document CLOCK_MONOTONIC_COARSE
PATCH 1/1 document CLOCK_MONOTONIC_COARSE
Let's try that again without using gmail.
-andy
commit 782f8fd7a4ecd601d46e13e6a55a04662bae2f27
Author: Andy Isaacson <adi-psgPW5cihnJWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> Date: Thu May 31 16:36:30 2012 -0700
clock_getres.2: document CLOCK_MONOTONIC_COARSE
man2/clock_getres.2 +7 -0
@@ -136,6 +136,13 @@ Similar to but provides access to a raw hardware-based time that is not subject to NTP adjustments. .TP +.BR CLOCK_MONOTONIC_COARSE " (since Linux 2.6.32; Linux-specific)" +.\" Added in commit da15cfdae03351c689736f8d142618592e3cebc3, John Stultz, Aug 19 2009 +Similar to +.BR CLOCK_MONOTONIC , +but provides only the time at the most recent clock tick. This can be +faster to access. +.TP .B CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID High-resolution per-process timer from the CPU. .TP
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 20120531235955.GA18876-psgPW5cihnJWk0Htik3J/[email protected]
Quoted 2 lines · Andy Isaacson
+.BR
CLOCK_MONOTONIC_COARSE" (since Linux 2.6.32; Linux-specific)"
+.\" Added in commitda15cfdae03351c689736f8d142618592e3cebc3, John Stultz, Aug 19 2009
Is it necessary to specify the commit rev?
Signature · 5 lines
Alexandre Bique -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): CAP737o+rUezC4tiCra-qTiVL2XxbKJ7Z+9oeHrw6hCEkEX8Cyg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org
Quoted 5 lines · Alexandre Bique
Quoted 2 lines · Andy Isaacson
+.BR
CLOCK_MONOTONIC_COARSE" (since Linux 2.6.32; Linux-specific)"
+.\" Added in commitda15cfdae03351c689736f8d142618592e3cebc3, John Stultz, Aug 19 2009Is it necessary to specify the commit rev?
Speaking as a git user, it's much more helpful to provide the commitID than to just provide committer+date as was done for other items in this file. It allows "git tag --contains da15cfdae" to find out what release it was merged in, for example.
Is there any downside to having the commit hash in the comment?
-andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): CAE_FxDi3ecT8vJnJdeh_T1_2TaTdAWBn=iSb_Z_-EVMW9+6Wxw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org
Quoted 6 lines · Andy Isaacson
Quoted 4 lines · Alexandre Bique
Quoted 2 lines · Andy Isaacson
+.BR
CLOCK_MONOTONIC_COARSE" (since Linux 2.6.32; Linux-specific)"
+.\" Added in commitda15cfdae03351c689736f8d142618592e3cebc3, John Stultz, Aug 19 2009
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
Is it necessary to specify the commit rev?
Speaking as a git user, it's much more helpful to provide the commitID than to just provide committer+date as was done for other items in this file. It allows "git tag --contains
da15cfdae" to find out what release it was merged in, for example.Is there any downside to having the commit hash in the comment?
I agree with you, it is convenient to have the commit revision when you need to dig into Linux source code.
Signature · 5 lines
Alexandre Bique -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html