Skip to contentSkip to conversation

ARM: mx51: Fix build error due to missing include of <linux/bug.h>

PATCH New Fabio Estevam 4 participants 7 messages Feb 28, 2012 – Feb 29, 2012

Subsystems (3)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 ARM: mx51: Fix build error due to missing include of <linux/bug.h>

Fix the following build error:

arch/arm/mach-imx/cpu_op-mx51.c: In function 'mx51_get_cpu_op':
arch/arm/mach-imx/cpu_op-mx51.c:27: error: implicit declaration of function 'BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO'

---
This applies against linux-next

 arch/arm/mach-imx/cpu_op-mx51.c |    1 +
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-imx/cpu_op-mx51.c +1 -0
index 9d34c3d..9a4f77a 100644
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 #include <linux/types.h>
 #include <mach/hardware.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/bug.h>
 
 static struct cpu_op mx51_cpu_op[] = {
 	{
Signature · 1 line
1.7.1
#1 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 ARM: mx51: Fix build error due to missing include of <linux/bug.h>

Quoted 4 lines · Fabio Estevam

Fix the following build error:

arch/arm/mach-imx/cpu_op-mx51.c: In function 'mx51_get_cpu_op':
arch/arm/mach-imx/cpu_op-mx51.c:27: error: implicit declaration of function 'BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO'

I think having the asm/bug.h replaced with linux/bug.h in linux/kernel.h would be a better solution.

Quoted 29 lines

---
This applies against linux-next

 arch/arm/mach-imx/cpu_op-mx51.c |    1 +
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-imx/cpu_op-mx51.c +1 -0
index 9d34c3d..9a4f77a 100644
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 #include <linux/types.h>
 #include <mach/hardware.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/bug.h>
 
 static struct cpu_op mx51_cpu_op[] = {
 	{
Signature · 8 lines
1.7.1



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
reviewer
#2 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 ARM: mx51: Fix build error due to missing include of <linux/bug.h>

Quoted 2 lines · Russell King - ARM Linux

I think having the asm/bug.h replaced with linux/bug.h in linux/kernel.h would be a better solution.

commit 6f863554 (kernel.h: doesn't explicitly use bug.h, so don't include it. ), which appears in linux-next, has removed asm/debug.h from linux/kernel.h.

I should have pointed this commit ID in my commit log.

Regards,

Fabio Estevam

#3 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 ARM: mx51: Fix build error due to missing include of <linux/bug.h>

Quoted 11 lines · Fabio Estevam
Quoted 2 lines · Russell King - ARM Linux

I think having the asm/bug.h replaced with linux/bug.h in linux/kernel.h would be a better solution.

commit 6f863554 (kernel.h: doesn't explicitly use bug.h, so don't include it. ), which appears in linux-next, has removed asm/debug.h from linux/kernel.h.

I should have pointed this commit ID in my commit log.

No, this is not a fix, and it probably makes things worse.

linux/kernel.h _does_ use bug stuff - in ARRAY_SIZE().

ARRAY_SIZE() uses __must_be_array(), which is defined in linux/compiler-gcc.h, which is obtained via linux/compiler.h and linux/linkage.h.

linux/compiler-gcc.h defines __must_be_array() to be:
#define __must_be_array(a) BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(__same_type((a), &(a)[0]))

and BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO used to be in linux/kernel.h but got moved to linux/bug.h.

Hence why people are seeing build breakage with ARRAY_SIZE().

The answer is not to start scattering lots of .c files with linux/bug.h includes, but to fix linux/kernel.h.

reviewer
#4 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 ARM: mx51: Fix build error due to missing include of <linux/bug.h>

Quoted 24 lines · Russell King - ARM Linux
Quoted 11 lines · Fabio Estevam
Quoted 2 lines · Russell King - ARM Linux

I think having the asm/bug.h replaced with linux/bug.h in linux/kernel.h would be a better solution.

commit 6f863554 (kernel.h: doesn't explicitly use bug.h, so don't include it. ), which appears in linux-next, has removed asm/debug.h from linux/kernel.h.

I should have pointed this commit ID in my commit log.

No, this is not a fix, and it probably makes things worse.

linux/kernel.h _does_ use bug stuff - in ARRAY_SIZE().

ARRAY_SIZE() uses __must_be_array(), which is defined in linux/compiler-gcc.h,
which is obtained via linux/compiler.h and linux/linkage.h.

linux/compiler-gcc.h defines __must_be_array() to be:
#define __must_be_array(a) BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(__same_type((a), &(a)[0]))

Quoted 7 lines

and BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO used to be in linux/kernel.h but got moved to linux/bug.h.

Hence why people are seeing build breakage with ARRAY_SIZE().

The answer is not to start scattering lots of .c files with linux/bug.h includes, but to fix linux/kernel.h.

This makes sense, thanks.

Will submit a patch for lkml shortly.

#5 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 ARM: mx51: Fix build error due to missing include of <linux/bug.h>

In reply to Russell King - ARM Linux

[Re: [PATCH] ARM: mx51: Fix build error due to missing include of <linux/bug.h>] On 28/02/2012 (Tue 13:21) Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:

[...]

Quoted 2 lines

The answer is not to start scattering lots of .c files with linux/bug.h includes, but to fix linux/kernel.h.

Hi Russell,

I understand your concerns, and had I found myself "buggering" lots of .c files, I would have backed away and said to myself, "OK, this really isn't going to work - we really can't do this."

But to put some metrics to it, after building for about 10 different arch and all their defconfigs, I only had to change about twenty[1] of the approximately sixteen thousand .c files in the kernel. That is about 0.125% -- which is one of the things that made me think "Hey, we
can really do this cleanup!" Including this file, there were only
two .c files in all of arch/arm that were using bug somehow.

So I think having kernel.h not require bug.h is completely do-able. But in the end, I'm not welded to the idea. I think it is a win, but I'm not going to kick up a big stink if Linus or Andrew say they don't think it is of value, and would rather not rock the boat.

Thanks,
Paul.
--

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/1/26/521

#6 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 ARM: mx51: Fix build error due to missing include of <linux/bug.h>

Quoted 9 lines · Paul Gortmaker

[Re: [PATCH] ARM: mx51: Fix build error due to missing include of <linux/bug.h>] On 28/02/2012 (Tue 13:21) Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:

[...]

Quoted 2 lines

The answer is not to start scattering lots of .c files with linux/bug.h includes, but to fix linux/kernel.h.

Hi Russell,

Quoted 7 lines

I understand your concerns, and had I found myself "buggering" lots of .c files, I would have backed away and said to myself, "OK, this really isn't going to work - we really can't do this."

But to put some metrics to it, after building for about 10 different arch and all their defconfigs, I only had to change about twenty[1] of the approximately sixteen thousand .c files in the kernel.

I think there's more than that - I've seen two reports for other files which have needed fixing so far, and I wouldn't be surprised if there's more.

I guess we'll see in coming weeks how it pans out, but my gut feeling is that this is going to cause a fair number of build problems.