openssl: Fix build on ARM with GCC 4.6.x
PATCH 1/2 openssl: Fix build on ARM with GCC 4.6.x
--- package/openssl/openssl.mk | 7 +++++++ 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
package/openssl/openssl.mk +7 -0
@@ -9,7 +9,14 @@ OPENSSL_SITE = http://www.openssl.org/source OPENSSL_INSTALL_STAGING = YES OPENSSL_DEPENDENCIES = zlib OPENSSL_TARGET_ARCH = generic32 + +ifeq ($(BR2_GCC_VERSION_4_6_X)-$(ARCH),y-arm) +# workaround for gcc issue +# http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308 +OPENSSL_CFLAGS = $(subst -Os,-O2,$(TARGET_CFLAGS)) +else OPENSSL_CFLAGS = $(TARGET_CFLAGS) +endif ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_OPENSSL_OCF),y) OPENSSL_CFLAGS += -DHAVE_CRYPTODEV -DUSE_CRYPTODEV_DIGESTS
Signature · 1 line
1.7.9.1
PATCH 2/2 openssl: Add -march and -mcpu flags
--- package/openssl/openssl.mk | 2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
package/openssl/openssl.mk +2 -0
@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ else OPENSSL_CFLAGS = $(TARGET_CFLAGS) endif +OPENSSL_CFLAGS += -march=$(BR2_GCC_TARGET_ARCH) -mcpu=$(BR2_GCC_TARGET_TUNE) + ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_OPENSSL_OCF),y) OPENSSL_CFLAGS += -DHAVE_CRYPTODEV -DUSE_CRYPTODEV_DIGESTS
Signature · 1 line
1.7.9.1
PATCH 1/2 openssl: Fix build on ARM with GCC 4.6.x
In reply to Ismael LucenoHi Ismael,
Quoted 12 lines · Ismael Luceno
Signed-off-by Ismael Luceno <[email protected]>--- package/openssl/openssl.mk | 7 +++++++ 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)package/openssl/openssl.mk +0
-0@@ -9,7 +9,14 @@ OPENSSL_SITE = http://www.openssl.org/source OPENSSL_INSTALL_STAGING = YES
package/openssl/openssl.mk OPENSSL_SITE = http://www.openssl.org/source · line 19
Quoted 10 lines
package/openssl/openssl.mk +7
-0OPENSSL_DEPENDENCIES = zlib OPENSSL_TARGET_ARCH = generic32 + +ifeq ($(BR2_GCC_VERSION_4_6_X)-$(ARCH),y-arm) +# workaround for gcc issue +# http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308 +OPENSSL_CFLAGS = $(subst -Os,-O2,$(TARGET_CFLAGS)) +else OPENSSL_CFLAGS = $(TARGET_CFLAGS) +endif
Will this work for external and ct-ng toolchains?
baruch
Signature · 3 lines
http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
- baruch at tkos.co.il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -PATCH 1/2 openssl: Fix build on ARM with GCC 4.6.x
Le Thu, 1 Mar 2012 07:37:27 +0200,
Baruch Siach <[email protected]> a ?crit :
Quoted 1 line
Will this work for external and ct-ng toolchains?
No. For the external and ct-ng toolchains, we have no way of testing the gcc version through BR2_* variables, we could only do it by running the cross gcc itself and checking its version number.
Thomas
Signature · 4 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com
PATCH 1/2 openssl: Fix build on ARM with GCC 4.6.x
In reply to Baruch SiachQuoted 28 lines · On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 07:37:27 +0200 Baruch Siach <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Ismael,
Quoted 12 lines · Ismael Luceno
Signed-off-by Ismael Luceno <[email protected]>--- package/openssl/openssl.mk | 7 +++++++ 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)package/openssl/openssl.mk +0
-0@@ -9,7 +9,14 @@ OPENSSL_SITE = http://www.openssl.org/source OPENSSL_INSTALL_STAGING = YESpackage/openssl/openssl.mk OPENSSL_SITE = http://www.openssl.org/source · line 19
Quoted 10 lines
package/openssl/openssl.mk +7
-0OPENSSL_DEPENDENCIES = zlib OPENSSL_TARGET_ARCH = generic32 + +ifeq ($(BR2_GCC_VERSION_4_6_X)-$(ARCH),y-arm) +# workaround for gcc issue +# http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308 +OPENSSL_CFLAGS = $(subst -Os,-O2,$(TARGET_CFLAGS)) +else OPENSSL_CFLAGS = $(TARGET_CFLAGS) +endifWill this work for external and ct-ng toolchains?
Quoted 2 lines
baruch
As long as you set BR2_GCC_VERSION_4_6_X manually...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20120301/c8b6a728/attachment.asc>
PATCH 1/2 openssl: Fix build on ARM with GCC 4.6.x
Hi Ismael,
Quoted 28 lines · Ismael Luceno
Quoted 26 lines · On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 07:37:27 +0200 Baruch Siach <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 12 lines · Ismael Luceno
Signed-off-by Ismael Luceno <[email protected]>--- package/openssl/openssl.mk | 7 +++++++ 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)package/openssl/openssl.mk +0
-0@@ -9,7 +9,14 @@ OPENSSL_SITE = http://www.openssl.org/source OPENSSL_INSTALL_STAGING = YESpackage/openssl/openssl.mk OPENSSL_SITE = http://www.openssl.org/source · line 19
Quoted 10 lines
package/openssl/openssl.mk +7
-0OPENSSL_DEPENDENCIES = zlib OPENSSL_TARGET_ARCH = generic32 + +ifeq ($(BR2_GCC_VERSION_4_6_X)-$(ARCH),y-arm) +# workaround for gcc issue +# http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308 +OPENSSL_CFLAGS = $(subst -Os,-O2,$(TARGET_CFLAGS)) +else OPENSSL_CFLAGS = $(TARGET_CFLAGS) +endifWill this work for external and ct-ng toolchains?
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line
baruch
As long as you set
BR2_GCC_VERSION_4_6_Xmanually...
But BR2_GCC_VERSION_4_6_X is only available when selecting internal toolchains. See toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in.
Doesn't the patch from r183512 fix this bug?
baruch
Signature · 3 lines
http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
- baruch at tkos.co.il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -PATCH 1/2 openssl: Fix build on ARM with GCC 4.6.x
On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 20:10:32 +0200
Baruch Siach <[email protected]> wrote:
<...>
Quoted 2 lines
But
BR2_GCC_VERSION_4_6_Xis only available when selecting internal toolchains. See toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in.
Would setting it (on the command line) produce any side-effect?
Quoted 1 line
Doesn't the patch from r183512 fix this bug?
What is "r183512" supposed to mean?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20120303/0f46aab0/attachment.asc>
PATCH 1/2 openssl: Fix build on ARM with GCC 4.6.x
Hi Ismael,
Quoted 5 lines · Ismael Luceno
Quoted 1 line · On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 20:10:32 +0200 Baruch Siach <[email protected]> wrote:
Doesn't the patch from r183512 fix this bug?
What is "r183512" supposed to mean?
This the Subversion commit mentioned in comment #20 of Bugzilla bug #48308 that you linked to (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308).
Comment #21 seems to indicate that this fix hasn't been backported to gcc 4.6.x. Maybe a better solutions would be to add this patch Buildroot's internal gcc.
baruch
Signature · 3 lines
http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
- baruch at tkos.co.il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -PATCH 1/2 openssl: Fix build on ARM with GCC 4.6.x
Quoted 9 lines · On Mon, 5 Mar 2012 07:19:37 +0200 Baruch Siach <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 5 lines · Ismael Luceno
Quoted 1 line · On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 20:10:32 +0200 Baruch Siach <[email protected]> wrote:
Doesn't the patch from r183512 fix this bug?
What is "r183512" supposed to mean?
This the Subversion commit mentioned in comment #20 of Bugzilla bug #48308 that you linked to
<...>
Oh, I thought you were talking about buildroot.
Quoted 2 lines
(http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308). Comment #21 seems to indicate that this fix hasn't been backported to gcc 4.6.x.
Probably not hitting anytime soon.
Quoted 2 lines
Maybe a better solutions would be to add this patch Buildroot's internal gcc.
Indeed.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20120305/16c2119c/attachment.asc>
PATCH 1/2 openssl: Fix build on ARM with GCC 4.6.x
In reply to Baruch SiachQuoted 19 lines · Baruch Siach
Hi Ismael,
Quoted 5 lines · Ismael Luceno
Quoted 1 line · On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 20:10:32 +0200 Baruch Siach <[email protected]> wrote:
Doesn't the patch from r183512 fix this bug?
What is "r183512" supposed to mean?
This the Subversion commit mentioned in comment #20 of Bugzilla bug #48308
that you linked to
(http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308).
Comment #21 seems to indicate that this fix hasn't been backported to gcc
4.6.x. Maybe a better solutions would be to add this patch Buildroot's
internal gcc.
Quoted 1 line
baruch
+1 on fixing gcc, there's no business in touching openssl and possibly breaking it on some other scenario because of this. Regards.