_REASON_BACKGROUND ] ="background" , - [WB_REASON_TRY_TO_FREE_PAGES ] ="try_to_free_pages" , - [WB_REASON_SYNC ] ="sync" , - [WB_REASON_PERIODIC ] ="periodic" , - [WB_REASON_LAPTOP_TIMER ] ="laptop_timer" , - [WB_REASON_FREE_MORE_MEM ] ="free_more_memory" , - [WB_REASON_FS_FREE_SPACE ] ="fs_free_space" , - [WB_REASON_FORKER_THREAD ] ="forker_thread" +WB_ENUM_REASONS };/* Index:
linux-trace.git/include/linux/writeback.h
===================================================================include/linux/writeback.h +13
-11@@ -38,21 +38,23 @@ enum writeback_sync_modes { WB_SYNC_ALL, /* Wait on every mapping */ }; +#define WB_ENUM_REASONS \ + C(WB_REASON_BACKGROUND, "background"), \ + C(WB_REASON_TRY_TO_FREE_PAGES, "try_to_free_pages"), \ + C(WB_REASON_SYNC, "sync"), \ + C(WB_REASON_PERIODIC, "periodic"), \ + C(WB_REASON_LAPTOP_TIMER, "laptop_timer"), \ + C(WB_REASON_FREE_MORE_MEM, "free_more_memory"), \ + C(WB_REASON_FS_FREE_SPACE, "fs_free_space"), \ + C(WB_REASON_FORKER_THREAD, "forker_thread") +/* * why some writeback work was initiated */ -enum wb_reason { -WB_REASON_BACKGROUND , -WB_REASON_TRY_TO_FREE_PAGES , -WB_REASON_SYNC , -WB_REASON_PERIODIC , -WB_REASON_LAPTOP_TIMER , -WB_REASON_FREE_MORE_MEM , -WB_REASON_FS_FREE_SPACE , -WB_REASON_FORKER_THREAD , +#undef C +#define C (a, b) a +enum wb_reason {WB_ENUM_REASONS ,WB_REASONS_MAX }; -WB_REASON_MAX , -};extern const char *wb_reason_name[];/* Index:
linux-trace.git/include/trace/events/writeback.h
===================================================================include/trace/events/writeback.h +3
-8@@ -21,16 +21,11 @@ {I_REFERENCED, "I_REFERENCED"} \ ) +#undef C +#define C (a, b) {a, b}#define show_work_reason (reason) \ __print_symbolic(reason, \ - {WB_REASON_BACKGROUND, "background"}, \ - {WB_REASON_TRY_TO_FREE_PAGES, "try_to_free_pages"}, \ - {WB_REASON_SYNC, "sync"}, \ - {WB_REASON_PERIODIC, "periodic"}, \ - {WB_REASON_LAPTOP_TIMER, "laptop_timer"}, \ - {WB_REASON_FREE_MORE_MEM, "free_more_memory"}, \ - {WB_REASON_FS_FREE_SPACE, "fs_free_space"}, \ - {WB_REASON_FORKER_THREAD, "forker_thread"} \ + WB_ENUM_REASONS \ )struct wb_writeback_work ;
Steven Rostedt
maintainerRe: [RFC][PATCH] writeback: Unduplicate writeback reason
Quoted 11 lines · Wu Fengguang
Hi Steven,
Quoted 6 lines · Steven Rostedt
Names of the writeback reasons are used in both the main kernel as well as for parsing the tracepoint format file. Instead of duplicating the names in two locations making it likely that they may become out of sync, use some macro magic to make sure all the names stay in sync. Any update only needs to happen in one spot for it to take place in all locations.
It looks a bit hacky,
One of my professors showed me this trick a long time ago when I was going for my Masters. It was actually the trick I based the entire TRACE_EVENT() macro magic on :)
Quoted 10 lines
but does the nice job of de-duplicating code.
And it compiles. So I like it and would like to take it with the below rename :-)Quoted 3 lines
Note, this is an RFC patch, and it probably needs much better comments (well, it currently has no comments), and the
C()macro probably should have a different name too.C =>
WB_ENUM_REASONS_ITEM? It may look unpleasantly long, however is unique enough to make the many #define/#undef safe.
Sure. Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
Note, there's one buggy issue still. That the enums names still trip up trace-cmd. But that's fine, because I have a plan to fix that too. But that will be on the ftrace said.
Thanks!
-- Steve
Re: [RFC][PATCH] writeback: Unduplicate writeback reason
In reply to Steven RostedtQuoted 10 lines · Steven Rostedt
Names of the writeback reasons are used in both the main kernel as well as for parsing the tracepoint format file. Instead of duplicating the names in two locations making it likely that they may become out of sync, use some macro magic to make sure all the names stay in sync. Any update only needs to happen in one spot for it to take place in all locations.
Note, this is an RFC patch, and it probably needs much better comments (well, it currently has no comments), and the
C()macro probably should have a different name too.
I'm not sure this is a pattern we want to repeat all over the place - print_symbolic() is quite widely used and adding macro redefinitions all over the place doesn't fill me with joy.
AFAICT this code doesn't need a declared array to work so you can just use a preprocessor construct like this (as used in XFS):
#define value_1 1
#define value_2 2
.....
or
enum {
value_1 = 1,
value_2 = 2,
.....
}followed by:
#define VALUES \
{ value_1, "Value 1" }, \
{ value_2, "Value 2" }, \
.....And it just uses print_symbolic(__entry->value, VALUES); to print them out.
If this construct does everything requiredi, then I think it is a much better pattern to use because it's easy to maintain, doesn't require an array to be declared in a C file and doesn't require macro tricks to do it's job....
Cheers,
Dave.
Signature · 2 lines
Dave Chinner [email protected]
Re: [RFC][PATCH] writeback: Unduplicate writeback reason
Quoted 8 lines · Dave Chinner
Quoted 7 lines · Steven Rostedt
Names of the writeback reasons are used in both the main kernel as well as for parsing the tracepoint format file. Instead of duplicating the names in two locations making it likely that they may become out of sync, use some macro magic to make sure all the names stay in sync. Any update only needs to happen in one spot for it to take place in all locations.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Note, this is an RFC patch, and it probably needs much better comments (well, it currently has no comments), and the
C()macro probably should have a different name too.I'm not sure this is a pattern we want to repeat all over the place -
print_symbolic()is quite widely used and adding macro redefinitions all over the place doesn't fill me with joy.
Yeah, unfortunately...
Quoted 1 line
AFAICT this code doesn't need a declared array to work so you can
You mean the string array wb_reason_name[]? Ah it's actually not used for now -- until there comes the (planned) writeback stats patch to show the reason names in some debugfs/sysfs interface.
So for the upcoming 3.2, wb_reason_name[] can be removed to avoid the duplication. However the question still remains how exactly are we going to re-introduce it in future?
Quoted 16 lines
just use a preprocessor construct like this (as used in XFS):
#define
value_11
#definevalue_22
.....or
enum { value_1 = 1, value_2 = 2, ..... }followed by:
Quoted 7 lines
#define VALUES \ { value_1, "Value 1" }, \ { value_2, "Value 2" }, \ .....And it just uses
print_symbolic(__entry->value, VALUES); to print them out.
If using the above macros, wb_reason_name[] can be defined as
static const struct trace_print_flags wb_reason_name[] = { VALUES };and reference it in this way
wb_reason_name[reason][1]
The first element is redundant info and will be ignored, because
wb_reason_name[reason][0] == reason
Quoted 4 lines
If this construct does everything requiredi, then I think it is a much better pattern to use because it's easy to maintain, doesn't require an array to be declared in a C file and doesn't require macro tricks to do it's job....
Hmm, I looked through XFS tracing code and find no use case like the wb_reason_name[]. That is, the XFS symbolic names are only used for tracing output and there is no sharing with debugfs/sysfs outputs. So we may be talking about different situations.
Thanks,
Fengguang
Re: [RFC][PATCH] writeback: Unduplicate writeback reason
Quoted 17 lines · Wu Fengguang
Quoted 8 lines · Dave Chinner
Quoted 7 lines · Steven Rostedt
Names of the writeback reasons are used in both the main kernel as well as for parsing the tracepoint format file. Instead of duplicating the names in two locations making it likely that they may become out of sync, use some macro magic to make sure all the names stay in sync. Any update only needs to happen in one spot for it to take place in all locations.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Note, this is an RFC patch, and it probably needs much better comments (well, it currently has no comments), and the
C()macro probably should have a different name too.I'm not sure this is a pattern we want to repeat all over the place -
print_symbolic()is quite widely used and adding macro redefinitions all over the place doesn't fill me with joy.
Quoted 7 lines
Yeah, unfortunately...
Quoted 1 line
AFAICT this code doesn't need a declared array to work so you can
You mean the string array wb_reason_name[]? Ah it's actually not used for now -- until there comes the (planned) writeback stats patch to show the reason names in some debugfs/sysfs interface.
Ah, ok. I missed that context.
.....
Quoted 14 lines
Quoted 9 lines
followed by:
#define VALUES \ { value_1, "Value 1" }, \ { value_2, "Value 2" }, \ .....And it just uses
print_symbolic(__entry->value, VALUES); to print them out.If using the above macros, wb_reason_name[] can be defined as
static const struct trace_print_flags wb_reason_name[] = { VALUES };
Quoted 7 lines
and reference it in this way
wb_reason_name[reason][1]The first element is redundant info and will be ignored, because
wb_reason_name[reason][0] == reason
Yeah, that would work, and still place the definitions close together....
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 5 lines
If this construct does everything requiredi, then I think it is a much better pattern to use because it's easy to maintain, doesn't require an array to be declared in a C file and doesn't require macro tricks to do it's job....
Hmm, I looked through XFS tracing code and find no use case like the wb_reason_name[]. That is, the XFS symbolic names are only used for tracing output and there is no sharing with debugfs/sysfs outputs.
Right. I didn't realise the writeback stuff was eventually going to be shared with sysfs. Still, it looks like it works better than playing macro redefinition games with you addition above, so perhaps it was best I didn't realise this in the first place. ;)
Cheers,
Dave.
Signature · 2 lines
Dave Chinner [email protected]