ethtool: bump to 3.2
PATCH 1/2 ethtool: bump to 3.2
From: Yegor Yefremov <[email protected]>
--- package/ethtool/ethtool.mk | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
package/ethtool/ethtool.mk +1 -1
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ # ############################################################# -ETHTOOL_VERSION = 3.1 +ETHTOOL_VERSION = 3.2 ETHTOOL_SITE = $(BR2_KERNEL_MIRROR)/software/network/ethtool $(eval $(call AUTOTARGETS))
Signature · 1 line
1.7.1.1
PATCH 2/2 New package: kmod
From: Yegor Yefremov <[email protected]>
--- package/Config.in | 1 + package/kmod/Config.in | 7 +++++++ package/kmod/kmod.mk | 8 ++++++++ 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 package/kmod/Config.in create mode 100644 package/kmod/kmod.mk
package/Config.in +1 -0
@@ -557,6 +557,7 @@ if BR2_PACKAGE_BUSYBOX_SHOW_OTHERS source "package/bootutils/Config.in" endif source "package/htop/Config.in" +source "package/kmod/Config.in" if BR2_PACKAGE_BUSYBOX_SHOW_OTHERS source "package/module-init-tools/Config.in" source "package/procps/Config.in"
package/kmod/Config.in new file +7 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +config BR2_PACKAGE_KMOD + bool "kmod" + help + handle kernel modules + + http://git.profusion.mobi/cgit.cgi/kmod.git/ +
package/kmod/kmod.mk new file +8 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +KMOD_VERSION = 3 +KMOD_SOURCE = kmod-$(KMOD_VERSION).tar.bz2 +KMOD_SITE = http://git.profusion.mobi/cgit.cgi/kmod.git/snapshot +KMOD_INSTALL_STAGING =YES +KMOD_AUTORECONF = YES + +$(eval $(call AUTOTARGETS)) +
Signature · 1 line
1.7.1.1
PATCH 2/2 New package: kmod
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
"yegorslists" == yegorslists <[email protected]> writes:
yegorslists> From: Yegor Yefremov <[email protected]> yegorslists> Signed-off-by: Yegor Yefremov <[email protected]>
You were missing a host-pkg-config dependency. I've fixed that and committed, thanks.
Signature · 1 line
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
PATCH 2/2 New package: kmod
In reply to yegorslists at googlemail.compackage/kmod/Config.in line 6
Quoted 12 lines · On Monday 16 January 2012 16:04:36 yegorslists at googlemail.com wrote:
package/kmod/Config.in new file +6
-0@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +config BR2_PACKAGE_KMOD + bool "kmod" + help + handle kernel modules + + http://git.profusion.mobi/cgit.cgi/kmod.git/
It would be nice if there was a config option to disable installing
the tools, in case you want to use it as a library (which is probably the primary intention).
That option should setKMOD_INSTALL_STAGING = NOKMOD_CONF_OPT += --disable-tools
Regards,
Arnout
Signature · 6 lines
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286540 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F
PATCH 2/2 New package: kmod
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
"Arnout" == Arnout Vandecappelle <[email protected]> writes:
Quoted 4 lines · Arnout> On Monday 16 January 2012 16:04:36 yegorslists at googlemail.com wrote:
Quoted 4 lines
package/kmod/Config.in new file +0
-1--- /dev/null
Quoted 8 lines
package/kmod/Config.in line 6
Quoted 8 lines
+++ b/package/kmod/Config.in
package/kmod/Config.in new file +6
-0@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +config BR2_PACKAGE_KMOD + bool "kmod" + help + handle kernel modules + + http://git.profusion.mobi/cgit.cgi/kmod.git/
Arnout> It would be nice if there was a config option to disable installing Arnout> the tools, in case you want to use it as a library (which is probably Arnout> the primary intention).
True. /usr/bin/kmod is 88k, so not huge - But ok.
Arnout> That option should set
Arnout> KMOD_INSTALL_STAGING = NO
Why would you not install into staging?
Arnout> KMOD_CONF_OPT += --disable-tools
Signature · 1 line
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
PATCH 2/2 New package: kmod
Quoted 18 lines · On Monday 16 January 2012 20:27:20 Peter Korsgaard wrote:
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
"Arnout" == Arnout Vandecappelle <[email protected]> writes:
Quoted 4 lines · Arnout> On Monday 16 January 2012 16:04:36 yegorslists at googlemail.com wrote:
Quoted 4 lines
package/kmod/Config.in new file +0
-1--- /dev/nullQuoted 8 lines
package/kmod/Config.in line 6
Quoted 8 lines
+++ b/package/kmod/Config.in
package/kmod/Config.in new file +6
-0@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +config BR2_PACKAGE_KMOD + bool "kmod" + help + handle kernel modules + + http://git.profusion.mobi/cgit.cgi/kmod.git/Arnout> That option should set
Arnout>KMOD_INSTALL_STAGING= NO
Quoted 1 line
Why would you not install into staging?
That should me KMOD_INSTALL_TARGET, of course.
Regards,
Arnout
Signature · 6 lines
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286540 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F
PATCH 2/2 New package: kmod
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
"Arnout" == Arnout Vandecappelle <[email protected]> writes:
Arnout> That option should set
Arnout> KMOD_INSTALL_STAGING = NO
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Why would you not install into staging?
Arnout> That should me KMOD_INSTALL_TARGET, of course.
You would still need to install the shared library, so we should rather remove the binary instead.
Signature · 1 line
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
PATCH 2/2 New package: kmod
Quoted 11 lines · Peter Korsgaard
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
"Arnout" == Arnout Vandecappelle <[email protected]> writes:
?Arnout> That option should set
?Arnout>KMOD_INSTALL_STAGING= NO
?>>
?>> Why would you not install into staging??Arnout> ?That should me
KMOD_INSTALL_TARGET, of course.You would still need to install the shared library, so we should rather remove the binary instead.
I added this package, because it is udev's dependency now. I'll have to look into udev, to tell if it uses only library or binary too.
As we came to this topic, what is your opinion on adding /run? It also became udev's dependency.
I'll set my udev's patch series tomorrow.
Yegor
PATCH 2/2 New package: kmod
Quoted 7 lines · Yegor Yefremov
I added this package, because it is udev's dependency now. I'll have to look into udev, to tell if it uses only library or binary too. As we came to this topic, what is your opinion on adding /run? It also became udev's dependency. I'll set my udev's patch series tomorrow. Yegor _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot at busybox.net
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
udev byself needs only the lib. the binarys can be used as insmod/rmmod/modprobe/modinfo replacement from module-init-tools or busybox's solution. the "kmod" binary byself is a multicall binary so insmod/rmmod/... can be symlinks to this binary.
Stephan
PATCH 2/2 New package: kmod
In reply to Yegor YefremovQuoted 2 lines · On Tuesday 17 January 2012 23:13:08 Yegor Yefremov wrote:
As we came to this topic, what is your opinion on adding /run? It also became udev's dependency.
IIRC /run basically replaces /var/run in Fedora, Debian, SuSE and others.
Since we anyway symlink /var/run to /tmp, we can easily do the same for /run.
Regards,
Arnout
Signature · 6 lines
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286540 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F
PATCH 2/2 New package: kmod
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
"Arnout" == Arnout Vandecappelle <[email protected]> writes:
Quoted 2 lines · Arnout> On Tuesday 17 January 2012 23:13:08 Yegor Yefremov wrote:
Quoted 2 lines
As we came to this topic, what is your opinion on adding /run? It also became udev's dependency.
Arnout> IIRC /run basically replaces /var/run in Fedora, Debian, SuSE Arnout> and others. Since we anyway symlink /var/run to /tmp, we can Arnout> easily do the same for /run.
That's my understanding as well. I don't have any issues with adding a /run symlink to fs/skeleton.
Signature · 1 line
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
PATCH 2/2 New package: kmod
Quoted 6 lines · Peter Korsgaard
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
"Arnout" == Arnout Vandecappelle <[email protected]> writes:
?Arnout> On Tuesday 17 January 2012 23:13:08 Yegor Yefremov wrote:
?>> As we came to this topic, what is your opinion on adding /run? It also ?>> became udev's dependency.
Quoted 6 lines
?Arnout> ?IIRC /run basically replaces
/var/runin Fedora, Debian, SuSE ?Arnout> and others. ?Since we anyway symlink/var/runto /tmp, we can ?Arnout> easily do the same for /run.That's my understanding as well. I don't have any issues with adding a /run symlink to fs/skeleton.
O.K. I'll prepare the patch.
Yegor
PATCH 1/2 ethtool: bump to 3.2
In reply to yegorslists at googlemail.comQuoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
"yegorslists" == yegorslists <[email protected]> writes:
yegorslists> From: Yegor Yefremov <[email protected]> yegorslists> Signed-off-by: Yegor Yefremov <[email protected]>
Committed, thanks.
Signature · 1 line
Bye, Peter Korsgaard