md:Add break if find.
From 6e04c2374db7fc34ccbf9f37f85e735a349c816c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: majianpeng <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 13:26:25 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] md:Add break if find.
--- drivers/md/raid5.c | 4 +++- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
drivers/md/raid5.c +3 -1
@@ -4369,8 +4369,10 @@ static inline sector_t sync_request(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t sector_nr, int* recovery aborts. */ for (i =0 ; i < conf->raid_disks; i++) -if (conf->disks[i].rdev ==NULL ) +if (conf->disks[i].rdev ==NULL ) { still_degraded =1 ; +break ; + }bitmap_start_sync (mddev->bitmap, sector_nr, &sync_blocks, still_degraded);
Signature · 6 lines
1.7.5.4 -------------- majianpeng 2012-03-13
Quoted 17 lines · On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 13:28:12 +0800 "majianpeng" <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 1 line
From
6e04c2374db7fc34ccbf9f37f85e735a349c816cMon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001From: majianpeng <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 13:26:25 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] md:Add break if find.Signed-off-by majianpeng <[email protected]>--- drivers/md/raid5.c | 4 +++- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)drivers/md/raid5.c +0
-0@@ -4369,8 +4369,10 @@ static inline sector_t sync_request(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t sector_nr, int* recovery aborts.
drivers/md/raid5.c static inline sector_t sync_request(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t sector_nr, int · line 4378
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/md/raid5.c +3
-1*/ for (i =0 ; i < conf->raid_disks; i++) -if (conf->disks[i].rdev ==NULL ) +if (conf->disks[i].rdev ==NULL ) { still_degraded =1 ; +break ; + }bitmap_start_sync (mddev->bitmap, sector_nr, &sync_blocks, still_degraded);
Thanks - however I don't think I'll apply this one.
It is a micro optimisation which only improve an uncommon case a little, but it makes the source code long and the generated machine code longer (by 32 bytes on x86_64).
So I don't really think it is a win.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
Thansk,I know.
------------------
kedacomkernel
2012-03-14
-------------------------------------------------------------
发件人:NeilBrown
发送日期:2012-03-14 10:06:35
收件人:majianpeng
抄送:linux-raid
主题:Re: md:Add break if find.
Quoted 17 lines · On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 13:28:12 +0800 "majianpeng" <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 1 line
From
6e04c2374db7fc34ccbf9f37f85e735a349c816cMon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001From: majianpeng <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 13:26:25 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] md:Add break if find.Signed-off-by majianpeng <[email protected]>--- drivers/md/raid5.c | 4 +++- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)drivers/md/raid5.c +0
-0@@ -4369,8 +4369,10 @@ static inline sector_t sync_request(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t sector_nr, int* recovery aborts.
drivers/md/raid5.c static inline sector_t sync_request(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t sector_nr, int · line 4378
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/md/raid5.c +3
-1*/ for (i =0 ; i < conf->raid_disks; i++) -if (conf->disks[i].rdev ==NULL ) +if (conf->disks[i].rdev ==NULL ) { still_degraded =1 ; +break ; + }bitmap_start_sync (mddev->bitmap, sector_nr, &sync_blocks, still_degraded);
Thanks - however I don't think I'll apply this one.
It is a micro optimisation which only improve an uncommon case a little, but it makes the source code long and the generated machine code longer (by 32 bytes on x86_64).
So I don't really think it is a win.
Thanks,
NeilBrown