raid5: Add R5_ReadNoMerge flag which prevent bio from merging at block layer
Subsystems (2)
RFC PATCH 1/1 raid5: Add R5_ReadNoMerge flag which prevent bio from merging at block layer
Because bios will merge at block-layer,so bios-error may caused by other bio which be merged into to the same request.
Using this flag,it will find exactly error-sector and not do redundant operation like re-write and re-read.
--- block/blk-core.c | 8 ++++++++ drivers/md/raid5.c | 16 +++++++++++++--- drivers/md/raid5.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
block/blk-core.c +8 -0
@@ -1401,6 +1401,9 @@ void init_request_from_bio(struct request *req, struct bio *bio)if (bio->bi_rw &REQ_RAHEAD ) req->cmd_flags |=REQ_FAILFAST_MASK ; +if (unlikely (bio->bi_rw &REQ_NOMERGE )) + req->cmd_flags |=REQ_NOMERGE ; + req->errors =0 ; req->__sector = bio->bi_sector; req->ioprio =bio_prio (bio);
@@ -1428,6 +1431,11 @@ void blk_queue_bio(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio) goto get_rq; } +if (unlikely (bio->bi_rw &REQ_NOMERGE )) { +spin_lock_irq (q->queue_lock); + where =ELEVATOR_INSERT_BACK ; + goto get_rq; + }/* * Check if we can merge with the plugged list before grabbing * any locks.
drivers/md/raid5.c +13 -3
@@ -632,6 +632,9 @@ static void ops_run_io(struct stripe_head *sh, struct stripe_head_state *s)else bi->bi_sector = (sh->sector + rdev->data_offset); +if (test_bit (R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags)) + bi->bi_rw |=REQ_NOMERGE ; + bi->bi_flags =1 <<BIO_UPTODATE ; bi->bi_idx =0 ; bi->bi_io_vec[0 ].bv_len =STRIPE_SIZE ;
@@ -1731,7 +1734,9 @@ static void raid5_end_read_request(struct bio * bi, int error)atomic_add (STRIPE_SECTORS , &rdev->corrected_errors);clear_bit (R5_ReadError, &sh->dev[i].flags);clear_bit (R5_ReWrite, &sh->dev[i].flags); - } + }else if (test_bit (R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags)) +clear_bit (R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags); +if (atomic_read (&rdev->read_errors))atomic_set (&rdev->read_errors,0 ); }else {
@@ -1773,7 +1778,11 @@ static void raid5_end_read_request(struct bio * bi, int error)else retry =1 ;if (retry) -set_bit (R5_ReadError, &sh->dev[i].flags); +if (test_bit (R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags)) { +set_bit (R5_ReadError, &sh->dev[i].flags); +clear_bit (R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags); + }else +set_bit (R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags);else {clear_bit (R5_ReadError, &sh->dev[i].flags);clear_bit (R5_ReWrite, &sh->dev[i].flags);
@@ -4481,7 +4490,8 @@ static int retry_aligned_read(struct r5conf *conf, struct bio *raid_bio) conf->retry_read_aligned = raid_bio;return handled; } - +if (likely (raid_bio->bi_size >>9 ) >STRIPE_SECTORS ) +set_bit (R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[dd_idx].flags);handle_stripe (sh);release_stripe (sh); handled++;
drivers/md/raid5.h +1 -0
@@ -273,6 +273,7 @@ enum r5dev_flags { R5_Wantwrite, R5_Overlap,/* There is a pending overlapping request * on this block */ + R5_ReadNoMerge,/* prevent bio from merging in block-layer */ R5_ReadError,/* seen a read error here recently */ R5_ReWrite, /* have tried to over-write the readerror */
Signature · 1 line
1.7.5.4
Quoted 6 lines · On Tue, 3 Jul 2012 14:23:41 +0800 majianpeng <[email protected]> wrote:
Because bios will merge at block-layer,so bios-error may caused by other bio which be merged into to the same request.
Using this flag,it will find exactly error-sector and not do redundant operation like re-write and re-read.Signed-off-by majianpeng <[email protected]>
Hi,
I think this patch needs a more detailed explanation.
What exactly is the situation that causes a problem, and what exactly is the problem that it causes?
Pretend that I don't know anything about what happens below the md level..
Thanks,
NeilBrown
Quoted 92 lines
--- block/blk-core.c | 8 ++++++++ drivers/md/raid5.c | 16 +++++++++++++--- drivers/md/raid5.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)block/blk-core.c +8
-0@@ -1401,6 +1401,9 @@ void init_request_from_bio(struct request *req, struct bio *bio)if (bio->bi_rw &REQ_RAHEAD ) req->cmd_flags |=REQ_FAILFAST_MASK ; +if (unlikely (bio->bi_rw &REQ_NOMERGE )) + req->cmd_flags |=REQ_NOMERGE ; + req->errors =0 ; req->__sector = bio->bi_sector; req->ioprio =bio_prio (bio);@@ -1428,6 +1431,11 @@ void blk_queue_bio(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio) goto get_rq; } +if (unlikely (bio->bi_rw &REQ_NOMERGE )) { +spin_lock_irq (q->queue_lock); + where =ELEVATOR_INSERT_BACK ; + goto get_rq; + }/* * Check if we can merge with the plugged list before grabbing * any locks. drivers/md/raid5.c +13
-3@@ -632,6 +632,9 @@ static void ops_run_io(struct stripe_head *sh, struct stripe_head_state *s)else bi->bi_sector = (sh->sector + rdev->data_offset); +if (test_bit (R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags)) + bi->bi_rw |=REQ_NOMERGE ; + bi->bi_flags =1 <<BIO_UPTODATE ; bi->bi_idx =0 ; bi->bi_io_vec[0 ].bv_len =STRIPE_SIZE ;@@ -1731,7 +1734,9 @@ static void raid5_end_read_request(struct bio * bi, int error)atomic_add (STRIPE_SECTORS , &rdev->corrected_errors);clear_bit (R5_ReadError, &sh->dev[i].flags);clear_bit (R5_ReWrite, &sh->dev[i].flags); - } + }else if (test_bit (R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags)) +clear_bit (R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags); +if (atomic_read (&rdev->read_errors))atomic_set (&rdev->read_errors,0 ); }else {@@ -1773,7 +1778,11 @@ static void raid5_end_read_request(struct bio * bi, int error)else retry =1 ;if (retry) -set_bit (R5_ReadError, &sh->dev[i].flags); +if (test_bit (R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags)) { +set_bit (R5_ReadError, &sh->dev[i].flags); +clear_bit (R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags); + }else +set_bit (R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags);else {clear_bit (R5_ReadError, &sh->dev[i].flags);clear_bit (R5_ReWrite, &sh->dev[i].flags);@@ -4481,7 +4490,8 @@ static int retry_aligned_read(struct r5conf *conf, struct bio *raid_bio) conf->retry_read_aligned = raid_bio;return handled; } - +if (likely (raid_bio->bi_size >>9 ) >STRIPE_SECTORS ) +set_bit (R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[dd_idx].flags);handle_stripe (sh);release_stripe (sh); handled++;drivers/md/raid5.h +1
-0@@ -273,6 +273,7 @@ enum r5dev_flags { R5_Wantwrite, R5_Overlap,/* There is a pending overlapping request * on this block */ + R5_ReadNoMerge,/* prevent bio from merging in block-layer */ R5_ReadError,/* seen a read error here recently */ R5_ReWrite, /* have tried to over-write the readerror */
On 2012-07-03 14:38 NeilBrown <[email protected]> Wrote:
Quoted 105 lines · On Tue, 3 Jul 2012 14:23:41 +0800 majianpeng <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 7 lines
Because bios will merge at block-layer,so bios-error may caused by other bio which be merged into to the same request.
Using this flag,it will find exactly error-sector and not do redundant operation like re-write and re-read.Signed-off-by majianpeng <[email protected]>Hi,
I think this patch needs a more detailed explanation.What exactly is the situation that causes a problem, and what exactly is the problem that it causes?
Pretend that I don't know anything about what happens below the md level..
Thanks,
NeilBrownQuoted 84 lines
--- block/blk-core.c | 8 ++++++++ drivers/md/raid5.c | 16 +++++++++++++--- drivers/md/raid5.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)block/blk-core.c +8
-0@@ -1401,6 +1401,9 @@ void init_request_from_bio(struct request *req, struct bio *bio)if (bio->bi_rw &REQ_RAHEAD ) req->cmd_flags |=REQ_FAILFAST_MASK ; +if (unlikely (bio->bi_rw &REQ_NOMERGE )) + req->cmd_flags |=REQ_NOMERGE ; + req->errors =0 ; req->__sector = bio->bi_sector; req->ioprio =bio_prio (bio);@@ -1428,6 +1431,11 @@ void blk_queue_bio(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio) goto get_rq; } +if (unlikely (bio->bi_rw &REQ_NOMERGE )) { +spin_lock_irq (q->queue_lock); + where =ELEVATOR_INSERT_BACK ; + goto get_rq; + }/* * Check if we can merge with the plugged list before grabbing * any locks. drivers/md/raid5.c +13
-3@@ -632,6 +632,9 @@ static void ops_run_io(struct stripe_head *sh, struct stripe_head_state *s)else bi->bi_sector = (sh->sector + rdev->data_offset); +if (test_bit (R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags)) + bi->bi_rw |=REQ_NOMERGE ; + bi->bi_flags =1 <<BIO_UPTODATE ; bi->bi_idx =0 ; bi->bi_io_vec[0 ].bv_len =STRIPE_SIZE ;@@ -1731,7 +1734,9 @@ static void raid5_end_read_request(struct bio * bi, int error)atomic_add (STRIPE_SECTORS , &rdev->corrected_errors);clear_bit (R5_ReadError, &sh->dev[i].flags);clear_bit (R5_ReWrite, &sh->dev[i].flags); - } + }else if (test_bit (R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags)) +clear_bit (R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags); +if (atomic_read (&rdev->read_errors))atomic_set (&rdev->read_errors,0 ); }else {@@ -1773,7 +1778,11 @@ static void raid5_end_read_request(struct bio * bi, int error)else retry =1 ;if (retry) -set_bit (R5_ReadError, &sh->dev[i].flags); +if (test_bit (R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags)) { +set_bit (R5_ReadError, &sh->dev[i].flags); +clear_bit (R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags); + }else +set_bit (R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags);else {clear_bit (R5_ReadError, &sh->dev[i].flags);clear_bit (R5_ReWrite, &sh->dev[i].flags);@@ -4481,7 +4490,8 @@ static int retry_aligned_read(struct r5conf *conf, struct bio *raid_bio) conf->retry_read_aligned = raid_bio;return handled; } - +if (likely (raid_bio->bi_size >>9 ) >STRIPE_SECTORS ) +set_bit (R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[dd_idx].flags);handle_stripe (sh);release_stripe (sh); handled++;drivers/md/raid5.h +0
-0
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/md/raid5.h enum r5dev_flags { · line 279
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/md/raid5.h +1
-0@@ -273,6 +273,7 @@ enum r5dev_flags { R5_Wantwrite, R5_Overlap,/* There is a pending overlapping request * on this block */ + R5_ReadNoMerge,/* prevent bio from merging in block-layer */ R5_ReadError,/* seen a read error here recently */ R5_ReWrite, /* have tried to over-write the readerror */
How about the below explanation:
Because bio will be merged at block-layer,so bios-error may caused by other bio which be merged into to the same request.
For example: if chunk_aligned_read failed, it will add bio to some stipe. But because the bio-merge function,those bios at most be merged.It will like the chunk_aligned_read and returen error.Then it will re-write and re-read. Suppose RAID5 created by n disk and chunk-size is 512K.
If read 512k chunk_aligned and met error(sector 0 is media error),
then add 512/4=128 stipe.If those bios merged and must be error.The rewrite operation will read (n-1) * 128 and computer 128 stripe.But using this flag,we only exec one rewrite. This occur in resync/repair situation and chunk-aligned-read.
May be using this flag,we can find exact bad-sector.Not recorded the whole request bios as bad-sector.
Quoted 129 lines · On Tue, 3 Jul 2012 16:52:49 +0800 majianpeng <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2012-07-03 14:38 NeilBrown <[email protected]> Wrote:
Quoted 105 lines · On Tue, 3 Jul 2012 14:23:41 +0800 majianpeng <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 7 lines
Because bios will merge at block-layer,so bios-error may caused by other bio which be merged into to the same request.
Using this flag,it will find exactly error-sector and not do redundant operation like re-write and re-read.Signed-off-by majianpeng <[email protected]>Hi,
I think this patch needs a more detailed explanation.What exactly is the situation that causes a problem, and what exactly is the problem that it causes?
Pretend that I don't know anything about what happens below the md level..
Thanks,
NeilBrownQuoted 84 lines
--- block/blk-core.c | 8 ++++++++ drivers/md/raid5.c | 16 +++++++++++++--- drivers/md/raid5.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)block/blk-core.c +8
-0@@ -1401,6 +1401,9 @@ void init_request_from_bio(struct request *req, struct bio *bio)if (bio->bi_rw &REQ_RAHEAD ) req->cmd_flags |=REQ_FAILFAST_MASK ; +if (unlikely (bio->bi_rw &REQ_NOMERGE )) + req->cmd_flags |=REQ_NOMERGE ; + req->errors =0 ; req->__sector = bio->bi_sector; req->ioprio =bio_prio (bio);@@ -1428,6 +1431,11 @@ void blk_queue_bio(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio) goto get_rq; } +if (unlikely (bio->bi_rw &REQ_NOMERGE )) { +spin_lock_irq (q->queue_lock); + where =ELEVATOR_INSERT_BACK ; + goto get_rq; + }/* * Check if we can merge with the plugged list before grabbing * any locks. drivers/md/raid5.c +13
-3@@ -632,6 +632,9 @@ static void ops_run_io(struct stripe_head *sh, struct stripe_head_state *s)else bi->bi_sector = (sh->sector + rdev->data_offset); +if (test_bit (R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags)) + bi->bi_rw |=REQ_NOMERGE ; + bi->bi_flags =1 <<BIO_UPTODATE ; bi->bi_idx =0 ; bi->bi_io_vec[0 ].bv_len =STRIPE_SIZE ;@@ -1731,7 +1734,9 @@ static void raid5_end_read_request(struct bio * bi, int error)atomic_add (STRIPE_SECTORS , &rdev->corrected_errors);clear_bit (R5_ReadError, &sh->dev[i].flags);clear_bit (R5_ReWrite, &sh->dev[i].flags); - } + }else if (test_bit (R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags)) +clear_bit (R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags); +if (atomic_read (&rdev->read_errors))atomic_set (&rdev->read_errors,0 ); }else {@@ -1773,7 +1778,11 @@ static void raid5_end_read_request(struct bio * bi, int error)else retry =1 ;if (retry) -set_bit (R5_ReadError, &sh->dev[i].flags); +if (test_bit (R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags)) { +set_bit (R5_ReadError, &sh->dev[i].flags); +clear_bit (R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags); + }else +set_bit (R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags);else {clear_bit (R5_ReadError, &sh->dev[i].flags);clear_bit (R5_ReWrite, &sh->dev[i].flags);@@ -4481,7 +4490,8 @@ static int retry_aligned_read(struct r5conf *conf, struct bio *raid_bio) conf->retry_read_aligned = raid_bio;return handled; } - +if (likely (raid_bio->bi_size >>9 ) >STRIPE_SECTORS ) +set_bit (R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[dd_idx].flags);handle_stripe (sh);release_stripe (sh); handled++;drivers/md/raid5.h +0
-0Quoted 10 lines
drivers/md/raid5.h enum r5dev_flags { · line 279
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/md/raid5.h +1
-0@@ -273,6 +273,7 @@ enum r5dev_flags { R5_Wantwrite, R5_Overlap,/* There is a pending overlapping request * on this block */ + R5_ReadNoMerge,/* prevent bio from merging in block-layer */ R5_ReadError,/* seen a read error here recently */ R5_ReWrite, /* have tried to over-write the readerror */How about the below explanation:
Because bio will be merged at block-layer,so bios-error may caused by other bio which be merged into to the same request.
For example: ifchunk_aligned_readfailed, it will add bio to some stipe. But because the bio-merge function,those bios at most be merged.It will like thechunk_aligned_readand returen error.Then it will re-write and re-read. Suppose RAID5 created by n disk and chunk-size is 512K.
If read 512kchunk_alignedand met error(sector 0 is media error),
then add 512/4=128 stipe.If those bios merged and must be error.The rewrite operation will read (n-1) * 128 and computer 128 stripe.But using this flag,we only exec one rewrite. This occur in resync/repair situation and chunk-aligned-read.
Quoted 2 lines
May be using this flag,we can find exact bad-sector.Not recorded the whole request bios as bad-sector
Thanks. That make some sense.
I wonder if we can just use REQ_FUA to stop requests being merged, rather than create a new flag. In general we should probably be using REQ_FUA in all the cases where we are checking for, and trying to fix, read errors.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
On 2012-07-04 10:30 NeilBrown <[email protected]> Wrote:
Quoted 24 lines · On Tue, 3 Jul 2012 16:52:49 +0800 majianpeng <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 23 lines
On 2012-07-03 14:38 NeilBrown <[email protected]> Wrote:
Quoted 21 lines · On Tue, 3 Jul 2012 14:23:41 +0800 majianpeng <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 7 lines
Because bios will merge at block-layer,so bios-error may caused by other bio which be merged into to the same request.
Using this flag,it will find exactly error-sector and not do redundant operation like re-write and re-read.Signed-off-by majianpeng <[email protected]>Hi,
I think this patch needs a more detailed explanation.What exactly is the situation that causes a problem, and what exactly is the problem that it causes?
Pretend that I don't know anything about what happens below the md level..
Thanks,
NeilBrown
....
Quoted 19 lines
Quoted 16 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line
How about the below explanation:
Because bio will be merged at block-layer,so bios-error may caused by other bio which be merged into to the same request.
For example: ifchunk_aligned_readfailed, it will add bio to some stipe. But because the bio-merge function,those bios at most be merged.It will like thechunk_aligned_readand returen error.Then it will re-write and re-read. Suppose RAID5 created by n disk and chunk-size is 512K.
If read 512kchunk_alignedand met error(sector 0 is media error),
then add 512/4=128 stipe.If those bios merged and must be error.The rewrite operation will read (n-1) * 128 and computer 128 stripe.But using this flag,we only exec one rewrite. This occur in resync/repair situation and chunk-aligned-read.Quoted 2 lines
May be using this flag,we can find exact bad-sector.Not recorded the whole request bios as bad-sector
Quoted 10 lines
Thanks. That make some sense.
I wonder if we can just use
REQ_FUAto stop requests being merged, rather than create a new flag. In general we should probably be usingREQ_FUAin all the cases where we are checking for, and trying to fix, read errors.Thanks,
NeilBrown
Using REQ_FUA/REQ_FLUSH can have same effect.
But i think REQ_FUA/REQ_FLUSH operation do more work for example, pre_flush/post_pflush and the harddisk will do more work.But our purpose only exec bio slonely.