char random: fix boot id uniqueness race
PATCH 1/1 char random: fix boot id uniqueness race
The proc file /proc/sys/kernel/random/boot_id can be read concurrently by user-space processes. If two (or more) user-space processes concurrently read boot_id when sysctl_bootid is not yet assigned, a race can occur making boot_id differ between the reads. Because the whole point of the boot id is to be unique across a kernel execution, fix this by protecting this operation with a mutex, and introduce a boot_id_generated flag, along with appropriate memory barriers, to let the fast-path know if the boot ID has been generated without having to hold the mutex.
I propose this approach rather than setting it up within an initcall(), because letting execution randomness add to entropy before populating the boot id seems to be a wanted property. Also, populating it lazily rather than at boot time only makes the performance hit be taken when boot_id is being read.
--- drivers/char/random.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/char/random.c +17 -3
@@ -1231,6 +1231,8 @@ static int min_read_thresh = 8, min_writstatic int max_read_thresh =INPUT_POOL_WORDS *32 ;static int max_write_thresh =INPUT_POOL_WORDS *32 ;static char sysctl_bootid[16 ]; +static int boot_id_generated; +static DEFINE_MUTEX (boot_id_mutex);/* * These functions is used to return both the bootid UUID, and random
@@ -1250,10 +1252,22 @@ static int proc_do_uuid(ctl_table *table uuid = table->data;if (!uuid) { uuid = tmp_uuid; - uuid[8 ] =0 ; - } -if (uuid[8 ] ==0 )generate_random_uuid (uuid); + }else { +if (unlikely (!ACCESS_ONCE (boot_id_generated))) { +mutex_lock (&boot_id_mutex); +if (!boot_id_generated) { +generate_random_uuid (uuid); +/* Store uuid before boot_id_generated. */ +smp_wmb (); + boot_id_generated =1 ; + } +mutex_unlock (&boot_id_mutex); + }else { +/* Load boot_id_generated before uuid */ +smp_rmb (); + } + }sprintf (buf,"%pU" , uuid);
Signature · 4 lines
Mathieu Desnoyers Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com
Ted Ts'o
maintainerdrivers/char/random.c static int min_read_thresh = 8, min_writ · line 1235
Quoted 10 lines · Mathieu Desnoyers
Index:
linux-2.6-lttng/drivers/char/random.c
===================================================================drivers/char/random.c +2
-0@@ -1231,6 +1231,8 @@ static int min_read_thresh = 8, min_writstatic int max_read_thresh =INPUT_POOL_WORDS *32 ;static int max_write_thresh =INPUT_POOL_WORDS *32 ;static char sysctl_bootid[16 ]; +static int boot_id_generated; +static DEFINE_MUTEX (boot_id_mutex);
My preference would be to put these statics in proc_do_uuid(), but that's arguably a nit.
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/char/random.c +5
-0+ }else { +if (unlikely (!ACCESS_ONCE (boot_id_generated))) { +mutex_lock (&boot_id_mutex); +if (!boot_id_generated) { +generate_random_uuid (uuid);
drivers/char/random.c static int proc_do_uuid(ctl_table *table · line 1270
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/char/random.c +10
-0+/* Store uuid before boot_id_generated. */ +smp_wmb (); + boot_id_generated =1 ; + } +mutex_unlock (&boot_id_mutex); + }else { +/* Load boot_id_generated before uuid */ +smp_rmb (); + } + }
I don't believe the smp_wmb() and smp_rmb() are necessary here; the mutex_lock() and mutex_unlock() should put the necessary memory barriers in place.
Regards,
- Ted
Quoted 11 lines · * Ted Ts'o ([email protected]) wrote:
drivers/char/random.c static int min_read_thresh = 8, min_writ · line 1235
Quoted 10 lines · Mathieu Desnoyers
Index:
linux-2.6-lttng/drivers/char/random.c
===================================================================drivers/char/random.c +2
-0@@ -1231,6 +1231,8 @@ static int min_read_thresh = 8, min_writstatic int max_read_thresh =INPUT_POOL_WORDS *32 ;static int max_write_thresh =INPUT_POOL_WORDS *32 ;static char sysctl_bootid[16 ]; +static int boot_id_generated; +static DEFINE_MUTEX (boot_id_mutex);
Hi Ted,
Quoted 3 lines
My preference would be to put these statics in
proc_do_uuid(), but that's arguably a nit.
No problem, can do.
Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 12 lines
drivers/char/random.c +11
-0+ }else { +if (unlikely (!ACCESS_ONCE (boot_id_generated))) { +mutex_lock (&boot_id_mutex); +if (!boot_id_generated) { +generate_random_uuid (uuid); +/* Store uuid before boot_id_generated. */ +smp_wmb (); + boot_id_generated =1 ; + } +mutex_unlock (&boot_id_mutex); + }else {
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/char/random.c static int proc_do_uuid(ctl_table *table · line 1270
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/char/random.c +4
-0+/* Load boot_id_generated before uuid */ +smp_rmb (); + } + }I don't believe the
smp_wmb()andsmp_rmb()are necessary here; themutex_lock()andmutex_unlock()should put the necessary memory barriers in place.
The need for memory barriers is a consequence of letting the fast-path run without holding this mutex.
Here is the race dealt with by the smp_rmb()/smp_wmb(). I'm showing the result of reversed write order here:
CPU A CPU B
Load boot_id_generated
(test -> false)mutex_lock(&boot_id_mutex)
(implied memory barrier
with acquire semantic)
Load boot_id_generated again
(test -> false)boot_id_generated = 1
(both the compiler and
CPU are free to reorder
the boot_id_generated
store before uuid stores)
Load boot_id_generated
(test -> true)
Load uuid content
(races with generate_random_uuid:
result either 0 or corrupted)
Return corrupted uuid.generate_random_uuid(uuid)mutex_unlock(&boot_id_mutex)
I prefer not requiring the fast-path to take a mutex, because this would transform a read-mostly operation into an operation that requires cache-line exchanges (the mutex). However, if we want the fast-path to be mutex-free, we need to enforce order with memory barriers: smp_rmb on the read-side, smp_wmb on the update-side. Failure to do so leads to the race shown above, where a corrupted boot_id can be returned.
Please let me know if there are aspects of your question I can address better,
Thanks,
Mathieu
Quoted 4 lines
Regards,
- Ted
Signature · 4 lines
Mathieu Desnoyers Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com