gpio/omap: Some more driver fixes
Subsystems (2)
v4 cover gpio/omap: Some more driver fixes
This series excludes the cleanup patches as suggested by Kevin from the previously posted series.
The fixes include correction of _set_gpio_irqenable() implementation, missing wakeup_en register update in set_gpio_wakeup(), type mismatch of gpio trigger parameter in set_gpio_trigger(), incorrect dataout register update in set_gpio_dataout_() and few corrections in context save logic.
It is baselined on top of:git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6.git gpio/next
Commit: 81b279d80a63628e580c71a31d30a8c3b3047ad4
Series is available here for reference:git://gitorious.org/~tarunkanti/omap-sw-develoment/tarunkantis-linux-omap-dev for_3.4/gpio_more_fixes
Power Test:
Off-mode and Retention on OMAP3430 (Suspend and Idle paths). Also confirmed that dataout register content preserved over off-mode.
Functional Test:
OMAP2430, OMAP3430SDP, ZOOM3, OMAP4430, OMAP4-BLAZE
v4:
a) Implemented all comments on v3 which are mostly related to avoiding unnecessary register read while updating the context.
b) Folded:
gpio/omap: fix dataout register overwrite in _set_gpio_dataout into:
gpio/omap: fix missing dataout context save in _set_gpio_dataout_reg
v3:
- Added 4 more additional patches to the previous series which are all bug fixes.
v2:
- Added a new patch to update wakeup_en register in _set_gpio_wakeup() in addition to updating bank->context.wake_en.
- Added a new patch to remove redundant decoding of gpio offset in gpio_get(), _get_gpio_datain() and _get_gpio_dataout().
- Added a new patch to remove suspend/resume callbacks because the operations performed with the callbacks are redundant.
Tarun Kanti DebBarma (7):
gpio/omap: fix wakeup_en register update in _set_gpio_wakeup() gpio/omap: fix trigger type to unsigned
gpio/omap: fix _set_gpio_irqenable implementation gpio/omap: fix missing dataout context save in _set_gpio_dataout_reg gpio/omap: fix incorrect context restore logic in omap_gpio_runtime_* gpio/omap: fix incorrect update to context.irqenable1 gpio/omap: fix redundant decoding of gpio offset
drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
PATCH RESEND v4 1/7 gpio/omap: fix wakeup_en register update in _set_gpio_wakeup()
There are two ways through which wakeup_en register can be programmed using gpiolib APIs as shown below. It is seen that in the second case in _set_gpio_wakeup(), even though bank->suspend_wakeup is updated correctly, its value is not programmed in wakeup_en register. Fix this.
irq_set_type()->gpio_irq_type()->_set_gpio_triggering()->set_gpio_trigger() irq_set_wake()->gpio_wake_enable()->_set_gpio_wakeup()
--- drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c +1 -0
@@ -511,6 +511,7 @@ static int _set_gpio_wakeup(struct gpio_bank *bank, int gpio, int enable)else bank->suspend_wakeup &= ~gpio_bit; +__raw_writel (bank->suspend_wakeup, bank->base + bank->regs->wkup_en);spin_unlock_irqrestore (&bank->lock, flags);return 0 ;
Signature · 1 line
1.7.0.4
PATCH RESEND v4 2/7 gpio/omap: fix trigger type to unsigned
In reply to Tarun Kanti DebBarmaThe GPIO trigger parameter is of type unsigned.
enum {
IRQ_TYPE_NONE = 0x00000000,
IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING = 0x00000001,
IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING = 0x00000002,
IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH = (IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING | IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING),
IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH = 0x00000004,
IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW = 0x00000008,
IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_MASK = (IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH),
IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK = 0x0000000f,
IRQ_TYPE_PROBE = 0x00000010,...
};
Even though gpio_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned type) has the right type of parameter, the subsequent called functions set_gpio_triggering() and set_gpio_trigger() wrongly makes it signed integer. Fix this.
--- drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c | 5 +++-- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c +3 -2
@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static void _set_gpio_debounce(struct gpio_bank *bank, unsigned gpio, }static inline void set_gpio_trigger (struct gpio_bank *bank,int gpio, -int trigger) +unsigned trigger) {void __iomem *base = bank->base;u32 gpio_bit =1 << gpio;
@@ -327,7 +327,8 @@ static void _toggle_gpio_edge_triggering(struct gpio_bank *bank, int gpio)static void _toggle_gpio_edge_triggering (struct gpio_bank *bank,int gpio) {}#endif -static int _set_gpio_triggering (struct gpio_bank *bank,int gpio,int trigger) +static int _set_gpio_triggering (struct gpio_bank *bank,int gpio, +unsigned trigger) {void __iomem *reg = bank->base;void __iomem *base = bank->base;
Signature · 1 line
1.7.0.4
PATCH RESEND v4 3/7 gpio/omap: fix _set_gpio_irqenable implementation
In reply to Tarun Kanti DebBarmaThis function should be capable of both enabling and disabling interrupts based upon the *enable* parameter. Right now the function only enables the interrupt and *enable* is not used at all. So add the interrupt disable capability also using the parameter.
--- drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c | 5 ++++- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c +4 -1
@@ -484,7 +484,10 @@ static void _disable_gpio_irqbank(struct gpio_bank *bank, int gpio_mask)static inline void _set_gpio_irqenable (struct gpio_bank *bank,int gpio,int enable) { -_enable_gpio_irqbank (bank,GPIO_BIT (bank, gpio)); +if (enable) +_enable_gpio_irqbank (bank,GPIO_BIT (bank, gpio)); +else +_disable_gpio_irqbank (bank,GPIO_BIT (bank, gpio)); }/*
Signature · 1 line
1.7.0.4
PATCH RESEND v4 4/7 gpio/omap: fix missing dataout context save in _set_gpio_dataout_reg
In reply to Tarun Kanti DebBarmaThere are two functions, _set_gpio_dataout_reg() and _set_gpio_dataout_mask() which writes to dataout register and the dataout context must be saved. It is missing in the first function, _set_gpio_dataout_reg(). Fix this.
--- drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c | 7 +++++-- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c +5 -2
@@ -120,10 +120,13 @@ static void _set_gpio_dataout_reg(struct gpio_bank *bank, int gpio, int enable)void __iomem *reg = bank->base;u32 l =GPIO_BIT (bank, gpio); -if (enable) +if (enable) { reg += bank->regs->set_dataout; -else + bank->context.dataout |= l; + }else { reg += bank->regs->clr_dataout; + bank->context.dataout &= ~l; + }__raw_writel (l, reg); }
Signature · 1 line
1.7.0.4
PATCH RESEND v4 5/7 gpio/omap: fix incorrect context restore logic in omap_gpio_runtime_*
In reply to Tarun Kanti DebBarmaIn omap_gpio_runtime_suspend/resume() the context save/restore should be independent of bank->enabled_non_wakeup_gpios. This was preventing context restore of GPIO lines which are not wakeup enabled.
--- drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c | 5 +---- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c +1 -4
@@ -1247,9 +1247,6 @@ static int omap_gpio_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)* non-wakeup GPIOs. Otherwise spurious IRQs will be * generated. See OMAP2420 Errata item 1.101. */ -if (!(bank->enabled_non_wakeup_gpios)) - goto update_gpio_context_count; - bank->saved_datain =__raw_readl (bank->base + bank->regs->datain); l1 =__raw_readl (bank->base + bank->regs->fallingdetect);
@@ -1298,7 +1295,7 @@ static int omap_gpio_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)__raw_writel (bank->context.risingdetect, bank->base + bank->regs->risingdetect); -if (!bank->enabled_non_wakeup_gpios || !bank->workaround_enabled) { +if (!bank->workaround_enabled) {spin_unlock_irqrestore (&bank->lock, flags);return 0 ; }
Signature · 1 line
1.7.0.4
PATCH RESEND v4 6/7 gpio/omap: fix incorrect update to context.irqenable1
In reply to Tarun Kanti DebBarmaIn _enable_gpio_irqbank() when bank->regs->set_irqenable is valid, gpio_mask can be directly set by writing to set_irqenable register without overwriting current value. In order to ensure the same is stored in context.irqenable1, we must read from regs->irqenable instead of overwriting it with gpio_mask.
The overwriting makes sense only in the second case where irqenable is explicitly read and updated with new gpio_mask before writing it back. However, for consistency reading regs->irqenable into the bank->context.irqenable1 takes care of both the scenarios.
if (bank->regs->set_irqenable) {
reg += bank->regs->set_irqenable;
l = gpio_mask;
} else {
reg += bank->regs->irqenable;
l = __raw_readl(reg);
if (bank->regs->irqenable_inv)
l &= ~gpio_mask;
else
l |= gpio_mask;
}Make the same change for _disable_gpio_irqbank().
--- drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c | 6 ++++-- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c +4 -2
@@ -451,6 +451,7 @@ static void _enable_gpio_irqbank(struct gpio_bank *bank, int gpio_mask)if (bank->regs->set_irqenable) { reg += bank->regs->set_irqenable; l = gpio_mask; + bank->context.irqenable1 |= gpio_mask; }else { reg += bank->regs->irqenable; l =__raw_readl (reg);
@@ -458,10 +459,10 @@ static void _enable_gpio_irqbank(struct gpio_bank *bank, int gpio_mask) l &= ~gpio_mask; else l |= gpio_mask; + bank->context.irqenable1 = l; }__raw_writel (l, reg); - bank->context.irqenable1 = l; }static void _disable_gpio_irqbank (struct gpio_bank *bank,int gpio_mask)
@@ -472,6 +473,7 @@ static void _disable_gpio_irqbank(struct gpio_bank *bank, int gpio_mask)if (bank->regs->clr_irqenable) { reg += bank->regs->clr_irqenable; l = gpio_mask; + bank->context.irqenable1 &= ~gpio_mask; }else { reg += bank->regs->irqenable; l =__raw_readl (reg);
@@ -479,10 +481,10 @@ static void _disable_gpio_irqbank(struct gpio_bank *bank, int gpio_mask) l |= gpio_mask; else l &= ~gpio_mask; + bank->context.irqenable1 = l; }__raw_writel (l, reg); - bank->context.irqenable1 = l; }static inline void _set_gpio_irqenable (struct gpio_bank *bank,int gpio,int enable)
Signature · 1 line
1.7.0.4
PATCH RESEND v4 6/7 gpio/omap: fix incorrect update to context.irqenable1
Quoted 10 lines · Tarun Kanti DebBarma
In
_enable_gpio_irqbank()whenbank->regs->set_irqenableis valid,gpio_maskcan be directly set by writing toset_irqenableregister without overwriting current value. In order to ensure the same is stored in context.irqenable1, we must read fromregs->irqenableinstead of overwriting it withgpio_mask.The overwriting makes sense only in the second case where irqenable is explicitly read and updated with new
gpio_maskbefore writing it back. However, for consistency readingregs->irqenableinto thebank->context.irqenable1takes care of both the scenarios.
...except that the code doesn't do this anymore.
I like the newer version (I hope so, since I suggested it :), but please update the changlog to describe what the code is actually doing.
Thanks,
Kevin
PATCH RESEND v4 6/7 gpio/omap: fix incorrect update to context.irqenable1
Quoted 8 lines · Kevin Hilman
Quoted 5 lines · Tarun Kanti DebBarma
In
_enable_gpio_irqbank()whenbank->regs->set_irqenableis valid,gpio_maskcan be directly set by writing toset_irqenableregister without overwriting current value. In order to ensure the same is stored in context.irqenable1, we must read fromregs->irqenableinstead of overwriting it withgpio_mask.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
The overwriting makes sense only in the second case where irqenable is explicitly read and updated with new
gpio_maskbefore writing it back. However, for consistency readingregs->irqenableinto thebank->context.irqenable1takes care of both the scenarios....except that the code doesn't do this anymore.
Yes.
Quoted 3 lines
I like the newer version (I hope so, since I suggested it :), but please update the changlog to describe what the code is actually doing.
Sure.
--
Tarun
Quoted 4 lines
Thanks,
Kevin
PATCH RESEND v4 6/7 gpio/omap: fix incorrect update to context.irqenable1
Quoted 14 lines · Tarun Kanti
Quoted 13 lines · Kevin Hilman
Quoted 10 lines · Tarun Kanti DebBarma
In
_enable_gpio_irqbank()whenbank->regs->set_irqenableis valid,gpio_maskcan be directly set by writing toset_irqenableregister without overwriting current value. In order to ensure the same is stored in context.irqenable1, we must read fromregs->irqenableinstead of overwriting it withgpio_mask.The overwriting makes sense only in the second case where irqenable is explicitly read and updated with new
gpio_maskbefore writing it back. However, for consistency readingregs->irqenableinto thebank->context.irqenable1takes care of both the scenarios.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 1 line
...except that the code doesn't do this anymore.
Yes.
Quoted 3 lines
I like the newer version (I hope so, since I suggested it :), but please update the changlog to describe what the code is actually doing.
Sure.
I have updated the change log here:git://gitorious.org/~tarunkanti/omap-sw-develoment/tarunkantis-linux-omap-dev
for_3.4/gpio_more_fixes
--
Tarun
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Thanks,
Kevin
PATCH RESEND v4 6/7 gpio/omap: fix incorrect update to context.irqenable1
Quoted 17 lines · Tarun Kanti
Quoted 15 lines · Tarun Kanti
Quoted 14 lines · Kevin Hilman
Quoted 10 lines · Tarun Kanti DebBarma
In
_enable_gpio_irqbank()whenbank->regs->set_irqenableis valid,gpio_maskcan be directly set by writing toset_irqenableregister without overwriting current value. In order to ensure the same is stored in context.irqenable1, we must read fromregs->irqenableinstead of overwriting it withgpio_mask.The overwriting makes sense only in the second case where irqenable is explicitly read and updated with new
gpio_maskbefore writing it back. However, for consistency readingregs->irqenableinto thebank->context.irqenable1takes care of both the scenarios....except that the code doesn't do this anymore.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Yes.
Quoted 3 lines
I like the newer version (I hope so, since I suggested it :), but please update the changlog to describe what the code is actually doing.
Sure.
I have updated the change log here:
git://gitorious.org/~tarunkanti/omap-sw-develoment/tarunkantis-linux-omap-dev
for_3.4/gpio_more_fixes
Please also post and updated version of the patch for review.
Kevin
PATCH RESEND v4 6/7 gpio/omap: fix incorrect update to context.irqenable1
Quoted 21 lines · Kevin Hilman
Quoted 19 lines · Tarun Kanti
Quoted 17 lines · Tarun Kanti
Quoted 8 lines · Kevin Hilman
Quoted 5 lines · Tarun Kanti DebBarma
In
_enable_gpio_irqbank()whenbank->regs->set_irqenableis valid,gpio_maskcan be directly set by writing toset_irqenableregister without overwriting current value. In order to ensure the same is stored in context.irqenable1, we must read fromregs->irqenableinstead of overwriting it withgpio_mask.Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
The overwriting makes sense only in the second case where irqenable is explicitly read and updated with new
gpio_maskbefore writing it back. However, for consistency readingregs->irqenableinto thebank->context.irqenable1takes care of both the scenarios....except that the code doesn't do this anymore.
Yes.
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 2 lines
I like the newer version (I hope so, since I suggested it :), but please update the changlog to describe what the code is actually doing.
Sure.
I have updated the change log here:
git://gitorious.org/~tarunkanti/omap-sw-develoment/tarunkantis-linux-omap-dev
for_3.4/gpio_more_fixesPlease also post and updated version of the patch for review.
Sure.
--
Tarun
Quoted 2 lines
Kevin
PATCH RESEND v4 7/7 gpio/omap: fix redundant decoding of gpio offset
In reply to Tarun Kanti DebBarmaIn gpio_get(), _get_gpio_datain() and _get_gpio_dataout() get rid of un-necessary operation to compute gpio mask. The gpio offset passed to gpio_get() is sufficient to do that.
Here is Russell's original comment:
Can someone explain to me this:
static int _get_gpio_datain(struct gpio_bank *bank, int gpio)
{
void __iomem *reg = bank->base + bank->regs->datain;
return (__raw_readl(reg) & GPIO_BIT(bank, gpio)) != 0;
}static int gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
{
struct gpio_bank *bank = container_of(chip, struct gpio_bank, chip);
void __iomem *reg = bank->base;
int gpio = chip->base + offset;
u32 mask = GPIO_BIT(bank, gpio);
if (gpio_is_input(bank, mask))
return _get_gpio_datain(bank, gpio);
else
return _get_gpio_dataout(bank, gpio);
}Given that bank->width on OMAP is either 32 or 16, and GPIO numbers for any GPIO chip are always aligned to 32 or 16, why does this code bother adding the chips base gpio number and then modulo the width?
Surely this means if - for argument sake - you registered a GPIO chip with 8 lines followed by one with 16 lines, GPIO0..7 would be chip 0 bit 0..7, GPIO8..15 would be chip 1 bit 8..15, GPIO16..23 would be chip 1 bit 0..7.
However, if you registered a GPIO chip with 16 lines first, it would mean GPIO0..15 would be chip 0 bit 0..15, and GPIO16..31 would be chip 1 bit 0..15.
Surely this kind of behaviour is not intended?
Is there a reason why the bitmask can't just be (1 << offset) where offset is passed into these functions as GPIO number - chip->base ?
--- drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c | 18 +++++++----------- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c +7 -11
@@ -147,18 +147,18 @@ static void _set_gpio_dataout_mask(struct gpio_bank *bank, int gpio, int enable) bank->context.dataout = l; } -static int _get_gpio_datain (struct gpio_bank *bank,int gpio) +static int _get_gpio_datain (struct gpio_bank *bank,int offset) {void __iomem *reg = bank->base + bank->regs->datain; -return (__raw_readl (reg) &GPIO_BIT (bank, gpio)) !=0 ; +return (__raw_readl (reg) & (1 << offset)) !=0 ; } -static int _get_gpio_dataout (struct gpio_bank *bank,int gpio) +static int _get_gpio_dataout (struct gpio_bank *bank,int offset) {void __iomem *reg = bank->base + bank->regs->dataout; -return (__raw_readl (reg) &GPIO_BIT (bank, gpio)) !=0 ; +return (__raw_readl (reg) & (1 << offset)) !=0 ; }static inline void _gpio_rmw (void __iomem *base,u32 reg,u32 mask,bool set)
@@ -865,19 +865,15 @@ static int gpio_is_input(struct gpio_bank *bank, int mask)static int gpio_get (struct gpio_chip *chip,unsigned offset) {struct gpio_bank *bank; -void __iomem *reg; -int gpio;u32 mask; - gpio = chip->base + offset; bank = container_of(chip, struct gpio_bank, chip); - reg = bank->base; - mask =GPIO_BIT (bank, gpio); + mask = (1 << offset);if (gpio_is_input (bank, mask)) -return _get_gpio_datain (bank, gpio); +return _get_gpio_datain (bank, offset);else -return _get_gpio_dataout (bank, gpio); +return _get_gpio_dataout (bank, offset); }static int gpio_output (struct gpio_chip *chip,unsigned offset,int value)
Signature · 1 line
1.7.0.4
v4 cover gpio/omap: Some more driver fixes
In reply to Tarun Kanti DebBarmaQuoted 9 lines · Tarun Kanti DebBarma
This series excludes the cleanup patches as suggested by Kevin from the previously posted series.
The fixes include correction of
_set_gpio_irqenable()implementation, missingwakeup_enregister update inset_gpio_wakeup(), type mismatch of gpio trigger parameter inset_gpio_trigger(), incorrect dataout register update inset_gpio_dataout_()and few corrections in context save logic.
Quoted 6 lines
It is baselined on top of:
git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6.gitgpio/next
Commit:81b279d80a63628e580c71a31d30a8c3b3047ad4Series is available here for reference:
git://gitorious.org/~tarunkanti/omap-sw-develoment/tarunkantis-linux-omap-devfor_3.4/gpio_more_fixes
Merged; thanks
g.
Quoted 44 lines
Power Test:
Off-mode and Retention on OMAP3430 (Suspend and Idle paths). Also confirmed that dataout register content preserved over off-mode.Functional Test:
OMAP2430, OMAP3430SDP, ZOOM3, OMAP4430, OMAP4-BLAZEv4:
a) Implemented all comments on v3 which are mostly related to avoiding unnecessary register read while updating the context.b) Folded:
gpio/omap: fix dataout register overwrite in_set_gpio_dataoutinto:
gpio/omap: fix missing dataout context save in_set_gpio_dataout_regv3:
- Added 4 more additional patches to the previous series which are all bug fixes.v2:
- Added a new patch to updatewakeup_enregister in_set_gpio_wakeup()in addition to updatingbank->context.wake_en.- Added a new patch to remove redundant decoding of gpio offset in
gpio_get(),_get_gpio_datain()and_get_gpio_dataout().- Added a new patch to remove suspend/resume callbacks because the operations performed with the callbacks are redundant.
Tarun Kanti DebBarma (7):
gpio/omap: fixwakeup_enregister update in_set_gpio_wakeup()gpio/omap: fix trigger type to unsigned
gpio/omap: fix_set_gpio_irqenableimplementation gpio/omap: fix missing dataout context save in_set_gpio_dataout_reggpio/omap: fix incorrect context restore logic in omap_gpio_runtime_* gpio/omap: fix incorrect update to context.irqenable1 gpio/omap: fix redundant decoding of gpio offsetdrivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
Signature · 2 lines
Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies,Ltd.
v4 cover gpio/omap: Some more driver fixes
Hi Grant,
Quoted 10 lines · Grant Likely
Quoted 9 lines · Tarun Kanti DebBarma
This series excludes the cleanup patches as suggested by Kevin from the previously posted series.
The fixes include correction of
_set_gpio_irqenable()implementation, missingwakeup_enregister update inset_gpio_wakeup(), type mismatch of gpio trigger parameter inset_gpio_trigger(), incorrect dataout register update inset_gpio_dataout_()and few corrections in context save logic.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
It is baselined on top of:
git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6.gitgpio/next
Commit:81b279d80a63628e580c71a31d30a8c3b3047ad4Series is available here for reference:
git://gitorious.org/~tarunkanti/omap-sw-develoment/tarunkantis-linux-omap-devfor_3.4/gpio_more_fixesMerged; thanks
Can you hold off slightly before merging this.
I haven't been through v4 yet or tested the fixes alone now that they're separated from the other cleanups.
Expect a pull request from me when ready.
Thanks,
Kevin
v4 cover gpio/omap: Some more driver fixes
Quoted 21 lines · Kevin Hilman
Hi Grant,
Quoted 17 lines · Grant Likely
Quoted 15 lines · Tarun Kanti DebBarma
This series excludes the cleanup patches as suggested by Kevin from the previously posted series.
The fixes include correction of
_set_gpio_irqenable()implementation, missingwakeup_enregister update inset_gpio_wakeup(), type mismatch of gpio trigger parameter inset_gpio_trigger(), incorrect dataout register update inset_gpio_dataout_()and few corrections in context save logic.It is baselined on top of:
git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6.gitgpio/next
Commit:81b279d80a63628e580c71a31d30a8c3b3047ad4Series is available here for reference:
git://gitorious.org/~tarunkanti/omap-sw-develoment/tarunkantis-linux-omap-devfor_3.4/gpio_more_fixes
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
Merged; thanks
Can you hold off slightly before merging this.
I haven't been through v4 yet or tested the fixes alone now that they're separated from the other cleanups.
Expect a pull request from me when ready.
Okay. It's in linux-next at the moment, but I'll pull it back out.
g.
v4 cover gpio/omap: Some more driver fixes
Quoted 24 lines · Grant Likely
Quoted 23 lines · Kevin Hilman
Hi Grant,
Quoted 18 lines · Grant Likely
Quoted 9 lines · Tarun Kanti DebBarma
This series excludes the cleanup patches as suggested by Kevin from the previously posted series.
The fixes include correction of
_set_gpio_irqenable()implementation, missingwakeup_enregister update inset_gpio_wakeup(), type mismatch of gpio trigger parameter inset_gpio_trigger(), incorrect dataout register update inset_gpio_dataout_()and few corrections in context save logic.Quoted 6 lines
It is baselined on top of:
git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6.gitgpio/next
Commit:81b279d80a63628e580c71a31d30a8c3b3047ad4Series is available here for reference:
git://gitorious.org/~tarunkanti/omap-sw-develoment/tarunkantis-linux-omap-devfor_3.4/gpio_more_fixesMerged; thanks
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Can you hold off slightly before merging this.
I haven't been through v4 yet or tested the fixes alone now that they're separated from the other cleanups.
Expect a pull request from me when ready.
Okay. It's in linux-next at the moment, but I'll pull it back out.
Thanks.
I've been through this series now, pull request coming shortly. Hopefully it can still make it for v3.4 since this fixes some regressions introduced by the previous series. :(
Kevin