ARM: ks8695: use [readl|writel]_relaxed()
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 2/4 ARM: ks8695: use [readl|writel]_relaxed()
I have no clue why __raw* macros are used here, but I strongly suspect there is no good reason at all for this, so removing another bad example.
Signed-off-by Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
--- arch/arm/mach-ks8695/time.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------ 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-ks8695/time.c +12 -12
@@ -67,11 +67,11 @@ static unsigned long ks8695_gettimeoffset (void)* interrupt. We solve this by ensuring that the counter has not * reloaded between our two reads. */ - elapsed =__raw_readl (KS8695_TMR_VA +KS8695_T1TC ) +__raw_readl (KS8695_TMR_VA +KS8695_T1PD ); + elapsed =readl_relaxed (KS8695_TMR_VA +KS8695_T1TC ) +readl_relaxed (KS8695_TMR_VA +KS8695_T1PD );do { tick2 = elapsed; - intpending =__raw_readl (KS8695_IRQ_VA +KS8695_INTST ) & (1 <<KS8695_IRQ_TIMER1 ); - elapsed =__raw_readl (KS8695_TMR_VA +KS8695_T1TC ) +__raw_readl (KS8695_TMR_VA +KS8695_T1PD ); + intpending =readl_relaxed (KS8695_IRQ_VA +KS8695_INTST ) & (1 <<KS8695_IRQ_TIMER1 ); + elapsed =readl_relaxed (KS8695_TMR_VA +KS8695_T1TC ) +readl_relaxed (KS8695_TMR_VA +KS8695_T1PD ); }while (elapsed > tick2);/* Convert to number of ticks expired (not remaining) */
@@ -106,14 +106,14 @@ static void ks8695_timer_setup(void)unsigned long tmcon;/* disable timer1 */ - tmcon =__raw_readl (KS8695_TMR_VA +KS8695_TMCON ); -__raw_writel (tmcon & ~TMCON_T1EN ,KS8695_TMR_VA +KS8695_TMCON ); + tmcon =readl_relaxed (KS8695_TMR_VA +KS8695_TMCON ); +writel_relaxed (tmcon & ~TMCON_T1EN ,KS8695_TMR_VA +KS8695_TMCON ); -__raw_writel (tmout /2 ,KS8695_TMR_VA +KS8695_T1TC ); -__raw_writel (tmout /2 ,KS8695_TMR_VA +KS8695_T1PD ); +writel_relaxed (tmout /2 ,KS8695_TMR_VA +KS8695_T1TC ); +writel_relaxed (tmout /2 ,KS8695_TMR_VA +KS8695_T1PD );/* re-enable timer1 */ -__raw_writel (tmcon |TMCON_T1EN ,KS8695_TMR_VA +KS8695_TMCON ); +writel_relaxed (tmcon |TMCON_T1EN ,KS8695_TMR_VA +KS8695_TMCON ); }static void __init ks8695_timer_init (void )
@@ -138,12 +138,12 @@ void ks8695_restart(char mode, const char *cmd)soft_restart (0 );/* disable timer0 */ - reg =__raw_readl (KS8695_TMR_VA +KS8695_TMCON ); -__raw_writel (reg & ~TMCON_T0EN ,KS8695_TMR_VA +KS8695_TMCON ); + reg =readl_relaxed (KS8695_TMR_VA +KS8695_TMCON ); +writel_relaxed (reg & ~TMCON_T0EN ,KS8695_TMR_VA +KS8695_TMCON );/* enable watchdog mode */ -__raw_writel ((10 <<8 ) |T0TC_WATCHDOG ,KS8695_TMR_VA +KS8695_T0TC ); +writel_relaxed ((10 <<8 ) |T0TC_WATCHDOG ,KS8695_TMR_VA +KS8695_T0TC );/* re-enable timer0 */ -__raw_writel (reg |TMCON_T0EN ,KS8695_TMR_VA +KS8695_TMCON ); +writel_relaxed (reg |TMCON_T0EN ,KS8695_TMR_VA +KS8695_TMCON ); }
Signature · 1 line
1.7.7.6
PATCH 2/4 ARM: ks8695: use [readl|writel]_relaxed()
Quoted 5 lines · Linus Walleij
I have no clue why __raw* macros are used here, but I strongly suspect there is no good reason at all for this, so removing another bad example.
Signed-off-by Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Yes, looks good.
Acked-by Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>