fs/ext4: add missing ext4_resize_end
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 fs/ext4: add missing ext4_resize_end
Online resize ioctls 'EXT4_IOC_GROUP_EXTEND' and 'EXT4_IOC_GROUP_ADD' call ext4_resize_begin() to check permissions and to set the EXT4_RESIZING bit lock, they do their work and they must finish with ext4_resize_end() which calls clear_bit_unlock() to unlock and to avoid -EBUSY errors for the next resize operations.
This patch adds the missing ext4_resize_end() calls on error paths.
Patch tested.
--- fs/ext4/ioctl.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
fs/ext4/ioctl.c +18 -10
@@ -182,19 +182,22 @@ setversion_out:if (err)return err; -if (get_user (n_blocks_count, (__u32 __user *)arg)) -return -EFAULT ; +if (get_user (n_blocks_count, (__u32 __user *)arg)) { + err = -EFAULT ; + goto group_extend_out; + }if (EXT4_HAS_RO_COMPAT_FEATURE (sb,EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_BIGALLOC )) {ext4_msg (sb,KERN_ERR ,"Online resizing not supported with bigalloc" ); -return -EOPNOTSUPP ; + err = -EOPNOTSUPP ; + goto group_extend_out; } err =mnt_want_write (filp->f_path.mnt);if (err) -return err; + goto group_extend_out; err =ext4_group_extend (sb,EXT4_SB (sb)->s_es, n_blocks_count);if (EXT4_SB (sb)->s_journal) {
@@ -204,9 +207,10 @@ setversion_out: }if (err ==0 ) err = err2; +mnt_drop_write (filp->f_path.mnt); +group_extend_out:ext4_resize_end (sb); -return err; }
@@ -267,19 +271,22 @@ mext_out:return err;if (copy_from_user (&input, (struct ext4_new_group_input __user *)arg, -sizeof (input))) -return -EFAULT ; +sizeof (input))) { + err = -EFAULT ; + goto group_add_out; + }if (EXT4_HAS_RO_COMPAT_FEATURE (sb,EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_BIGALLOC )) {ext4_msg (sb,KERN_ERR ,"Online resizing not supported with bigalloc" ); -return -EOPNOTSUPP ; + err = -EOPNOTSUPP ; + goto group_add_out; } err =mnt_want_write (filp->f_path.mnt);if (err) -return err; + goto group_add_out; err =ext4_group_add (sb, &input);if (EXT4_SB (sb)->s_journal) {
@@ -289,9 +296,10 @@ mext_out: }if (err ==0 ) err = err2; +mnt_drop_write (filp->f_path.mnt); +group_add_out:ext4_resize_end (sb); -return err; }
Signature · 1 line
1.7.1
Thanks.
The patch looks good. I have to update the new resize patch too.
Yongqiang.
Quoted 105 lines · Djalal Harouni
Online resize ioctls '
EXT4_IOC_GROUP_EXTEND' and 'EXT4_IOC_GROUP_ADD' callext4_resize_begin()to check permissions and to set theEXT4_RESIZINGbit lock, they do their work and they must finish withext4_resize_end()which callsclear_bit_unlock()to unlock and to avoid-EBUSYerrors for the next resize operations.This patch adds the missing
ext4_resize_end()calls on error paths.Patch tested.
Signed-off-by Djalal Harouni <[email protected]>---
�fs/ext4/ioctl.c | � 28 ++++++++++++++++++---------- �1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)fs/ext4/ioctl.c +18
-11@@ -182,19 +182,22 @@ setversion_out: � � � � � � � �if (err) � � � � � � � � � � � �return err; - � � � � � � � if (get_user(n_blocks_count, (__u32 __user *)arg)) - � � � � � � � � � � � return -EFAULT; + � � � � � � � if (get_user(n_blocks_count, (__u32 __user *)arg)) { + � � � � � � � � � � � err = -EFAULT; + � � � � � � � � � � � goto group_extend_out; + � � � � � � � } � � � � � � � �if (EXT4_HAS_RO_COMPAT_FEATURE(sb, � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_BIGALLOC)) { � � � � � � � � � � � �ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � "Online resizing not supported with bigalloc"); - � � � � � � � � � � � return -EOPNOTSUPP; + � � � � � � � � � � � err = -EOPNOTSUPP; + � � � � � � � � � � � goto group_extend_out; � � � � � � � �} � � � � � � � �err = mnt_want_write(filp->f_path.mnt); � � � � � � � �if (err) - � � � � � � � � � � � return err; + � � � � � � � � � � � goto group_extend_out; � � � � � � � �err = ext4_group_extend(sb, EXT4_SB(sb)->s_es, n_blocks_count); � � � � � � � �if (EXT4_SB(sb)->s_journal) {@@ -204,9 +207,10 @@ setversion_out: � � � � � � � �} � � � � � � � �if (err == 0) � � � � � � � � � � � �err = err2; + � � � � � � � �mnt_drop_write(filp->f_path.mnt); +group_extend_out: � � � � � � � �ext4_resize_end(sb); - � � � � � � � �return err; � � � �}@@ -267,19 +271,22 @@ mext_out: � � � � � � � � � � � �return err; � � � � � � � �if (copy_from_user(&input, (struct ext4_new_group_input __user *)arg, - � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � sizeof(input))) - � � � � � � � � � � � return -EFAULT; + � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � sizeof(input))) { + � � � � � � � � � � � err = -EFAULT; + � � � � � � � � � � � goto group_add_out; + � � � � � � � } � � � � � � � �if (EXT4_HAS_RO_COMPAT_FEATURE(sb, � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_BIGALLOC)) { � � � � � � � � � � � �ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � "Online resizing not supported with bigalloc"); - � � � � � � � � � � � return -EOPNOTSUPP; + � � � � � � � � � � � err = -EOPNOTSUPP; + � � � � � � � � � � � goto group_add_out; � � � � � � � �} � � � � � � � �err = mnt_want_write(filp->f_path.mnt); � � � � � � � �if (err) - � � � � � � � � � � � return err; + � � � � � � � � � � � goto group_add_out; � � � � � � � �err = ext4_group_add(sb, &input); � � � � � � � �if (EXT4_SB(sb)->s_journal) {@@ -289,9 +296,10 @@ mext_out: � � � � � � � �} � � � � � � � �if (err == 0) � � � � � � � � � � � �err = err2; + � � � � � � � �mnt_drop_write(filp->f_path.mnt); +group_add_out: � � � � � � � �ext4_resize_end(sb); - � � � � � � � �return err; � � � �} --1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at �http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at �http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Signature · 2 lines
Best Wishes Yongqiang Yang
Quoted 14 lines · Yongqiang Yang
Thanks.
The patch looks good. I have to update the new resize patch too.
Yongqiang.
Quoted 7 lines · Djalal Harouni
Online resize ioctls '
EXT4_IOC_GROUP_EXTEND' and 'EXT4_IOC_GROUP_ADD' callext4_resize_begin()to check permissions and to set theEXT4_RESIZINGbit lock, they do their work and they must finish withext4_resize_end()which callsclear_bit_unlock()to unlock and to avoid-EBUSYerrors for the next resize operations.This patch adds the missing
ext4_resize_end()calls on error paths.
Any news on this one ?
If we call EXT4_IOC_GROUP_EXTEND ioctl and get_user() fails with -EFAULT then any new call will return -EBUSY, unless we unmount/mount the fs.
In rare situations this can lead to a corrupt filesystem, I've experienced this, but I'm not sure what I did. fsck fix it.
Thanks.
Signature · 2 lines
tixxdz http://opendz.org
Quoted 6 lines · Djalal Harouni
Online resize ioctls '
EXT4_IOC_GROUP_EXTEND' and 'EXT4_IOC_GROUP_ADD' callext4_resize_begin()to check permissions and to set theEXT4_RESIZINGbit lock, they do their work and they must finish withext4_resize_end()which callsclear_bit_unlock()to unlock and to avoid-EBUSYerrors for the next resize operations.
Quoted 6 lines
This patch adds the missing
ext4_resize_end()calls on error paths.Patch tested.
Signed-off-by Djalal Harouni <[email protected]>
Applied, thanks.
- Ted