ARM: OMAP2+: cpu: Add am33xx device under cpu_class_is_omap2
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 ARM: OMAP2+: cpu: Add am33xx device under cpu_class_is_omap2
Newly added AM33XX device falls under omap2 class, so make cpu_class_is_omap2() true for AM33XX (Add soc_is_am33xx() check).
--- arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/cpu.h | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/cpu.h +1 -1
@@ -375,7 +375,7 @@ IS_OMAP_TYPE(3430, 0x3430)#define cpu_class_is_omap1 () (cpu_is_omap7xx() || cpu_is_omap15xx() || \ cpu_is_omap16xx())#define cpu_class_is_omap2 () (cpu_is_omap24xx() || cpu_is_omap34xx() || \ - cpu_is_omap44xx()) + cpu_is_omap44xx() || soc_is_am33xx())/* Various silicon revisions for omap2 */ #define OMAP242X_CLASS 0x24200024
Signature · 1 line
1.7.0.4
PATCH 1/1 ARM: OMAP2+: cpu: Add am33xx device under cpu_class_is_omap2
Quoted 14 lines · Vaibhav Hiremath
Newly added AM33XX device falls under omap2 class, so make
cpu_class_is_omap2()true for AM33XX (Addsoc_is_am33xx()check).Signed-off-by Vaibhav Hiremath <[email protected]>--- arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/cpu.h | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/cpu.h +0
-0
arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/cpu.h IS_OMAP_TYPE(3430, 0x3430) · line 381
Quoted 8 lines
arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/cpu.h +1
-1@@ -375,7 +375,7 @@ IS_OMAP_TYPE(3430, 0x3430)#define cpu_class_is_omap1 () (cpu_is_omap7xx() || cpu_is_omap15xx() || \ cpu_is_omap16xx())#define cpu_class_is_omap2 () (cpu_is_omap24xx() || cpu_is_omap34xx() || \ - cpu_is_omap44xx()) + cpu_is_omap44xx() || soc_is_am33xx())/* Various silicon revisions for omap2 */ #define OMAP242X_CLASS 0x24200024
I think this can be now simply !cpu_class_is_omap1() as there is a very slim chance that we'll ever be compiling omap1 and omap2+ together because of the different compiler flags needed.
Regards,
Tony
PATCH 1/1 ARM: OMAP2+: cpu: Add am33xx device under cpu_class_is_omap2
Quoted 27 lines · Tony Lindgren
Quoted 14 lines · Vaibhav Hiremath
Newly added AM33XX device falls under omap2 class, so make
cpu_class_is_omap2()true for AM33XX (Addsoc_is_am33xx()check).Signed-off-by Vaibhav Hiremath <[email protected]>--- arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/cpu.h | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/cpu.h +0
-0arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/cpu.h IS_OMAP_TYPE(3430, 0x3430) · line 381
Quoted 8 lines
arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/cpu.h +1
-1@@ -375,7 +375,7 @@ IS_OMAP_TYPE(3430, 0x3430)#define cpu_class_is_omap1 () (cpu_is_omap7xx() || cpu_is_omap15xx() || \ cpu_is_omap16xx())#define cpu_class_is_omap2 () (cpu_is_omap24xx() || cpu_is_omap34xx() || \ - cpu_is_omap44xx()) + cpu_is_omap44xx() || soc_is_am33xx())/* Various silicon revisions for omap2 */ #define OMAP242X_CLASS 0x24200024I think this can be now simply !cpu_class_is_omap1() as there is a very slim chance that we'll ever be compiling omap1 and omap2+ together because of the different compiler flags needed.
Quoted 3 lines
Regards,
Tony
Ok...
Shall I submit patch with this change?
Thanks,
Vaibhav
PATCH 1/1 ARM: OMAP2+: cpu: Add am33xx device under cpu_class_is_omap2
Quoted 27 lines · Vaibhav Hiremath
Quoted 26 lines · Tony Lindgren
Quoted 14 lines · Vaibhav Hiremath
Newly added AM33XX device falls under omap2 class, so make
cpu_class_is_omap2()true for AM33XX (Addsoc_is_am33xx()check).Signed-off-by Vaibhav Hiremath <[email protected]>--- arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/cpu.h | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/cpu.h +0
-0arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/cpu.h IS_OMAP_TYPE(3430, 0x3430) · line 380
Quoted 7 lines
arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/cpu.h +1
-1@@ -375,7 +375,7 @@ IS_OMAP_TYPE(3430, 0x3430)#define cpu_class_is_omap1 () (cpu_is_omap7xx() || cpu_is_omap15xx() || \ cpu_is_omap16xx())#define cpu_class_is_omap2 () (cpu_is_omap24xx() || cpu_is_omap34xx() || \ - cpu_is_omap44xx()) + cpu_is_omap44xx() || soc_is_am33xx())/* Various silicon revisions for omap2 */ #define OMAP242X_CLASS 0x24200024I think this can be now simply !cpu_class_is_omap1() as there is a very slim chance that we'll ever be compiling omap1 and omap2+ together because of the different compiler flags needed.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Regards,
Tony
Ok...
Shall I submit patch with this change?
Yes thanks.
Tony